Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mielono
Caldari SWARTA
|
Posted - 2010.02.08 14:29:00 -
[1]
This key would only give out KM information, useful for public killboards to auto-update as well as an idea that I have on the MD forums. Link here Player Made Insurance
|
Drake Draconis
Shadow Cadre Looney Toons.
|
Posted - 2010.02.08 17:58:00 -
[2]
As much as I despise and abhor kill-mails and kill-boards.
This would at least prevent me from having to hand out more than what is necessary to appease my alliance or some such.
I suppose it wouldn't hurt.
Causal not so serious support. ========================= CEO of Shadow Cadre http://www.shadowcadre.com ========================= |
Bel'shamharoth
|
Posted - 2010.02.08 18:44:00 -
[3]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'm not a fig plucker or a fig plucker's son, but I'll pluck figs till the fig plucking's done. |
Skarii TuThess
Lansez Innovations
|
Posted - 2010.02.08 19:19:00 -
[4]
I support this idea - useful for automated services where you don't fully trust the system you are providing access to.
|
SencneS
Rebellion Against Big Irreversible Dinks
|
Posted - 2010.02.08 22:23:00 -
[5]
Supported because it's a good idea also it helps streamline the process and minimize the data harvest.
Amarr for Life |
Herschel Yamamoto
Agent-Orange
|
Posted - 2010.02.09 03:15:00 -
[6]
Yeah, having limited and full APIs for corporations as their own entities, instead of running everything through directors personally, sounds like a good idea to me.
|
Chainsaw Plankton
IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE
|
Posted - 2010.02.09 07:03:00 -
[7]
oh god yes
|
Jonah Pod
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.02.09 07:52:00 -
[8]
Without any more details, I couldn't support the idea no matter that it seems to be a good one. Additionally, I doubt it'll make it to the CSM that way.
OP, please update your proposal with more details. Have a look at the CSM wiki pages to get an idea of what degree of detail is considered appropriate by the CSM.
|
Aineko Macx
|
Posted - 2010.02.09 08:52:00 -
[9]
Supported.
Originally by: Jonah Pod Without any more details, I couldn't support the idea no matter that it seems to be a good one. Additionally, I doubt it'll make it to the CSM that way.
What more detail do you need? Both the API system and the killlog.xml already exist. We are just asking for a new API key which gives access to only that API XML.
|
Mielono
Caldari SWARTA
|
Posted - 2010.02.10 04:52:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Aineko Macx Supported.
Originally by: Jonah Pod Without any more details, I couldn't support the idea no matter that it seems to be a good one. Additionally, I doubt it'll make it to the CSM that way.
What more detail do you need? Both the API system and the killlog.xml already exist. We are just asking for a new API key which gives access to only that API XML.
Exactly... I figured simple is better.
|
|
Zormaka Brutus
Supalayian
|
Posted - 2010.02.10 08:32:00 -
[11]
Yes to the killmail only api key !
|
Mielono
Caldari SWARTA
|
Posted - 2010.02.11 09:36:00 -
[12]
Applying my first bump for bumps sake
|
Dariah Stardweller
Gung-Ho
|
Posted - 2010.02.11 11:10:00 -
[13]
|
Jonah Pod
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.02.11 22:38:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Aineko Macx Supported.
Originally by: Jonah Pod Without any more details, I couldn't support the idea no matter that it seems to be a good one. Additionally, I doubt it'll make it to the CSM that way.
What more detail do you need? Both the API system and the killlog.xml already exist. We are just asking for a new API key which gives access to only that API XML.
Detailed information such as why it would be necessary to have a new API key introduced ONLY for this specific purpose while the current Limited API Key already allows access to this information. Stuff like this.
As it is now, you're simply asking CCP to support your ingame business idea (which you certainly would be able to implement using the information available as given today).
|
Dr BattleSmith
PAX Interstellar Services
|
Posted - 2010.02.11 23:28:00 -
[15]
With oAuth they could have multiple scopes.
The user could approve access for a 3rd party to access certain scopes with a single click. In a safe and secure way with no need for messy public keys.
Without an oAuth API for OpenSocial apps and others to latch onto the coming social network is going to be a joke.
|
Mark Galean
Ooops Inc. Infinite Innovation
|
Posted - 2010.02.12 07:02:00 -
[16]
Edited by: Mark Galean on 12/02/2010 07:02:30 Proposal for enhanced API management and multiple keys for several access-levels (would replace this request) : http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1267401
Mark Galean, Ooops Inc. Infinite Innovation (II) |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |