Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
121. Sticky:New dev blog: U and I - Our Little Improvements Together - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
ChaseTheLasers wrote: I know I'm late to the party, but it's fashionable. One nark I currently have with the UI is linking 'show info' items to chats. See my awesome picture: http://i.imgur.com/uoB8m.jpg Beer at the next fanfest I attend f...
- by steave435 - at 2012.03.09 14:45:00
|
122. leap year - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Explorer wrote: Andski wrote: also delete boot.ini erryday Hey, we only did that once! (Not that it was possible to delete it again once we had deleted it the first time...) Lies, there are plenty of new computers around to ruin now!
- by steave435 - at 2012.02.28 13:32:00
|
123. Two Ideas for Stabs - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Jude Lloyd wrote: Gypsio III wrote: Jude Lloyd wrote: Skippermonkey wrote: warp core stabs have their advantages and disadvantages. only people who dont want to fight (with the exception of smartbomb battleships) fit warp core stabs. ...
- by steave435 - at 2011.12.14 14:24:00
|
124. Fighting PL, advice? - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
The Racketeer wrote: Xolve wrote: The Racketeer wrote: sensor boosters and tracking computers witch take time to re-script. WOT? Re-Script is pretty instantaneous. Right Click, Select, Boom. If they are fit to snipe with optimal ...
- by steave435 - at 2011.12.14 11:08:00
|
125. Best highsec t2 industrial? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Joe For Sale wrote: Thanks folks. I thought I had read somewhere the orca's hanger was now scannable (perhaps that was by concord), but if that isn't the case, it sounds like I need an orca. Definitely. Fit a 100mn MWD to it and you can move ...
- by steave435 - at 2011.12.13 11:52:00
|
126. Corp Locations populating too slowly - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
While you're at it, I'd like the option to simply store a bookmark as a corp bookmark on creation, rather then having to make a personal one and dragging it over. That's just an extra pointless step.
- by steave435 - at 2011.12.13 11:31:00
|
127. Self-destructing reworked - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Hirana Yoshida wrote: But how does being witness to a scuttling translate into being privy to all data concerning the ship immediately prior to the act? Hell, they are still finding known scuttled wrecks from WWII with all sorts of gizmos and ...
- by steave435 - at 2011.12.12 15:32:00
|
128. Maybe it is time for Low sec without supers? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Andreus Ixiris wrote: Ecky X wrote: The fact is without lowsec accessibility, capitals would be trapped in pockets of space. I'd be totally cool with this. ....Which means that only the defenders would be able to use caps, and thus have...
- by steave435 - at 2011.11.23 20:46:00
|
129. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Capital Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Arkady Sadik wrote: Awesome, thank you! CCP Tallest wrote: * There need to be deadspace shield invulnerability fields equivalent to the A-Type EANM modules One of the biggest problems here is that shield faction modules are exorbitantly mo...
- by steave435 - at 2011.11.10 19:03:00
|
130. Jump Freighters are overpowered - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Meh, he just doesn't want his solopwnmobile nerfed.
- by steave435 - at 2011.11.05 01:49:00
|
131. Jump Freighters are overpowered - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
No one's gonna take you seriously with that name, too obvious thrulinn / trullin' / trolling.
- by steave435 - at 2011.10.30 16:38:00
|
132. Jump Freighters are overpowered - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Centra Spike wrote: Weaselior wrote: i have, however, torpedoed your argument with nary a peep from you besides "u mad" so i feel quite safe in telling you to get back in your hole unless you're willing to put some actual effort in to dealin...
- by steave435 - at 2011.10.28 22:37:00
|
133. log off exploits - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Othran wrote: GCC carries over to next system, aggro doesn't last time I tested. You sure you're not thinking of GCC - remember that will start triggering other aggro timers in next system? Yes, it's been in 0.0. Astrid Stjerna wrote: /...
- by steave435 - at 2011.10.27 20:02:00
|
134. BOMBS! - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Gavin DeVries wrote: Demon View wrote: Gavin DeVries wrote: While you're under gate cloak, you're invulnerable for at least that 30 second session change timer. If you hold your cloak the bombs won't hit you. Gate cloak lasts 60 second...
- by steave435 - at 2011.10.27 16:32:00
|
135. Jump Freighters are overpowered - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Since you don't bother doing anything other then repeating yourself, ignoring anything you don't agree with, there's no point bothering to put any effort in it.
- by steave435 - at 2011.10.27 16:10:00
|
136. New ships and modules - what do you think of them ? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Zoe Alarhun wrote: Bleh I shouldn't post in a hurry. I got some of the numbers mixed up. Thorax less mass, higher IM. Stabber More mass, lower IM. Either way you might be right - as far as I can discern the info dump higher = better. But what...
- by steave435 - at 2011.10.27 14:39:00
|
137. log off exploits - in Warfare & Tactics [original thread]
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: Tamiya Sarossa wrote: Gizznitt Malikite wrote: Note: Agression timers are currently System Specific. Meaning if you change to a different system, you can immediately log off without aggression in the new system. ...
- by steave435 - at 2011.10.27 08:10:00
|
138. Jump Freighters are overpowered - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Weaselior wrote: basically put your argument is so bad and amounts to little more than cutting and pasting arguments valid in other contexts and hoping nobody notices their systematic demolition that you deserve nothing more than contemptuous d...
- by steave435 - at 2011.10.26 19:03:00
|
139. Oneiros vs. The World - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Goose99 wrote: Don't forget the Onerios is still missing the Amar 80% armor exp resist for natural omnitank. Between extra cap mods taking slots and hardners to kill exp hole, it is still definitely weaker. The only advantage is still not depen...
- by steave435 - at 2011.10.26 14:35:00
|
140. Remote Sensor Boosting - am I missing sumfink? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Abenham wrote: Furthering the excellent information in Chrome Striker's post. There are two ships that get bonuses to Tracking Link Range and Efficiency (which may mean cap efficiency of the tracking link module... not too sure on that bonus) ...
- by steave435 - at 2011.10.26 13:56:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |