Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Flair Firestar
|
Posted - 2010.02.07 09:41:00 -
[1]
Our corp recently installed a second pos in our wormhole to do polymer reaktions.
One of our members now wants to use one of the two reaktors (polymer reactor and the corresponding 4 silos). Since we would like to limit the "config starbase equipment" role to directors for security reasons. (the main pos would be vulnerable to anyone with that role) Our solution has been to set the reaktor tower to allow onlining/offlining for the starbase fuel technician role. However we ran into the problem that the fuel technician can use the reaktor as is. But when he needs to do a different reaktion he gets an error message telling him that the "config starbase equipment" role is needed to change the silo types to a different mineral/polymer/gas.
Is there any option to allow that without the config starbase role? On another note, can online/offline acess be restricted to certain modules? Or can it only be done to the pos as a whole?
|
JitaPriceChecker2
|
Posted - 2010.02.07 10:32:00 -
[2]
I have run into the same problem , found no solution.
|
Emporer Norton
|
Posted - 2010.02.07 18:09:00 -
[3]
Best solution would be for that person to setup an alt account only need corp management 1 and anchoring 3 then can setup there own pos however they want depending on modules can be over 500 million isk though for a large tower other then that they would need the roles and that just depends on how much you trust them
|
Flair Firestar
|
Posted - 2010.02.08 17:08:00 -
[4]
Oh well. I was hoping for a more elegant solution. That will mean he will have to call a director when he changes reaktions.
|
Agent Unknown
Caldari
|
Posted - 2010.02.08 21:24:00 -
[5]
Can you set the silos to "starbase fuel technician" for use/take/offline/online as well? Also, I now have one of those annoying sigs.
Originally by: CCP Fallout
And yelling is bad. It makes the baby Jesus cry and when the baby Jesus cries I'm forced to lock threads
|
Flair Firestar
|
Posted - 2010.02.09 08:42:00 -
[6]
That¦s what we did. However changing the contents of a silo (c28 to c32 for example) we still get the tower complaining that "config starbase equipent role" is needed.
|
Jack Sabastian
|
Posted - 2010.02.11 11:04:00 -
[7]
I'm not sure how pratical this will be in your case but put up one one silo for each reactant? That way he doesn't have to change the silos type, just online the correct silos and he's golden.
It's not too many for all polymer reactions. 9 Fullerites, 9 hybrid polymers, and 7 miniral is only 25 silos.
It's one way to do it.
|
JitaPriceChecker2
|
Posted - 2010.02.11 12:33:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Jack Sabastian I'm not sure how pratical this will be in your case but put up one one silo for each reactant? That way he doesn't have to change the silos type, just online the correct silos and he's golden.
It's not too many for all polymer reactions. 9 Fullerites, 9 hybrid polymers, and 7 miniral is only 25 silos.
It's one way to do it.
You still need config starbase to change reaction it self. Do you suggest to him to anchor 9 reactors as well ?
|
Jack Sabastian
|
Posted - 2010.02.12 09:40:00 -
[9]
Originally by: JitaPriceChecker2
Originally by: Jack Sabastian ...
You still need config starbase to change reaction it self. Do you suggest to him to anchor 9 reactors as well ?
See that I didn't know, well that blows that plan out of the water. It was just an out of the box I idea thought of that might help.
|
Flair Firestar
|
Posted - 2010.02.12 11:40:00 -
[10]
It¦s still a working Idea.
The downside is the massive blob of silos it creates. We¦ll stay with the "call director" solution for the time being. As nobody would volunteer to haul all those extra structures into our wormhole.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |