Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 [30] |
581. Stationary Supers Bumping off each other (900ms+) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote: Unsuccessful At Everything wrote: CCP stealth fixes the problem of multiple supers hiding in a POS bubble. Heh. From the looks of the OP, it would appear that every super is under the constant threat of ...
- by d0cTeR9 - at 2015.01.31 23:40:11
|
582. Stationary Supers Bumping off each other (900ms+) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It's bullshit badly designed 'game mechanic' that cost someone a titan not long ago (and many MANY other super's).
- by d0cTeR9 - at 2015.01.31 18:15:38
|
583. Balance the Fighter drone - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
lol non-carrier pilots spotted... How about sticking to what you guys fly...
- by d0cTeR9 - at 2015.01.30 22:53:23
|
584. Lowsec PodKill super sec status hit? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Icarus Able wrote: Destruction of property and Murder are two VERY different things, it doesnt take anything away from gameplay so why change it? Sucks to be those hundreds of crew men and women heh? LOL!
- by d0cTeR9 - at 2015.01.30 21:48:19
|
585. Okay, so, seriously. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Legalities take time... i'm in the US, waiting on some legal stuff for a business... counting 6 month now. Yep... legalities suck.
- by d0cTeR9 - at 2015.01.24 05:45:43
|
586. Server response.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rekt
- by d0cTeR9 - at 2015.01.22 20:13:42
|
587. Crow fit? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Get a raptor.
- by d0cTeR9 - at 2015.01.22 03:09:30
|
588. [HOLY COW] Sleepers, Jovians, and the 'Other' - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Strom Ronuken wrote: Jandice Ymladris wrote: Regarding some recent info i collected about the Circadian Seeker change, I updated my article on it: ' Circadian Seekers retaliate !' Main things are the change in behaviour by the Seekers sinc...
- by d0cTeR9 - at 2015.01.22 03:00:48
|
589. Original Eve Packaging - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Solecist Project wrote: Now I feel old for trying to resurrect a classic ... ... and barely anyone gets it. I got it and laughed. It was funnier when other posters didn't get it!
- by d0cTeR9 - at 2015.01.16 20:25:09
|
590. How safe is playing EVE in 3d? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rawketsled wrote: Best not to risk it. If you get ganked by an alpha fleet, you might explode all over your room. Cleaning blood off your desk and computer is a perilous endeavour. Agreed, don't take the chance.
- by d0cTeR9 - at 2015.01.15 05:40:32
|
591. ~ Survey ~ which capital is sexiest ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It's always been the Nyx, and remains the Nyx.
- by d0cTeR9 - at 2015.01.14 23:21:51
|
592. I like the new lighting engine and all... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Any chance in fixing gallente ships? The new supra-chrome-deluxe-coloring is just... Bad.
- by d0cTeR9 - at 2015.01.14 02:06:30
|
593. Sticky:[Proteus] Reduction in Fighter and Fighter Bomber scan resolutio... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Be sure to spam CCP at fanfest about this cap/supercapitals bullshit.
- by d0cTeR9 - at 2015.01.10 20:12:06
|
594. Nerfing fighter bomber scanres is a terrible idea. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Ghaustyl Kathix wrote: Prelate Hucel-Ge wrote: You do realize that fighter bombers cannot hit subcaps for damage at all, right? I've seen a tracking-fit Nyx (sitting on station or tower with assigning fighters) hit battleships and battlecru...
- by d0cTeR9 - at 2015.01.08 07:30:18
|
595. Sticky:[Proteus] Reduction in Fighter and Fighter Bomber scan resolutio... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
chossuh wrote: Red Teufel wrote: There is little to no risk to the carrier who is performing skynet. Especialy in a cyno jammed system. At most these changes just means if you are in an ishtar or anti frig you may have a chance to get away. ...
- by d0cTeR9 - at 2015.01.08 02:01:31
|
596. Sticky:[Proteus] Reduction in Fighter and Fighter Bomber scan resolutio... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rowells wrote: Alexis Nightwish wrote: CCP Fozzie wrote: The primary goal of this change is to ensure that rapidly scooping and relaunching fighters and fighter bombers never gives a dps advantage. So instead of, you know, preventing t...
- by d0cTeR9 - at 2015.01.07 02:27:52
|
597. Sticky:[Proteus] Reduction in Fighter and Fighter Bomber scan resolutio... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
How about nerfing the thousands of interceptors, cov ops and ishtars instead of picking on a few supercaps that are trying to survive from the onslaught flying something expensive brings? Meaning everyone wants to kill it and will do almost anythi...
- by d0cTeR9 - at 2015.01.06 03:41:44
|
598. 2 ideas, 1 thread - cloaking and high sec cynos - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Cloaks have been broken since they were first implemented. CCP has given up on them, and are concentrating on major issues at hand. Like the 1% of people using carriers/supercarriers and somehow exploiting the fighter/fighter bomber scan resolut...
- by d0cTeR9 - at 2015.01.06 01:17:42
|
599. Sticky:[Proteus] Reduction in Fighter and Fighter Bomber scan resolutio... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Dar Saleem wrote: Haidere wrote: Ladies, you're both pretty. Now let's try and help CCP find a logical, effective fix for this problem instead of flailing away at each other. You make the assumption CCP actually listen to us. They don't....
- by d0cTeR9 - at 2015.01.06 01:09:02
|
600. Improving the Fitting Experience - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
LONG overdue.
- by d0cTeR9 - at 2015.01.06 00:36:41
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 [30] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |