Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sedilis
Lead Farmers
|
Posted - 2010.02.03 12:21:00 -
[61]
+1
|
Santiago Fahahrri
Galactic Geographic
|
Posted - 2010.02.03 13:37:00 -
[62]
As convenient as this would be, I have to say I vote No. T3 subsystems are not the same as swapping modules, you're actually cracking open the hull and making major modifications. I see the need to put the ship in a hangar as similar the putting an ocean ship in dry-dock to do major hull work.
Maybe if specialized POS facilities were created for this, including temporary housing for the crew (who can't stay in the ship while it's open to space) and if it took a lot longer than just swapping a module...
|
Jethro Hawkins
Capital Construction Research
|
Posted - 2010.02.03 16:31:00 -
[63]
Sweet jesus do this please.
------------ Join: "CCRES Public" Farming WH's, making T3, making other people cry. Would you like to know more? |
Herpes Sweatrash
|
Posted - 2010.02.03 19:36:00 -
[64]
This don't need to be in game...there should be some sacrfices made when live in wormhole and not being able change subsystem on easy mode ship is one of them.
|
Nox Zyd
|
Posted - 2010.02.07 15:17:00 -
[65]
Edited by: Nox Zyd on 07/02/2010 15:18:49 +1 from me
But I agree with the above post that there should be a new POS module to enable refit of Sub-Systems.
|
Takamura Muggins
|
Posted - 2010.02.08 05:24:00 -
[66]
supoorted immensly.
|
Iltarus Almondis
Minelands HELM Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.02.08 21:49:00 -
[67]
/signed
|
Vasali Tor
|
Posted - 2010.02.10 23:48:00 -
[68]
+1 and soon please
|
Overlord Battletank
|
Posted - 2010.02.11 04:56:00 -
[69]
This has got to change. Worm hole space is the perfect place for tech 3 ships but without the ability to swap subsystems they are really gimped.
|
JamesWyh
Probe Patrol Revival Of The Talocan Empire
|
Posted - 2010.02.12 23:43:00 -
[70]
Full support
|
|
CALUGARU
Capital Construction Research
|
Posted - 2010.02.13 00:58:00 -
[71]
PLEASE CCP LISTEN TO US
THUMBS UP ______________
The new Orca:
Originally by: CCP Navigator ooopss
|
LittleDice
|
Posted - 2010.02.13 01:03:00 -
[72]
100% support it.
|
nchek maroot
tlhlnag wo
|
Posted - 2010.02.13 01:42:00 -
[73]
Supported, however I don't think you need a new POS mod, there are already ship assembly arrays. If you can build a whole ship I don't think re-configuring a ship is out of the question. |
Kitsune Jones
|
Posted - 2010.02.13 02:46:00 -
[74]
Yeah, this only makes sense. If you can build ships from scratch in a POS, you really should be able to swap around modular ship parts too.
|
Raziel Saston
|
Posted - 2010.02.13 17:28:00 -
[75]
nods
|
Ace Secunda
Black Viper Nomads
|
Posted - 2010.02.16 10:46:00 -
[76]
I agree 100%
'If I can't blow it up It don't exsist'
|
Shandas
Garoun Investment Bank
|
Posted - 2010.02.16 13:53:00 -
[77]
Originally by: Santiago Fahahrri As convenient as this would be, I have to say I vote No. T3 subsystems are not the same as swapping modules, you're actually cracking open the hull and making major modifications. I see the need to put the ship in a hangar as similar the putting an ocean ship in dry-dock to do major hull work.
Maybe if specialized POS facilities were created for this, including temporary housing for the crew (who can't stay in the ship while it's open to space) and if it took a lot longer than just swapping a module...
I'm suprised someone hasn't shot you down because you're trying to base stuff on real life/realism. I'd watch the references as it's a big no no to some people.
Anyway, we have several 'dry dock' options, Ship maint. array, just because you can't sit in it like a station doesn't mean that's not how it works. You store your ship inside the array. Lots of room in a POS to offload that pesky crew who makes no difference to how the ship functions.
I view the ship maintenance array just like I would docking in a station, just doesn't have a docked graphic. Yes, you sit in space while you swap things, but that's not how I see it working. You still dock to get things swapped on your ship. I would guess the way the code it written you have to be in the ship to change it (same as if you're in a station). If that wasn't the case you could choose a ship in the array and swap moduals then board it (notice it's board as in get out and move to this ship).
That is why I think T3 should be just as configureable. It's stupid that you can build them but you can't put one together in Whole space.
|
Reverend Book
|
Posted - 2010.02.16 19:03:00 -
[78]
Only makes sense. You should be able to utilize the abilities of ships in the area where their components are found . . .
|
Carim FalNador
|
Posted - 2010.02.18 15:18:00 -
[79]
I agree with QP. This is a huge issue, I of cause think there should be a limitation on where you can refit the tech3 ship. So the suggestion of haveing a "Tech 3 modular refitting POS module" is the best!
CCP - Allowing people in Wspace to change sub systems has nothing to do with "preventing colonization". since we already have conolized wspace. Not being able to change sub systems only means have have to bring extra ships. It makes the Tech3 ship fill its role better, a ship that can be changed for its need.
|
Meelah Ra
Aperture Harmonics K162
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 06:16:00 -
[80]
Please just fix this already!
|
|
SYUFF
|
Posted - 2010.02.20 10:07:00 -
[81]
I dont live in a wormhole, nor ever have. Nor can I fly a Strategic Cruiser, but I am one for common sense.
/signed, If I can assemble a ship from scratch at a POS, I can make some modifications to it if I like.
|
Nemoliyah
|
Posted - 2010.02.20 13:19:00 -
[82]
/signed
|
343guilty1
Strategic Insanity
|
Posted - 2010.02.20 15:34:00 -
[83]
I've run into this problem myself, made it very hard to switch from sleepers to combat effeciently, supported.
|
Thaylon Sen
|
Posted - 2010.02.23 19:45:00 -
[84]
Just bumped into this problem myself. Kind of defeats the point of having a T3 if you cant change the setups at a POS (in w-space at least).
Completely support the motion.
|
Taereha
|
Posted - 2010.02.28 15:12:00 -
[85]
Completely agree!
|
Damark
|
Posted - 2010.03.09 18:17:00 -
[86]
My name is Damark and I support Quivering's nomination for President of Eve... i mean this motion
|
Saitwo
|
Posted - 2010.03.10 15:40:00 -
[87]
YES PLEASE!
|
Alexander Manu
Stargazer Exploration Company Sundiver Technology Diversified
|
Posted - 2010.03.11 10:01:00 -
[88]
agree 100%. It must be looked into...
|
ElectricDolphin3
Stargazer Exploration Company
|
Posted - 2010.03.11 10:07:00 -
[89]
I really like this proposed compromise. I very much support this.
|
Aamrr
|
Posted - 2010.03.12 02:26:00 -
[90]
As a wormhole resident and producer of T3 ships, this is a primary concern for my Eve career.
Please make this a priority!
/signed.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |