Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Foolish Bob
Caldari The Dirty Rotten Scoundrels
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 14:57:00 -
[1]
With yet another 20 vs 20 fight lagged to buggery, I call shenanigans! This was supposed to have been fixed months ago, and now since the last patch but one it seems it's back every bit as bad as before. Reporting it in issues goes un-noticed apparently so make your marks here if you're fed up with this.
|
Foolish Bob
The Dirty Rotten Scoundrels
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 14:57:00 -
[2]
|
Vedro M
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 15:00:00 -
[3]
|
Laerise
PIE Inc.
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 15:00:00 -
[4]
Supported, seriously, you can fix it in 0.0, fix in lowsec as well.
|
Astrum Latito
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 15:02:00 -
[5]
I agree whole heartedly, it's sad when tactics etc are nul and void because you have to relog to get rid of lag issues in the middle of the battle.
|
Anon Amarr
Amarr Absinthe Brothers Consortium
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 15:05:00 -
[6]
Signed. less than 50 ships shouldnt be "too much"
|
Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc.
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 15:07:00 -
[7]
Lag in the warzones is beyond ludicrous levels. Something definitely has to be done.
|
Billatron
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 15:07:00 -
[8]
Needs to be fixed - supported
|
Fallen Aurora
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 15:09:00 -
[9]
Totally agree this amount of lag in small 20 vs 20 engagements is un workable. Please fix it. I love FW but the lag hurts :(
|
Jadetiger1
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 15:11:00 -
[10]
I agree, totally bull****. And keep Capital ships out of FW.
|
|
Nur AlHuda
Callide Vulpis
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 15:13:00 -
[11]
This was not the first time it happened and lags is working against big and also small fleets.
|
Dr Bjerring
Absinthe Brothers Consortium
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 16:39:00 -
[12]
Lag in the warzones is beyond ludicrous levels. Something definitely has to be done
|
BattleStar Crusader
Absinthe Brothers Consortium
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 16:39:00 -
[13]
Fix it or alot of people will quite eve. Thise proves that you lack the abilitiy to help you customers. bad customer services and worthy of report to the authorities.
|
Colaxais
Aquila Astralis
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 16:39:00 -
[14]
Signed.
|
Astria Tiphareth
24th Imperial Crusade
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 16:41:00 -
[15]
Agreed. Signing on principle. That said, this thread does highlight that they're aware of the problem. ___ My views may not represent those of my corporation, which is why I never get invited to those diplomatic parties... Environmental Effects
|
Zenton Karvash
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 16:42:00 -
[16]
Agreed |
macsimum
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 16:43:00 -
[17]
signed.
|
lucifers widow
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 22:14:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Foolish Bob With yet another 20 vs 20 fight lagged to buggery, I call shenanigans!
Same here, seemed to be fixed for a week or so then reverted back again, they trying to make all leave fw for 0.0 combat ( they pretty much said so themselves ).
Surely at the least they can re-enforce they busier fw systems ie Kourm-Auga-Dal-Rens-Ammake-Vard etc on the Amarr Vs Min and pets (Sf) war
|
fishblades
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.05.14 23:07:00 -
[19]
I dont get it, how is faction warfare any different than 0.0 PvP. We have fights in the 200-300 range and its playable.
|
Erick Voliffe
State Protectorate
|
Posted - 2009.05.25 15:50:00 -
[20]
If i remember correctly lag wasn't this bad when FW started and the fleets were bigger. What happen the hardware running the zones degrade badly or something? I can't believe ccp is letting something really good for the average player fade away.
|
|
Serpens Sol
Tribal Liberation Force
|
Posted - 2009.05.25 16:22:00 -
[21]
/signed |
Hun Jakuza
Tribal Liberation Force
|
Posted - 2009.05.26 07:34:00 -
[22]
/Signed
CCP move their server capacity of 95% to 0.0 space. High and low sec unplayable when the fleets reach 40+ members. We want playing too 20 vs 20 fight,so we need more few nods to FW spaces. |
Lissome Elan
501st Providence Light Defense Squadron
|
Posted - 2009.05.26 09:07:00 -
[23]
Signed. |
Ankhesentapemkah
Ammatar Free Corps
|
Posted - 2009.05.26 10:33:00 -
[24]
Raised this issue a month ago, and it was voted down by the current CSM, as they didn't consider it important enough.
Once Erik gets elected, I'm sure he'll make a second issue of this and take it with him to Iceland though, if it doesn't get voted down by ignorant CSM again. ---
|
Tiger's Spirit
|
Posted - 2009.05.26 10:38:00 -
[25]
Originally by: Ankhesentapemkah Raised this issue a month ago, and it was voted down by the current CSM, as they didn't consider it important enough.
Once Erik gets elected, I'm sure he'll make a second issue of this and take it with him to Iceland though, if it doesn't get voted down by ignorant CSM again.
Lol. CSM against FW support ? What a hell ? Why ? Because FW fix need hardwares from 0.0 ???? I guess CSM work for players not for against.
And yes +1 signed against FW lag.
|
Ankhesentapemkah
Gallente Ammatar Free Corps
|
Posted - 2009.05.26 10:53:00 -
[26]
Originally by: Tiger's Spirit Lol. CSM against FW support ? What a hell ? Why ? Because FW fix need hardwares from 0.0 ???? I guess CSM work for players not for against.
And yes +1 signed against FW lag.
Because none of the other CSM have much of a clue about FW besides what I told them, and because they believe it when CCP said "we're working on fixing the lag", despite FW players seeing no results for the past 5 months.
The thing that bothers me is that some FW still don't want to vote for the CSM (Erik and Heartstone are the FW candidates, with Erik having my preference) and thus yet another batch of 0.0 hobo's are likely to get voted in. Don't expect any FW issues to be raised if that happens. ---
|
Dr BattleSmith
PAX Interstellar Services
|
Posted - 2009.05.27 02:22:00 -
[27]
FW is where it's at!
Wake up CCP!
|
Becq Starforged
Minmatar Ship Construction Services Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2009.05.27 02:27:00 -
[28]
I think it's more accurate to say that FW is where it could be ... if CCP paid more attention to the unfortunate problems that currently plague it.
-- Becq Starforged
The Flame of Freedom Burns On! |
Erik Finnegan
|
Posted - 2009.05.30 06:55:00 -
[29]
FW needs boost. I am baffled to what lengths we are willing to go in the struggle to "fix" FW. Now we are suggesting CCP the right server layout ? Oh my God. You know, if CCP were attributing the right level of attention to FW then they would well be able to fix hardware issues related to FW.
What I want the other CSM, and eventually CCP, to understand is the end-game potential which FW has. Once the vision is big enough and shared, resources will flow to it.
Thumbs up to every FW issue on the board!
|
TraininVain
|
Posted - 2009.05.30 08:39:00 -
[30]
Thumbs up.
I dunno if this has been worked on (I think I've seen less desyncs) or if it's just a general low-sec issue but w/e it still gets unacceptably laggy when anything resembling a fight happens.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |