|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Whitehound
|
Posted - 2009.04.14 12:09:00 -
[1]
A previous thread on thrusters.
You are not alone.
An alternative idea of mine is to have a Navigation Computer, which improves speed and agility, and can be configured with a script to maximize either speed or agility. This will likely find the most love. -- If there is anything in your life you fear of losing, then keep your mouth shut once in a while. |
Whitehound
|
Posted - 2009.04.14 19:29:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Whitehound on 14/04/2009 19:30:31
Originally by: James Malice We dont care what you would rather have.
Hilarious ...
And who is going to care about what you think? Did such a thought ever occur to you?
Go back under your bridge!!
-- If there is anything in your life you fear of losing, then keep your mouth shut once in a while. |
Whitehound
|
Posted - 2009.04.14 19:46:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Mayobe The reason agility modules fit in lowslots is exactly so that this cannot be done.
That is not true. You have tracking enhancers for the low-slots as well as tracking computers for the mid-slot, for example.
Nothing forbids to have such a module.
The only reason why it does not exists yet is because most movements take place along the main axis of a ship - forward. Just because some people do not have a use for an increased agility does not mean that others do not have.
Have some respect for the ideas of others and come with good reason if you think it is wrong. Do not talk like a child and just dump your opinion into a thread. This is not the kids corner of a WoW forum. -- If there is anything in your life you fear of losing, then keep your mouth shut once in a while. |
Whitehound
|
Posted - 2009.04.14 19:55:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Whitehound on 14/04/2009 19:58:25
Originally by: Marcus Gideon We've already established that there are certain ways things are done in EVE. And yet there are players who want the entire gaming community, and in fact the programmers themselves, to bend to a select few.
That is a stupid comment. Who has said to bend the developers? That is all just in your head, Marcus. It is a childish image of how you see others and nothing more. Keep this out of the forum, please.
Quote: Some players fail to realize that there are trade-offs in the game, and you have to deal with that. If you want to carry as much as possible, then you're going to be slow and bulky. If you want to be light and nimble, then you can't carry as much.
And with this opinion one can counter all ideas ever made and being made in this forum ... or maybe not. -- If there is anything in your life you fear of losing, then keep your mouth shut once in a while. |
Whitehound
|
Posted - 2009.04.14 19:57:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Marcus Gideon The reason agility and cargo modules take up the same sockets... is because CCP wants to ensure that players have to prioritize whether they want more space, or quicker ships.
Actually, you fail. Speed is not the same as agility. And one can install cargo expanders in the low-slot as well as an afterburner in the mid-slot. It works out beautifully. -- If there is anything in your life you fear of losing, then keep your mouth shut once in a while. |
Whitehound
|
Posted - 2009.04.14 20:26:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Marcus Gideon Who said anything about speed.
You did. Cargo expanders reduce a ship's speed not a ship's agility. That is where you go wrong. The rest of your comment is for those who care about it. -- If there is anything in your life you fear of losing, then keep your mouth shut once in a while. |
Whitehound
|
Posted - 2009.04.14 21:00:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Marcus Gideon Stop being a douchbag?
I totally forgot, you only read the first sentence of replies. Hope that one works for ya.
Cargo Expanders, and Inertia Stabilizers, both fill Low Slots. THAT'S what I was referring to, in the fact that you have to accept trade-offs in what you fit to your ship.
*goes back to planning his massive Hulk mining op, and looks for a Locator Agent*
Is this another insult? Are they working for you?!?
The rest of your comment still does not give sense and fails at being an excuse. -- If there is anything in your life you fear of losing, then keep your mouth shut once in a while. |
Whitehound
|
Posted - 2009.04.14 21:57:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Whitehound on 14/04/2009 21:58:41
Originally by: Marcus Gideon The Game Developers Have Established Certain Mechanisms In The Game To Ensure Proper Balance.
No, they have not. There are no "certain mechanisms" in the game to do this. It is what you don't understand. The developers add game element after game element, then they test their ideas, and only when things get out of balance do they add more (or remove something) to create a balance. The developers will often know ahead of testing what will get the game out of balance and how to keep it in balance, but it is not a mechanism in the game. It is part of the developers' job. Or, for you, it is part of the mechanism called "Game Developer".
Are you making attempts at BS-ing people because you just don't get the OPs idea? -- If there is anything in your life you fear of losing, then keep your mouth shut once in a while. |
Whitehound
|
Posted - 2009.04.16 08:49:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Whitehound on 16/04/2009 08:50:39 Idea: I wish for an improved version of Marcus Gideon. Please add more wisdom and remove the trolling. This shall make a nicely balanced and open-minded person.
Originally by: Marcus Gideon Of course you can argue either way. But honestly, this particular idea... of a Mid slot agility booster, will only be used by Haulers of every shape and size.
You are so arrogant! Who else do you think is going to use them?
Or are you saying battle ships and battle cruisers have a major use for mining laser upgrades and therefore we have them?
Do you want to get rid of mining laser upgrades because battle ships have no use for them?
Do you want to remove ABs and MWDs because they make slow ships faster?
Why do you not want a powerful thruster module?!?
Quote: I don't think I'm a troll, ...
Yes, you are trolling.
You bring the same argument over and over again, and it is based on the idea that all CCP does is somehow cast in stone and not meant to be changed or questioned. If so, then how come they have given us a forum to discuss ideas in? This forum sure is not meant to be a place for trolling.
When a topic gets raised several times then it shows how much people wish for an improvement. If you get tired of reading these threads then it is time for you to get out of here! It sure does not mean that others have to stop posting their ideas.
-- If there is anything in your life you fear of losing, then keep your mouth shut once in a while. |
|
|
|