| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
101. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Drasked Originally by: d026 Originally by: Baleur Dude, there are counters for ships going that fast.. Its called Stasis Webifiers. Enjoy your newfound knowledge! ohh no.. why didnt i think about this. a...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.30 12:40:00
|
102. Thanking GMs - am I wasting the GM's time? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 30/10/2007 12:39:42 Originally by: CCP Arkanon You forgot to say thank you, they like that. Thanks Nova! Also, they are not 'cages', per se. They are Adjustable Containment Cubicles (ACC), please use the proper nam...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.30 12:39:00
|
103. Eve and its relevance to ACTUAL combat - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Dr Wahoos Originally by: Haks'he Lirky so people should assemble gangs that they know cant win anything? where is your logic? is it even there? o i have no problem with ops. im saying that when a person agrees t...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.30 12:36:00
|
104. Thanking GMs - am I wasting the GM's time? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Yuri Hakata Hi. I have a quick question: If a GM has fixed a thing for me, and I am grateful, what is the proper course of action? - Add a message to the petition, thanking him/her, thereby forcing the GM to check the pet...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.30 12:33:00
|
105. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Baleur Dude, there are counters for ships going that fast.. Its called Stasis Webifiers. Enjoy your newfound knowledge! ohh no.. why didnt i think about this. and how am i supposed to get into webrange?
- by d026 - at 2007.10.30 12:30:00
|
106. CCP Please Nerf everything - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Oregon sinful THIS GAME SHOULD NOT BE FAIR see.. nerf your FOTM ship!
- by d026 - at 2007.10.30 00:55:00
|
107. Time to go ccp - GM's giving stuff - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
buy me a dread ?
- by d026 - at 2007.10.30 00:49:00
|
108. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
and btw its smashkill not smahill , but i agree i'd prefere killsmash:)
- by d026 - at 2007.10.30 00:48:00
|
109. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: umop 3pisdn Originally by: JamnOne Originally by: Zana Kito Edited by: Zana Kito on 30/10/2007 00:06:39 edit: to the guy above me.. drones to counter nanofits?.. lol. Hmm, if Drones is funny then I gu...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.30 00:47:00
|
110. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Gamesguy Originally by: d026 Edited by: d026 on 29/10/2007 23:55:35 Quote: So you conceed the argument. Thank you. Now should we nerf rooks because according to you anything you cant solo with the right fit...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.30 00:46:00
|
111. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 29/10/2007 23:55:35 Quote: So you conceed the argument. Thank you. Now should we nerf rooks because according to you anything you cant solo with the right fit should be nerfed? but you compare differen ship classe...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 23:55:00
|
112. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 29/10/2007 22:54:14 Edited by: d026 on 29/10/2007 22:52:58 Quote: Yes because fighting 5 vs 15 is very borig indeed. dont tell me you fight 5 vs 15 if you werent sure to win. also this just proves how imba sp...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 22:53:00
|
113. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: Vague handwavium. Give me a setup or stfu. Damps and lots of eccm? What ship are you flying that has so many mids? You mentioned the muninn and the deimos, those have THREE mids. Thats 1 eccm, 1 mwd, and 1 disruptor, thats assuming yo...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 22:51:00
|
114. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: Says who? Anybody can overheat if they have the skill for it. from now on if we have a balancing question we always include the 15 whatever % overheat. Quote: And you can solo a vaga with many ships. Nano-huginn, or anoth...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 22:19:00
|
115. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Gamesguy WRONG. Lets say you fit 2 ECCM(the most paranoid setup ever that gimps u against everything else), you can kick a muninn's sensor str to 50. On a rook you have around 13.5 jam str/racial, with just 3 racials the ro...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 22:06:00
|
116. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: Only to find out the battleship also happened to carry a domi scram that just overheated to 36km. nonesns to balance the game arround faction items. faction should give you an edge and should never be mandatory. Quote: Over...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 21:57:00
|
117. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Gamesguy Originally by: d026 Originally by: Drasked Guys, you bring your normal gang + 1 huginn wich is nanod or tanked and now the opposing team can't do jack.. I just dont see the problem when the counter ...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 21:46:00
|
118. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Phoenix Jones That wouldn't be possible, because it detriments all ships, as well as yourself cause now you'll have to have the dang module on. its not that you only fight nanos he whole day so usualy you wold probably...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 21:44:00
|
119. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 29/10/2007 21:41:53 balance will only ever be achived if they introduce a module forcing a vaga to commit to a fight. as long as such module is not available (or only in form of the combination of 2 other ships) the ship an...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 21:37:00
|
120. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: MITSUK0 ECM drones, heavy neuts, overheated webs, piloting skill, interceptors, remote tanking/logistics, co-ordinated flying, weapons capable of dealing damage out to ~26km, killing drones first. Those are just a few count...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 21:33:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |