Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Neo Omni
Gallente
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 18:12:00 -
[1]
Do they just keep generating new ships in the event of a hi-sec attack or can you take them out given enough firepower on your side?
Can you set up a blockade around any entity in hi-sec? A jump gate, a station?
|
Sheriff Jones
Amarr Clinical Experiment
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 18:15:00 -
[2]
You could, but you'd get banned.
CONCORDs most effective weapon is the "we are developers do not mess with us" gun, which they use with an immensive glee.
My opinions represent the opinions of my corporation completely. I'm the CEO damnit. |
Agent Known
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 18:15:00 -
[3]
You cannot tank Concord. You cannot kill Concord. Concord will kill ANY fleet that triggers it no matter what.
Enjoy.
|
Lazarann
Caldari Ideal Machine
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 18:15:00 -
[4]
If they don't kill you fast enough, yes, more ships spawn until they've got enough to melt your brains.
|
Malthros Zenobia
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 18:19:00 -
[5]
If you bring ships to take down a CONCORD spawn, you'll have to alhpa kill that spawn, at which point everyone involved gets a fresh concord spawn of their own to curb stomp them, resulting in some kickass salvaging opportunities and dozens if not hundreds of CONCORD ships at the spot.
Originally by: kieron The Carrier was never intended to be a solo OMGWTF mission-farming PWNmobile.
|
CAREBEAR SPY
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 18:20:00 -
[6]
the only ship i know that might be able to tank concord is teh polaris. u kin try 2 buy 1 since there not too expensive.
|
Sniper Wolf18
Gallente A Pretty Pony Princess General Tso's Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 18:37:00 -
[7]
Concord is invincible, they cannot be vinced
Though, in hindsight; I really should put in some sort of spacer between my post and signature |
FluterEx
Caldari 22nd Black Rise Defensive Unit
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 18:49:00 -
[8]
This Should answer you question.
|
5pinDizzy
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 18:50:00 -
[9]
If you can tank bans handed out from devs and gm's then yes you can tank concord.
Causing a huge disruption for the hell of it can also gets you banned my friends tell me.
Although if you're a macro miner, knock yourself out.
if you disagree with me then you should probably post a response and stop reading my signature. |
Doctor Penguin
Amarr Shadow Command Tenth Legion
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 18:51:00 -
[10]
Do CONCORD leave wrecks if you kill them? ________________________________________________
http://eve.drome.nl/CaodCleaner/ Help make CAOD readable. |
|
Crimson Violet
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 19:12:00 -
[11]
Rule 1: Do not talk about CONCORD.
|
Blane Xero
Amarr The Firestorm Cartel
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 19:14:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Crimson Violet Rule 1: Do not talk about CONCORD.
Rule 2: Do NOT Talk about Concord.
______________________________________________ Haruhiist since December 2008
|
Ouset radealt
Gallente University of Caille
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 19:19:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Blane Xero
Originally by: Crimson Violet Rule 1: Do not talk about CONCORD.
Rule 2: Do NOT Talk about Concord.
Rule 3: Do not think about CONCORD.
|
Haradgrim
Tyrell Corp INTERDICTION
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 19:23:00 -
[14]
Concord reminds me of the guards in UO, appear out of no where and hack you to bits. If somehow you survive; you get banned. --
Originally by: CCP Oveur Just donæt forget the reach-around.
|
5pinDizzy
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 19:26:00 -
[15]
Originally by: CAREBEAR SPY the only ship i know that might be able to tank concord is teh polaris. u kin try 2 buy 1 since there not too expensive.
I would pay big bucks to see what happened to a Polaris that got flagged.
if you disagree with me then you should probably post a response and stop reading my signature. |
John Grimm
Amarr Rendili StarDrive Yards
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 19:33:00 -
[16]
I think i have found a weakness and I've been mining like mad looking for some kryptonite.
As soon as I'm able I'll star building some kryptonite based lasorz.
Even superman couldn't stand up to kryptonite, and every1 knows Supermen pwns CONNCORD.
|
Lord Flatulence
Caldari Spack Lords
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 19:38:00 -
[17]
Originally by: 5pinDizzy
Originally by: CAREBEAR SPY the only ship i know that might be able to tank concord is teh polaris. u kin try 2 buy 1 since there not too expensive.
I would pay big bucks to see what happened to a Polaris that got flagged.
I'm sure i remember reading that Concord deals damage that ignores the resistances of the crim's ship. If this is true then i'd say even the mighty Polaris would be toast...
|
Ghost Hunter
Naqam
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 19:46:00 -
[18]
In the distant past, CONCORD was killable and tankable because of how weak it was.
This was used by a certain pirate corp's advantage which is called, among many other things, the Yulai Incident.
It is what jump started CONCORD into the omnipotent kill machine it is today.
Tl;dr you could before, but you can't anymore. It's a true bannable offence otherwise. ______
The Seven Events of the Apocalypse The fourth event is described by Macaper as ôthe appetite of nothing expands over the worldö; |
Hariya
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 20:15:00 -
[19]
In the more recent past, one high sec POS took a match with Concord. After a while the CCP stepped in and stopped the fight, because the amount of wrecks and pewpew was about to crash the server node...
|
Joe Skellington
Minmatar Transorbital Blood Alliance of Dragons
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 21:11:00 -
[20]
Edited by: Joe Skellington on 21/03/2009 21:11:32 Edited by: Joe Skellington on 21/03/2009 21:11:16
Originally by: Ghost Hunter
Tl;dr you could before, but you can't anymore. It's a true bannable offence otherwise.
It's OFFENSE. K Thx. I normally don't care when I see misspellings, but I see this all the time and it's annoying. Almost as bad as this:
http://www.wikihow.com/Use-There,-Their-and-They%27re
|
|
Pure SIlver
Caldari ArmoredCore Armed Forces
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 21:15:00 -
[21]
Originally by: Joe Skellington Edited by: Joe Skellington on 21/03/2009 21:11:32 Edited by: Joe Skellington on 21/03/2009 21:11:16
Originally by: Ghost Hunter
Tl;dr you could before, but you can't anymore. It's a true bannable offence otherwise.
It's OFFENSE. K Thx. I normally don't care when I see misspellings, but I see this all the time and it's annoying. Almost as bad as this:
http://www.wikihow.com/Use-There,-Their-and-They%27re
i hate you
|
Armoured C
Gallente Federation of Freedom Fighters Aggression.
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 21:32:00 -
[22]
in Soviet space, D.E.D kills concord
CEO of Armoured InvestmentsÖ
Join the ingame mailing list Armoured Investments for future investment opportuniti |
PantrashMoFo
Caldari Bruggen Raiders
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 21:57:00 -
[23]
Edited by: PantrashMoFo on 21/03/2009 21:57:34
Originally by: Joe Skellington Edited by: Joe Skellington on 21/03/2009 21:11:32 Edited by: Joe Skellington on 21/03/2009 21:11:16
Originally by: Ghost Hunter
Tl;dr you could before, but you can't anymore. It's a true bannable offence otherwise.
It's OFFENSE. K Thx. I normally don't care when I see misspellings, but I see this all the time and it's annoying. Almost as bad as this:
http://www.wikihow.com/Use-There,-Their-and-They%27re
Offence is used correctly by Ghost Hunter. It is the British spelling of the word. We invented the language and therefore win. K Thx.
|
Khrae Dektra
Minmatar Sweet Oblivion
|
Posted - 2009.03.21 21:58:00 -
[24]
Edited by: Khrae Dektra on 21/03/2009 21:59:45
Originally by: Joe Skellington
It's OFFENSE. K Thx. I normally don't care when I see misspellings, but I see this all the time and it's annoying. Almost as bad as this:
http://www.wikihow.com/Use-There,-Their-and-They%27re
Offence is the correct English spelling, offense is the correct US spelling, so get over it tbh. *edit ^what he said |
Durzel
The Xenodus Initiative.
|
Posted - 2009.03.22 00:31:00 -
[25]
You could I'm sure theoretically alpha a CONCORD frigate in a sniper Apoc or equivalent. As soon as they lock you though (which would be near instantaneous) you would be jammed & scrammed thus negating any chance of shooting, repping or doing anything else besides creating a big explosion for everyone else to enjoy.
|
Waco West
|
Posted - 2009.03.22 01:26:00 -
[26]
Concord's only weakness is direct exposure to a black hole, and even then it's only 50-50.
|
Tellenta
Gallente Invicta. Advocated Destruction
|
Posted - 2009.03.22 01:38:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Neo Omni Do they just keep generating new ships in the event of a hi-sec attack or can you take them out given enough firepower on your side?
Can you set up a blockade around any entity in hi-sec? A jump gate, a station?
You were able to do so once upon a time, I think there is an eve vid of that in arg I forget what old Jita was Yulia thats it. They made a mass smartbombing remote rep gang and owned concord for a while.. Concord has since gotten a boost, at most you get two volleys before you are ecm'd neuted and webed to halarity.
|
Tellenta
Gallente Invicta. Advocated Destruction
|
Posted - 2009.03.22 02:02:00 -
[28]
Edited by: Tellenta on 22/03/2009 02:02:59
Originally by: Joe Skellington Edited by: Joe Skellington on 21/03/2009 21:11:32 Edited by: Joe Skellington on 21/03/2009 21:11:16
Originally by: Ghost Hunter
Tl;dr you could before, but you can't anymore. It's a true bannable offence otherwise.
It's OFFENSE. K Thx. I normally don't care when I see misspellings, but I see this all the time and it's annoying. Almost as bad as this:
http://www.wikihow.com/Use-There,-Their-and-They%27re
Their They're now its ok.
|
Lucas Tigh
East Khanid Trading Khanid Trade Syndicate
|
Posted - 2009.03.22 02:03:00 -
[29]
Originally by: PantrashMoFo Offence is used correctly by Ghost Hunter. It is the British spelling of the word. We invented the language and therefore win. K Thx.
No. No, you did not invent the language. Languages evolve. -------------------------------------
CCP, make me a winner. |
DocBrown
|
Posted - 2009.03.22 02:25:00 -
[30]
CONCORD can order a BigMac at Burger King... AND will get it.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |