| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tasbard
   |
Posted - 2010.01.20 14:10:00 -
[1]
Patch Notes:
 Quote:
In some cases remote repairing was not applying aggression correctly to the receiver of the repairs if they were committing crimes at the time. This has now been fixed.
So STFU about it already. |
Kijo Rikki
Caldari
Swarm of Angry Bees
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 14:16:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Kijo Rikki on 20/01/2010 14:15:51
I'm assuming the issue was neutral reppers not being flagged for helping aggressors? If so the wording suggests nothing will change as the receiver of the repairs =/= the repping paty.
|
Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 14:21:00 -
[3]
Where does that snippet say that a 3rd party assisting a wartarget/criminal is in any way impeded during/after providing said assistance?
Entirely unrelated to the vast majority of RR complaints concerning aggression, so I sincerely doubt you can scrap your medication for that particular headache just yet.
PS: If you are going to swear be man enough to spell it out and don't use acronyms in order to bypass the profnaity filter.
|
Insa Rexion
Minmatar
CTRL-Q
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 14:54:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Tasbard
Patch Notes:
Quote:
In some cases remote repairing was not applying aggression correctly to the receiver of the repairs if they were committing crimes at the time. This has now been fixed.
So STFU about it already.
Nope, it's a fix to a bug in the existing mechanics, not a change to thise mechanics, the whines may continue unabated
--------------------------------------------
well mannered ****ole |
Zoe Midoru
Eve University
Ivy League
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 20:03:00 -
[5]
So, it seems to me like there's two possibilities here.
A) The OP is so stupid that they actually don't understand that this has nothing to do with the RR issues that people complain about.
B) The OP realizes that this has nothing to do with said issues, but is so stupid that they think this is somehow a good burn or troll.
|
Lexa Hellfury
Incura
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 20:10:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Tasbard
Patch Notes:
Quote:
In some cases remote repairing was not applying aggression correctly to the receiver of the repairs if they were committing crimes at the time. This has now been fixed.
So STFU about it already.
Reading comprehension fail.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Helena C
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 20:28:00 -
[7]
The entire remote repping mechanic is rather fail IMHO. It allows for total gayness in high sec wars, by giving no agro and allowing them to dock or jump through a gate with no aggression timer.
Then if you are a pirate, you get flagged as a GCC, just for repping a corpmate. Makes absolutely no sense at all and is rather stupid.
Corpmates should only become GCC if they rep when the corpmate has GCC. They should not be GCC flagged just for repping a negative status corpmate.
Remote Repping should also start a aggression timer for gate jumps and docking which would quickly end the high sec crap, that goes on non stop with the station hugging tards.
|
Pater Peccavi
Minmatar
The Bastards
|
Posted - 2010.01.20 21:08:00 -
[8]
What did the patch actually fix? RR is supposed to aggress the remote repped person if said person is committing a crime? Me so confused!
_________
|
Ulwithy Arillious
|
Posted - 2010.01.21 03:36:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Helena C
high sec is fail
Fixed that for you.
|
Kazang
Wrecking Shots
|
Posted - 2010.01.21 15:05:00 -
[10]
***s whining about neutral RR not only fail at eve but also reading comprehension.
A pattern is beginning to form.
Kazang
|
|
|
Guillame Herschel
Gallente
NME1
|
Posted - 2010.01.21 20:11:00 -
[11]
So was this a bug or exploit? If a neutral was repping a criminal when he committed his crime, no aggression would accrue to the criminal?
Otherwise, it makes no sense.
-- He said "The President is near."
|
Helena C
|
Posted - 2010.01.21 20:46:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Ulwithy Arillious
Originally by: Helena C
high sec is fail
Fixed that for you.
Well actually it's just as big of a issue in low sec. At least the issue of going GCC for repping a negative status corp member. I agree high sec war decs are externally gay and it's the reason I've only been involved in two.
Giving RR alt's docking/jumping aggro would go a long way toward making is less gay.
|
Madame Masque
|
Posted - 2010.01.21 20:53:00 -
[13]
yea neutral rr is unfair for all us poor players without 6 alts 
|
Nareg Maxence
Gallente
JotunHeim Hird
|
Posted - 2010.01.21 22:06:00 -
[14]
I am not sure I understand what this actually fixes.
According to the note, remote repair should apply aggression on the reciever of the repair. This is not a mechanic I was aware of. The note further states that if the pilot that is recieving this repair is committing a crime, in some cases he does not get aggression?
Wut?
|
captain skinback
|
Posted - 2010.01.22 13:37:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Zoe Midoru
So, it seems to me like there's two possibilities here.
A) The OP is so stupid that they actually don't understand that this has nothing to do with the RR issues that people complain about.
B) The OP realizes that this has nothing to do with said issues, but is so stupid that they think this is somehow a good burn or troll.
captain obvious to the rescue! |
Tammarr
|
Posted - 2010.01.22 13:47:00 -
[16]
I truly understand the highsec whines about neutral logistics repairing.
But I will never agree that remote repairing should give you a timer stoping docking and jumping.
Why?
Umm, guys they had a logged off fleet right ontop of us, jumpbridging in, deagress get your reps running we have no chance now that they've doubled in numbers, we got to bug out and try to strike at any trailers.
repairing gives aggro:
Crap guys. Looks like we cant get away, lets take a few of them with us, oh, they are in vast superiority and also have logistics, lets go make coffee/smoke and get back in 5 mins with our fresh clones for there is no use in teamwork and assist eachother to try and make an orderly retreat.
|
JitaPriceChecker2
|
Posted - 2010.01.22 14:02:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Tasbard
Patch Notes:
Quote:
In some cases remote repairing was not applying aggression correctly to the receiver of the repairs if they were committing crimes at the time. This has now been fixed.
So STFU about it already.
Learn to read.
|
Tasbard
|
Posted - 2010.01.22 14:49:00 -
[18]
Successful troll 8/10
how many times can people say exactly the same thing in post after post? why would u keep posting? cause i'm a really good troll, thats why. idiots. |
Kijo Rikki
Caldari
Swarm of Angry Bees
|
Posted - 2010.01.22 15:45:00 -
[19]
I find it amusing you're willing to make yourself look like an idiot and an ass in the name of trolling.
Ah well, Jesus loves you! (assuming he exists)
|
Pater Peccavi
Minmatar
The Bastards
|
Posted - 2010.01.22 16:08:00 -
[20]
Edited by: Pater Peccavi on 22/01/2010 16:10:18
I still want to know what the patch actually did. The wording doesn't make much sense.
Edit:
Originally by: Tasbard
Successful troll 8/10
how many times can people say exactly the same thing in post after post? why would u keep posting? cause i'm a really good troll, thats why. idiots.
That's what all people say when they realize they said something stupid on the internets. "No, guys! I wasn't bein serious! Ima troll!" Nice try to save face.
_________
|
|
|
Dimitryy
Gallente
Ever Flow
Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.01.22 20:59:00 -
[21]
Originally by: Madame Masque
yea neutral rr is unfair for all us poor players without 6 alts
You say as you alt-post on the forums
------------------------------------------
Jack Blackstone > Dimitryy I hope you die. |
Fer DeLance
|
Posted - 2010.01.23 11:28:00 -
[22]
RR is ultracr@p the way it works. No aggression timer, undock RR, shoot back if you get shot, if you don't feel like shooting back, jump the gate, or just dock, repeat from step one. I used to get upset when this happened. Nowdays, everyone can be sure that there is always a RR alt around to aid your opponent.
CCP will not fix this, because of marketing. Neutral RR forces ppl to have a second accound and use alts. Well, i never had an alt, not will i ever have an alt, but other ppl i am sure will, as they are somehow forced to have a second subscription.
But since the neutral RR is ok with the CCP and concord, what i do, is get a RR BS, and when i see corps fighting, i randomly choose a side, and RR them. It's fun, no one expects that, not even the guys that benefit from it. A couple of days ago, i RRed a Myrmidon, that was fighting 2 BC's 2 Cruisers and a frigate outside a station, and the guy managed to kill four out of five aggressors. lol...
They need to fix this asap. RR should cause CONCORD to spawn. If you have not payed for the war, if you are not aggressed, then why should you be able to change the tide?
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |