EVE Search - Favourite Rumours

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Favourite Rumours

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)
Arban Staz	Posted - 2009.06.11 22:56:00 - [91] Originally by: Abrazzar I heard Uwe Boll comment about making EVE The Movie. Maybe even extending it into a movie series. Can't wait to play the game of the movie.
Blane Xero Amarr The Firestorm Cartel	Posted - 2009.06.11 23:48:00 - [92] Originally by: Arban Staz Originally by: Abrazzar I heard Uwe Boll comment about making EVE The Movie. Maybe even extending it into a movie series. Can't wait to play the game of the movie. I'm quite sad, my first thought was "A game of internet spaceships, **** yeah! That'd rock!" then i realised something.
Rhinanna Minmatar	Posted - 2009.06.12 00:08:00 - [93] Edited by: Rhinanna on 12/06/2009 00:14:50 Originally by: Eventy One Edited by: Eventy One on 11/06/2009 16:48:40 Originally by: Siobhan Amarr - you're the only 1st world country that didn't ratify the Kyoto protocol Actually, thankfully Canada didn't either given the rather dubious science blaming humans for global warming. I'm certain we're a 1st world nation and we rejected the same silly protocol. Meh fecking board not posting right - retyping comment. 1> Even if there is no proof that global warming is caused by man, there is 100% proof that greenhouse gasses make the effect WORSE. Restricting the emission of greenhouse gasses is therefore a good thing no matter how you look at it. 2> For any given period of time you would naturally expect 50% of the planets/moons in the solar system to be getting hotter or colder, its called the law of averages. Most of the changes are not outside of natural variations. Earth's is. A increase in solar radiation would show an increase in the temp. of ALL or almost ALL planets in the solar system not just a few. Trying to defend the oil industry sponsored 'research' that says 'oh no, feel free to burn all the oil you want, it won't do any harm honest' is really daft. Practically every report so far that came to that conclusion has been sponsored by an oil company. You don't think that might bias the results slightly do you! :)
Eventy One Magellan Exploration and Survey	Posted - 2009.06.12 00:25:00 - [94] Edited by: Eventy One on 12/06/2009 00:29:48 Originally by: Rhinanna Trying to defend the oil industry sponsored 'research' that says 'oh no, feel free to burn all the oil you want, it won't do any harm honest' is really daft. Practically every report so far that came to that conclusion has been sponsored by an oil company. You don't think that might bias the results slightly do you! :) Therein lies the problem - the actual problem is not perceived without political bias. According to the economist magazine (forget which month), the sum total of all human contribution to green house gases is less than 7%. Seven percent! Which means all of the chicken little, sky-is-falling politics is bunk. This is NOT to say we shouldn't be responsible stewards of the environment, but it is to say using bad science and bad politics to justify stupid unfounded and illogical policies is just plain stupid. If this were 900-1300 AD, we'd be blaming our horses for their green-house gas emissions which caused the Medieval Warm Period (MWP). That too, would be a load of horse manure.
Nuzzy Futs Amarr Hedion University	Posted - 2009.06.12 00:34:00 - [95] Originally by: Eventy One Edited by: Eventy One on 12/06/2009 00:29:48 Originally by: Rhinanna Trying to defend the oil industry sponsored 'research' that says 'oh no, feel free to burn all the oil you want, it won't do any harm honest' is really daft. Practically every report so far that came to that conclusion has been sponsored by an oil company. You don't think that might bias the results slightly do you! :) Therein lies the problem - the actual problem is not perceived without political bias. According to the economist magazine (forget which month), the sum total of all human contribution to green house gases is less than 7%. Seven percent! Which means all of the chicken little, sky-is-falling politics is bunk. This is NOT to say we shouldn't be responsible stewards of the environment, but it is to say using bad science and bad politics to justify stupid unfounded and illogical policies is just plain stupid. If this were 900-1300 AD, we'd be blaming our horses for their green-house gas emissions which caused the Medieval Warm Period (MWP). That too, would be a load of horse manure. If it were the medieval period we would be buring the witches as they were obvioslly the cause of the problem. and yes using BS science and omissions to push a political agenda is quite a pantload. Awww Nuts.
Rhinanna Minmatar	Posted - 2009.06.12 01:14:00 - [96] Originally by: Eventy One Edited by: Eventy One on 12/06/2009 00:29:48 Originally by: Rhinanna Trying to defend the oil industry sponsored 'research' that says 'oh no, feel free to burn all the oil you want, it won't do any harm honest' is really daft. Practically every report so far that came to that conclusion has been sponsored by an oil company. You don't think that might bias the results slightly do you! :) Therein lies the problem - the actual problem is not perceived without political bias. According to the economist magazine (forget which month), the sum total of all human contribution to green house gases is less than 7%. Seven percent! Which means all of the chicken little, sky-is-falling politics is bunk. This is NOT to say we shouldn't be responsible stewards of the environment, but it is to say using bad science and bad politics to justify stupid unfounded and illogical policies is just plain stupid. If this were 900-1300 AD, we'd be blaming our horses for their green-house gas emissions which caused the Medieval Warm Period (MWP). That too, would be a load of horse manure. 7% is MASSIVE!!! Lets use a EVE based example here. Lets say you are taking 1000 DPS of damage(greenhouse gasses produced) with a 1000 DPS tank(ocean gas absorbsion e.t.c.) with a EHP of 30,000 Now we increase the damage by just 7% thats 1070 damage per second. Instead of tanking the damage you now will be dead in 7 minutes and 8 seconds. A huge difference just from 7%. Yes the 'OMG we are all going to die in the next few years' people are just as bad as the 'Theres no global warming' group, that doesn't mean that there isn't a reason to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions to the levels the planet can sustain indefinably.
Boris Varshavsky	Posted - 2009.06.12 02:43:00 - [97] Originally by: Southern Suzy rumour has it there will be a lego version of eve I would so get that. Who is a fan of LEGO? I AM!
Eventy One Magellan Exploration and Survey	Posted - 2009.06.12 02:57:00 - [98] Edited by: Eventy One on 12/06/2009 02:58:31 Originally by: Rhinanna Yes the 'OMG we are all going to die in the next few years' people are just as bad as the 'Theres no global warming' group, that doesn't mean that there isn't a reason to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions to the levels the planet can sustain indefinably. I think we are both advocating moderation, from slightly opposite points of view. Climatological history is a bit like the stock market. There are short, medium and long term trends - all none deterministic. All unpredictable. The fact that we had a Medieval Warm Period shows that this is a non-deterministic dynamic system. Like the stock market, we can see short term trends, after the fact; like we can see medium and long term trends, also after the fact. Try to predict these trends, and all credibility is completely lost. Fact is that we've only recorded climatological temperature for what 100 years? Before that, the data is completely reconstructed. What's rule number one of making observations in science? (Use the same measure to measure all data). We've seen a recent warming trend. There is no science in the world that can show this to be unusual (without making itself look dubious). No one disputes that we've seen warming. People dispute that any of this is effected by us, in any way shape or form. Here's what we do know: The global warming index's for 2008/2009 has the average temperature down, not up This trend will likely continue until 2015 Antarctica is getting cooler, not warmer The sun is warming up, other planets are experiencing warming as well Although all of this points to the sun, no science has tied this to man. I agree we must live sustainably, but because that is the right thing to do - not because our climate depends upon it!
Serj Darek Black Nova Corp KenZoku	Posted - 2009.06.12 03:09:00 - [99] The best rumor to date.... Walking in stations has been postponed another two years.
Eventy One Magellan Exploration and Survey	Posted - 2009.06.12 03:11:00 - [100] Originally by: Serj Darek The best rumor to date.... Walking in stations has been postponed another two years. But the re-introduction of the Jove will happen next major upgrade?

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.