| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Today is the day - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: qanatas on 01/09/2009 07:40:00 Originally by: Tamahra btw, from two different sources who were at the gamescom theres the statement that dust will also feed into factional warfare. We'll have to wait how this will be h...
- by qanatas - at 2009.09.01 07:39:00
|
2. Has Eve Peaked? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Cassiopeia Draco As others have said, after a major expansion a number of accounts get reactivated, plus you have the influx of new blood due to advertising. But the winterexpansion will be focusing on sovereignty. And...
- by qanatas - at 2009.08.17 08:30:00
|
3. Fleet Fight Feedback Thread - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Which test you were in: August 5 @ 19:00 OS version Vista 64bit CPU (ex. AMD X2 6000+, Intel E6400, etc) E8400 GPU (ex. ATI 2950, Nvidia 8800, etc) Nvidia 8800GT RAM (ex. 2GB, 4GB, etc.) 8Gb Average FPS during the test(s) 15-30 Did you exper...
- by qanatas - at 2009.08.05 21:26:00
|
4. FW lag investigation follow up please, CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
There was an engagement on the auga -> dal gate, around 20:35. It seems the fix works for some and not for others.
- by qanatas - at 2009.07.09 20:59:00
|
5. FW lag investigation follow up please, CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: qanatas on 02/07/2009 20:17:20 Originally by: Sylar Darkayen I extremely highly doubt that the fact your in a militia is causing the lag. In the end, it's nothing different than a 50 vs. 50 fight anywhere. Null-sec, low-sec,...
- by qanatas - at 2009.07.02 20:17:00
|
6. FW lag investigation follow up please, CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Ytterbium Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah Factional Warfare [...] more tangible benefits . Action stations, action stations, dev blog incoming. I repeat, dev blog incoming, set condition one throughout the...
- by qanatas - at 2009.06.29 20:45:00
|
7. FW lag investigation follow up please, CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Very disappointing. And to tout the new patch as 'fantastic' on the frontpage ...
- by qanatas - at 2009.06.26 21:08:00
|
8. FW lag investigation follow up please, CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: M0rning5tar Originally by: CCP Wrangler We have been testing this on Singularity and we have some leads, currently we're in the process of looking into the data we've gathered and following up on the aforementioned l...
- by qanatas - at 2009.06.16 07:49:00
|
9. Ok I guess this is the day for *****ing.. FW lag.. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Obsidian Hawk you could always put in a declaration of a fleet op 24 hours in advance to the target system and have ccp reinforce it. even if it is 20 v 20 it still means added resources there. Well tbh, that would be a ...
- by qanatas - at 2009.06.13 23:09:00
|
10. FW lag investigation follow up please, CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This is totally ruining what could be very fun. 20 x 20 cruiser / bc fights etc, but you get lagged out and desynced.
- by qanatas - at 2009.06.13 22:55:00
|
11. FW lag investigation follow up please, CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Nephilim Xeno and i can confirm the lag is still there as bad as always and it's always the same: fighst starts shooting first primary and everything seems fine first primary dies and mass desyncs start relogging eliminate...
- by qanatas - at 2009.06.08 06:55:00
|
12. FW lag investigation follow up please, CCP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Is this still being looked into ? Any updates ? Anything involving a somewhat large battle with battleships, and the client completely lags out, even to the point where you're completely desyncing with the server...
- by qanatas - at 2009.05.31 22:58:00
|
13. Need to relog after jump - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Can't really play the game like this atm. You can get killed in a gatecamp without you even knowing about it, and log on in your pod or worse in your clone station ...
- by qanatas - at 2009.05.20 20:14:00
|
14. Battle Summary for Kamela, 19:19 - 21:17 - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It was a pleasure to be there :). Truely epic and /tip hat to all who were there !
- by qanatas - at 2008.09.04 10:34:00
|
15. FW: Are CCP biased? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The interest to cap plexes on minnie side has been declining greatly the past few weeks, it¦s also reflected in the numbers. I wonder if CCP has any future plans for FW, they better hurry up, before interest starts to decline even more.
- by qanatas - at 2008.08.06 09:49:00
|
16. Faction Warfare: Is anyone having fun on the Amarr side? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Found the link to the Faction Frigate etc bpcs standing thing. Forum Thread
- by qanatas - at 2008.07.23 13:23:00
|
17. Faction Warfare: Is anyone having fun on the Amarr side? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Becq Starforged An indirect benefit is that gaining standing with your FW corp (missions or complexes) increases your faction standing, and if your faction standing rises high enough, you can get (nearly) free faction ship B...
- by qanatas - at 2008.07.23 07:52:00
|
18. No Feedback FROM the Devs on FW? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Maybe the devs play Amarr
- by qanatas - at 2008.06.30 06:50:00
|
19. Is FW what you thought it would be? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The first few days were a lot of fun, with nice battles and squirmishes in a lot of systems. But lately you can hardly find a wartarget. The capping of systems is very boring. Initially it's nice for the faction standing boost (the title means n...
- by qanatas - at 2008.06.25 06:42:00
|
20. Best Amarr or Caldari FW Corps? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Any amarr corp will do if you like being docked in a station.
- by qanatas - at 2008.06.18 06:44:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |