Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 |
101. [issue] Moon mining, possible "mining out" and random redistribution - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: teji on 13/08/2008 16:19:42 Oh god this is dumb. Stop making proposals on 0.0 which you obviously have no idea about. How about this Let's have agents that you have improved your standings with just up and vanish. Let's have BPO's...
- by teji - at 2008.08.13 16:16:00
|
102. Goons - Mastercard Advert - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Kaaii Whats that Lassie? Timmys fallen down the well?? Did you know that Timmy never did fall down the well.
- by teji - at 2008.08.11 22:03:00
|
103. [Issue] Risk/reward of empire - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
good ideas are good
- by teji - at 2008.08.07 16:52:00
|
104. Attention: due to fuel shortages speedlimits have been reduced. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: facialimpediment Originally by: CCP Taera You do not need to start over - speed is still a viable option, we've just made it an option instead of a mandatory tool for near invulnerabilty. Relatively speaking, Int...
- by teji - at 2008.07.30 08:14:00
|
105. Attention: due to fuel shortages speedlimits have been reduced. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: teji on 30/07/2008 07:13:54 Edited by: teji on 30/07/2008 07:13:12 Quote: As that's what this change is about, making so that nano-fitting isn't the ONLY viable option(i know it's not but it's FOTM and as such, too used) w...
- by teji - at 2008.07.30 07:11:00
|
106. Attention: due to fuel shortages speedlimits have been reduced. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Taera You do not need to start over - speed is still a viable option, we've just made it an option instead of a mandatory tool for near invulnerabilty. Relatively speaking, Interceptors are actually getting a boost! ...
- by teji - at 2008.07.30 07:04:00
|
107. Speed Rebalanced: Feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: TZeer And BTW, cruise is not a "Anti BS" weapon, torps are, cruise are for support. A cruise raven cant break a proper tanked BS tank, so not a Anti BS weapon. Maybe if you say it enough times someone will believe this c...
- by teji - at 2008.07.29 23:56:00
|
108. Speed Rebalanced: Feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I was going to respond to your dumb comment but I see smarter people already did.
- by teji - at 2008.07.29 20:26:00
|
109. Speed Rebalanced: Feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Rathion Teji, you really fail at this, Do you know Why you don't see ANY nano' BC's right now, BECAUSE BATTLE CRUISERS ARE TO FAT AND SLOW TO NANO, this has not changed, HAC's are fast enough to do this, Battlecruisers are n...
- by teji - at 2008.07.29 19:59:00
|
110. Speed Rebalanced: Feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Rathion Yes there still Faster then everything Larger then them HOLY SHIT smaller stuff goes faster then HACs, stop crying. AND with the Web nerf and speed changes they are still FAST ENOUGH to speed tank albiet now they hav...
- by teji - at 2008.07.29 19:33:00
|
111. Speed Rebalanced: Feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Max CAOD And teji.. fail at trolling... HAC's will be slower then interceptors, but faster then cruisers, battlecruisers, battleships, commandships etc. They can still speedtank, but can no longer be invulnerable to a whole ...
- by teji - at 2008.07.29 19:26:00
|
112. Speed Rebalanced: Feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: teji on 29/07/2008 19:18:21 Edited by: teji on 29/07/2008 19:17:28 Originally by: Rathion This nerf still allows HAC's to be faster then other stuff. Yea, they are still faster than titans, freighters, carriers, drea...
- by teji - at 2008.07.29 19:17:00
|
113. Speed Rebalanced: Feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: SuiJuris Battelships are supposed to be able to hit Battleships, and Cruisers are supposed to be able to hit Cruisers, the Speeds on SiSi are perfectly inline with current tracking. a Cruiser and Get in under a Battleships g...
- by teji - at 2008.07.29 16:31:00
|
114. Speed Rebalanced: Feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Quote: PS. I also want to point out something nobody seems to have mentioned regarding warp scramblers and them possibly being overpowered. Prior to the changes the stasis webifier reduced your speed by 90%, without touching your huge signa...
- by teji - at 2008.07.29 16:08:00
|
115. Speed Rebalanced: Feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: teji on 29/07/2008 02:40:06 Originally by: Atrei Capital Originally by: Haakelen Maybe it's because you've only been in Science and Trade Institute for 1 day? vOv but seriously, your metric of success is hard to gau...
- by teji - at 2008.07.29 02:39:00
|
116. Speed Rebalanced: Feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Quote: Speed must never reach ludicrous speed, which is defined as speeds where missiles and drones don't intercept the class of ship they were intended for. Well the speed is currently ludicrous. Cruise missiles are tearing apart interc...
- by teji - at 2008.07.29 00:40:00
|
117. Speed Rebalanced: Feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Exlegion You're nothing but an idiotic troll looking to bait. Seriously, leave this thread to players actually interested in balance. You provide nothing but hateful and spiteful posts, as well as a few others in here. T...
- by teji - at 2008.07.28 18:08:00
|
118. Speed Rebalanced: Feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Taya Tal Will CCP do anything to help the Rapier/Huginn? I would like at least something done to help them crawl out of their stupidly deep hole. They used to be very popular in PvP, but now I fear that they will go the way ...
- by teji - at 2008.07.28 17:46:00
|
119. Speed Rebalanced: Feedback thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Deva Blackfire Edited by: Deva Blackfire on 28/07/2008 17:21:22 There is major problem now. FIGHTERS They are faster than new "nano" HACs. As an anti-capital/battleship weapon they are going to evaporate all cruisers. F...
- by teji - at 2008.07.28 17:26:00
|
120. New Dev Blog: Speed Rebalanced by Nozh - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
When they said that they were looking in to assault frigates. You thought that they were going to make assault frigates actually useful. They really meant that they were going to nerf everything to be as useless as assault frigates.
- by teji - at 2008.07.28 15:58:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |