Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
601. Can we now have local 0.0 removed please? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gah make up your minds people. There is no difference between local and delayed local for the perspective of the miner or ratter or hauler (or whatever flies around not shooting stuff). The endresult for him is the same, especially since there st...
- by iP0D - at 2009.06.21 20:19:00
|
602. stuff about character transfers and problems caused by it - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I don't get it. They are still required to make a thread on a private sale afaik? Or at least I vaguely remember something like that. If it isn't the case, that would be enough to let players backtrack tbh. <3 Chribba, with eve-search.com for...
- by iP0D - at 2009.06.21 14:32:00
|
603. stuff about character transfers and problems caused by it - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: mazzilliu another issue is that ALL petition history and discussion is retained when characters are transferred to different accounts. I'm pretty sure this violates CCP's privacy policy with reguards to petition when that ...
- by iP0D - at 2009.06.21 14:32:00
|
604. The Great DD Re-Envisioning - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
so .. you want to turn an expensive glass cannon that melts in 30 seconds into a glass cannon which has to fiddle around for longer then that time to get a shot off? I'm confused.
- by iP0D - at 2009.06.21 13:20:00
|
605. Can we now have local 0.0 removed please? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: iP0D on 21/06/2009 11:30:33 Originally by: Shaemell Buttleson blabla It would help quite a bit if you actually tried to tackle a problem through a decent discussion, and one topic at a time, without throwing a multitude ...
- by iP0D - at 2009.06.21 11:30:00
|
606. Stop with the DD nerf threads already! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Havohej Originally by: iP0D looking at the latest lolDDcarrierkill hilarity you wonder how real people really are about their "opinions". Sure .. titans are bad, don't mind we just put a bid on two more and ordered 5...
- by iP0D - at 2009.06.20 22:50:00
|
607. Faster CSM process for minor issues - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I like this. Not just because of principle and results, but also because it would be a great tool to keep the fires lit under a CSM where a good bunch are only in it to get CCP's technology briefing so their groups can get ahead of the curve of ch...
- by iP0D - at 2009.06.20 22:42:00
|
608. Stop with the DD nerf threads already! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Pedro Sangre I don't think you get it. That display was fair warning to EVE & CCP. If titans / DDs aren't fixed, we (and others too most likely) will do it in combat...repeatedly...until even your bad posting is drowned out...
- by iP0D - at 2009.06.19 19:09:00
|
609. Multi-stage Contracts - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Yeah, not a huge thing, but supported. Makes me wish we had our own Mission Creation interface for corporations, would do a ton for corp job management, delegation, member tracking, payrolls, etc.
- by iP0D - at 2009.06.17 21:22:00
|
610. More composed Supercap fix - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
not supported. Doesn't do anything for how powerblocks deal with matters. Doesn't change anything enough to put a tresholds against supercap blobs. Doesn't give any room for making better use of secondary roles of the ship classes. Seriously, th...
- by iP0D - at 2009.06.17 12:14:00
|
611. Eve universe needs massive expansion - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Mos7Wan7ed the problem empire seems overcrowded is the risk/reward for low sec and 0.0. they should move all level 5 agents to faction 0.0 then all lvl 4 agents to low sec. there ya go problem solved. but, also make 0.0 more...
- by iP0D - at 2009.06.15 11:53:00
|
612. Proposal - Clean up CAOD 2.0 - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Heh, quite probably a silly idea ... but what about a completely different angle :-) Have CAOD access based on in game title and skills. Corporate PR Manager or something, rank 14. Enables the pilot to have one open thread on CAOD per skill leve...
- by iP0D - at 2009.06.15 11:27:00
|
613. traveling through new eden old school style.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Eris Discordia Now you jump into a system and you land 15 km from the stargate, that leads back where you are coming from. It used to be the case that you¦d jump into a system and land in the middle of the system ( not ...
- by iP0D - at 2009.06.08 18:39:00
|
614. No more than 100 pilots allowed per Alliance? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sigh. Look at the human species. Then look at your idea again. It is not compatible. You cannot force people to refrain from stupidity, the only way to get at minimum some learning curve going is through sheer pain. And that is an angle CCP is no...
- by iP0D - at 2009.06.06 11:30:00
|
615. New skill boosting rewards via activities ingame - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
You could try to sign up with the Jumpgate Evolution closed beta, which has been indefinately delayed, as they have to rethink core game concepts (like the very idea you just suggested) >.<
- by iP0D - at 2009.06.06 11:28:00
|
616. Can CCP please provide - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rework it then. Effort. Either that or bribe a dev with alcohol free beer at the fanfest.
- by iP0D - at 2009.06.06 11:27:00
|
617. Would you be willing to accept big changes to mining? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
indeed.
- by iP0D - at 2009.06.06 11:24:00
|
618. Can CCP please provide - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
EVE has no manual, or documentation, it's part of the fun to figure it all out ourselves hmkay. Check the Skill discussions section, probably someone already done something in this direction.
- by iP0D - at 2009.06.06 11:23:00
|
619. No more than 100 pilots allowed per Alliance? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Goonswarm1 Goonswarm2 Goonswarm3 Goonswarm4 Goonswarm5 Goonswarmbeta Goonswarm6 Goonswarmreserves Goonswarm7 Etc. Seriously.
- by iP0D - at 2009.06.06 11:22:00
|
620. POS REdesign proposal - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Wrong forum section.
- by iP0D - at 2009.06.06 11:16:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |