Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 24 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 11 post(s) |
An Anarchyyt
Gallente Battlestars GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 18:18:00 -
[391]
Originally by: scotty551 Sov system needed changed for sure but what is going to happen on patch day ? Is everyones sov going to be reset making once invulnerable systems vulnerable to attack ? Will alliances lose their sov 4 security and what will happen to super caps being built in those systems when evrything changes ?
This is the info the people who already work hard to defend and maintain their little bit of 0.0 need to know.
What we don't want to find is on patch day everything gets reset and we find we need to rebuild our space all over again to make it as secure as it was before the patch. Its not just about keeping the space but its also about ensuring our assets in that space a still safe and protected during the sov change stransition period.
Here's a hint: You can look for the posts with the blue bars rather than needlessly ranting and pre-emptiveley whining.
Originally by: CCP Wrangler Second, a gentile is a non jewish person
|
Aelena Thraant
Divine Power. Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 18:28:00 -
[392]
I think in general these are good ideas. I'm worried about the Super Caps that are in the queue when this goes live due to the usual lack of a date far enough away to know. (And no I don't build Super Caps though if anyone wants to give me a Nyx I wouldn't turn it down).
What about 0.0 NPC Space? ie Fountain Core, Venal, Curse, Etc. Are we going to be able to do anything there are will they stay static? EVE Killboard and Forum Hosting Service: MyEVEKb |
Hugh Hefner
Caldari Paxton Industries Paxton Federation
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 18:35:00 -
[393]
Hmmm, with Dust and this change I guess we can soon rename the game StarCraft the next Generation?
|
Darkdood
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 18:39:00 -
[394]
The one thing that I see and like about this setup is the implication that you can take a very small set of systems and setup multiple outposts etc and expand that infrastructure. That eliminates the need for them to be spread out over 2 entire regions.
Even if bob or goon or whoever has the ability to take 20 constellations what would motivate them to do so when it costs them money. If you can cherry pick 6 constellations and expand their infrastructure to make 300 billion a month and only pay a 50 billion gate fee why would you want to expand to 20 and pay 300 billion in fees to earn 500 billion. The total profit is 50 billion less, and its 5 times the hassle. The ONLY advantage is bragging rights. So you can brag you make less money? Lol...
The real problem here is that all the "old money" groups will cherry pick the very best of the best constellations and the smaller groups will be left with the rest, but they will have the power to move into 0.0 which prior to this was impossible.
Obviously I'm assuming allot. My one compliant is the way the devs are teasing us without any real details. My greatest fear though is that blobs will still be the status quo rather than smaller strategic fights.
|
Isaac Starstriker
Amarr Smegnet Incorporated Libertas Fidelitas
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 18:43:00 -
[395]
Originally by: Darkdood
Obviously I'm assuming allot. My one compliant is the way the devs are teasing us without any real details. My greatest fear though is that blobs will still be the status quo rather than smaller strategic fights.
Guess what? Dev already stated that although they can provide players with the tools necessary, they cannot change human behavior, no one can. So yeah, if BoB/Goons/NCs feel like they want to blob the living crap out of you, and they can, they will. CCP will never be able to change this. Ever.
If you can, I'd love to hear it, but good luck changing human nature.
--Isaac Isaac's Haul*Mart - Closed
|
Quartex
Gallente Octavian Vanguard RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 19:00:00 -
[396]
There is far too little detail to be specific about anything but I want to speculate anyway.....there will be more Alliance names in nulsec and roaming gangs will probably have to decide what to fit for, before setting out (Reckon there'll be Flag killing mods).
They'll be looking to take some ISKies out of the game too but no-one should underestimate what existing Alliances can save up before the change, to fortify their space with. Don't expect the map to change overnight ... the fact you can make your space perfect means that you don't need to go to the other side of the map to take someone elses.
Pets and Mercs will take on new importance to a space holding Alliance and PvP Alliances will have to find a way to maintain gameplay balance between industry and warfighting, or face losing pilots to Mercs et al.
The dashboard will mean sudden cta's to rush to a certain system and limit damage from an incursion and DUST activity will fit into this to, so that you have to react with your Dust team/pay DUST mercs.
Isn't speculation fun!?
|
Kesper North
Caldari Epiphyte Mining and Exploration Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 19:01:00 -
[397]
Originally by: CCP Abathur Jump Bridges may no longer allow ships with a jump drive to use them. There has been some debate about just flinging them to a random Class 6 wormhole system but I lost that argument with Greyscale (who is decidedly more sane than I). Note - if implemented, Jump Freighters may escape this rule.
I think most of what you said is awesome, but I have to strongly, violently disagree with this part.
If we can only cyno jam station systems...
And capital ships can't use jump bridges...
...where are we supposed to park our capitals?!
-- Killed me? Read about it in my blog! Northern Lights: Solo PVP in EVE Online
|
Aelena Thraant
Divine Power. Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 19:02:00 -
[398]
Originally by: Isaac Starstriker
Originally by: Darkdood
Obviously I'm assuming allot. My one compliant is the way the devs are teasing us without any real details. My greatest fear though is that blobs will still be the status quo rather than smaller strategic fights.
Guess what? Dev already stated that although they can provide players with the tools necessary, they cannot change human behavior, no one can. So yeah, if BoB/Goons/NCs feel like they want to blob the living crap out of you, and they can, they will. CCP will never be able to change this. Ever.
If you can, I'd love to hear it, but good luck changing human nature.
--Isaac
There is this device that destroys blobs with one push... oh wait.... nevermind... didn't work EVE Killboard and Forum Hosting Service: MyEVEKb |
|
CCP Abathur
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 19:06:00 -
[399]
Originally by: Kesper North
Originally by: CCP Abathur Jump Bridges may no longer allow ships with a jump drive to use them. There has been some debate about just flinging them to a random Class 6 wormhole system but I lost that argument with Greyscale (who is decidedly more sane than I). Note - if implemented, Jump Freighters may escape this rule.
I think most of what you said is awesome, but I have to strongly, violently disagree with this part.
If we can only cyno jam station systems...
And capital ships can't use jump bridges...
...where are we supposed to park our capitals?!
Well... I might ask the guy in charge of the cyno generator to cycle it off so that I could get in and dock back up. If they say no, I'd park at a starbase. If there was no starbase, I would ask my FC who was in charge of this horrible op?
|
|
ArmyOfMe
The Athiest Syndicate Advocated Destruction
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 19:13:00 -
[400]
Edited by: ArmyOfMe on 10/09/2009 19:13:32
Originally by: CCP Abathur
Originally by: Kesper North
Originally by: CCP Abathur Jump Bridges may no longer allow ships with a jump drive to use them. There has been some debate about just flinging them to a random Class 6 wormhole system but I lost that argument with Greyscale (who is decidedly more sane than I). Note - if implemented, Jump Freighters may escape this rule.
I think most of what you said is awesome, but I have to strongly, violently disagree with this part.
If we can only cyno jam station systems...
And capital ships can't use jump bridges...
...where are we supposed to park our capitals?!
Well... I might ask the guy in charge of the cyno generator to cycle it off so that I could get in and dock back up. If they say no, I'd park at a starbase. If there was no starbase, I would ask my FC who was in charge of this horrible op?
this is quite nice, as i think it would lead to a heck of a lot more pew pew from roaming gangs etc in 0,0
|
|
Virtuozzo
The Collective Against ALL Authorities
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 19:14:00 -
[401]
Originally by: CCP Abathur
Originally by: Kesper North
Originally by: CCP Abathur Jump Bridges may no longer allow ships with a jump drive to use them. There has been some debate about just flinging them to a random Class 6 wormhole system but I lost that argument with Greyscale (who is decidedly more sane than I). Note - if implemented, Jump Freighters may escape this rule.
I think most of what you said is awesome, but I have to strongly, violently disagree with this part.
If we can only cyno jam station systems...
And capital ships can't use jump bridges...
...where are we supposed to park our capitals?!
Well... I might ask the guy in charge of the cyno generator to cycle it off so that I could get in and dock back up. If they say no, I'd park at a starbase. If there was no starbase, I would ask my FC who was in charge of this horrible op?
I fully admit to having watched BSG: Pegasus way too many times :P But is it too late to consider some sort of shipyard concept? :-) Surprise *** of the highest scale is such a wonderful thing.
≡v≡
Please resize sig to a file size no greater than 24000 bytes - Mitnal
|
John McCreedy
Caldari Eve Defence Force
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 19:26:00 -
[402]
What's the time scale on all this, please because there needs to be a lot of forthcoming clarification? For example, how will the handover from the current Sovereignty mechanic to the new one be handled? If every Alliance suddenly looses Sov due to their POS no longer being the claiming mechanic, there's going to be complete and utter chaos - think what happened to BoB on an Eve wide scale. It wouldn't be pretty and could alienate a high proportion of the player base.
What about conquering space going forward? Are Corp's/Alliance's investments in Capital fleets now worthless or will they still have a part to play? If POS no longer claim sovereignty, will Dreads now be relegated to tools in wars of attrition where their only role is to take down money making POS (assuming Moon Mining isn't being removed)? It was once said large fleets should be the end of a strategic solution, not the beginning. I hope you still maintain this philosophy. I can't say I'm fond of bashing POS but I don't want to see major investments made worthless over night.
You say that you want Alliances to hold small but well developed tracts of space but if R64 moons can allow most Alliances to knock out Titans like the rest of us knock out BS, how will you address the fact that they will simply switch investment to maintenance, especially if Capital Ship importance is downgraded, thus allowing for the upkeep of their current vast empires. Unless you address this issue, you'll simply be creating a problem of near limitless wealth for the largest Alliances further down the road.
Don't misunderstand, I agree the current system has to change before Eve looses too many veterans to burn out but this needs very careful balancing before deployment, not post deployment otherwise it will be too late to head off potentially major issues in the future.
Across the galaxy there is only war. .
|
Treelox
Amarr Evolution
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 19:30:00 -
[403]
I would love to see the ability of conquerors of Outpost systems, the ability upon their first docking with their newly conquered outpost to totally destroy it.
A razed invasion ala Rome VS Carthage, a fully punitive invasion with no plans to hold the conquered territory, would help keep 0.0 more fluid, IMO. --
|
Zastrow J
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 19:36:00 -
[404]
Originally by: CCP Abathur Well... I might ask the guy in charge of the cyno generator to cycle it off so that I could get in and dock back up. If they say no, I'd park at a starbase. If there was no starbase, I would ask my FC who was in charge of this horrible op?
cap pilots will have to adapt, and those who cannot will become victims of eVHUGHAUGHAGHAUGHAUHGAUHGUAHGUAHGUHAaghahguahg
|
Soleil Fournier
AWE Corporation Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 19:46:00 -
[405]
Abathur:
One of the problems with the pos system was the intense time and manpower it took to setup and maintain the network. What steps does this new system take to make sure that we don't repeat this problem with the new system?
|
Niko Mat
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 19:47:00 -
[406]
Originally by: John McCreedy What's the time scale on all this, please
This has already been answered - it's the winter expansion. So roughly end of november/start of december, but it'll be done when it's done.
Quote: For example, how will the handover from the current Sovereignty mechanic to the new one be handled?
This has already been addressed in this thread.
Quote: What about conquering space going forward? Are Corp's/Alliance's investments in Capital fleets now worthless or will they still have a part to play? If POS no longer claim sovereignty, will Dreads now be relegated to tools in wars of attrition where their only role is to take down money making POS (assuming Moon Mining isn't being removed)?
This has already been addressed in this thread.
|
Avernus
Gallente Imperium Technologies
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 20:12:00 -
[407]
Edited by: Avernus on 10/09/2009 20:13:26
Originally by: Viper ****zIe
Originally by: CCP Abathur
Seleene
Seleene? Wondered where you had got too, glad to see you on the team there, I know first hand you understand sov issues perfectly well.
On the other hand... no Prohibition III will ever happen. Ofc we'd need MC... and FIX... and IAC. Yeah, wasn't going to happen anyways.
Btw, your devblog, it was like 1/4 the size of your battle reports! WTF man!
Edit; fun with quote tags.
|
The GrimWristler
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 20:19:00 -
[408]
Alot of cap pilots will turn to sub caps instead. Evidence shows that the titans will become ****e, and from reading the IGN blog, I can imagine carriers and dreads being blown up to quickly by frig bomber fleets, unless i read this incurrectly. Dreads will also become a ship that wont be needed as much as they do in the current system. It sounds like all the cap ships are becoming nerfed directly or/and indirectly in ways where people just wont use them as much or if at all.
http://uk.pc.ign.com/articles/102/1021847p1.html
To this day i think the titan is balanced nicely except for the fact that multiple titans become invinsible. A limit upon the titans use within a particular system at anyone time would effectively stop the invinsibility so to speak.
Some people have mentioned about the sheer amount of POS's that would be taken down in dominion due to the new sov system. Well. no. Pos's will still do the job like it is now but not used for sov. Therefore the cost of pos's and general maintenance will continue. the expense of gates each day/week/month will be something that will create more strain on alliances wealth. let alone the fact that some systems have multiples of gates per 1 system.
Allthough i agree that the current system needs to be tweaked, i dont feel stargates should be the route of claiming Sov. we all know that planets are the future in eve, from where dust 514 is concerned. being someone who thinks about things really indepth, Planets within systems would be a better way of claiming sov. the planets will slowly become managable from a continent sideline anyway, from what development ive seen on particular fanfest clips.
Having dust 514 get introduced as a seperate game which runs parallel with eve and the goings on through Sov. It make sense that dust514 should get the opportunity to claim sov also. stargates wouldnt be in dust 514 as such as its all primarily done on planets, unless im mistaken, from what ive read.
I'm still puzzled by the original dev blog where by it was mentioned that the current sov system has lead to a dead end. I can think of many tweaks and changes within the sov system that would improve the game in little ways. I also dont feel that changing SOV all throughout 0.0 all at once would be ideal due to chaos.
I feel that stargates are for transfering players from 1 system to another and should be kept that way. whether locking gates or having gate guns could be implemented, would for me make more sense. Beacons at planets or special pos structures for planets i feel would make more sense for claiming Sov.
|
Sh'iriin
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 21:04:00 -
[409]
<< I can imagine carriers and dreads being blown up to quickly by frig bomber fleets, unless i read this incurrectly. >>
the bombers they talk about are for carriers, as heavy version of the fighters they have...
|
Ukucia
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 21:06:00 -
[410]
Originally by: Jadal McPieksu
Originally by: Ukucia
Depends on implementation. It's quite possible to structure the system so that it's not profitable for the large alliances to "hold" as much space as they currently do. That opens the space up to others. But there hasn't been enough details yet to come to a conclusion.
No. It may make the map completely useless (very little "officially sov flagged") but alliances value geographical buffer zones more than anything else. If we have a major alliance huddled in 5-10 systems and another small alliance sets up shop next door, 3-4 jumps away, they will be vaporized unless they are blue (= pets or allies).
Well, this still depends on the implementation.
If a Goon-sized alliance can only profitably exploit, say, 15 systems, then they're not going to want to hold an enormous buffer zone themselves, and the profit's there for new alliances to move in.
Yes, in the short run they pay the Goons. But that's the short run. Perhaps a new alliance in former Goon space finds itself next to whatever alliance becomes the new BoB and there's 3 buffer blues between them and Goontopia. They'll probably align themselves with the folks next door.
This will **** off the Goons, who invade, and but the mini-alliance has friends who come to their defense, and suddenly all 0.0 is shooting again, just like WWI.
That's the kind of thing I'm hoping for, but really we can't make any judgement calls until the rest of the details come out and a lot of numbers get crunched.
|
|
yunger
Big Guns Inc. Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 21:08:00 -
[411]
Originally by: CCP Abathur
Originally by: Kesper North
Originally by: CCP Abathur Jump Bridges may no longer allow ships with a jump drive to use them. There has been some debate about just flinging them to a random Class 6 wormhole system but I lost that argument with Greyscale (who is decidedly more sane than I). Note - if implemented, Jump Freighters may escape this rule.
I think most of what you said is awesome, but I have to strongly, violently disagree with this part.
If we can only cyno jam station systems...
And capital ships can't use jump bridges...
...where are we supposed to park our capitals?!
Well... I might ask the guy in charge of the cyno generator to cycle it off so that I could get in and dock back up. If they say no, I'd park at a starbase. If there was no starbase, I would ask my FC who was in charge of this horrible op?
Problem as I see it is that the main staging area often is a sov 4 system (that will not exist anymore as I understand it) and in larger alliances these will often see carriers and jf/rorquals entering every 10 minutes. So cycling wonĘt be possible. and seeing that staging systems will probably have a few hundred caps parked in them were allot of them probably wont log in everyday it pretty much comes down to what possibilities will the new system have for delaying the hostiles from simply bringing a blob and taking the station in 2 days so many pilots wont even be able to react.
|
The GrimWristler
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 21:08:00 -
[412]
@ Sh'iriin
Ahh... Thats ok then i guess. :) atleast theres 1 promising thing from all of this, from a cap pilot point of view. :)
|
Ukucia
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 21:14:00 -
[413]
Originally by: Tobias Sjodin Edited by: Tobias Sjodin on 10/09/2009 16:59:06 Would still very much like to know what will happen in the transition from current state to Dominion, for instance to todays sovereignty.
Without a transition, there will be no sovereignty at all. So will alliances have to immediately start claiming the same old space, or what?
I don't care about the little plug-in modules or how nifty the new claiming thingymabobs are. I want to know how you will transition from old to new.
Isn't it a tad premature to expect all the transition elements to be worked out when they haven't finished working out what the new elements are yet?
"Ok, Sov 4 means they get a planetary super-mine" two weeks later: "planetary super-mines are too good. We're gonna have to not put them in".
Take a deep breath, and let 'em finish designing the new system before they work out the transition into the new system.
|
Ukucia
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 21:19:00 -
[414]
Originally by: Destination SkillQueue
Originally by: Ukucia
Depends on implementation. Let's say the devs do make it not profitable to hold vast expanses of empty space. So some of the larger alliances split up into smaller alliances that nominally work together. K, that would result in no real change. Unless there's major bonuses for working in your own alliance's space, and penalties for working in another alliance's space. So now the multi-mini-goons are disconnected from each other. Time passes, and the various entities don't feel like a cohesive unit anymore. Eventually, you end up with separate alliances with their own goals, which might not quite fit in with the overall group's goals.
Think Canada and the US. They're definitely close friends, but Canada does have it's own politics and does some things the US really doesn't like.
That is very unlikely for two reasons. First it goes against the sandbox ideal.
There have been many tweaks to the sandbox to push us in the direction CCP wants us to go. For example: Alliances didn't exist at one time. Neither did POSs. Or Sov. Or Cynos. And so on.
Quote: Secondly, even if it was put into the game, established alliances have developed mature communication methods, that allow circumvention of any communication limitations.
I'm not saying they wouldn't be able to speak to each other. What I'm saying is if they are encouraged to just stay in their own space, then they start to care less about the space of their former alliance mates. Their goals and interests diverge.
Quote: This is what we sort of have now, but it favors defensive forces too much and non-capital fleets have lost importance, reducing the pressure that ambitious empire dwellers could create otherwise. Removing pos grind and changing capitals(hello titan nerf) will help to change things. Such a limit is natural and you can't metagame your way around it. Just the pressure caused by constant outside forces trying to cause trouble would keep things more lively and create space for new alliances to be crated.
Actually, such a change is just the kind of thing I'm talking about. CCP doesn't say "You can only hold 15 systems". CCP puts out a formula that says if you hold too many, it's gonna cost an arm and a leg. We don't care if you just cut down on how much space you hold, or if you pay for it by taking the ISK from your neighbors.
|
ian666
Minmatar Brutor tribe
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 22:09:00 -
[415]
Originally by: CCP Abathur
Jump Bridges may no longer allow ships with a jump drive to use them. (...) Note - if implemented, Jump Freighters may escape this rule.
Bad
Any logistic ship should not escape from anything, JF's too. There should be two ways only - either safer *locked* system for all caps with Jump Drive (except BlackOps), or a 'less' safer but with ability to jump in and do whatever you want (industry, logistics etc). Maybe then people start to use regular freighters and gates for logistics more often.
|
Professor Dumbledore
Amarr GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 22:16:00 -
[416]
Originally by: CCP Abathur
Originally by: Kesper North
Originally by: CCP Abathur Jump Bridges may no longer allow ships with a jump drive to use them. There has been some debate about just flinging them to a random Class 6 wormhole system but I lost that argument with Greyscale (who is decidedly more sane than I). Note - if implemented, Jump Freighters may escape this rule.
I think most of what you said is awesome, but I have to strongly, violently disagree with this part.
If we can only cyno jam station systems...
And capital ships can't use jump bridges...
...where are we supposed to park our capitals?!
Well... I might ask the guy in charge of the cyno generator to cycle it off so that I could get in and dock back up. If they say no, I'd park at a starbase. If there was no starbase, I would ask my FC who was in charge of this horrible op?
This is so ******ed it hurts. Your the ****ing person they put in charge of this too eh. well i guess the game will burn to the ground then.
|
Kesper North
Caldari Epiphyte Mining and Exploration Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 22:22:00 -
[417]
Originally by: CCP Abathur
Well... I might ask the guy in charge of the cyno generator to cycle it off so that I could get in and dock back up. If they say no, I'd park at a starbase. If there was no starbase, I would ask my FC who was in charge of this horrible op?
So that is all well and good for official ops, but the problem here is that the most common capital movements are unofficial. They are people moving their carriers to lowsec and back to pick up new PVP ships, they are people jumping Rorquals full of minerals down to (or up from Empire). They are not large fleet movements and if I ask the guy in charge of the cyno jammer to unjam the system so that I can pick up a fleet BS and a couple of new Zealots, he is going to tell me to go to hell. And that is assuming that he is even online, which he won't be, because he is German and I am American.
I can't park at a starbase because I'm not about to put my carrier in a SMA where anyone can grab it, which means that I have to stay in it... which means that I am being penalized in the same way that a mothership or titan pilot is, and that is rather unfair.
There is no "op", there is just the day to day flow of personal and corporate logistics in any 0.0 alliance, and this change would disrupt it completely - and be really irritating, and no fun at all.
I propose an alternative: Allow the cyno generator pos mod to function in cyno jammed systems. That way, you can still jump capitals in but your enemies cannot.
-- Killed me? Read about it in my blog! Northern Lights: Solo PVP in EVE Online
|
Doctor Mabuse
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 22:32:00 -
[418]
Originally by: Professor Dumbledore
This is so ******ed it hurts. Your the ****ing person they put in charge of this too eh. well i guess the game will burn to the ground then.
Onoes! The skies falling! /o\ A Goon said so!
I can't believe you really want control over who jumps through the gates, this is about adding choice into the game no allowing you to sit behind your carebear protection wall.
Then again perhaps you're this upset because you think CCP will break the game before the Goons do? I'm sure a few personal insults aimed at the devs will help though. Srsly.
------------------------------------
Who's trip-trapping on my bridge? |
Zeba
Minmatar Honourable East India Trading Company
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 22:42:00 -
[419]
Originally by: Doctor Mabuse
Originally by: Professor Dumbledore
This is so ******ed it hurts. Your the ****ing person they put in charge of this too eh. well i guess the game will burn to the ground then.
Onoes! The skies falling! /o\ A Goon said so!
I can't believe you really want control over who jumps through the gates, this is about adding choice into the game no allowing you to sit behind your carebear protection wall.
Then again perhaps you're this upset because you think CCP will break the game before the Goons do? I'm sure a few personal insults aimed at the devs will help though. Srsly.
*facepalm*
Dumbledore is a grenade the goons throw into a thread just for the lulz of responces like yours.
Quote: [03:39:05] Emperor Salazar > HOLY **** ITS ZEBA [03:39:20] Emperor Salazar > NEVER STOP POASTING
Zeba is the BEST! ~Mitnal |
Doctor Mabuse
|
Posted - 2009.09.10 22:51:00 -
[420]
Originally by: Zeba *facepalm*
Dumbledore is a grenade the goons throw into a thread just for the lulz of responces like yours.
A curse on those tricksy Goons!
------------------------------------
Who's trip-trapping on my bridge? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 24 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |