Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 41 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 19 post(s) |
Helicity Boson
Amarr The Python Cartel.
|
Posted - 2009.10.29 05:14:00 -
[151]
will... not... let...topic...die.
must...fix...rockets...
*will die if this is done*
|
Gypsio III
Dirty Filthy Perverts
|
Posted - 2009.10.29 11:37:00 -
[152]
Oh for god's sake, why is this taking so long? A simple fix to increase explosion velocity would suffice, it doesn't require the complete (overpowering) reworking that ACs are getting, just fix the bloody roflkets so that they don't need an ABing frigate target to be dual-webbed (impossible for a frigate) to deal their full damage, which is crappy anyway.
Either that, or tell us that you intend to look thoroughly at rockets, standard missiles and their launchers, and their host ships' fittings, so we could actually get SMLs on a Hawk or the new Hookbill, without requiring multiple fitting mods. Just communicate in some fashion, please.
|
Raimo
Red Federation
|
Posted - 2009.10.29 17:17:00 -
[153]
+1 For rocket boost.
They need to hit frigates for close to full damage in most situations and could use an overall damage boost. Join RvB!
|
Tagami Wasp
Caldari Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.10.29 17:47:00 -
[154]
Edited by: Tagami Wasp on 29/10/2009 17:47:09 BUMP. Cause rockets need some love.
|
Amarrian Cynicism
Amarr Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2009.10.29 18:38:00 -
[155]
Fix rockets, please, please, please, please.
|
Farganth
|
Posted - 2009.10.29 22:03:00 -
[156]
How I enter the eve forums? well... i just enter at google: eve rockets and at position 4 this thread appears :). The first one thread that I always look . The others threads are secondary :) Rockets need to be balanced asap imo. Its getting ridiculous. Or is already incredibly amazingly ridiculous?
No rocket fix, no happy rocketers :(
Fly safe!
PD: another thread that I look is the AF thread that was unsticked... lol.. they decided to stop the fixing... arrrgh.. there was some rockets hope there :(
|
Rip Minner
Gallente Freewind Ventures
|
Posted - 2009.10.30 06:44:00 -
[157]
rockets need some exp speed loving plz Is it a rock? Point a Lazer at it and profit. Is it a ship? Point a Lazer at it and profit. I dont realy see any differnces here. |
Mohenna
|
Posted - 2009.10.30 11:48:00 -
[158]
Originally by: Farganth How I enter the eve forums? well... i just enter at google: eve rockets and at position 4 this thread appears :).
Oh my. 3rd now.
|
picswapper
|
Posted - 2009.10.30 14:14:00 -
[159]
Fix them already D:
it's a damned shame a completely broken weapon system like this is allowed to persist for so long when devs are aware of it...
|
Koolaid Man
|
Posted - 2009.10.30 18:48:00 -
[160]
Small increase in DPS, in order to allow rockets to out dps turrets when fitted on bonused ships. That would be nice too. Or just un-fuq the things.
|
|
Mohenna
|
Posted - 2009.10.31 20:58:00 -
[161]
One thing bugs me; in this thread even, we seem to not be able to agree about whether the roflckets (now official term) should be buffed through
- drastically better dps (rof or actual damage is for later)
- drastically better explosion speed
- a mediocre buff of both
Option 1 wouldn't help solo much: the main problem is now explosion speed, which seems to have a '200' cut off by mistake. So a great increase in EFT dps wouldn't increase actual dps much. On the other hand, rocket ships would become great fleet ships, because when you have a target scrammed and webbed you'd omgwtfpwn it. This seems to fit well in the amarr and caldari philosophies.
Option 2 would help solo a lot, and perhaps give amarr and caldari some ships that are good at solo finally. The problem with missile agility in rockets would be more felt though, while in option one, once you scram web and orbit it at 500 the friggin thing should finally catch it. Option 1 would be the lazy programmer's choice, option 2 would require a fix of the agility problem.
Option 3 I personally don't like but it could be a compromise I guess.
Personally I prefer 2, with a fix of agility (starting vector towards target ought to be enough) as I am a lonewolf. But really I'd love any of the three to be applied, finally.
|
Tagami Wasp
Caldari Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.10.31 22:38:00 -
[162]
Originally by: Mohenna ... [list=i] drastically better dps (rof or actual damage is for later) drastically better explosion speed...
Drastic buff is more near to the mark tbh. Rockets lack both in damage and explosion velocity and they get shafted by vector problems.
|
Mohenna
|
Posted - 2009.11.01 11:09:00 -
[163]
With 'drastic dps' I mean blaster level dps, if you also give it explosion speed you'll be OPing them, what would you prefer of the 2 is the question. It seems option 3 as you want both and you know you won't be getting the first two?
|
Duchess Starbuckington
|
Posted - 2009.11.01 12:58:00 -
[164]
I can only conclude that a dev suffered severe trauma at the hands of someone using rockets, as they seem absolutely hell bent on making them suck. It's ****ing amazing that they've managed to go this long without a fix.
|
Tagami Wasp
Caldari Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.11.01 14:38:00 -
[165]
Originally by: Mohenna With 'drastic dps' I mean blaster level dps, if you also give it explosion speed you'll be OPing them, what would you prefer of the 2 is the question. It seems option 3 as you want both and you know you won't be getting the first two?
I was thinking AC level of damage actually and an explosion velocity that will let the Crow go after Taranises and be on par (if flown by a good pilot). If you go against a Taranis in a crow with roflkets, he will laugh in your face and proceed to shred you.
|
Ezien
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 07:17:00 -
[166]
This thread needs a bump to the very small top.
Out of all the great changes coming in Dominion (Projectile weapons even getting a buff/rebalancing), no devs found a little time to bump the rocket explosion velocities up a little?
/sadpanda |
Deva Blackfire
24th Imperial Crusade
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 10:11:00 -
[167]
Originally by: Tagami Wasp
I was thinking AC level of damage actually and an explosion velocity that will let the Crow go after Taranises and be on par (if flown by a good pilot). If you go against a Taranis in a crow with roflkets, he will laugh in your face and proceed to shred you.
I think taranis is wrong comparison. As taranis pilot i can happily engage any other ceptor and laugh in their face while i shred them. But yeah id love to have ship (malediction/heretic) comparable in pewpew ability to others in their class.
|
Mohenna
|
Posted - 2009.11.02 10:33:00 -
[168]
Originally by: Tagami Wasp I was thinking AC level of damage actually and an explosion velocity that will let the Crow go after Taranises and be on par (if flown by a good pilot). If you go against a Taranis in a crow with roflkets, he will laugh in your face and proceed to shred you.
Then we agree, AC damage and somewhat better explo speed is what I meant with option 3.
|
Helicity Boson
Amarr The Python Cartel.
|
Posted - 2009.11.03 07:42:00 -
[169]
Giant thread here, giant thread in the assembly hall, a CSM that brought the point forwards, and STILL nothing :(
I'd really love a dev comment on rockets about now...
|
Rage Spear
|
Posted - 2009.11.04 16:13:00 -
[170]
How can this not have even had a single dev reply?
Makes me very sad to see rockets so pointless...
WTB an interested Dev
|
|
WarlockX
Amarr Free Trade Corp
|
Posted - 2009.11.04 18:47:00 -
[171]
/Signed.
Rockets need to be looked at. ----------------------------------------------- Free Trade Corp - Flash page
|
Andreya
Red Federation
|
Posted - 2009.11.04 22:22:00 -
[172]
Originally by: Rage Spear How can this not have even had a single dev reply?
Makes me very sad to see rockets so pointless...
WTB an interested Dev
jeesus CCP, get your head outta your bums and communicate with your income source. if there is 140 posts regarding something, at least say 'we are looking into it for next patch' , or 'its on our drawing board' all you guys do by not answering us is allow negativity to fester
although we have all seen before when dev posts have caused uproar... its better than letting the lemmings make assumptions and rage over our own guesswork _________________________________________________________ Only once you've lost everything, are you free to do anything. Your signature exceeds the maximum allowed filesize of 24000 bytes -Navigator ([email protected]) |
Snivach
|
Posted - 2009.11.05 00:00:00 -
[173]
Edited by: Snivach on 05/11/2009 00:01:36 erm maybe I can help?
Its a rocket... not a stinger missile...
Elaborating: Does a rocket curve when you shoot it? Tbh it seems like its more of a tracking issue than explosion velocity.
|
Tagami Wasp
Caldari Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.11.05 00:02:00 -
[174]
V2 were rockets too, punk. Now, CCP, fix em.
|
Snivach
|
Posted - 2009.11.05 00:07:00 -
[175]
eh well it was worth a try. First post in a feedback thread \o/
Originally by: CCP Incognito I always take you guys seriously.
When I read form posts that seems intresting, I run a few operations on it first :)
I take a form posts and run it through a de-whine filter. Then it is spun to remove the BS. Next it goes in a cold bath to let the angst, rage, and emo cool off. Finally I poke it with a sharp pin to let the egos deflate. What is left is usually an empty message, but sometimes there is a nugget of gold left.
I'm sure they have noticed ;)
|
S'vart Tseirgn
Calimae Logistics Foundation Manifest Destiny.
|
Posted - 2009.11.05 05:47:00 -
[176]
CCP: Ignoring the bugs since day 1!
Just to keep this in a place where it might actually be read! *BUMP!*
/grump
|
Tagami Wasp
Caldari Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.11.05 17:26:00 -
[177]
Originally by: CCP Chronotis it has been delayed to post-dominion as we were prioritized onto other things and could not complete the full changes including rockets and the like and we did not want to deploy it without the full set of changes.
Can we have an ETA for this?
|
Helicity Boson
Amarr The Python Cartel.
|
Posted - 2009.11.06 14:04:00 -
[178]
not giving up!
bump!
|
Ezien
|
Posted - 2009.11.07 22:15:00 -
[179]
Originally by: Tagami Wasp
Originally by: CCP Chronotis it has been delayed to post-dominion as we were prioritized onto other things and could not complete the full changes including rockets and the like and we did not want to deploy it without the full set of changes.
Can we have an ETA for this?
It's good that the devs know about it.
However, obviously they think other parts of the game take priority over rocket balances.
/bump to convince them otherwise |
Duchess Starbuckington
|
Posted - 2009.11.07 22:29:00 -
[180]
Edited by: Duchess Starbuckington on 07/11/2009 22:29:16
Originally by: Ezien
However, obviously they think everything takes priority over rocket balances.
/bump to convince them otherwise
fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 41 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |