Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Nihilion Zero
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 15:45:00 -
[31]
Most definitely NOT supported. I speak for myself, as well as many other Eve players with whom I associate and have spoken with at length about ambulation, your assertion that nobody wants ambulation is false.
Personally, I believe ambulation will add sorely needed dimensionality to the game. If implemented well, ambulation could potentially broaden the player base to include not only more, new players (good for everyone because noobs are the life-blood of an MMO), but more diverse players as well. For example, one of the reasons so few females play Eve is because they don't empathize as easily with an internet spaceship as males do. They like faces, gestures, and manipulating environments--collecting and creating things.
Just because YOU don't want to play in ambulation, that doesn't mean other people don't either.
|
Dr BattleSmith
PAX Interstellar Services
|
Posted - 2009.06.09 02:47:00 -
[32]
Originally by: Nihilion Zero Most definitely NOT supported. I speak for myself, as well as many other Eve players with whom I associate and have spoken with at length about ambulation, your assertion that nobody wants ambulation is false.
Personally, I believe ambulation will add sorely needed dimensionality to the game. If implemented well, ambulation could potentially broaden the player base to include not only more, new players (good for everyone because noobs are the life-blood of an MMO), but more diverse players as well. For example, one of the reasons so few females play Eve is because they don't empathize as easily with an internet spaceship as males do. They like faces, gestures, and manipulating environments--collecting and creating things.
Just because YOU don't want to play in ambulation, that doesn't mean other people don't either.
I don't care either way.
As long as evemail is fixed BEFORE it's implemented.
|
Korerin Mayul
Amarr The R.I.T.U.A.L Corp
|
Posted - 2009.06.09 08:24:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Antihrist Pripravnik
Originally by: Dr BattleSmith I don't think anyone really wants "walking in stations"
I do.
as do i. |
Faith O'Siras
|
Posted - 2009.06.09 15:35:00 -
[34]
Edited by: Faith O''Siras on 09/06/2009 15:35:52 Edited by: Faith O''Siras on 09/06/2009 15:35:20
Originally by: Dr BattleSmith I don't think anyone really wants "walking in stations"
<stuff>
If these eye-candy patches are released before bug-fixes and UI improvements, I think I'll stop my subscriptions ahead of more inaction.
Listen, pal ...
I do want walking in stations. I really do. Don't ever speak for me, again. The next time you do, I'll have your pod.
Also, GTFO out of my game. I can haz ur stuffz, righty right? |
Efrim Black
Gallente Shadow Cadre
|
Posted - 2009.06.10 01:39:00 -
[35]
Originally by: Odhinn Vinlandii
Originally by: Sanaril Wolfchild They devoted an extra team to this, do you really believe a few unhappy players can stop WiS? Did you hear what they told us at the fanfaire about it last year? No way, that any force can stop WiS
Something is stopping it. It's two years behind schedule.
yeah development is, they are perfecting it. A version of it was played by lots of people at the last EVE fest. Not a video, they played it. It's coming soon.
Besides, it's pretty obvious most people here want to get out of their ships and have a beer on occasion. |
Uronksur Suth
Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2009.06.11 21:20:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Dr BattleSmith I don't think anyone really wants "walking in stations", it's a nice thought and we're kinda interested but really for the game it just sounds like a time/isk sink.
Instead I'm sure we could all benefit from any time assigned to that non-critical feature to be reassigned to UI improvements such as a new (and working) Evemail interface.
There are many important things being skipped over in favour of features no one has requested. Which in-turn add nothing to the game.
If these eye-candy patches are released before bug-fixes and UI improvements, I think I'll stop my subscriptions ahead of more inaction.
No. I want WiS. |
Rumba Purring
|
Posted - 2009.06.11 22:14:00 -
[37]
I want WiS, so please think again. ------------- Would you be ready if the gravity reversed itself? |
Sappho Ajhannis
Knowledge Stick Station
|
Posted - 2009.06.12 00:04:00 -
[38]
Lots of people want WiS. A fair few people don't. Without taking some sort of vote count on it I don't think anyone can say for sure what the % either way is.
I like the idea of WiS, even though I do really want CCP to fix FW and loads of other stuff, just because it can make eve a more immersive, richer virtual world that will appeal to more people. After WiS? Maybe then would be a good time to go back and sort out the problems.
|
Guru Saurfang
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2009.06.12 12:08:00 -
[39]
Linkage
this project is bigger then EVE :P |
Oam Mkoll
Caldari The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.06.12 15:12:00 -
[40]
Here's what's gonna happen: 1. WiS comes out. Turns out to be 'unfinished' as it is obviously of very limited use in the core gameplay framework of EVE. 2. CCP adds several minor gimmicks in one or two patches. 3. Walking in Stations ends on the Dead Patch Graveyard right next to Factional Warfare. Meanwhile the mechanics that really need to be revisited (FW, mining, POSes) keep rotting on the side track.
/sadface ---
|
|
Tobias Delgado
|
Posted - 2009.07.18 09:32:00 -
[41]
Edited by: Tobias Delgado on 18/07/2009 09:32:46 some people have said EVE is more of a Sci-Fi Simulator, and in most Sci-Fi Simulation games, that inculdes Captain your ship, going Planet Side on occasion, and walking about in the stations. Meaning WiS is a HUGE milestone for the simulation side of the game, so I have two words for you:
NOT SUPPORTED
|
Terra Mikael
Private Nuisance
|
Posted - 2009.07.18 09:36:00 -
[42]
Going further, walking in stations will be mostly created by a CCP group who are working on a totally different game.
they are pretty much going to copy/paste what that team did for walking in stat. ________________________________
Originally by: Lone Gunman Yes overpowered would be giving a ship with the Covert ops cloak the ability to fire say..Torpedos, now that would be overpowered. But CCP would |
yani dumyat
Minmatar Tribal Liberation Force
|
Posted - 2009.07.18 11:33:00 -
[43]
Edited by: yani dumyat on 18/07/2009 11:34:00
Not supported, the day CCP concentrates too much on fixing the bugs instead of adding new content is the day eve will die.
Originally by: Dr BattleSmith
I don't think anyone really wants "insert latest expansion here", it's a nice thought and we're kinda interested but really for the game it just sounds like a time/isk sink.
Instead I'm sure we could all benefit from any time assigned to that non-critical feature to be reassigned to UI improvements such as a new (and working) Evemail interface.
There are many important things being skipped over in favour of features no one has requested. Which in-turn add nothing to the game.
If these eye-candy patches are released before bug-fixes and UI improvements, I think I'll stop my subscriptions ahead of more inaction.
Bolded the only edit required to turn your OP into the generic post that appears before every expansion. _________________________________________________ Lifeboat ----> + Human |
Aria Selenis
Minmatar Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
|
Posted - 2009.07.18 14:05:00 -
[44]
Not supported.
Quantum Rise was mostly game changes, bugfixes, and no new content save for the Orca.
Quantum Rise was also my least favorite expansion due to this.
It's important to realize that the art team of EVE doesn't write the code, the people fixing bugs are not the same people who are designing ambulation.. of course, if you'd like to have the art managers, writers, and other creative groups go in to rewrite the code and fix bugs, I'm sure things will turn out just fine..
I would like to see EVE expand beyond 'internet spaceships', into a thriving sci-fi setting. With more than spaceships.
Don't play the game like it's a job and rage over the little things. Adding depth and character to the game are more important than fixing some minor bug somewhere in the game that cost you a killmail one time.
And, of course, theres the fact that the people doing bugfixes are not going to stop because a new aspect is being added to the game...
---
If all these people had their way, EVE would be a flawless game with no backstory that ran in ASCII. A text based adventure. "Why yes, I'd like to fly my ship up." Graphics? Fluff, fix the bugs! Background? Fix the bugs!
New ships to fly? No new content, only bug fixes! New tactics, modules, areas, professions, etc...?
Every game has bugs. If you try to stop all new content until every bug is fixed, the players will get bored, and the game will die. Remember you're still in an RPG here; Internet spaceships are not, in fact, serious business. I'm in support of anything that makes the game more fun for me to play, whether or not I have to (oh dear god why) tap tab twice to fix my overview once every few days.
|
Sharp Feather
Gallente Aliastra
|
Posted - 2009.07.19 00:12:00 -
[45]
Originally by: Guru Saurfang Linkage
this project is bigger then EVE :P
The poor OP dont see the big picture. WIS is a base for WOD, the next MMO from CCP. Wake up. =================================================
Before: Developers loved games and made money. Now: Developers love money and make games. |
hired goon
|
Posted - 2009.07.19 16:02:00 -
[46]
anti-support post -omg-
|
Uronksur Suth
Sankkasen Mining Conglomerate Libertas Fidelitas
|
Posted - 2009.07.19 17:40:00 -
[47]
Originally by: hired goon anti-support post
|
Raukho
Evoke. Ev0ke
|
Posted - 2009.07.19 17:42:00 -
[48]
no interest in wos here
|
Neti Keire
Amarr Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Tread Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.07.20 05:47:00 -
[49]
Not supported.
I for one am looking forward to ambulation.
|
Dr BattleSmith
PAX Interstellar Services
|
Posted - 2009.07.20 07:23:00 -
[50]
Why people are so keen to pay a subscription to beta test CCPs new game I just don't know.
Guess hype just effects some people badly.
|
|
van Uber
Swedish Aerospace Inc Southern Cross Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.07.20 09:07:00 -
[51]
Originally by: Dr BattleSmith Why people are so keen to pay a subscription to beta test CCPs new game I just don't know.
Guess hype just effects some people badly.
Because the spaceships will still be there
Such a waste of CSM time. Not supported.
|
So'Lar Wynde
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2009.07.21 22:37:00 -
[52]
Personally, I want WIS. The lack of it to this point is the main reason I haven't played EVE until only a few weeks ago. I've played many other MMOs over the past 20 years (yeah, I consider some of the old MUDs as MMOs ) and am looking forward to a few others such as Star Trek Online (GAWD I hope they improve the character graphics before launch!) and Fallen Earth, but even though EVE has intrigued me, the lack of ingame characters has kept me from taking the plunge. It was only after a visit from my brother who plays EVE and his revelation that WIS was getting near that I decided to open two accounts and get started.
The game as-it-is is quite awesome, but the lack of a 'real' ingame character is a turn-off to me as I'm sure it is to many, MANY other MMO players. Ambulation will give EVE the much-needed personification that is needed to actually pull a player into the game universe and will probably lead to other interesting features as well.
So...
NOT SUPPORTED. The Original Adder
|
Awesome Possum
Insert Obscure Latin Name
|
Posted - 2009.07.22 00:48:00 -
[53]
Originally by: Isaac Starstriker Umm, no. We do not get the ability to dictate CCP policy. Have a problem with that? Too bad. I have loads of problems with other Developers of other games, but do you hear me whining? no.
CCP can do whatever it wants. You can quit the game in protest or go back to playing like you already are.
--Isaac
He's not dictating policy, you fuckwit, he's asking.
And I support it, WIS will be an abysmal failure, and the time/money spent on it would be better spent elsewhere. ♥
Wreck Disposal Services |
voogru
Gallente Massive Damage United Corporations Against Macros
|
Posted - 2009.07.22 00:51:00 -
[54]
Not supported. I want WIS.
Hate Farmers? Click Here |
Yakius Warkar
Minmatar Industrial Limited
|
Posted - 2009.07.22 02:11:00 -
[55]
Don't need walking in stations.. can still have all the other cool features like players stores.
|
Ardetia
Caldari United Front Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.07.28 02:03:00 -
[56]
Edited by: Ardetia on 28/07/2009 02:03:59 Sadly, I want to see this Ambulation live just because :) might bring new players?
|
Saju Somtaaw
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2009.07.28 03:57:00 -
[57]
NOT SUPPORTED
I too am looking forward to WiS/Ambulation/Whatever-they-decide-to-call-it. Even if they weren't making it those resources wouldn't be used for Eve, as they're working on another MMO that will use the WiS engine as its base, Ambulation is just an extra that comes with it as well as a chance to get the graphics portion live and tested while the back-end stuff is worked on. ---- --- --- Devs Sign Here; GMs and ISD welcome to :) |
ellena allente
|
Posted - 2009.07.28 05:17:00 -
[58]
I support ambulation completely.
|
A Ingus
|
Posted - 2009.07.28 14:08:00 -
[59]
Originally by: ellena allente I support ambulation completely.
And I completely support your support of ambulation completely!
Can't wait to see the rest of you walking in station. Heh.
|
Jarvis Hellstrom
Gallente The Flying Tigers
|
Posted - 2009.07.28 14:24:00 -
[60]
I'm also signing in as one of the 'no ones' who want Walking in Stations.
If it's not your cup of tea, that's fine, but a lot of folks are very much looking forward to it both I and my wife (who has her own characters and accounts) are really jonesing for it.
As to why - it's hard to roleplay in a spaceship. New Eden is more than hulls and a lot of folks want to experience that. So what if they recycle the code? That's just good business and the cross pollination will mean that both games will benefit.
May God stand between you and harm in all the Empty places you must walk
(Old Egyptian Blessing) |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |