Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
p4rky
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 11:45:00 -
[1]
Edited by: p4rky on 29/11/2009 11:50:38 I often question myself as to why we have self destruct! There are many reasons it is needed , such as getting rid of ships u no longer require and claiming insurance or indeed bieng trapped in a wormhole selfdestructing and then podding urself to get home , fair enough these are acceptable
In the past two weeks we have had 2 x carriers tackled in missions/plexes and an orca in WH space , whats the first thing they do? Self destruct this is not because are stuck , its simply to deny the attackers of a KM and loot
Eve online says that they are trying to promote gang warfare , In every aspect! but when it comes to this there is simple no way to kill a carrier with a decent tank in under 2 mins unless you have a large fleet , if your on a roaming gang and cannot refit ships then its pritty much pointless
Suggestions
Increase time on Self destruct I:e larger the ship the longer it takes to self destruct or Do not let the self destruct inatiate if the Target ship is Pointed by Players
Any feedback of similar situations would be welcome i know this is an issue and its begining to annoy me !! Im sure there can be something done about this And done just say "get a bigger gang" Support would be welcomed , i mean how many times have u missed out on a kill due to self destruct and the the person rubbing it in your face in local
|
CombatSmurf
Digital assassins
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 12:10:00 -
[2]
/signed
/////
Whats the similarity between having sex in a canoe and drinking american beer?
Its ****ing close to water. |
NightWolfe
Exanimo Inc Everto Rex Regis
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 12:13:00 -
[3]
Point, no SD sounds like a plan to me
|
Hybschmann
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 12:21:00 -
[4]
Signed
|
Kikils
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 12:23:00 -
[5]
xx we made him be that way ...
|
Skidmark Smellybum
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 12:23:00 -
[6]
signed
|
Miniion
Exanimo Inc Everto Rex Regis
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 12:24:00 -
[7]
Edited by: Miniion on 29/11/2009 12:26:10 /signed
Nothing say keyboard destruction like a carebear that self destructs, step above logoffski's
|
Asssassin X
Mean Corp
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 12:39:00 -
[8]
Edited by: Asssassin X on 29/11/2009 12:41:09 /SIGNED!! __
Enforcer of the NBSI policy |
Alvar
Legio Credere Reloaded
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 12:39:00 -
[9]
/signed
|
dragopent
Digital assassins
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 12:40:00 -
[10]
i agree if they want to take ships into harms way then SD should not be available to allow escape if the ship is tackled [url=http://dass.killmail.org?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=82250] [/url] |
|
Sargerous
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 12:42:00 -
[11]
/signed
|
Dr Nefarious
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 12:44:00 -
[12]
/signed I was wondering when someone would propose this
by the way, pretty...
|
Marlona Sky
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 12:51:00 -
[13]
Yarr!!!!
/me waves to p4rky
|
Marconus Orion
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 12:52:00 -
[14]
Yes. Timer based on size of ship. The bigger they are, the longer it takes.
|
Kikils
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 12:52:00 -
[15]
agreed
|
Marconius
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 12:53:00 -
[16]
p4rky > carebears
|
Oxana Ptotemkish
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 12:58:00 -
[17]
Sounds good to me, it's just a griefing tactic on us pvpers from carebears. "The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education."-- Paul Feyerabend |
Lord Innocence
Gallente Legio Credere Reloaded
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 13:16:00 -
[18]
/signed
i like the idea of no selfdescruct for the target when he is pointed, this gives a new option for pirates to steal ships. Because the only options to escape for the victim is to loose the ship through damage or leave it with the pod.
|
Rukro
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 13:23:00 -
[19]
/signed
maybe even increase SD time with plates/shield extenders :D
|
Aiko Shinjiro
Mean Corp Mean Coalition
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 14:06:00 -
[20]
rgr signed Yarrharr fiddle dee dee
|
|
SUICIDAL Larsen
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 14:14:00 -
[21]
Edited by: SUICIDAL Larsen on 29/11/2009 14:17:00 /signed!
|
Endorphimore
Minmatar League of Gentlemen Systematic-Chaos
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 14:21:00 -
[22]
/signed
|
Uma Thurman
Minmatar Mean Corp Mean Coalition
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 14:31:00 -
[23]
/signed
|
Mike Wittman
Digital assassins
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 14:46:00 -
[24]
Edited by: Mike Wittman on 29/11/2009 14:49:17 Edited by: Mike Wittman on 29/11/2009 14:46:11 /signed
Also make the self destruct message more visable. Take it out of the notifications where it gets overwritten by guns.
|
slimatary
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 15:15:00 -
[25]
Indeed
|
cptblood
Exanimo Inc Everto Rex Regis
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 15:27:00 -
[26]
indeed
|
Flaming Lemming
Caldari Puppeteer Press
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 15:32:00 -
[27]
Not supported.
Guess what? Even if you didn't get a killmail, you still accomplished your goal, the enemy ship is dead.
And so you didn't get a chance at loot, that just means the opposing player made a smart tactical decision to deny it to you.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Thoughtcrime does not entail death: thoughtcrime is death |
Anewb N'eve
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 16:51:00 -
[28]
Actually you should not be able to self destruct a ship at all.
|
Santiago Fahahrri
Galactic Geographic
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 17:02:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Flaming Lemming Not supported.
Guess what? Even if you didn't get a killmail, you still accomplished your goal, the enemy ship is dead.
And so you didn't get a chance at loot, that just means the opposing player made a smart tactical decision to deny it to you.
This. ~ Santiago Fahahrri Galactic Geographic |
Drake Draconis
Minmatar Shadow Cadre E-P-O-C-H
|
Posted - 2009.11.29 17:21:00 -
[30]
Edited by: Drake Draconis on 29/11/2009 17:22:07 The logic is sound.. but I don't give a damn about killmails.
So not supporting.
Because that's what this is all about... a egotistical epeen extension.
The ship still dies... that and the tactical reasons involved. ========================= CEO of Shadow Cadre http://www.shadowcadre.com ========================= |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |