Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sgt Ocker wrote: Instead of turning Sov Nul into a part of New Eden that is driven by wars and ongoing conflict, they decided to go the opposite way and encourage large groups to get larger by introducing a sov system that is broken into mul...
- by flakeys - at 2015.03.22 07:01:17
|
2. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
davet517 wrote: flakeys wrote: Next time you guys want to mock low-sec or high-sec people be sure to do it with characters that don't look like utter carebears themselves . Sometimes, in Eve, people have multiple accounts. It's really k...
- by flakeys - at 2015.03.15 22:01:47
|
3. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Falin Whalen wrote: FT Diomedes wrote: VolatileVoid wrote: flakeys wrote: Don't worry , you guys won't become pirates.Pirates tend to also pick solo fights , are not too scared for losses and don't have SRP. Nope , if there is one th...
- by flakeys - at 2015.03.15 19:38:18
|
4. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
VolatileVoid wrote: There was a question about why people playing in certain aereas of space. Highsec: You don't need to play together at all. Nullsec: You need to play together in many ways but don't need to be online all the time and can do...
- by flakeys - at 2015.03.15 07:39:53
|
5. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Lupe Meza wrote: Zakks wrote: As a newer player (2months), I am ready to quit after my sub ends this month. There is no place for, how you say, 'scrubs' in this game. I have never seen such a sense of entitlement by a group of veteran player...
- by flakeys - at 2015.03.09 07:48:49
|
6. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Duffyman wrote: It's not that hard: - Replace null sec anoms with missions -> Now a system can support hundreds of pilots and null sec powers will let go of 2/3 of their space (keeping the ones with the best moons of course) - Make the so...
- by flakeys - at 2015.03.08 17:17:18
|
7. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Alp Khan wrote: flakeys wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Kinis Deren wrote: You do know there is a Phase III coming and probably will address the risk/reward issue with null sec after the null restructuring is in place? What I know ...
- by flakeys - at 2015.03.08 08:07:30
|
8. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Kinis Deren wrote: You do know there is a Phase III coming and probably will address the risk/reward issue with null sec after the null restructuring is in place? What I know is that it exists, not what it's cont...
- by flakeys - at 2015.03.07 17:16:21
|
9. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sgt Ocker wrote: Artemis Ellery Sazas wrote: While I admire smaller corps/alliances desire to own your own sov, you are very wrong about what will happen. There is one part of this that outsiders do not seem to understand, holding a success...
- by flakeys - at 2015.03.07 11:36:50
|
10. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Artemis Ellery Sazas wrote: While I admire smaller corps/alliances desire to own your own sov, you are very wrong about what will happen. There is one part of this that outsiders do not seem to understand, holding a successful sov system is a ...
- by flakeys - at 2015.03.07 11:18:56
|
11. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Kumar WhiteCastle wrote: Why is the one and only CSM discussing nullsec and sovereignty in the forums a hisec CSM known to dislike nullsec and all those that live there? Azariah is almost certainly trolling the thread. Why shouldn't he ?If...
- by flakeys - at 2015.03.07 10:48:35
|
12. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Chi'Nane T'Kal wrote: Lavayar wrote: afkalt wrote: Lavayar wrote: afkalt wrote: Why are people so scared of paper ships that cannot warp? Have you seen what ships like cerberus are capable of? These "trollceptors" are loot piny...
- by flakeys - at 2015.03.06 15:11:19
|
13. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
TarPalantir I wrote: Tar-Palantir is a pretty much life long member of Evolution. That means he has been in BoB, IT, INIT, 401K, and now NCdot alliances. All of them had different ways of fighting, scale, and approaches to the Sov side of Null-...
- by flakeys - at 2015.03.05 19:08:28
|
14. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
X Gallentius wrote: Shorten range of module to 75 km so that a reasonably spec'd anti-interceptor Destroyer can engage. Interceptor immunity gone. No T2 module in game increases performance by a factor of 10. This module shouldn't be the first...
- by flakeys - at 2015.03.05 16:14:39
|
15. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Killbac Orator wrote: 3. One module class that incorporates range penalty based upon fitted ship class ( ceptor = 50km, BC = 100km, BS = 250km) with 250km max for any fitted ship class greater than BS, ( no need for a T2 variant ). This a...
- by flakeys - at 2015.03.05 16:01:08
|
16. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Miner Hottie wrote: M1k3y Koontz wrote: Alp Khan wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Eli Apol wrote: Current method at least offers some initiative to the attackers to actually start a meaningful fight as the defender has to come on gri...
- by flakeys - at 2015.03.05 15:38:16
|
17. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Frostys Virpio wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Frostys Virpio wrote: Leaving grid even if your ship gets killed does not restore the shield back to 100%. You can come back just a few minutes later and continue from relatively the same poi...
- by flakeys - at 2015.03.05 14:38:16
|
18. Announcement:Dev Blog: Long-Distance Travel Changes Inbound - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Manfred Sideous wrote: I was born by the river in a little tent Oh, and just like the river I've been running ever since It's been a long, a long time coming But I know a change gon' come, oh yes it will It's been too hard living, but I'm afr...
- by flakeys - at 2014.10.03 19:05:00
|
19. Announcement:Dev Blog: Long-Distance Travel Changes Inbound - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Doc Fury wrote: Skydell wrote: Arsine Mayhem wrote: Aliza Cosma Chupinskowa wrote: Fix our game on the way that promotes and generate teamplay and involved more players to make a goal (that means in this case a long jump route). CCP ...
- by flakeys - at 2014.10.03 19:02:00
|
20. Announcement:Dev Blog: Long-Distance Travel Changes Inbound - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Doc Fury wrote: To all the goons still crying over this: CCP is not trying to ruin the game, they are trying to ruin your game. I think we found a new pshhhhhhhhh .
- by flakeys - at 2014.10.03 18:56:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |