Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
|
CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 13:22:00 -
[1]
EVE Online: Dominion 1.1 will be deployed this Thursday, January 21, 2010. Dominion 1.1 will see the emergence of Supercarriers and fighter bombers on the battlefield, changes to territorial control units for claiming sovereignty and new EVE Voice fonts.
The deployment process will begin at 07:00 UTC and is expected to be completed at 13:00 UTC. Patch notes are available for review.
Navigator Senior Community Representative CCP Hf, EVE Online
|
|
Valator Uel
Caldari D-Stress Ad Astra.
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 13:34:00 -
[2]
Quote: CCP Tuxford can no longer shut down TQ on a whim.
lol? Tux has been nerfed.
Quote: Aya > Hostile tcf gang coming to h-pa Deva Blackfire > ships? Ralarina > Yes, in ships
|
Niraia
Gallente Starcakes HellFleet
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 13:38:00 -
[3]
Awww :)
"New wallet API functions have been added." - Are these documented somewhere?
|
Grideris
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 13:39:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Valator Uel
Quote: CCP Tuxford can no longer shut down TQ on a whim.
lol? Tux has been nerfed.
No! Not Tux!
|
Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 13:48:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Destination SkillQueue on 20/01/2010 13:48:38
Quote: Voice fonts have now been added to EVE Voice. This new feature will allow you to alter your voice during chat to increase or lower pitch or to change from male to female voices. This is certainly not going to be abused in any way.
Confirming this
|
Darth Sith
Genbuku. Daisho Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 13:56:00 -
[6]
Woot! .. My Nyx has a purpose again :)
|
Gabba Junior
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 13:57:00 -
[7]
Shame the TCU's got there hitpoints increased now and not the last patch as this would've definitely saved W.I. Is that the excuse we are going to here?
\o/ for Super Carriers maybe they will all come out of hiding now
|
Severion Atarkos
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 13:58:00 -
[8]
Finally I can use my nyx again, now we just need to fix the monster grid bug and eve might be back on the right track.
|
DaDutchDude
Minmatar Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 14:09:00 -
[9]
No mention about the second bonus to the Hel. Has it been left unchanged? _____________________________________
Agony Unleashed (home of PVP University)
|
Ga'len
Minmatar Ship Construction Services Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 14:10:00 -
[10]
This is nice and all, but when are you going to fix the game breaking lag in nullsec?
|
|
iP0D
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 14:11:00 -
[11]
None of the changes for sovereignty structures bring any real change to the current bottlenecks in sovereignty warfare I have to say.
TCU hitpoints is pretty irrelevant in the bigger picture, and the SBU increase is really not enough to do anything against just throwing a bunch of caps against it for a siege cycle and go back to scratch again.
Same with reinforced timer variance change. It still falls within timezone cover, it really needs a very different approach to influence such timers tbh. At least with pos you could kite, hard work, but heck through effort you get a decent shot at it. Right now the only method is superior concentration of force for those times that matter, anything else - including original dominion concepts of dominance and engaging/defending in multiple locations - remains pretty irrelevant.
|
Charles Javeroux
Gallente INTERSTELLAR CREDIT
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 14:11:00 -
[12]
\o/Yay for s-carrier boost. This should definetly have a good influence on cap market. ...oh and I promise to use those sexy female voice fonts on good purposes
Originally by: Orek Fear I guess the ultimate solution to inflation in EVE turned out to be an NPC stripper...
|
Ix Forres
Caldari Vanguard Frontiers Antaeus Combine
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 14:18:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Niraia Awww :)
"New wallet API functions have been added." - Are these documented somewhere?
Tee hee. You said 'documented'.
http://www.eveonline.com/api/doc/default.asp - the official API documentation (no mention of anything added since the birth of the API) http://wiki.eve-id.net/APIv2_Page_Index - the unofficial API documentation (halfway decent)
Seriously though, documentation is nowhere to be seen for these, so unless we get lucky with guessing function names, these functions might as well not exist. It's like saying "We've added a new shiptype! But you can't trade them, can't buy them on the market and you can't put them in contracts. And we're not telling you where they come from." -- Ix Forres EVE Application Developer EVE Metrics | accVIEW | I Tweet |
|
CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 14:19:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Niraia Awww :)
"New wallet API functions have been added." - Are these documented somewhere?
I am going to find out some more information regarding this and give you and update
Navigator Senior Community Representative CCP Hf, EVE Online
|
|
Xtover
Suicide Kings
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 14:24:00 -
[15]
oh hai.
reading.
|
|
CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 14:33:00 -
[16]
Originally by: CCP Navigator
Originally by: Niraia Awww :)
"New wallet API functions have been added." - Are these documented somewhere?
I am going to find out some more information regarding this and give you and update
Update as promised:
There are two new columns in the API related to taxation a character gets when they receive bounties, mission rewards or mission time bonuses.
ò taxReceiverID (corporation ID who received the tax) ò taxAmount (the amount of tax paid)
The in-game wallet still shows a separate transaction where the tax was paid but the API combines these into one transaction where amount plus taxAmount = amount in first transaction displayed in-game.
Navigator Senior Community Representative CCP Hf, EVE Online
|
|
Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 14:42:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Xtover
Quote: Locked targets show a standings icon making it easier for remote repairing pilots to identify who they should be repairing and who they should be shooting more easily.
holy **** you added that in fast... what was that, 24 hours from assembly hall to patch? new record? nice.
I applaud your optimism in thinking that the feature hasn't been requested long before that multiple times.
|
Xtover
Suicide Kings
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 14:43:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Destination SkillQueue I applaud your optimism in thinking that the feature hasn't been requested long before that multiple times.
I applaud your correction.
Still happy it's in,
c?
|
TeaDaze
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 14:45:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Ga'len When are you going to fix the server stability issues?
I'm sure they are working on this however that doesn't mean all other changes should be put on hold, right? Different teams work on different features and (before anyone suggests it) the mythical man month shows why just throwing more developers at a single problem usually causes more harm than good.
The answer will be "when it is ready" and I'd rather that than some half baked partial fix that then causes other issues.
That said, the CSM will be asking for an update on this issue at the Iceland summit if nothing has been released in the meantime.
|
Jameroz
Echoes of Space
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 14:46:00 -
[20]
Originally by: CCP Navigator Update as promised:
There are two new columns in the API related to taxation a character gets when they receive bounties, mission rewards or mission time bonuses.
Thanks for the clarification.
|
|
AlexSmaller
DEFCON. The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 14:51:00 -
[21]
no need for speed????
What about the lag???
|
Skyvyr
Caldari House Of BlackStar Emergence.
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 14:52:00 -
[22]
This is one of the few patch notes that didn't include:
Quote: EXPLOIT FIXES * Several exploits have been fixed making the world a better place for all.
I, too, enjoyed the CCP Tuxford nerf. -- I often heard the Sky's the limit, sadly I'm broke fairly often. |
Princess Jodi
Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 14:57:00 -
[23]
Will SuperCarriers be allowed to dock? I see no mention of it, yet previous discussions leaned that way.
|
Boppi
Blue Republic
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 14:58:00 -
[24]
Edited by: Boppi on 20/01/2010 15:00:34 FIX THE GAY ****ED UP ******ED LAG!
FOR ****S SAKE!
F********************************! ___________________________
1st lol umad? omgwtf! cu on teh battlefield hurfblurf post with ur main derp Toasting in an epic bread hurr |
Ancy Denaries
Forever Unbound
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 14:59:00 -
[25]
Originally by: Princess Jodi Will SuperCarriers be allowed to dock? I see no mention of it, yet previous discussions leaned that way.
No. Quote: CCP Tuxford can no longer shut down TQ on a whim.
I demand this right be returned to Tuxford! It is his own right to make a fool of himself!
Quote: Asteroid belt celestial markers will no longer decloak ships.
THANK YOU!
---- The Demigodess with a Conscience - An EVE IC Blog Personal Killboard |
mistersparky
Estrale Frontiers
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 14:59:00 -
[26]
Quote: Heavy ships will now properly align themselves towards their warp destination so no more warping sideways or backwards.
What!?! This is an outrage! I demand the mighty warp slide not be nerfed.
|
Templarus Maximums
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 15:08:00 -
[27]
Please tell me MS drone bays are getting expanded so they can hold both fighters and bombers :(
|
Xtover
Suicide Kings
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 15:14:00 -
[28]
Originally by: mistersparky
Quote: Heavy ships will now properly align themselves towards their warp destination so no more warping sideways or backwards.
What!?! This is an outrage! I demand the mighty warp slide not be nerfed.
instead you can drift around stations like 2 fast 2 furious....
|
Princess Jodi
Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 15:19:00 -
[29]
Well, CCP, if you don't allow SuperCarriers to dock you're not gonna see more of them. Being forced to have an alt capable of holding the ship is a big roadblock to owning one. Bigger than the cost of the ship.
I agree with SC's having to use the Fighter-Bombers themselves.
I haven't been on Sisi to test... do the Fighter-Bombers follow ships thru warps like Fighters do?
|
McFly
C0LDFIRE
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 15:24:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Princess Jodi Well, CCP, if you don't allow SuperCarriers to dock you're not gonna see more of them. Being forced to have an alt capable of holding the ship is a big roadblock to owning one. Bigger than the cost of the ship.
I agree with SC's having to use the Fighter-Bombers themselves.
I haven't been on Sisi to test... do the Fighter-Bombers follow ships thru warps like Fighters do?
Hasn't stopped people from using them before....
-- my sig got nerfed again, csm thread to get forum sig limitations lifted a bit |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |