| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 30 |
121. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Flinx Evenstar Originally by: d026 nanos are bad because there is NO counter available to my ship or any other ship out there (except for the huginn in combination with a tackler) resulting in a nanos destruction. ...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 21:24:00
|
122. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 29/10/2007 20:56:06 Edited by: d026 on 29/10/2007 20:55:49 Originally by: Flinx Evenstar Originally by: d026 1st fight. who is the nanogang? 2nd fight. see they had to out blob you 19 to 5 to win this on...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 20:55:00
|
123. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 29/10/2007 20:52:31 Originally by: Semkhet I'll tell what is wrong with you: your head works backwards. Who are you to define that X Km/sec is too fast or too slow by any objective standard in EVE's context ? ...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 20:52:00
|
124. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 29/10/2007 20:49:34 Originally by: Flinx Evenstar Edited by: Flinx Evenstar on 29/10/2007 20:37:55 Originally by: d026 but to effectively fight a nono gang you need a blob because with only minmatar rec...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 20:48:00
|
125. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Phocas Lebournes OP, not every ship can by default win against any other ship on its own. Rapier or Huginn is your best friend against a vagabond. every ship can beat the opposites setup somehow. except none can win ag...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 20:45:00
|
126. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Flinx Evenstar Originally by: Rexthor Hammerfists what i hate about nanogangs is that its so easy to avoid combat with em, they can choose their targets and easily flee when they deem its needed. nanos prevent fight...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 20:21:00
|
127. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 29/10/2007 20:20:00 Originally by: Jade190 Originally by: d026 speed fits are cause for blobbing because: to kill 1 you need 3 Eve is supposed to be multi-player anyway. So you should have a buddy with ...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 20:18:00
|
128. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Kruel Speedfits are the counter to blobbing. Removing them will only encourage blobbing more. Is that what you want? speed fits are cause for blobbing because: to kill 1 you need 3
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 18:24:00
|
129. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 29/10/2007 18:09:28 Edited by: d026 on 29/10/2007 18:08:29 Originally by: Drasked Originally by: d026 eve is paper > rock > scissors . but nanofits don't follow this scheme. they are a lil of scis...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 18:07:00
|
130. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
eve is paper > rock > scissors. but nanofits don't follow this scheme. they are a lil of scissor and rock at the same time thus making it impossible to counter with only one ship. right now speed is a huge advantage and this should be keept...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 17:42:00
|
131. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
there lies the problem. there arent any viable counters to speed execpt: 1. speed which only a minority of ships can use to they're advantage 2. long range webs which only are available from a minmatar recon 3. long range scrams which again are o...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 17:32:00
|
132. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Drasked Guys, you bring your normal gang + 1 huginn wich is nanod or tanked and now the opposing team can't do jack.. I just dont see the problem when the counter is so simple, 1 huginn. to kill a deimos with fit a i us...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 17:22:00
|
133. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: stahmul You don't "need" a Huginn or Rapier, they just make it easy and less risky to hold down a nanoship. An inty, a dictor, will work just fine to web someone. Who flies dictor or inty without speed fit? Okay, now how har...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 15:35:00
|
134. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 29/10/2007 15:30:34 Originally by: stahmul I don't call a single interceptor a "highly specialized" gang. so you buy a vaga. to kill it we need a huginn + support. balanced? i buy a deimos. to kill it we need a ...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 15:29:00
|
135. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Inflexible Originally by: Soulita Edited by: Soulita on 29/10/2007 15:13:39 Originally by: Arlenna Molatov This ship was doing 6600m/s. CCP, I would REALLY like to ask HOW in the damn hell are you suppose...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 15:28:00
|
136. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 29/10/2007 15:23:21 Originally by: stahmul What do you mean rare? Rare like snake implants? Rare like Domi MWD's ? Just because you can't find any pilots smart enough to train towards Huginn doesn't mean it's "rare"...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 15:23:00
|
137. Monthly whine : useless, heavily prenerfed content worse as no content - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Qui Shon Even if you got your 300-600mill state issue raven, would that make your PvE more bearable? Are you shooting for a certain isk amount, and stop missioning, stop "suffering the pain", when you reach it? Is that real...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 15:10:00
|
138. Monthly whine : useless, heavily prenerfed content worse as no content - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Qui Shon Now that you put it in such crass words, maybe underpowered but versatile really isn't such a bad way to go. So all that remains is reducing the price, fixing the Paladin, and maybe nerfing Kronos a bit. (Yes yes, ...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 15:08:00
|
139. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 29/10/2007 15:00:33 Some things i'd liek to see: No maneuverability/agility while MWD on. 40k webs 20k webs Module to increase targets mass Web sphere (launched from dictors, cant ovelay a dictor sphere)
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 15:00:00
|
140. Nano ships have to go...very seriously CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: d026 on 29/10/2007 14:56:34 Originally by: stahmul Originally by: d026 Originally by: hydraSlav Edited by: hydraSlav on 29/10/2007 14:08:19 The problem is not with nanos... the problem is with wrong webs...
- by d026 - at 2007.10.29 14:56:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |