| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

zepter
|
Posted - 2004.10.19 11:52:00 -
[1]
Edited by: zepter on 19/10/2004 11:56:01 Are CFS hypocrites? They attacked FA under the premise that FA broke the deal they had with CFS, yet CFS can't even abide to its own charter. Should CFS attack itself now too?
The reason for this is the 4 days old revised charter. Here are some quotes from the charter:
Quote: Any person in CFS space shall be designed a friend of the Coalition and must fight to protect it.
Quote: No entity will be allied/friend/neutral to any enemy of CFS.
Quote: All whom roam in CFS space that do not come when called for will be required to purchase a weekly pass to be allowed to remain in CFS space.
In the 3 regions affected by this charter there are a lot of corps neutral to FA, including a CFS corp (Xentech). How can you allow these corps to continue being neutral to your enemies when your chapter clearly says that they aren't allowed in CFS space? This would also mean that SA aren't welcome in CFS since they are neutral to FA.
CFS, you're nothing but hypocrites! You expect FA to honour your contracts yet you can't honour them yourselves.
|

zepter
|
Posted - 2004.10.19 11:52:00 -
[2]
Edited by: zepter on 19/10/2004 11:56:01 Are CFS hypocrites? They attacked FA under the premise that FA broke the deal they had with CFS, yet CFS can't even abide to its own charter. Should CFS attack itself now too?
The reason for this is the 4 days old revised charter. Here are some quotes from the charter:
Quote: Any person in CFS space shall be designed a friend of the Coalition and must fight to protect it.
Quote: No entity will be allied/friend/neutral to any enemy of CFS.
Quote: All whom roam in CFS space that do not come when called for will be required to purchase a weekly pass to be allowed to remain in CFS space.
In the 3 regions affected by this charter there are a lot of corps neutral to FA, including a CFS corp (Xentech). How can you allow these corps to continue being neutral to your enemies when your chapter clearly says that they aren't allowed in CFS space? This would also mean that SA aren't welcome in CFS since they are neutral to FA.
CFS, you're nothing but hypocrites! You expect FA to honour your contracts yet you can't honour them yourselves.
|

zepter
|
Posted - 2004.10.19 13:39:00 -
[3]
Edited by: zepter on 19/10/2004 13:42:46
Originally by: Andrew Redburn
Also corps having friends of any of our enmies in their bio/corp description ARE SHOT. Just like FA/FIX does shoot people having friends of UFS/StA/DSMA/CFS in their bio/corp description.
but the neutral freeloaders you don't shoot?
maybe i should put "neutral freeloader" in my bio then.
|

zepter
|
Posted - 2004.10.19 13:39:00 -
[4]
Edited by: zepter on 19/10/2004 13:42:46
Originally by: Andrew Redburn
Also corps having friends of any of our enmies in their bio/corp description ARE SHOT. Just like FA/FIX does shoot people having friends of UFS/StA/DSMA/CFS in their bio/corp description.
but the neutral freeloaders you don't shoot?
maybe i should put "neutral freeloader" in my bio then.
|

zepter
|
Posted - 2004.10.19 13:42:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Severe McCald
Originally by: zepter Edited by: zepter on 19/10/2004 11:56:01 Are CFS hypocrites?
Hypocrite: one who says one thing and does another.
Person with the benefit of experience: says one thing, tries it. It doesn't work. Says let us try something else and does so.
Different things.
Severe
hypocrite fits nicely.
|

zepter
|
Posted - 2004.10.19 13:42:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Severe McCald
Originally by: zepter Edited by: zepter on 19/10/2004 11:56:01 Are CFS hypocrites?
Hypocrite: one who says one thing and does another.
Person with the benefit of experience: says one thing, tries it. It doesn't work. Says let us try something else and does so.
Different things.
Severe
hypocrite fits nicely.
|

zepter
|
Posted - 2004.10.19 13:44:00 -
[7]
in what way did FA not honour their agreement with CFS?
|

zepter
|
Posted - 2004.10.19 13:44:00 -
[8]
in what way did FA not honour their agreement with CFS?
|
| |
|