EVE Search - [CSM] Who wants my VOTE?

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Jita Park Speakers Corner

[CSM] Who wants my VOTE?

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
The PitBoss Caldari Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers Privateer Alliance	Posted - 2009.05.21 20:51:00 - [1] Or better yet ... who will 'Champion' my type of game play. I, Like most 'Average Joes' in the game would like to vote for someone to represent their needs/wants ... BUT are too lazy to sift through all the 'FLUFF' to find the right candidate. I don't represent a large amount of in-game people BUT I can reach a LARGE amount due to in-game networking I have done over the years. If you fit the mold ... I will spread the word My EVE Demograph I am a 5 year Veteran of the Game. I have only 1 account. I am a PVPer FIRST (2 pvp toons). My pvp centers around EMPIRE war Decs. My Alt lives and PVPs in 0.0 during roams. I have one Trade Alt (to support my pvp habit). I am a casual player. My Concerns I want Addressed (as posted in Assembly Hall) [ISSUE] LOOTING from my KILL should = Looter FLAGGED to me. [ISSUE] Neutral/ALT Remote Repping & Aggression. So ... Who WANTS my VOTE ? Thank-You, The Pitboss (Space between The & Pitboss) Signatures by: Kalen Vox
SamuelAdams Gallente hirr Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2009.05.21 21:50:00 - [2] Edited by: SamuelAdams on 21/05/2009 21:51:39 n/t
Heartstone Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction	Posted - 2009.05.21 22:23:00 - [3] Issue Two I support fully as Neutral Remote Repping is a pain in the rear end and a blight on High Sec/Low Sec PVP. In 0.0 ofc it doesn't matter as much away from stations. Issue One I am not so sure about. I can't really see a problem with your proposal beyond why WOULD you get the rights to the loot but on the other hand I can't see many drawbacks from changing it without actually spending any time looking at the subject in question in detail. I would be loathe to support something that I haven't had time to look at the implications of. Vote for me. Don't vote for me. Whichever you think but please vote for someone. Let's have a good turnout this time ---
Avalloc GoonFleet GoonSwarm	Posted - 2009.05.21 22:46:00 - [4] Originally by: The PitBoss [ISSUE] LOOTING from my KILL should = Looter FLAGGED to me. I agree with your concern and would support a change to the current system along the ways you suggested. Players shouldn't continue to be able to hide behind being in an NPC corp when they're looting another player's kill. Originally by: The PitBoss [ISSUE] Neutral/ALT Remote Repping & Aggression. Agreed, in Empire and Lowsec an aggression tag needs to be tagged to those remote repping. In 0.0 space I don't see it as being a huge issue since it is either an npc station or they are friendly to the entity that controls the Outpost. When it comes to Stargates in 0.0 I'm pretty neutral on whether it should give aggression or not since you can just catch the guy on the other side. Originally by: The PitBoss So ... Who WANTS my VOTE ? I believe I have your interests at heart, being that I am in a PVP alliance and I am familiar with piracy in Empire as well. I want to encourage more players to venture into lowsec territories (via more incentives) which will in turn give the pirates more targets to play with.
Herschel Yamamoto Agent-Orange	Posted - 2009.05.21 23:14:00 - [5] Edited by: Herschel Yamamoto on 21/05/2009 23:16:03 I'd like to think I'd do a pretty good job of representing you. I spent several months doing the empire wardec thing back in the day, and am certainly interested in ideas on how to make the wardec system suck less - I don't have anything that can really be put onto paper, unfortunately, but if I see a workable idea I'll certainly jump on it. Regarding your two ideas, I'm sort of torn on the first - I think it's a good idea, but I'm not entirely sure. Maybe tying this into a wardec improvement would work, letting you have rights to kills you made legally, but not giving any rights to suicide gankers. That said, I'm totally in favour of the second. If you want to be in the fight, you should have to wait 30 seconds to dock/jump just like everyone else. If you think I'm your guy, I would certainly appreciate your vote. If you have any other questions, check out my site or drop me a line in-game.
Admiral IceBlock Caldari Northern Intelligence	Posted - 2009.05.21 23:17:00 - [6] I too, want your precious vote. Originally by: The PitBoss [ISSUE] LOOTING from my KILL should = Looter FLAGGED to me. I wholeheartedly agree. Originally by: The PitBoss [ISSUE] Neutral/ALT Remote Repping & Aggression. Don't agree so much with this one if I read your suggestion correctly.
Larkonis TrassIer Neo Spartans Laconian Syndicate	Posted - 2009.05.22 07:40:00 - [7] Hi PitBoss, Larkonis Trassler, International Man of Mystery and ex Privateer (pre nerf) here. I share your pain. I for one look back with a hint of bitterness at my time spent in Privateers for the two reasons you have pointed out. I believe yes... The spoils of YOUR KILL should be yours. Currently there is no way for the victor to correctly defend his spoils in an Empire battle from SCAVENGERS and THIEVES. Neutral Remote Repping is a pain in the arse. I would wholeheartedly welcome a change of the mechanics. If people wish to engage in battle then it should be flying their own colours, hiding behind the white flags and yellow and brown breeches of a neutral or NPC corporation should no longer guarentee safety.
Vuk Lau 4S Corporation Morsus Mihi	Posted - 2009.05.22 09:25:00 - [8] Vote for Omber Zombie he is cool guy, and he just gave me Rattlesnake to post this.
LaVista Vista Conservative Shenanigans Party	Posted - 2009.05.22 11:08:00 - [9] Originally by: The PitBoss [ISSUE] LOOTING from my KILL should = Looter FLAGGED to me. Let me just make this very clear in advance. I'm not a candidate, but I have been a member of the first 2 CSMs. The issue you think is important, was indeed raised. The CSM widely agreed that it was a good issue, and made a lot of sense. We brought it to CCP in Iceland. However, we were met with some devs fundamentally disagreeing on the idea and some who liked it. However CCP promised to take up the discussion internally and figure out if it's possible from a technical point of view. It turns out that changing it to having a such effect, is not easy at all, and will take some serious work in the aggro system. So while it's a nice idea, I'm sad to tell you that it's not really likely to happen at all. [/center]
Herschel Yamamoto Agent-Orange	Posted - 2009.05.22 14:51:00 - [10] Originally by: Vuk Lau Vote for Omber Zombie he is cool guy, and he just gave me Rattlesnake to post this. And you accepted it? You should have at least bargained him up to a CNR.

LaVista Vista Conservative Shenanigans Party	Posted - 2009.05.22 14:54:00 - [11] Originally by: Herschel Yamamoto Originally by: Vuk Lau Vote for Omber Zombie he is cool guy, and he just gave me Rattlesnake to post this. And you accepted it? You should have at least bargained him up to a CNR. Huh? Rattlesnake is 1bill. A CNR is 200mill.
Omber Zombie Gallente Frontier Technologies	Posted - 2009.05.22 16:13:00 - [12] it's ok, I got a night with his wife via webcam too ---------------------- My Blog
Garthran Gallente CINDER INDUSTRIALS United Outworlders	Posted - 2009.05.22 16:26:00 - [13] o.O sexy thread derail ftw!
The PitBoss Caldari Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers Privateer Alliance	Posted - 2009.05.22 17:07:00 - [14] Originally by: Garthran o.O sexy thread derail ftw! By CSM candidates Thank-You, The Pitboss (Space between The & Pitboss) Signatures by: Kalen Vox
Shatana Fulfairas Gallente Celestial Horizon Corp.	Posted - 2009.05.22 17:50:00 - [15] i Wont ask for your vote as i have a pvp alt but i am not running primarly on pvp issues myself, But i do have an opinion on your "Issues" Quote: CURRENT GAME MECHANIC Anyone who loots from the wreck of a Player Character is FLAGGED to the original pilot. MY SUGGESTED FIXES 1. The wreck looter gets FLAGGED to the original pilot ... AND everyone on the kill mail. 2. The wreck looter gets FLAGGED to the original pilot ... AND to the person who 'Layed the final blow' i think the game mechanic is a little kilter and fell out of the options you posted i like the second one best flagging you to "last blow and original pilot" i think you have valid idea to address the game mechanic Issue 2:- Neutral/ALT Remote Repairing & Aggression i believe once a fight starts as soon as somebody helps another in that fight they become part of the following actions weather its shield repairing or drones repairing armor that it should be considered to be part of the action as it does effec the overall fight so they need to be flaged as well as their role is part of the final outcome (i have also seen this with the repair ship running in and scooping the loot form the fight too)
Herschel Yamamoto Agent-Orange	Posted - 2009.05.23 03:06:00 - [16] Originally by: LaVista Vista Originally by: Herschel Yamamoto Originally by: Vuk Lau Vote for Omber Zombie he is cool guy, and he just gave me Rattlesnake to post this. And you accepted it? You should have at least bargained him up to a CNR. Huh? Rattlesnake is 1bill. A CNR is 200mill. I'm implying that the Rattlesnake is a worse ship than the CNR Yeah, I know you sell it, buy one, and pocket the difference, but I feel the need to mock expensive ships that suck.
The PitBoss Caldari Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers Privateer Alliance	Posted - 2009.05.23 14:13:00 - [17] Originally by: The PitBoss So ... Who WANTS my VOTE ? Ok first off I would like to thanks those CSM who took the time to respond seriously to the thread. Heartstone Avalloc Herschel Yamamoto Admiral IceBlock Larkonis TrassIer Shatana Fulfairas PLEASE NOTE: I feel any of the above would make great candidates BECAUSE they actually took the time to address an 'AVERAGE JOE's' concerns promptly ... and would probably do the same if/when they are CSMs. On the Downside I am a little disappointed that 2 CSM candidates/seat holders took the time to reply in the thread but NOT address my concerns with a serious answer -or- at all AND slightly derailed the subject. My vote will go to Avalloc Website: CLICKY EVE-O Thread: CLICKY Voting Page: CLICKY Reasoning Looking past his stances and in-game affiliations, I feel Avalloc will make an Excellent CSM representative. He not only addressed my concerns, He went out of his way to contact me in-game on 3 separate occasions since his reply to my post AND went as far as to ask if there were any other concerns I had, but did not bring up. PLEASE NOTE: Anyone with follow-up like this has the time and the desire to represent the player base REGUARDLESS of who they are. He definitely IS NOT in it for the free trip to iceland -or- the his EGO. Good Luck to all the candidates Thank-You, The Pitboss (Space between The & Pitboss) Signatures by: Kalen Vox
Elise Masutra Tleilex Manufacturing	Posted - 2009.05.23 19:55:00 - [18] Oh, ThePitboss! Nice to see you still kicking. Good old days on the confedertation allaince . I hope you are well and wish you good luck in space o/ I demand more press releases from you though
Issler Dainze Minmatar Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord	Posted - 2009.05.23 23:53:00 - [19] So Mr. Pitboss sir. I did not respond to this thread after reading your profile. I thought when I read it there are clearly some candidates that were moe aligned to your interests so me pandering for your vote would be disenginous. I am glad you found a candidate. Thank you for finding out what you needed to know and voting! Issler Please resize your signature to the maximum allowed resolution of 400 x 120 pixels with a maximum file size of 24000 bytes. -Weatherman
Garthran Gallente CINDER INDUSTRIALS United Outworlders	Posted - 2009.05.24 04:37:00 - [20] I judged that most of the candidates responses would be similar to mine, and I'm simply not famous enough to draw attention unless my answer was exactly what you wanted to hear. And, as Issler said, I wouldn't want to give an answer that is not indicative of my personal feelings, so I opted to allow you to exclude me from your considerations. Garthran



Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.