Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. CCP 10th Anniversary tonight! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
JD and coke for me I think. No change from a normal eve night tho :P sgb
- by smallgreenblur - at 2007.06.02 17:21:00
|
2. Drones REALLY need some love! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This thread is dropping down again... sgb
- by smallgreenblur - at 2007.05.26 10:52:00
|
3. Drones REALLY need some love! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ashaz ah there you are. i was wondering where this thread went yesterday. *bump* and another little "i lost my drones" story: Was kiting a deimos with my celestis. 20 sec timer goes beep beep. I call in drones. "returning ...
- by smallgreenblur - at 2007.05.25 11:25:00
|
4. How to scam using lag; ITS NOT AN EXPLOIT! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
0.0 is so much safer these days than empire. Sad but true. sgb
- by smallgreenblur - at 2007.05.10 15:25:00
|
5. Amarr - while waiting for the oomph... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Give amarr a split weapons system and then give them an optimal bonus on only one of those systems. We had to suffer it for 3 years, don't see why the rest of eve shouldn't... sgb
- by smallgreenblur - at 2007.05.01 12:55:00
|
6. Drones REALLY need some love! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Wow, they're looking at fixing this major issue sometime after the next 10 content patches. Nice one. sgb
- by smallgreenblur - at 2007.04.30 22:02:00
|
7. Drones REALLY need some love! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Would def be nice to find out at least that the issue is being looked at and will be fixed by x date... sgb
- by smallgreenblur - at 2007.04.18 08:47:00
|
8. Drones REALLY need some love! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Keeping this up the top :) sgb
- by smallgreenblur - at 2007.04.16 09:11:00
|
9. Drones REALLY need some love! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Not even gonna bother reading this. signed sgb
- by smallgreenblur - at 2007.04.08 06:56:00
|
10. Imbalance ... the Nano-Inertial Battleships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Jamius Edited by: Jamius on 23/03/2007 10:51:18 "an interceptor should be able to hold a solo BS in place indefinitely. BS should not be out solo anyway. they should be forced to have escort to keep off ceptors. it would...
- by smallgreenblur - at 2007.03.23 11:31:00
|
11. Imbalance ... the Nano-Inertial Battleships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nice nerf ccp, hit the nail on the head. Looking forward to something to do with nos in the near future, but don't hit them too hard :) sgb
- by smallgreenblur - at 2007.03.17 11:06:00
|
12. I don't care.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Here's an idea. If you don't like people sitting cloaked in your systems, do something about it. eg vs megathron. Send in a bs that's normally a big ratting ship, eg apoc or raven. Apoc would probably be better. Fit vs the megaT's damage types, i...
- by smallgreenblur - at 2007.03.15 11:42:00
|
13. Imbalance ... the Nano-Inertial Battleships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Dano Sarum I know there was a post early on in the thread complaining that nanoships are the only solution to blobs / gatecamps. While thats kinda true you have to bear in mind that once you take the ship OUT of that environ...
- by smallgreenblur - at 2007.03.14 18:09:00
|
14. Imbalance ... the Nano-Inertial Battleships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: n0thing Problem is that those ships can completly avoid any threat and pick their own fights wherever they want be it chokepoints or deep in the claimed space. And also have BS HP and good dps. sgb
- by smallgreenblur - at 2007.03.12 11:14:00
|
15. Imbalance ... the Nano-Inertial Battleships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Rhamnousia i dont really hav a problm with the nano'd ships they're suck anyway ... an averaged t2 tanked BS can tank a nanophoon dps till it ran out of cap easily (even with the 4 heavy nos) a nanophoon most likely is gon...
- by smallgreenblur - at 2007.03.12 09:36:00
|
16. Imbalance ... the Nano-Inertial Battleships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Basilii 11km/s machariels are very very unbalanced . You're made a typo there mate. That should read: Originally by: Basilii 22km/s machariels are very very unbalanced .
- by smallgreenblur - at 2007.03.11 16:27:00
|
17. Imbalance ... the Nano-Inertial Battleships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Dag'olar Okey dokey. I've flown nanophoons, and i've beek killed by nanophoons, and i don't see a problem. First, it's not nanophoons that are the problem, but nano-domi's. Typhoons you maybe have four torps or something la...
- by smallgreenblur - at 2007.03.10 15:20:00
|
18. Imbalance ... the Nano-Inertial Battleships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Ryysa Originally by: smallgreenblur The nanobs in that situation are only broken because they can just run away every time things are looking bad (generally even with one web on them). The other bs can't. sgb Ye...
- by smallgreenblur - at 2007.03.09 13:38:00
|
19. Rigs - What do you think of the current state, CCP? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Shismo 1. Make salvagers a mid slot item 2. Limit number per ship to 1 3. Increase sucsess rate by 5 times 4. Cut all rig components required down to 1/4rd of the current 5. Alow anyone to make rigs out of the components on ...
- by smallgreenblur - at 2007.03.09 12:58:00
|
20. Imbalance ... the Nano-Inertial Battleships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The nanobs in that situation are only broken because they can just run away every time things are looking bad (generally even with one web on them). The other bs can't. sgb
- by smallgreenblur - at 2007.03.09 11:41:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |