|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Nyota Sol
|
Posted - 2009.03.17 10:10:00 -
[1]
What are the different types of anomalies in W-space and how difficult are they?
Here's what i know so far. Id like confirmation on how the 4 types of anomalies per category may break down into specific tiers (i.e. do Core Strongholds tie specifically to tier 5?).
Perimeter (tiers 1 & 2?) - checkpoint - hangar - camp - ambush point
Frontier (tiers 3 & 4?) - command - barracks - outpost - fortification
Core (tiers 5 & 6?) - garrison - stronghold - bastion - citadel
|
Nyota Sol
|
Posted - 2009.03.17 12:07:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Space Wanderer
Originally by: Nyota Sol What are the different types of anomalies in W-space and how difficult are they?
[snip]
Perimeter (tiers 1 & 2?) - checkpoint - hangar - camp - ambush point
Frontier (tiers 3 & 4?) - command - barracks - outpost - fortification
Core (tiers 5 & 6?) - garrison - stronghold - bastion - citadel
Good information. Might need more verification though. For instance I am pretty sure it does not work for sites. I found core gravitational sites in upper tiers (normal unknowns, no dangeour nor deadly).
I'd like to see it verified. I'm focusing on just anomalies because they can be scanned down instantly.
There are 4 types of perimeter anomalies, but they seem to come in pairs. Camp & Ambush Points vs Check Point & Hangars. I'm assuming one pairing is easier and thus Tier 1 vs Tier 2.
I cant test very well because i have a simple cruiser and get destroyed almost instantly.
|
Nyota Sol
|
Posted - 2009.03.17 23:07:00 -
[3]
FaQuestion: What are the different types of bonuses that you get when in a wormhole system?
|
Nyota Sol
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 08:36:00 -
[4]
you'd think SOMEBODY would have done that by now and it's not the kind of information that you'd want to keep private.
Originally by: Salvo Brunel Edited by: Salvo Brunel on 17/03/2009 17:18:03 Can sites be found outside of the solar system boundary? In other words, if my 32au probe takes in all stargates, celestials etc is there any chance that I'm missing a site? My experience is that once I've scanned the part of the solar system with celestials in, I never find sites by moving my probes elsewhere. Could anyone confirm this, please?
I think almost all of them will be within 6au of planets, but i am not 100% sure about that.
|
Nyota Sol
|
Posted - 2009.03.18 14:08:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Lady Spank
Originally by: Space Wanderer
Originally by: Nyota Sol FaQuestion: What are the different types of bonuses that you get when in a wormhole system?
Wish I knew... Probably somebody somewhere compiled a list, but I don't where.
| Pulsar | C 1 | C 2 | C 3 | C 4 | C 5 | C 6 |
Nice job!!
Just to confirm, the 6 Categories indicate tiers of w-space, right?
|
Nyota Sol
|
Posted - 2009.03.19 12:46:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Lady Spank
Originally by: Sam'I'am How do you tell which, if any, of these are in the system? Visually I ahve seen different ones but how to tell the strength and name?
Compare the name of the wormhole with the following map, then check it on the chart posted.
http://011000110110111101100011011010110110110001100101.com/eve/whtcmap.png
Link is messed up. Folks can copy/paste the text if they want.
Entity's map is incomplete it seems, and i was wondering if anybody knows if this will be updated with more WH names? And have we verified "repeat" classification of these WH names?
|
Nyota Sol
|
Posted - 2009.03.20 14:13:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Sam'I'am err yeah but that just tells what class it is?....not what effects it gives.....oh carp,how does it say whether there is a Pulsar or Black hole in system?
so I'm in a N110....thats a green class 7 according to that map....but if I see some weird graphics in space: what are they (Pulsars or?)
WH's will have classes not permanent ties to systems with specific effects.
WHs and w-systems are independent.
|
Nyota Sol
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 11:51:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Boydsan DeZinj I have had a few issues where I get a 100% signal and a yellow or green dot. But I can not warp to it. Any idea what is wrong? Bug? Likewise, I have also seen a open red circle at 100% and two red dots at 100% - also unwarpable. I have been thinking... could it be my low skills?
My current skills are
Astrometrics 3 Astrometrics Triangulation 3 Astrometrics Pinpointing 0 (since i need astrometrics to 4 to get it) Astrometric Acquisition 2
(I will be getting astrometrics to 4 soon... then go to 3 for both pinpointing and Acquisition)
I have also tried, all sorts of shapes to try to get a solid lock. Most of the time, I can get one without sweating But ever since this last patch. I get a few signals... I just can not lock down.. at all....
Sorry I posted this on the wrong thread... sorry...
One thing I like ot add... is....
Sometimes as I can it down... I will a stronger strength but it becomes a bubble or an open red circle. Then I have to repeat the process... but at a lower scan size.
In most cases, you can just fiddle with 4-5 probes and rescan. Sometimes you need to spread them out slightly.
I've had a handful of signatures that i could not scan above 70% no matter what i tried. I was using core probes and do not have max skills. However there are reports of highly skilled pilots having similar problems.
|
Nyota Sol
|
Posted - 2009.03.24 13:23:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Nyota Sol What are the different types of anomalies in W-space and how difficult are they?
Here's what i know so far. Id like confirmation on how the 4 types of anomalies per category may break down into specific tiers (i.e. do Core Strongholds tie specifically to tier 5?).
Perimeter (tiers 1 & 2?) - checkpoint - hangar - camp - ambush point
Frontier (tiers 3 & 4?) - command - barracks - outpost - fortification
Core (tiers 5 & 6?) - garrison - stronghold - bastion - citadel
Can anybody verify these categories?
Can anybody differentiate the harder/easier tiers per "type" (i.e. which Core anomalies are Tier 6 vs Tier 7)?
Can anybody correlate these to the categories of WH description (i.e. unknown, dangerous unknown, etc)?
|
Nyota Sol
|
Posted - 2009.03.27 11:56:00 -
[10]
http://www.starvingpoet.net/?page=SpaceEffects
That site is really awesome.
Tracks the wormhole effects (more comprehensively than the above list) and adds screenshots of the different major phenomena (black hole, pulsar, etc).
___________________________________________
Lost in Space - Apocrypha Exploration Resources |
|
Nyota Sol
|
Posted - 2009.03.27 15:14:00 -
[11]
Class 1 (unknown): Perimeter Anomaly - camp - ambush point
Class 2 (unknown): Perimeter Anomaly - checkpoint - hangar
Class 3 (dangerous unknown): Frontier Anomaly - outpost - fortification
Class 4 (dangerous unknown): Frontier Anomaly - command - barracks
Class 5 (deadly unknown): Core Anomaly - garrison - stronghold
Class 6 (deadly unknown): Core Anomaly - bastion - citadel ___________________________________________
Lost in Space - Apocrypha Exploration Resources |
Nyota Sol
|
Posted - 2009.03.28 16:01:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Kva Plexcha Some questions ...
I have never used the tetrahedron formation when scanning, I have only used the planar cross ( I am assuming that this is when you have all 4 probes on the same plane and position them at 90 degree intervals around the dot.) To date I have been able to scan down any signature. Since this is effective, should I even bother to try the pyramid approach?
The tetrahedron is not required. I believe it's simply the most efficient setup because it uses 4 probes with wider angles.
If i understand the math behind the scan formulas, you get stronger results with 180 degree angles than you get from 90 degree angles. If you had 8 probes around a target, i think Eve would pick the 4 with the best angles and probably get something close to a tetrahedron if given enough probe choices.
But the mathematics of ideal positioning arent the same as the comfortable methods of finding or sorting signals.
Perhaps it could be argued that a diamond shape is ideal for seeking targets within a select area when dealing with deviation.
Originally by: Kva Plexcha
Is it possible to resize all of the selected (active) probes at the same time? I have been manually resizing each one as I narrow down on the signature.
In the scanner, shift-select all the probes and right click to change the range. You can also move them together by holding down shift while manipulating one.
___________________________________________
Lost in Space - Apocrypha Exploration Resources |
Nyota Sol
|
Posted - 2009.04.01 02:51:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Space Wanderer
Originally by: Nyota Sol If i understand the math behind the scan formulas, you get stronger results with 180 degree angles than you get from 90 degree angles.
Not exactly. 90 degrees is exactly the same as as 180. And the "cross" formation theoretically is as effective as the tetrahedron.
You sure about that?
When i tested with 2 probes, I got smaller red circle results when i was closer to 180 than at 90 or 45. When aligned exactly at 180 the circle would be nearly impossible to see. Perhaps that's indicating something besides raw signal strength, but it certainly is related. ___________________________________________
Lost in Space - Apocrypha Exploration Resources |
|
|
|