Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Glarion Garnier
The Scope
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 15:05:00 -
[1]
So far we have cruisers. But what will be next?
Frigate Destroyer Battlecruiser Battleship
or
hauler
I hope it's not the hauler
|
Colonel Cornbread
Minmatar Subnet Syndicate Binary Brotherhood
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 15:13:00 -
[2]
shuttle |
Ash Bringer
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 15:15:00 -
[3]
My vote is drop the price |
Jack Airron
Gallente Setenta Corp Libertas Fidelitas
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 15:17:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Glarion Garnier So far we have cruisers. But what will be next?
Frigate Destroyer Battlecruiser Battleship
or
hauler
I hope it's not the hauler
battle cruiser. but i suspect that the t3 cruisers where a test and since the test went well they will be adding more then one t3 ship class this time. |
Arthur Frayn
V.O.F.L IRON CORE H E L I C O N
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 15:26:00 -
[5]
T3 cruisers already have command ship performance now, so I reckon either frigates or battleships. |
Ghoest
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 15:33:00 -
[6]
Im not sure that anything other than cruisers makes sense unless they dramatically change something to increase production.
Wherever you went - Here you are.
|
Aargh
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 15:35:00 -
[7]
If larger ships either utilised more high end minerals or low end sleeper salvage, cost shouldn't be prohibitive.
|
Glarion Garnier
The Scope
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 15:41:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Aargh If larger ships either utilised more high end minerals or low end sleeper salvage, cost shouldn't be prohibitive.
Devs can tune material availability acording to their liking. So let's not discuss about the cost of the ships is this thread thanks. |
Deviana Sevidon
Gallente Panta-Rhei Guardian Federation
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 15:44:00 -
[9]
Winter Expansion introducing T3 Battleships, which will cost more then a Mothership to manufacture and will blow up even more easily.
Crowd Control Production is proud to announce a new Ship Class. Countless hours of Developer Time went to into the Creation of a new Class that none of you Guys will ever be able to afford. No one shall ever say that we take griefing not serious enough. |
Aargh
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 16:02:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Glarion Garnier
Originally by: Aargh If larger ships either utilised more high end minerals or low end sleeper salvage, cost shouldn't be prohibitive.
Devs can tune material availability acording to their liking. So let's not discuss about the cost of the ships is this thread thanks.
Which was precisely my point. Reading comprehension ftw. |
|
Glarion Garnier
The Scope
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 16:19:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Aargh
Originally by: Glarion Garnier
Originally by: Aargh If larger ships either utilised more high end minerals or low end sleeper salvage, cost shouldn't be prohibitive.
Devs can tune material availability acording to their liking. So let's not discuss about the cost of the ships is this thread thanks.
Which was precisely my point. Reading comprehension ftw.
I quoted wrong post. I ment to quote the ghoest's post. |
Dirk Magnum
Royal Hiigaran Navy SCUM.
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 16:44:00 -
[12]
Frigates. It's probably way too early to start thinking about new T3 ships, since the launch of the cruisers has probably not been as successful as they'd hoped and they didn't even have all the subsystems available on launch day. But unless they want to tweak Sleeper salvage drops so it takes less effort to gather the stuff needed for T3 production I don't see the ships becoming viable for regular players for a long time. To fill the void one option would be to release T3 frigates. A lot more people would pay 40 or 50 mil (target price 15-20 mil) for one of those than would pay a billion for a T3 cruiser.
|
Davinel Lulinvega
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 16:47:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Davinel Lulinvega on 05/06/2009 16:47:44 Titan obviously. A t3 hauler would make a nice upgrade to the itty of doom, though.
|
Rouge Drone
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 16:54:00 -
[14]
I want a t2 bantam first.
|
Trebor DeCaldar
Caldari
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 16:55:00 -
[15]
T3 destroyer so we can actually have a combat variant would be nice. The T1 is great for salvage, the T2 is a one trick pony and unless for pew-pew.
Give it a 'sonar' type system so it can decloak other ships in an AOA of 25~30k
|
Vyllana
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 17:19:00 -
[16]
I'd love to have T3 frigs. Battlecruisers would be cool too.
I wouldn't expect battleships any time soon since it took CCP years and years after introducing T2 before they put in T2 battleships, and even then they were extremely specialized and not for general use.
|
Twin blade
Minmatar The Triangle Veneratio Venator Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 21:19:00 -
[17]
I hope it would be the carrier.
There is alot of ways to make a carrier better with T3 tec but i do not think they will go curiser carrier some how but i hope. |
Mahke
Aeon Of Strife Executive Outcomes
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 21:26:00 -
[18]
Frigate.
Something with the power of an AF and speed of an interceptor for like 100mil or less ships+subs.
What am I kidding I should crosstrain minnie for a vaga. |
Karl Luckner
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 21:53:00 -
[19]
You really want more of this crap ?
|
Lazarann
Caldari Balls Deep Inc.
|
Posted - 2009.06.05 22:43:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Karl Luckner You really want more of this crap ?
Once it's fixed? Yes. I'd like BC's next followed by frigates.
|
|
Tester128
|
Posted - 2009.06.06 00:33:00 -
[21]
t3 is quite an epic fail atm, so no new t3 ships will ever be released if i remember correctly next expansion is about *walking in stations* so ccp guy will be quite busy with the stuff to fix t3 /prophet mode off |
Anubis Xian
Reavers
|
Posted - 2009.06.06 01:00:00 -
[22]
I think they should just convert T1 into T3 across the board. |
Mr Reeth
|
Posted - 2009.06.06 01:54:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Tester128 t3 is quite an epic fail atm, so no new t3 ships will ever be released if i remember correctly next expansion is about *walking in stations* so ccp guy will be quite busy with the stuff to fix t3 /prophet mode off
Yes, Tech 3 and WH space are fail except for pirates who no longer have to deal with local.
No, walking in stations is not coming out in the next expansion.
What I'd like to see is Tech 3 BSs, especially for the interchangeable weapon systems. I'd love an Amarrian BS that can switch between lasers/missiles/drones, but we all know that's not gonna happen.
|
Rip Striker
|
Posted - 2009.06.06 07:21:00 -
[24]
I'd place my bet on T3 frigates. Their efficiency would be comparable to, and in some instances better than, the current T1/T2 frigates and destroyers.
As it is now T3 cruisers are comparable to T1/T2 cruiser and battlecruiser hulls.
Next step would be to create T3 battleships.
|
Updyke
AsceNt.
|
Posted - 2009.06.06 07:37:00 -
[25]
STRATEGIC FRIGATES ZOMG |
Joss Sparq
Caldari Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2009.06.06 08:29:00 -
[26]
Strategic Mining Barges ... |
Sokratesz
Rionnag Alba Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2009.06.06 10:05:00 -
[27]
Some really weird utility BS would be cool.
But price needs to go down first by a decimal. |
Benco97
Gallente
|
Posted - 2009.06.06 11:52:00 -
[28]
Strategic Orca please, thanks.
Originally by: P'uck
You're a DUMBASS - bold italic underline at the VERY LEAST.
|
E Vile
|
Posted - 2009.06.06 12:33:00 -
[29]
Edited by: E Vile on 06/06/2009 12:33:28
T3? What T3? They released T3? OoooooOOoo, you mean that 2 BILLION isk cruiser. I got excited we had new content for a moment.
/sarcasm off
|
Cadius Vect
Domination. THE KLINGONS
|
Posted - 2009.06.06 13:26:00 -
[30]
Edited by: Cadius Vect on 06/06/2009 13:30:56 Edited by: Cadius Vect on 06/06/2009 13:28:35 Strategic titan.....obviously.
tbh I'd probably guess frigs, bringing t3 to a larger proportion of players, but I'd much rather see the tech 2 tier 3 battleships and tier 2 battlecruisers first, oh yeh and the tech 2 DD bantam. -----------------------------------------------------------
Killboard: http://www.battleclinic.com/eve_online/pk/view/player-Cadius+Vect-kills.html |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |