Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Phizban
The Needs Of The Few The Needs Of The Few Many
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 03:00:00 -
[1] - Quote
CQ wah. Ship spinning, wah. NEX wah.
Lets move the game backwards by re-adopting past iterations. Let us embrace the past, and let EVE stagnate. No change, only the same reliable unchanging predictable experience.
Now CCP can simply re-introduce the CQ / Ship Spin Hanger option and call it new content. Weeeeee!
So now the winter expansion suffers. Lets bring back previous AB and MWD and NANO specs. Lets bring back wrecks that can not be salvaged by anyone, and get back to the old RIG prices.
Oh, also, bring back the times when Dreads cost LESS than Carriers.
Finally, I would like all my ISK refunded from all my losses, in the past.
|
Gregor Palter
25
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 03:03:00 -
[2] - Quote
I wish they'd give you back a brain, logical reasoning and the ability to create good threads. I guess that would imply that, at some point at least, you had any of that to begin with. |
Albetta
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 03:06:00 -
[3] - Quote
Man your stupid |
Large Collidable Object
morons.
217
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 03:09:00 -
[4] - Quote
I wonder what combination of mental disorders the OP suffers from, but can't quite figure it out yet.
Could you please post one more time so I can nail it?
Anyway - to some extent, there seems to be some reasoning behind this - CCP might just start threatening players with more WiS crap and sell us a rollback as a new expansion whilst not developing any new content. morons-áare recruiting. We're good at breeding! |
The Apostle
The Black Priests
31
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 03:10:00 -
[5] - Quote
Quote:Now CCP can simply re-introduce the CQ / Ship Spin Hanger option and call it new content. Weeeeee! Words cannot describe how I feel about you right now so I wrote a little script just for you.
{dysfunction} if it's a troll It's a pretty poor troll else If it's not a troll you've had your head up your _____ for quite some time else you're an idiot.
return null {/dysfunction} Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. |
|
CCP Manifest
C C P C C P Alliance
64
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 03:13:00 -
[6] - Quote
I have not read this thread, and for that I apologize. However, I thought it more important to jump in immediately and clarify that ship spinning actually means that we will all start moving in circles again--either clockwise or counterclockwise depending on the preference of the pilot. ======== o7 CCP Manifest | Public Relations and Social Media | @ccp_manifest |
|
The Apostle
The Black Priests
31
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 03:19:00 -
[7] - Quote
Quote:we will all start moving in circles again--either clockwise or counterclockwise depending on the preference of the pilot.
Insinuation? If so clever.
If not, still clever and a credit to ya for being clever and not knowing it. Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. |
Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
46
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 03:19:00 -
[8] - Quote
CCP Manifest wrote:I have not read this thread, and for that I apologize. However, I thought it more important to jump in immediately and clarify that ship spinning actually means that we will all start moving in circles again--either clockwise or counterclockwise depending on the preference of the pilot.
Any speed controls? That would be a nice touch. Six months in the hole... it changes a man. |
London
8
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 03:24:00 -
[9] - Quote
CCP Manifest wrote:I have not read this thread, and for that I apologize. However, I thought it more important to jump in immediately and clarify that ship spinning actually means that we will all start moving in circles again--either clockwise or counterclockwise depending on the preference of the pilot.
|
Pytria Le'Danness
Placid Reborn
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 03:31:00 -
[10] - Quote
CCP Manifest wrote:I have not read this thread, and for that I apologize. However, I thought it more important to jump in immediately and clarify that ship spinning actually means that we will all start moving in circles again--either clockwise or counterclockwise depending on the preference of the pilot.
Yay! Wake me when we reach the point where the Thorax can field eight heavy drones again! |
|
BLACK-STAR
91
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 03:50:00 -
[11] - Quote
yes of course OP we are moving backwards OF COURSE we didn't need the hangar anyway~sarcasm.
There isn't much on the board about Winter (you know of yet) and you're complaining CCP fixing their mistakes hampers the next expansion?
Everyone is going to enjoy the hangar back. but OP is a derp. and no you can't fly a dread or any capitals so don't worry about it, and they're not even expensive as their expendable ships. [img]http://www.imgbox.de/users/S7AR/star.png[/img] |
Sir Substance
Suddenly Ninjas Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
20
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 03:54:00 -
[12] - Quote
CCP Manifest wrote:I have not read this thread, and for that I apologize. However, I thought it more important to jump in immediately and clarify that ship spinning actually means that we will all start moving in circles again--either clockwise or counterclockwise depending on the preference of the pilot.
I sniggered.
OP is clearly a troll, and a bad one at that. Try harder next time, you have to want it. |
Psychophantic
30
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 04:23:00 -
[13] - Quote
The problem is that if a few people who can't use keyboard shortcuts and run eve on office computers that can't handle CQ can impact the development of EVE then where does it stop.
It has begun. |
Abrazzar
106
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 04:23:00 -
[14] - Quote
CCP Manifest wrote:I have not read this thread, and for that I apologize. However, I thought it more important to jump in immediately and clarify that ship spinning actually means that we will all start moving in circles again--either clockwise or counterclockwise depending on the preference of the pilot. WHAT?!
No over and below spinning?
I QUIT !!!
Please visit your user settings to re-enable images. |
Lakshmii
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
13
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 04:39:00 -
[15] - Quote
Damned if you do, damned if you don't, eh CCP folk?
Also, what about sixth and seventh dimensional axial spinning?? a¦á_a¦¦a¦â |
Headerman
Quovis Shadow of xXDEATHXx
99
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 04:52:00 -
[16] - Quote
CCP Manifest wrote:I have not read this thread, and for that I apologize. However, I thought it more important to jump in immediately and clarify that ship spinning actually means that we will all start moving in circles again--either clockwise or counterclockwise depending on the preference of the pilot.
Oh good. Cause down under here, the water spins counter clockwise, so a spinning ship going <-- that way <-- will remind me of "Back to the Future", an awesome film. |
non judgement
Evolved from the Wreck Flying Burning Ships Alliance
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 05:04:00 -
[17] - Quote
Headerman wrote:CCP Manifest wrote:I have not read this thread, and for that I apologize. However, I thought it more important to jump in immediately and clarify that ship spinning actually means that we will all start moving in circles again--either clockwise or counterclockwise depending on the preference of the pilot. Oh good. Cause down under here, the water spins counter clockwise, so a spinning ship going <-- that way <-- will remind me of "Back to the Future", an awesome film. PS: Everyone war dec the OP and pod this PoS.
The confusing part of how water spinning would remind someone of Back to the Future was sadly ignore. Isn't direction of water spinning on the other side of the earth a bit of a fallacy? |
Trainwreck McGee
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
15
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 05:12:00 -
[18] - Quote
CCP if you listen to this dolt you will be out of jobs
nuff said CCP Trainwreck - Weekend Custodial Engineer / CCP Necrogoats foot stool |
Freyh
ClownStar
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 05:29:00 -
[19] - Quote
CCP Manifest wrote:I have not read this thread, and for that I apologize. However, I thought it more important to jump in immediately and clarify that ship spinning actually means that we will all start moving in circles again--either clockwise or counterclockwise depending on the preference of the pilot.
I allways do a "nod" first. Like a warmup. Then its clockwise
|
Denidil
The Graduates Morsus Mihi
94
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 05:33:00 -
[20] - Quote
Albetta wrote:Man your stupid
^^^^
also.. your avatar looks like a methed out version of mine WiS is kinda cool and all, but FiS is more important.-á More FIS WORK! Nerf Supers, get the new backgrounds, buff assault ships, do the 0.0 balance, buff lowsec. and make a space pony! DUST SHOULD BE ON THE PC (a real platform!) GDI! I WILL NOT BUY A FQNG PS3 |
|
T'Laar Bok
24
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 06:20:00 -
[21] - Quote
I want a roll back to before they started coding. No code == No bugs. YaY!
I guesstimate a 95% certainty that CCP will screw up the reintroduction of ship spinning.
Most likely by spinning the station while the ship sits still.
But it will be fixed soonGäó Amphetimines are your friend. |
Ladie Scarlet
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
112
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 07:02:00 -
[22] - Quote
Phizban wrote:CQ wah. Ship spinning, wah. NEX wah.
Lets move the game backwards by re-adopting past iterations. Let us embrace the past, and let EVE stagnate. No change, only the same reliable unchanging predictable experience.
Now CCP can simply re-introduce the CQ / Ship Spin Hanger option and call it new content. Weeeeee!
So now the winter expansion suffers. Lets bring back previous AB and MWD and NANO specs. Lets bring back wrecks that can not be salvaged by anyone, and get back to the old RIG prices.
Oh, also, bring back the times when Dreads cost LESS than Carriers.
Finally, I would like all my ISK refunded from all my losses, in the past.
This is a horrible post. Don't ever do this again.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |
Grey Stormshadow
Starwreck Industries
113
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 07:50:00 -
[23] - Quote
Congrats OP. You're the 1st person I add to my forum block list. That is reward from the brilliance of that highly intelligent post you made :) Forum fix for firefox and chrome Get working images and colored text Classic forum style 2.25final |
Jint Hikaru
OffWorld Exploration Inc
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 08:21:00 -
[24] - Quote
CCP Manifest wrote:I have not read this thread, and for that I apologize.
No need to apologize Manifest... the OP must be roleplaying a moron, because nobody with the mental capacity to use a keyboard would post such a usless post or show such a lack of understanding of what the return of the hangar means to the Eve community as a whole.
Jint Hikaru - Miner / Salvager / Explorer / SpaceBum In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. |
Sofia Bellard
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
27
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 08:22:00 -
[25] - Quote
CCP removing ship spinning was moving backwards.
Poor sad little pirates, -áwhy you so mad? |
Ciar Meara
Virtus Vindice
106
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 09:23:00 -
[26] - Quote
CCP Manifest wrote: I apologize
CCP aplogizes, OP is now happy and has decided to give up his life of trollish ways we can all leave this thread content and furfilled.
- [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow] |
Vyl Vit
Cambio Enterprises
41
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 09:56:00 -
[27] - Quote
'T is the way of civilization son. Read up on your Western Civ.
To her it doesn't matter much.-á It's chasms have been leapt, and she leans upon the skepticism of her chosen fate. |
Meryl SinGarda
Homeworld Republic United Homeworlds
176
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 10:05:00 -
[28] - Quote
Ladie Scarlet wrote:Phizban wrote:CQ wah. Ship spinning, wah. NEX wah.
Lets move the game backwards by re-adopting past iterations. Let us embrace the past, and let EVE stagnate. No change, only the same reliable unchanging predictable experience.
Now CCP can simply re-introduce the CQ / Ship Spin Hanger option and call it new content. Weeeeee!
So now the winter expansion suffers. Lets bring back previous AB and MWD and NANO specs. Lets bring back wrecks that can not be salvaged by anyone, and get back to the old RIG prices.
Oh, also, bring back the times when Dreads cost LESS than Carriers.
Finally, I would like all my ISK refunded from all my losses, in the past.
This is a horrible post. Don't ever do this again.
Not that I agree with the OP, but every single time I see you post something, it's this.
Fly Safe, Die Hard |
hired goon
Legio Prima Victrix Imperius Legio Victrix
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 10:07:00 -
[29] - Quote
I bet you all think Manifest's post was genius and funny. Well personally I had a few moments of excitement on the news that the slow auto-spin was coming back. Shame on you all |
The Apostle
The Black Priests
32
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 10:14:00 -
[30] - Quote
hired goon wrote:I bet you all think Manifest's post was genius and funny. Well personally I had a few moments of excitement on the news that the slow auto-spin was coming back. Shame on you all
it was, but what more can you expect from a hired goon?
Question: Did you complain when ship-spinning was removed?
If yes, then here it comes.
If no, stay on CQ and no change...
Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. |
|
BLACK-STAR
91
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 10:15:00 -
[31] - Quote
hired goon wrote:I bet you all think Manifest's post was genius and funny. Well personally I had a few moments of excitement on the news that the slow auto-spin was coming back. Shame on you all no....If you undock from station within CQ you load CQ back when you dock. If you're in the Hangar and undock, you'll load the Hangar when you dock again. [img]http://www.imgbox.de/users/S7AR/star.png[/img] |
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
57
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 10:22:00 -
[32] - Quote
I DEMAND WE HAVE SHIP FLIPPING!
I want to flip my ship UP AND DOWN not just clockwise and anticlockwise |
Thorn Galen
The Scope Gallente Federation
10
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 11:03:00 -
[33] - Quote
non judgement wrote:Headerman wrote:CCP Manifest wrote:I have not read this thread, and for that I apologize. However, I thought it more important to jump in immediately and clarify that ship spinning actually means that we will all start moving in circles again--either clockwise or counterclockwise depending on the preference of the pilot. Oh good. Cause down under here, the water spins counter clockwise, so a spinning ship going <-- that way <-- will remind me of "Back to the Future", an awesome film. PS: Everyone war dec the OP and pod this PoS. The confusing part of how water spinning would remind someone of Back to the Future was sadly ignore. Isn't water spinning in different directions north or south of the equator a bit of a fallacy?
It's called the Coreolis effect. In terms of North/South spinning :
(from http://stratus.ssec.wisc.edu/courses/gg101/coriolis/coriolis.html) "As to whether there's a conspiracy among sink manufacturers to sell only clockwise-encouraging faucets south of the Equator and counterclockwise faucets north of it is a topic for another day. The reader is encouraged to search the journal Science where I am told a pair of serious studies are presented (unfortunately, I don't know which issues the articles are in, or even which year...my information is still secondhand). The results were that after you carefully control all the variables (use a large wooden tub, control the temperature throughout the tub, have the drain be a tube extending up into the tub to avoid friction effects with the tub walls, start the water off spinning the "wrong" way, etc) and wait 18 hours for the water to settle down, water does indeed spiral down the sink opposite directions in the two hemispheres. But this effect is so subtle that it wouldn't ever be seen in your bathroom sink."
(This space for rent) |
Ladie Scarlet
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
118
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 11:05:00 -
[34] - Quote
Meryl SinGarda wrote:Ladie Scarlet wrote: This is a horrible post. Don't ever do this again.
Not that I agree with the OP, but every single time I see you post something, it's this. I know...there is so much bad posting. People should have to get some sort of posting license before they can post here.
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
58
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 11:08:00 -
[35] - Quote
Ladie Scarlet wrote:Meryl SinGarda wrote:Ladie Scarlet wrote: This is a horrible post. Don't ever do this again.
Not that I agree with the OP, but every single time I see you post something, it's this. I know...there is so much bad posting. People should have to get some sort of posting license before they can post here.
Your avatar needs a license.
|
My Postman
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
7
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 11:23:00 -
[36] - Quote
By making CQ NOT optional from the beginning, CCP did it wrong. Now they are correcting it, and you call it a step backwards.
Usually i-¦m a friendly, polite person, but you sir, are an idiot. |
Chaos Incarnate
Faceless Logistics
260
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 11:24:00 -
[37] - Quote
Miilla wrote:Ladie Scarlet wrote:Meryl SinGarda wrote:Ladie Scarlet wrote: This is a horrible post. Don't ever do this again.
Not that I agree with the OP, but every single time I see you post something, it's this. I know...there is so much bad posting. People should have to get some sort of posting license before they can post here. Your avatar needs a license.
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooh, burn!
haha, just kidding, that was really weak and you should be ashamed |
AlleyKat
The Unwanted.
22
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 11:34:00 -
[38] - Quote
Phizban wrote:CQ wah. Ship spinning, wah. NEX wah.
Lets move the game backwards by re-adopting past iterations. Let us embrace the past, and let EVE stagnate. No change, only the same reliable unchanging predictable experience.
Now CCP can simply re-introduce the CQ / Ship Spin Hanger option and call it new content. Weeeeee!
So now the winter expansion suffers. Lets bring back previous AB and MWD and NANO specs. Lets bring back wrecks that can not be salvaged by anyone, and get back to the old RIG prices.
Oh, also, bring back the times when Dreads cost LESS than Carriers.
Finally, I would like all my ISK refunded from all my losses, in the past.
You'll be glad to hear that a WireFrame version of EVE is being discussed, then. This will move EVE so far back, it will receive a round-house kick to the face and land in the 80's.
AK "Few have found anger in solace, than solace in anger."
"Sincerity is a game best played by the insincere"
|
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
58
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 11:35:00 -
[39] - Quote
AlleyKat wrote:Phizban wrote:CQ wah. Ship spinning, wah. NEX wah.
Lets move the game backwards by re-adopting past iterations. Let us embrace the past, and let EVE stagnate. No change, only the same reliable unchanging predictable experience.
Now CCP can simply re-introduce the CQ / Ship Spin Hanger option and call it new content. Weeeeee!
So now the winter expansion suffers. Lets bring back previous AB and MWD and NANO specs. Lets bring back wrecks that can not be salvaged by anyone, and get back to the old RIG prices.
Oh, also, bring back the times when Dreads cost LESS than Carriers.
Finally, I would like all my ISK refunded from all my losses, in the past.
You'll be glad to hear that a WireFrame version of EVE is being discussed, then. This will move EVE so far back, it will receive a round-house kick to the face and land in the 80's. AK
Do not mock Elite, EVER.
|
Cailais
Nasty Pope Holding Corp Talocan United
30
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 12:15:00 -
[40] - Quote
Phizban wrote: Lets bring back previous AB and MWD and NANO specs.
This is actually quite a good idea.
C.
|
|
Alissa Solette
University of Caille Gallente Federation
3
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 12:16:00 -
[41] - Quote
CCP Manifest wrote:I have not read this thread, and for that I apologize. However, I thought it more important to jump in immediately and clarify that ship spinning actually means that we will all start moving in circles again--either clockwise or counterclockwise depending on the preference of the pilot.
How much AUR will this feature cost? Also, will we be able to buy a monthly flat rate or will it be pay-as-you-spin?
Would be funny if it wasn't so sad. |
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
58
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 12:34:00 -
[42] - Quote
Talking of flat , so is your avatar :)
|
Tyrnaeg en Varche
29
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 13:58:00 -
[43] - Quote
Grey Stormshadow wrote:Congrats OP. You're the 1st person I add to my forum block list. That is reward from the brilliance of that highly intelligent post you made :) Oh, you should try that more, very handy to quickly browse through threads :) |
Herping yourDerp
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
72
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 15:21:00 -
[44] - Quote
forcing CQ was moving eve backwards.... this is a step in the right direction. either way, post with your main, trolls trolling |
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
15
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 17:18:00 -
[45] - Quote
Alissa Solette wrote:CCP Manifest wrote:I have not read this thread, and for that I apologize. However, I thought it more important to jump in immediately and clarify that ship spinning actually means that we will all start moving in circles again--either clockwise or counterclockwise depending on the preference of the pilot. How much AUR will this feature cost? Also, will we be able to buy a monthly flat rate or will it be pay-as-you-spin? Would be funny if it wasn't so sad.
Much like your post.
(Badoom ching) To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |
Satav
Latinum Exports
11
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 17:42:00 -
[46] - Quote
Phizban wrote:CQ wah. Ship spinning, wah. NEX wah.
Lets move the game backwards by re-adopting past iterations. Let us embrace the past, and let EVE stagnate. No change, only the same reliable unchanging predictable experience.
Now CCP can simply re-introduce the CQ / Ship Spin Hanger option and call it new content. Weeeeee!
So now the winter expansion suffers. Lets bring back previous AB and MWD and NANO specs. Lets bring back wrecks that can not be salvaged by anyone, and get back to the old RIG prices.
Oh, also, bring back the times when Dreads cost LESS than Carriers.
Finally, I would like all my ISK refunded from all my losses, in the past.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA! *gasps for air* HAHAHAHAHAHA
I knew it. All this input of wanting ship spinning back and now we are hearing that "eve is moving backwards and becoming stagnate"
lol. can anyone say STFU? lol. seriously. CCP can't satisfy all your wants and desires. The best pc game companies can't. So why don't we focus on the important stuff and tackle the small stuff when we can.
Sheesh ******* children these days huh?
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
"250 Hellcats inbound sir! They have us outmanned and outgunned. What are we going to do?" "catnip of course......." |
Vertisce Soritenshi
SHADOW WARD Tragedy.
17
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 18:42:00 -
[47] - Quote
Albetta wrote:Man your stupid
Oh the irony...his stupid what?
"You are" = You're
I think that's what, third grade English right there?
To the OP:
They aren't taking anything away from EvE. They are just adding back the ship spinning portion that was originally removed and giving us a button to make accessing CQ optional. Just like everybody with any common sense was saying when Incarna released.
How is this moving backwards? If anything this is moving forward. |
Igualmentedos
Shadow Veil Industrial Shadow Directive
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 18:45:00 -
[48] - Quote
Albetta wrote:Man your stupid
It's, "you're." Which is fine and all idc tbh, but come on you just called him stupid.
|
Zofe Stormcaller
B4D W0LF B4D W01F
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 20:38:00 -
[49] - Quote
OP needs to get bent. Getting CQ implented in the way the community wanted instead of the dumbass way it was is going forward. Lets just see if it actually gets implemented somewhat close to the dev blog |
The D1ngo
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2011.09.21 20:59:00 -
[50] - Quote
Phizban wrote:CQ wah. Ship spinning, wah. NEX wah.
Lets move the game backwards by re-adopting past iterations. Let us embrace the past, and let EVE stagnate. No change, only the same reliable unchanging predictable experience.
Now CCP can simply re-introduce the CQ / Ship Spin Hanger option and call it new content. Weeeeee!
So now the winter expansion suffers. Lets bring back previous AB and MWD and NANO specs. Lets bring back wrecks that can not be salvaged by anyone, and get back to the old RIG prices.
Oh, also, bring back the times when Dreads cost LESS than Carriers.
Finally, I would like all my ISK refunded from all my losses, in the past.
If only we would roll back to before you "rolled" your toon... |
|
Soi Mala
Whacky Waving Inflatable Flailing Arm Tubemen
45
|
Posted - 2011.09.22 14:46:00 -
[51] - Quote
Phizban wrote:CQ wah. Ship spinning, wah. NEX wah.
Lets move the game backwards by re-adopting past iterations. Let us embrace the past, and let EVE stagnate. No change, only the same reliable unchanging predictable experience.
Now CCP can simply re-introduce the CQ / Ship Spin Hanger option and call it new content. Weeeeee!
So now the winter expansion suffers. Lets bring back previous AB and MWD and NANO specs. Lets bring back wrecks that can not be salvaged by anyone, and get back to the old RIG prices.
Oh, also, bring back the times when Dreads cost LESS than Carriers.
Finally, I would like all my ISK refunded from all my losses, in the past.
We should spend decades/centuries designing methods to interface directly with ships, enabling the pilots to control the systems via their own nervous system. Man and machine interwoven, sacrificing their previous lives for the honour of becoming a capsuleer. They gain fame, riches, and immortality, all in exchange for their dedication, for their imprisonment in the war machine.
That doesn't sound very fun, so lets just roll that back, and have him jump out of that interface every time he docks, so he can prance around and show of his new sunglasses.
Get a grip you ******* ******.
|
Bloodpetal
Mimidae Risk Solutions
23
|
Posted - 2011.09.22 15:53:00 -
[52] - Quote
Miilla wrote:I DEMAND WE HAVE SHIP FLIPPING!
I want to flip my ship UP AND DOWN not just clockwise and anticlockwise
Thanks for showing the OP how to troll Millia - a shining example for all of us.
His attempt was a disgrace really.
NOSTRO AURUM NON EST AURUM VULGI |
Azelor Delaria
We Are So Troubled Everyone Runs Screaming The 0rphanage
21
|
Posted - 2011.09.22 16:05:00 -
[53] - Quote
OP, I would like you to do the following, in this order:
1.) Get a potato. 2.) Wrap it in tin foil. 3.) Put said potato-wrapped-in-tin-foil into your pocket. 4.) Die in a fire, that way the world is rid of your stupidity and I get a baked potato! \o/ |
jason hill
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
4
|
Posted - 2011.09.22 16:10:00 -
[54] - Quote
I think the OP forgot to take his med`s and is currently suffering from a stupidity leak ! |
Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2011.09.22 17:46:00 -
[55] - Quote
Phizban wrote:CQ wah. Ship spinning, wah. NEX wah.
Lets move the game backwards by re-adopting past iterations. Let us embrace the past, and let EVE stagnate. No change, only the same reliable unchanging predictable experience.
Now CCP can simply re-introduce the CQ / Ship Spin Hanger option and call it new content. Weeeeee!
So now the winter expansion suffers. Lets bring back previous AB and MWD and NANO specs. Lets bring back wrecks that can not be salvaged by anyone, and get back to the old RIG prices.
Oh, also, bring back the times when Dreads cost LESS than Carriers.
Finally, I would like all my ISK refunded from all my losses, in the past.
Unlike my troll brothers and sisturs I'm going to attempt to broach your concerns seriously.
Reintroducing ship spinning is not a move backwards. In fact, having to load CQ, get out of your ship and walk somewhere for tasks as simple as adding more ammo to your cargo bay or turning in missions or unloading/loading ore or buying/selling or any other numbers of actions requiring repetitive docking/undocking is an impediment to the game. Sir, you will get tired of having to wait for CQ to load everytime you do one of these things. The good news is you will still have that option. So, moving backwards? No. I would guess that CCP realized that having to spend 30s to dock, 30s to load CQ and however long to walk down the hall to your agent's office everytime you want to turn in/get a mission would be needlessly laborious and a detriment to game play. IDK. But that would be my guess.
Or, another way to look it is that they realized that for the vast majority of their players who can't afford +$5,000 rigs of bleeding edge technology that WiS is ultimately going to be a performance fiasco when more than one character and one room are involved in the rendering and that it might be best to give everyone the option of turning that sh&t off. IDK? We want breast augmentations and sluttier clothing in the NeX! |
Jonah Gravenstein
1
|
Posted - 2011.09.22 18:17:00 -
[56] - Quote
Confirming OP is either a troll or as dumb as a brick, probably the latter to be brutally honest
Miilla wrote:
Do not mock Elite, EVER.
Quoting Miillia, & actually agreeing... Damn it.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |