Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
starliight
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 23:58:00 -
[1]
This is a request for information, information that i believe alot of verry angry pilots are lookign for right now. A couple days ago now you totaly nerfed the new sc's without any type of warning, blog, or hint. After doing so much good to a ship class that has desperately needed it for so long it just astounds and amazes me that you could pull somthing as recless and unthought as this.
Now i can see why you might have done this and i agree in part that 12k dps on a nyx might have been a little excessive, but you dident have to destroy the only type of defense that the ship has to fix one verry small issue wich you created in the first place. Theirs tons of other viable options, for instance
why not limit the bandwith on a sc to 5000 and allow it to launch 20 drones like it should, but with a bandwith limit of 5000 you could only launch 10 fb's anyway.( just make dcu's add 500 bandwith a piece for the extra fb) hell you can even make dcu's only affect fb's so we dont have sc's launching 25 other types of drones. This also supports your claims to want sc's to choose because we arent changing their max dps at all without dcu's were simply allowing them to be more versatile by launch the full 20 drones sub fb level.
Any comments by ccp would be greately aprieciated, maybe just an explanation or plans for the future just give us some rational reason for this massive unannounced change and we can put the issue to rest.
|
Mkiaki
Gallente Center for Advanced Studies
|
Posted - 2009.11.13 00:03:00 -
[2]
inb4 lock.
|
SXYGeeK
Gallente do you Mostly Harmless
|
Posted - 2009.11.13 00:16:00 -
[3]
good post, but again, in the wrong place. your title has no relevance and there are already several threads open to discuss changes to the supercarriers.
changes are most often introduced to the test server with no warning or explination, many times they never make it to TQ.
They have already stated they are working on a dev blog to detail and reason out these changes, what we are seeing on the test server is only part of a greater picture.
continuing to post spam on the forums about this is not going to do anyone any good. -We So SeXy |
|
CCP WeirdFish
|
Posted - 2009.11.13 13:32:00 -
[4]
Originally by: SXYGeeK good post, but again, in the wrong place. your title has no relevance and there are already several threads open to discuss changes to the supercarriers.
changes are most often introduced to the test server with no warning or explination, many times they never make it to TQ.
They have already stated they are working on a dev blog to detail and reason out these changes, what we are seeing on the test server is only part of a greater picture.
continuing to post spam on the forums about this is not going to do anyone any good.
Sums it up :)
There is already a thread open disusing the supercarrier changes here.
Please do not start duplicate threads.
|
|
|
CCP StevieSG
|
Posted - 2009.11.13 14:17:00 -
[5]
Thread Locked- please post comments in the thread linked above by CCP Weirdfish.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |