Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 [35]:: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Vladic Ka
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.04.01 19:39:00 -
[1021]
Cmon guys you need to threadnaught this more. The Day of Darkness II thread has nearly caught up.
|
Severice
Crushed Ambitions
|
Posted - 2009.04.02 16:00:00 -
[1022]
From what i understand bob petitioned the name immediately, and CCP waited 2 months to get around to responding to it. Maybe the real issue here isn't the name change, it's the fact that CCP couldn't hand down a simple decision in less than 2 months. Bob didn't have the option of remaking kenzoku after 1 week, much less 2 months. They were in a race for sov and every moment mattered. Remaking bob later, might have been an option, but it was not an option after a week.
So the question is, what does CCP owe Kenzoku for a 2 month 'lol' on the name change issue? it took the players 3 minutes to find out, find a precedent, and ***** about it endlessly on the forums.
|
Nicholas Barker
Black Nova Corp KenZoku
|
Posted - 2009.04.02 17:06:00 -
[1023]
Originally by: Vladic Ka Cmon guys you need to threadnaught this more. The Day of Darkness II thread has nearly caught up.
it has, both on page 34. ------
|
Dane Hur
Caldari Research X
|
Posted - 2009.04.03 00:15:00 -
[1024]
So Ken have the devs on MSN, while goons have the most devs in their alliance and Ken gets to be the devs pets? Thats just unfair.
|
Lucas Tigh
East Khanid Trading Khanid Trade Syndicate
|
Posted - 2009.04.03 04:30:00 -
[1025]
Originally by: Vladic Ka Cmon guys you need to threadnaught this more. The Day of Darkness II thread has nearly caught up.
I'll contribute with some rousing discussion:
! -------------------------------------
CCP, make me a winner. |
Ryoji Tanakama
Caldari Firestar Drive Yards
|
Posted - 2009.04.03 12:24:00 -
[1026]
Despite the posturing from Goons and Not-BoB, it is CCP that have failed to keep their facts straight, act consistently and honour precedent throughout this entire affair.
If high-level alliance support/policy issues are going to be dictated by forum wars, with CCP flailing around frantically trying to make themselves appear to be in charge of their own game and failing all counts - why not just give big alliance executors clients with GM tools enabled and let them go at each other directly - cutting out the impotent middle man.
|
Vladic Ka
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.04.03 14:46:00 -
[1027]
Originally by: Ryoji Tanakama Despite the posturing from Goons and Not-BoB, it is CCP that have failed to keep their facts straight, act consistently and honour precedent throughout this entire affair.
If high-level alliance support/policy issues are going to be dictated by forum wars, with CCP flailing around frantically trying to make themselves appear to be in charge of their own game and failing all counts - why not just give big alliance executors clients with GM tools enabled and let them go at each other directly - cutting out the impotent middle man.
CCP had no precedent for to change an alliance name that had been created months prior. If BoB had waited perhaps they could have recreated the alliance after the BoB corp was renamed. But they didn't. So they are stuck with a crappy alliance name, they are bleeding members and they are no longer the powerhouse they once were.
|
rosey palmer
GoonwSarm
|
Posted - 2009.04.03 23:29:00 -
[1028]
Originally by: Vladic Ka
Originally by: Ryoji Tanakama Despite the posturing from Goons and Not-BoB, it is CCP that have failed to keep their facts straight, act consistently and honour precedent throughout this entire affair.
If high-level alliance support/policy issues are going to be dictated by forum wars, with CCP flailing around frantically trying to make themselves appear to be in charge of their own game and failing all counts - why not just give big alliance executors clients with GM tools enabled and let them go at each other directly - cutting out the impotent middle man.
CCP had no precedent for to change an alliance name that had been created months prior. If BoB had waited perhaps they could have recreated the alliance after the BoB corp was renamed. But they didn't. So they are stuck with a crappy alliance name, they are bleeding members and they are no longer the powerhouse they once were.
That's right brosef, except we control the BOB name with a corp we created to grief BOB, so they have no way to get that name back evah!!!!!!!
Bob lacks a name, CCP lacks a backbone
BOOOOSHHHH.
|
nuance rasam
|
Posted - 2009.04.03 23:34:00 -
[1029]
Edited by: nuance rasam on 03/04/2009 23:35:04
Originally by: Vladic Ka If BoB had waited perhaps they could have recreated the alliance after the BoB corp was renamed. But they didn't.
Except that it was never renamed back by CCP. Please try again. Wait for something that will never happen sounds like a great plan.
Originally by: Vladic Ka they are bleeding members and they are no longer the powerhouse they once were.
Didn't they just kick your ass and take another system from you?
I'm sure you will post on KUGU again how awsome you are posting in this tread.
|
Vladic Ka
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.04.03 23:50:00 -
[1030]
Kenny kicked no ones ass. -a- on the other hand did a fine job of getting some momentum going but they are also having some internal troubles ATM. It's almost as if black is white they way some alliances are today in comparison to a year ago.
|
|
slothe
Reikoku Reloaded KenZoku
|
Posted - 2009.04.04 02:39:00 -
[1031]
Originally by: rosey palmer
Originally by: Vladic Ka
Originally by: Ryoji Tanakama Despite the posturing from Goons and Not-BoB, it is CCP that have failed to keep their facts straight, act consistently and honour precedent throughout this entire affair.
If high-level alliance support/policy issues are going to be dictated by forum wars, with CCP flailing around frantically trying to make themselves appear to be in charge of their own game and failing all counts - why not just give big alliance executors clients with GM tools enabled and let them go at each other directly - cutting out the impotent middle man.
CCP had no precedent for to change an alliance name that had been created months prior. If BoB had waited perhaps they could have recreated the alliance after the BoB corp was renamed. But they didn't. So they are stuck with a crappy alliance name, they are bleeding members and they are no longer the powerhouse they once were.
That's right brosef, except we control the BOB name with a corp we created to grief BOB, so they have no way to get that name back evah!!!!!!!
Bob lacks a name, CCP lacks a backbone
BOOOOSHHHH.
I am glad that it has now been openly admitted in writing that this name was stolen for the purposes of griefing other players. The correct action should now be taken by CCP to rectify this matter and penalise the greifing parties. Your signature is too large. Please resize it to a maximum of 400 x 120 with the file size not exceeding 24000 bytes.Applebabe |
Suzanne Maretto
|
Posted - 2009.04.04 03:06:00 -
[1032]
Originally by: slothe Edited by: slothe on 31/03/2009 23:24:04 As you are not allowed to pose as CCP why should people be allowed to pose as Band of Brothers???
It's funny that you think Band of Brothers should be treated the same as CCP.
|
Firenze Nightingale
|
Posted - 2009.04.04 03:15:00 -
[1033]
Originally by: slothe
Originally by: rosey palmer
Originally by: Vladic Ka
Originally by: Ryoji Tanakama Despite the posturing from Goons and Not-BoB, it is CCP that have failed to keep their facts straight, act consistently and honour precedent throughout this entire affair.
If high-level alliance support/policy issues are going to be dictated by forum wars, with CCP flailing around frantically trying to make themselves appear to be in charge of their own game and failing all counts - why not just give big alliance executors clients with GM tools enabled and let them go at each other directly - cutting out the impotent middle man.
CCP had no precedent for to change an alliance name that had been created months prior. If BoB had waited perhaps they could have recreated the alliance after the BoB corp was renamed. But they didn't. So they are stuck with a crappy alliance name, they are bleeding members and they are no longer the powerhouse they once were.
That's right brosef, except we control the BOB name with a corp we created to grief BOB, so they have no way to get that name back evah!!!!!!!
Bob lacks a name, CCP lacks a backbone
BOOOOSHHHH.
I am glad that it has now been openly admitted in writing that this name was stolen for the purposes of griefing other players. The correct action should now be taken by CCP to rectify this matter and penalise the greifing parties.
Oh, puh-leeze. Yes, we get that someone griefed your band of griefers. Yes, we get that you're still moaning about it months after the fact. Yes, we get that you think CCP should waive its magic wand and give you back the name your leaders continue to insist was never all that important anyway.
But my God, you're a crashing bore, slothe.
|
Darathor Omegie
|
Posted - 2009.04.04 08:05:00 -
[1034]
That's right brosef, except we control the BOB name with a corp we created to grief BOB, so they have no way to get that name back evah!!!!!!!
Bob lacks a name, CCP lacks a backbone
BOOOOSHHHH.
I am glad that it has now been openly admitted in writing that this name was stolen for the purposes of griefing other players. The correct action should now be taken by CCP to rectify this matter and penalise the greifing parties.
If a player or group of players intentionally violate the ToS(Terms of service) the only appropriate response would either be a perm ban or a temp ban.
|
Vladic Ka
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2009.04.04 09:07:00 -
[1035]
Originally by: rosey palmer
That's right brosef, except we control the BOB name with a corp we created to grief BOB, so they have no way to get that name back evah!!!!!!!
Bob lacks a name, CCP lacks a backbone
BOOOOSHHHH.
Thank you rosey palmer of GoonwSarm
|
Yo Adriaaan
|
Posted - 2009.04.04 13:42:00 -
[1036]
Edited by: Yo Adriaaan on 04/04/2009 13:42:49
Originally by: Darathor Omegie
That's right brosef, except we control the BOB name with a corp we created to grief BOB, so they have no way to get that name back evah!!!!!!!
Bob lacks a name, CCP lacks a backbone
BOOOOSHHHH.
I am glad that it has now been openly admitted in writing that this name was stolen for the purposes of griefing other players. The correct action should now be taken by CCP to rectify this matter and penalise the greifing parties.
If a player or group of players intentionally violate the ToS(Terms of service) the only appropriate response would either be a perm ban or a temp ban.
And if a player or group of players intentionally, but clumsily, pretends to be a member of another alliance ... like "rosey palmer" of "GoonwSarm," up there ... the only appropriate response would be to mock them for their silliness.
|
Towelieban
Minmatar D00M.
|
Posted - 2009.04.04 14:40:00 -
[1037]
Vladic ka you are really trying to hard
|
Sallie Looker
|
Posted - 2009.04.04 17:18:00 -
[1038]
If only they'd had their proper name back, BoB wouldn't have had their asses handed to them today in 9cg.
Cheer up, boys ... there's always tomorrow.
Of course, tomorrow may not be better than today, but heck, it couldn't be much worse, could it?
|
Darathor Omegie
|
Posted - 2009.04.05 02:57:00 -
[1039]
Originally by: Yo Adriaaan Edited by: Yo Adriaaan on 04/04/2009 13:42:49
Originally by: Darathor Omegie
That's right brosef, except we control the BOB name with a corp we created to grief BOB, so they have no way to get that name back evah!!!!!!!
Bob lacks a name, CCP lacks a backbone
BOOOOSHHHH.
I am glad that it has now been openly admitted in writing that this name was stolen for the purposes of griefing other players. The correct action should now be taken by CCP to rectify this matter and penalise the greifing parties.
If a player or group of players intentionally violate the ToS(Terms of service) the only appropriate response would either be a perm ban or a temp ban.
And if a player or group of players intentionally, but clumsily, pretends to be a member of another alliance ... like "rosey palmer" of "GoonwSarm," up there ... the only appropriate response would be to mock them for their silliness.
lmao good catch, didn't notice that(oops).. lol
But there really needs to be an impersination type rule thingy...
|
rosey palmer
GoonwSarm
|
Posted - 2009.04.05 16:55:00 -
[1040]
Edited by: rosey palmer on 05/04/2009 16:58:56
Originally by: Yo Adriaaan
like "rosey palmer" of "GoonSwarm"
Kaaablammooooo.
I am silly, but effective
This is what the game has been reduced to.
|
|
Dirk Magnum
Royal Hiigaran Navy SCUM.
|
Posted - 2009.04.06 06:46:00 -
[1041]
Quote: GoonwSarm
But seriously as soon as Kenny gets reduced back to zilcho sovereignty they should just disband their current fail name alliance and go with Band of Brothers Reloaded or whatever. Nothing to lose except a tiny fraction of their overall wallet strength for the new alliance registration. This has probably been said already, this being a threadnaught and all.
|
Xanderss
|
Posted - 2009.05.05 07:09:00 -
[1042]
I have read much on this topic and how it happened betrayal could be very bad however I donĘt agree with one person being able to break 1000+-man alliance with a few clicks. From a game standard it makes no sense, so because one guy stood up and commended it was torn down,
Lets put some realism in to what happened if the president of united states stood up and said ok screw all of our allies and we are going communist do you think he would last very long? Or do you think he would be stopped? I think he would be dead pretty fast or in prison. I think thatĘs what would have happened in the dismantling of a nation sized corp regardless of the person title or privlages.
The game mechanics in this situation need to be corrected. They are very far fetched and anything but realistically what would happen if one man tried to break the ties of an alliance the size of nation.
Not a member of ether of the alliances but I call BS when I see it and this is like a 10 ton pile of crap. Just because the game mechanics allow it due to a bug or ingorance of the devs it shouldnĘt have been allowed to stick from day 1.
The fact such nonsense was allowed speaks volumes too ccp ignorance. One person couldnĘt disband a country in mins the fact poor game mechanics allowed such a clown show to occur should have been over turned instantly. But I guess ccp didnĘt want to admit its mistake.
|
Corsys
|
Posted - 2009.05.07 04:30:00 -
[1043]
I think some rich kid just paid bobs corp member real money to screw bob.. "hey, here's 10,000 real dollars.. screw bob".. and so it was.. dont know either of your alliances, but this whole thing happened way to easily.. it wouldn't happen like that in any sort of real life corporation. there is no 1 man who can destroy it all so simply.
Where's the honor in this? lol honor.. clearly that word has lost it's meaning on this generation.. A word you'd pray for if a man had a gun to your head.. but one so many of you forget when it has no consequence.
In real life if a corp owner did this.. he'd go to jail or possibly be killed by a ****ed off employee.. where is the responsibility? Where was concord? the ever useless beacon of hope? lol.. you want a story? make concord investigate why this guy screwed bob and find the real money trail..
If the truth ever comes out.. I bet it'll say one man was simply bought with real money..
Hell, I'll kill a man in a fair fight... Or if I think he's gonna start a fair fight. Or if he bothers me. Or if there's a woman. Or if I'm gettin' paid. Mostly only when I'm gettin' paid.
But I at least want em to know it's comin.
CCCP really needed to do something about this.. I find it disgusting on a personal level..
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 [35]:: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |