Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Marlona Sky
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2010.03.07 12:48:00 -
[1]
Read this first.
My proposal is that a player can NOT interact with planets unless they are in a player made corporation.
This will open up the option to war dec your competition. Also I don't want to see a bunch of ****ing macro-planet-*****-stupid-jerks messing up this feature as well. That is unless they can be pew pewed at.
|
GIGAR
Domini Umbrus
|
Posted - 2010.03.07 13:11:00 -
[2]
Sounds like a good idea. This could also prevent mass trials/alts from annoying serious players. Also, I pray to god that CCP doesn't dispute the planets in the same way moons are, having regions who are just "Better". Having systems that are better is fine, but all regions should be "balanced", in therms of ISK-generation. That means NO region-who-gives-1000-times-more-ISK than the others, CCP! --------------------------
Originally by: Akita T Actually, GIGAR is right.
Wtf?
Originally by: Akita T Well, at least sort of. A little bit. Conceptually speaking.
That's more like it. |
Marlona Sky
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2010.03.07 13:16:00 -
[3]
Supporting my proposal.
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2010.03.07 14:56:00 -
[4]
Obviously a sensible idea.
In fact I'd go one further: "Owning" an Empire planet automatically enrolls you in Faction Warfare (so if you're not in a player corp, you're enrolled in to the NPC FW corp).
Makes sense, if you think about it for a moment. Pod pilots can't plausibly claim to be seperated from the factions while running planets belonging to those factions.
|
GIGAR
Caldari Domini Umbrus
|
Posted - 2010.03.07 15:09:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Malcanis Obviously a sensible idea.
In fact I'd go one further: "Owning" an Empire planet automatically enrolls you in Faction Warfare (so if you're not in a player corp, you're enrolled in to the NPC FW corp).
Makes sense, if you think about it for a moment. Pod pilots can't plausibly claim to be seperated from the factions while running planets belonging to those factions.
No. If you read the article, you'd know that you can't "claim" planets*. The planets resources is split amongst everyone who choses to settle down on it.
* = 0.0 may be different in this regard, but this is probably more due to sov --------------------------
Originally by: Akita T Actually, GIGAR is right.
Wtf?
Originally by: Akita T Well, at least sort of. A little bit. Conceptually speaking.
That's more like it. |
Venkul Mul
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.03.07 15:32:00 -
[6]
No.
Stop trying to make "mob playing" mandatory.
|
Slade Hoo
Corpse Collection Point
|
Posted - 2010.03.07 15:46:00 -
[7]
------ Make Lowsec useful! Vote in the CSM-Forum! |
Marconus Orion
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2010.03.07 17:16:00 -
[8]
|
Ann Freya
|
Posted - 2010.03.07 17:21:00 -
[9]
yes dont **** up this with macro monkey ****... Anders Fogh needs to be sentenced for was crimes... Also Marlona Sky for leader of my death cult
|
Marlona Sky
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2010.03.07 17:22:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Malcanis Obviously a sensible idea.
In fact I'd go one further: "Owning" an Empire planet automatically enrolls you in Faction Warfare (so if you're not in a player corp, you're enrolled in to the NPC FW corp).
Makes sense, if you think about it for a moment. Pod pilots can't plausibly claim to be seperated from the factions while running planets belonging to those factions.
I don't think it should put you in faction warfare. Player made corp is enough in my opinion.
|
|
Jack bubu
Lyonesse. RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.03.07 19:11:00 -
[11]
Very good point! the more ways to encourage ppl to leave NPC corps, the better!
|
Gigiarc
|
Posted - 2010.03.07 19:16:00 -
[12]
|
Saju Somtaaw
Blacksteel Mining and Manufacturing DRACONIAN COVENANT
|
Posted - 2010.03.08 04:02:00 -
[13]
yes to being in a player corp, and make it so if you leave the player corp it stops producing untill your in a new one.
NO to being in Fac Warfare ---- --- ---
|
Simokon
Smegnet Incorporated
|
Posted - 2010.03.08 04:49:00 -
[14]
|
Drake Draconis
Minmatar Shadow Cadre Looney Toons.
|
Posted - 2010.03.08 07:44:00 -
[15]
Don't you think you people might be making a bit of an assumption here?
Jumping to conclusions?
Yeah... I'll let you wave your pitchforks and such. ========================= CEO of Shadow Cadre http://www.shadowcadre.com ========================= |
HeliosGal
Caldari
|
Posted - 2010.03.08 12:28:00 -
[16]
i support the idea as far as no npc corpers Signature - CCP what this game needs is more variance in PVE aspects and a little bit less PVP focus, more content more varied level 1-4 missions more than just 10 per faction high sec low sec and 00 |
Maxsim Goratiev
Gallente Imperial Tau Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.03.08 12:55:00 -
[17]
LEt's make it so you cannot ninja-salvage unless you are in corp, huh? same logic. The blind pokes at random in the dark.
|
SencneS
Rebellion Against Big Irreversible Dinks
|
Posted - 2010.03.08 17:18:00 -
[18]
As much as war decing your "competition" over what is bound to be pennies worth of income is probably more costly then the amount of ISK you could possibly make I support this.
Remember CCP have said they want LOW ENTRY POINT. Which means low amount of Skills and Low amount of ISK needed to "work" a planet. Sorry to say this people but if you're war decing fee is higher then the amount of income you could possibly make from their removal then maybe you should consider actually looking at the finance of it instead of blindly wardecing everyone.
From a Griefers point of view, yes Player corp because blasting newbies out of the sky is AWESOME entertainment!!
Amarr for Life |
Vheri Kai'or
|
Posted - 2010.03.08 17:37:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Drake Draconis Don't you think you people might be making a bit of an assumption here?
Jumping to conclusions?
Yeah... I'll let you wave your pitchforks and such.
have fun whining about 6 second reload times on t2 laser crystals.
supportin marlona.
|
Sokratesz
|
Posted - 2010.03.08 19:12:00 -
[20]
Not sure how CCP intend to differentiate between ¦planet mining¦ in the different sec levels but this sounds like a good idea for empire.
CSM Iceland meeting minutes - READ THEM :D |
|
Vaal Erit
Science and Trade Institute
|
Posted - 2010.03.08 19:29:00 -
[21]
Edited by: Vaal Erit on 08/03/2010 19:28:38 This is a bit premature. CCP said that the combat part of planets will be in the expansion after Tyrannis and include DUST 514 so combat will be a major part of it (despite the whining of carebear Venkul Mul, good lord)
I'm going under the assumption that you will be able to attack other people's planets, even NPC players in high sec. It will all be done on the ground so no ships or war decs needed.
Supporting this just incase CCP does something dumb again and allows macros to claim all the planets and be un-attackable.
Originally by: Jim Raynor EVE needs danger, EVE needs risks, EVE needs combat, even piracy, without these things, the game stagnates to a trivial game centering around bloating your wallet with no purpose. |
Furb Killer
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.03.08 19:38:00 -
[22]
Since it isnt known if wardecs are in any way related to planetary interaction this is just a lame attempt to irritate people who play different from how you play.
|
odama jasonsson
Asteroid Cowboys Pest Control Union
|
Posted - 2010.03.08 19:55:00 -
[23]
Supporting op. Plz we don't want macros ruining our income...
|
Sir Fourhead
Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2010.03.08 20:06:00 -
[24]
Please pardon the prissy overtones that will be found throughout this letter, but the reservoir from which CCP draws its lickspittles is primarily the masses of revolting enemies of the people. |
Marlona Sky
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2010.03.08 21:26:00 -
[25]
Originally by: Furb Killer Edited by: Furb Killer on 08/03/2010 19:38:07 First more info, no reason to worry about stuff now.
True, but I would rather they know this is how we feel about it well in advance so we are not 'suprised' when it is released. Don't you agree?
|
Furb Killer
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.03.08 21:54:00 -
[26]
I can agree if wardeccing would have any effect on the stuff. But if it doesnt it would just be a way to tell other people how they should play.
|
Mr Intel
|
Posted - 2010.03.09 03:48:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Drake Draconis Don't you think you people might be making a bit of an assumption here?
Jumping to conclusions?
Yeah... I'll let you wave your pitchforks and such.
I actually have to agree, you guys are jumping the gun, so to speak. It would be best to see what they are doing before whining about it.
Although im certain nothing like increasing spawns of very valuble items in one certain area of space (which happens to be host to a certain alliance) would ever happen.
|
Enzu777
|
Posted - 2010.03.09 05:07:00 -
[28]
agreed.
|
Marlona Sky
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2010.03.09 07:13:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Mr Intel Although im certain nothing like increasing spawns of very valuble items in one certain area of space (which happens to be host to a certain alliance) would ever happen.
BoB still controlling your game eh?
|
Redshirt I
|
Posted - 2010.03.09 09:22:00 -
[30]
I am against anything that forces players to join player corps. I am just as much against players being forced into any corp at all, I am not forced into such things in the RL so a game that is supposed to be a sandbox should not be making those decisions for me.
Planet mining/operations should be just as mining is now, highsec means lower valued resources and limited numbers. There should be steps taken to somehow keep macro miners from setting up camp but system security levels should mandate what risk planet side structures are in.
Personally I see planets becoming like Moons, something I will just not waste my time on. Well except if 514 turns out to be a good idea.... Red
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |