|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cherybol
Caldari Es and Whizz Hedonistic Imperative
|
Posted - 2009.04.22 05:27:00 -
[1]
I'm all for scamming and darwins theory.
But really?
[ 2009.04.22 05:12:02 ] Blue Macaw > Invulnerability Field II 200k [ 2009.04.22 05:12:02 ] Blue Macaw > Rokh Blueprint rokh BPC, 1 run 400k [ 2009.04.22 05:12:03 ] Blue Macaw > Invulnerability Field II 200k [ 2009.04.22 05:12:03 ] Largissumum Latro > Expanded Cargohold II surplus stock 249k first to click gets [ 2009.04.22 05:12:03 ] Blue Macaw > Rokh Blueprint rokh BPC, 1 run 400k [ 2009.04.22 05:12:03 ] Comrade Sesk > Dread Guristas Magnetic Scattering Amplifier =======wts 200k======= [ 2009.04.22 05:12:03 ] Blue Macaw > Invulnerability Field II 200k [ 2009.04.22 05:12:03 ] Blue Macaw > 425mm Railgun II 200k [ 2009.04.22 05:12:03 ] Comrade Sesk > Dread Guristas Magnetic Scattering Amplifier =======wts 200k======= [ 2009.04.22 05:12:05 ] Blue Macaw > Rokh Blueprint rokh BPC, 1 run 400k [ 2009.04.22 05:12:05 ] Largissumum Latro > Expanded Cargohold II surplus stock 249k first to click gets [ 2009.04.22 05:12:05 ] Comrade Sesk > Dread Guristas Magnetic Scattering Amplifier =======wts 200k======= [ 2009.04.22 05:12:05 ] Blue Macaw > Rokh Blueprint rokh BPC, 1 run 400k [ 2009.04.22 05:12:05 ] Blue Macaw > Invulnerability Field II 200k [ 2009.04.22 05:12:05 ] Blue Macaw > Rokh Blueprint rokh BPC, 1 run 400k [ 2009.04.22 05:12:05 ] Blue Macaw > Rokh Blueprint rokh BPC, 1 run 400k [ 2009.04.22 05:12:06 ] Largissumum Latro > Expanded Cargohold II surplus stock 249k first to click gets
I can't even block the scammers out now because the rate they 'humanly' post at is quicker then I can 'humanly' right click block them.
Can we get a limit here, or you know, better macro detection?
|
Cherybol
Caldari Es and Whizz Hedonistic Imperative
|
Posted - 2009.04.22 09:29:00 -
[2]
I love EVE-O trolls. They try so hard. |
Cherybol
Caldari Es and Whizz Hedonistic Imperative
|
Posted - 2009.04.22 09:33:00 -
[3]
Really, if we have limits on contracts as to prevent scammers posting a billion scam contracts, then whats the problem in implementing a limit as to how many messages per time interval can be sent in public channels? CSPA service charges? You know, unless CCP introduced Contracts and posed a skill limit on it just for laughs.
|
Cherybol
Caldari Es and Whizz Hedonistic Imperative
|
Posted - 2009.04.22 11:12:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Br41n
Originally by: Akita T
Originally by: Wet Ferret Yup, remember to close those chat channels. This is a single player game, afterall.
In Jita, you don't need, and you don't WANT the local chat. You want the market, and only the market.
No you don't, you don't NEED and you don't WANT to be in jita at all.
Nah, I want to be in Jita. Kthxs.
|
Cherybol
Caldari Es and Whizz Hedonistic Imperative
|
Posted - 2009.04.22 22:12:00 -
[5]
Some good ideas brought up here. I'm all for limitations on contract linking in public channels. I don't ever see a time when one would need to throw up 20x contracts constantly unless your spamming. Which, is why we're here to end that. I have a search function in Contracts. And I have the Sell Orders forum to browse for them aswell. Thanks.
|
|
|
|