Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tom Drakka
|
Posted - 2010.02.06 00:57:00 -
[1]
Could some one explain how sencer strength afects being probed. Also does sencer strength help you from being jammed. If so on both questions then how much sencer strength do you need.
|
Kiffe Mimic
|
Posted - 2010.02.06 01:21:00 -
[2]
From what i understand, sensor strength is the speed at which you lock a target, and the more the harder you are to get jammed. I could be wrong. |
Shade Millith
International House of PWNCakes Libertas Fidelitas
|
Posted - 2010.02.06 01:42:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Kiffe Mimic From what i understand, sensor strength is the speed at which you lock a target, and the more the harder you are to get jammed. I could be wrong.
Incorrect
Scan Resolution is what determines your targeting speed.
Sensor Strength makes it harder to probe, and to jam with ECM --------------------------------------------
|
Ivas Tiffy
|
Posted - 2010.02.06 01:46:00 -
[4]
dont undock
|
ScottyDosn'tKnow
Task Force Zener Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.02.06 01:58:00 -
[5]
Safe-spot, Cloak.
|
TheMahdi
|
Posted - 2010.02.06 12:20:00 -
[6]
Yes and yes.
To be unprobable you need: Sensor strength greater than your signature radius.
As for how much you need to not be jammable, that depends on how much jamming strength the opponent is throwing at you, so it's relative.
|
dtyk
|
Posted - 2010.02.06 12:38:00 -
[7]
For probes: (sensor strength/sig radius) > 1.08 Unjammable: Not possible. The chances decrease as it goes higher, but there's always a small chance.
|
XXSketchxx
Gallente Remote Soviet Industries
|
Posted - 2010.02.06 15:17:00 -
[8]
Originally by: dtyk For probes: (sensor strength/sig radius) > 1.08 Unjammable: Not possible. The chances decrease as it goes higher, but there's always a small chance.
Pretty sure its sig radius/sensor strength. Basically you want sensor strength to be greater than(or at least very close to) the signature radius.
Easiest way is with 2 mid slot ECCM and 1 low slot ECCM and at least electronic subsystem 4 with the dissolution sequencer subsystem fitted. The loki has the signature radius defensive subsystem as well, which when you have it fitted in addition to the dissolution sequencer and only 2 midslot ECCM (drop the low slot ECCM), you get 104m/97.8ss= 1.06 which is less than 1.08. Using the racial ECCM implants or halo implants (signature reduction) can also help, but I find these less desirable.
1.08 is also not entirely practical. It calls for a max skilled, virtue set, sisters gear (probes and launcher) and covert ops pilot. But if you can get your scan size (the ratio of signature radius to sensor strength) below 1.08, you are safe. Just be careful if fighting minmatar/angels as they target paint which will increase your signature and screw you, or using T2 missiles as this will also increase your signature radius. _____________________________________________
-Sketch, Certified Pharmacist
Need a Boost?
|
Contralto
GCHQ
|
Posted - 2010.02.06 19:25:00 -
[9]
Hi Sketch, how goes it?
Sketch is spot on and we have tried and tested the fits, With halo's as well in our recent Wh adventures together.
|
Skiff Chandler
|
Posted - 2010.02.07 22:59:00 -
[10]
there is a reason that just about only capital ships can do it.... Sensor stregth need to be higer then SCAN RES not sig radius a carrier with 75 sensor strength and 70 scan res will be unprobable
|
|
William Hamilton
Caldari Endless Destruction Legiunea ROmana
|
Posted - 2010.02.07 23:53:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Skiff Chandler there is a reason that just about only capital ships can do it.... Sensor stregth need to be higer then SCAN RES not sig radius a carrier with 75 sensor strength and 70 scan res will be unprobable
No, this is not true at all. Following this advice will get you killed.
It's Sensor Strength > Sig Res. Or Sensor Strength/SigRes > 1.08. These both work out to be approximatley the same.
This is why t3 is so good at doing it, the dissolion sequnecer subsystem boosts sensor strength by 75%.
|
XXSketchxx
Gallente Remote Soviet Industries
|
Posted - 2010.02.08 02:23:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Skiff Chandler there is a reason that just about only capital ships can do it.... Sensor stregth need to be higer then SCAN RES not sig radius a carrier with 75 sensor strength and 70 scan res will be unprobable
lol
please try this and go afk at your "safespot" without cloak _____________________________________________
-Sketch, Certified Pharmacist
Need a Boost?
|
Ebru Shally
|
Posted - 2010.02.08 13:06:00 -
[13]
---Troll Alert---
you should sell that T3 and buy a Heart of gold
Heart of Gold
S.S. Heart of Gold is the first prototype ship to successfully utilize the revolutionary Infinite Improbability Drive. It is 150 meters long and has been represented in various shapes. The original radio series did not specify a shape. In the novel adapted from the first four episodes of the radio series, it was described as a sleek white running shoe, which the TV adaptation adopted as a basis for its depictions. Finally, in the recent 2005 movie, it is more spherical with a hole and red brakelights on the rear that form the shape of a heart, a shape derived from a teacup in the brownian motion producer that powers the Infinite Improbability Drive. It also features a mural around the hole which depicts the invention of the Drive. It was built as a secret government project on planet Damogran from where Zaphod Beeblebrox, the then-President of the Imperial Galactic Government, stole it at the launching ceremony. The ship's cybernetics consist of a new generation of Sirius Cybernetics Corporation robots and computers with Genuine People Personalities (including Eddie the shipboard computer and Marvin). In the novel Life, the Universe and Everything, it is revealed that the core of the Improbability Drive is actually the Golden Bail of Prosperity, one of five items that forms the Wikkit Gate. The drive is subsequently stolen by the robots of Krikkit, but is later recovered by Zaphod Beeblebrox and reinstalled.
|
Contralto
GCHQ
|
Posted - 2010.02.08 16:12:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Skiff Chandler there is a reason that just about only capital ships can do it.... Sensor stregth need to be higer then SCAN RES not sig radius a carrier with 75 sensor strength and 70 scan res will be unprobable
Wow! how can someone be so wrong and yet so confident in his statement? The actuality is directly the opposite in all respects. Cap ships are almost impossible to make unprobeable without extreme measures including multiple remote Eccm, full local ECCM, skirmish links, boosters and HG halo's etc, and that's just Carriers.
|
Exploding Tukey
|
Posted - 2010.02.08 17:22:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Contralto Wow! how can someone be so wrong and yet so confident in his statement?
Welcome to the internet
|
Xauxau
Caldari
|
Posted - 2010.02.08 19:37:00 -
[16]
Originally by: dtyk For probes: (sensor strength/sig radius) > 1.08
Beware of enemies with target painters while seeking to fly "unprobeable".
|
dtyk
|
Posted - 2010.02.08 20:07:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Xauxau
Originally by: dtyk For probes: (sensor strength/sig radius) > 1.08
Beware of enemies with target painters while seeking to fly "unprobeable".
The formula applies, target painting only changes the variables.
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |