Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tester128
|
Posted - 2010.05.03 21:37:00 -
[1]
So, as i remember quite clearly, it was introduced a year ago with the intention to have 5 subsystems of each type. On the initial release we got 3 subs and in a patch 3 month later 1 more sub plus some rebalancing of the components drop and bpc reverse engineering. In the dominion expansion the only critical thing concerning t3 was the fix of the nullifier sub. So far there is absolutely no suggestion that the 5th sub will be introduced in tyrranis or any other incoming expansion. Not to mention t3 ship other than cruisers, or even some kind of rebalance of the existing useless subsystems. So, could it be assumed that t3 is staying as it is with no further development?
|
Ghoest
|
Posted - 2010.05.03 22:08:00 -
[2]
Your title is stupid.
It imples that T3 has failed. It hasnt. Now Im all for more options - options are fun. And some Loki help is in order. But the ships arent bad and in some cases they are very useful.
Wherever you went - Here you are.
|
Dan O'Connor
Cerberus Network Dignitas.
|
Posted - 2010.05.03 22:18:00 -
[3]
Correct me if I'm wrong (I have never owned, built or flown a T3 yet) - but: if I open a preview window for a T3, I can configure it with all 5 subsystems. ________________________
Apply | Channel CBSN Lounge |
Siamese Kitten
|
Posted - 2010.05.03 22:26:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Dan O'Connor Correct me if I'm wrong (I have never owned, built or flown a T3 yet) - but: if I open a preview window for a T3, I can configure it with all 5 subsystems.
For each race's strategic cruiser, there are 5 different subsystem slots, and 4 variants of each slot. I believe the op is asking where the fifth variation is - was there supposed to be one?
|
Dan O'Connor
Cerberus Network Dignitas.
|
Posted - 2010.05.03 22:33:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Siamese Kitten
Originally by: Dan O'Connor Correct me if I'm wrong (I have never owned, built or flown a T3 yet) - but: if I open a preview window for a T3, I can configure it with all 5 subsystems.
For each race's strategic cruiser, there are 5 different subsystem slots, and 4 variants of each slot. I believe the op is asking where the fifth variation is - was there supposed to be one?
Oh - gotcha. My bad. ________________________
Apply | Channel CBSN Lounge |
Lolrus McBukkit
|
Posted - 2010.05.04 03:27:00 -
[6]
On one hand, I understand people's frustration with CCP promising 5 subs, only delivering 4, and then not commenting on the topic, but realistically, do we really have any use for that 5th one?
What is CCP going to give us, a mining&refining subsystem, or something equally shortsighted/useless? As I see it, we have enough currently. Most people don't even consider a large majority of the combos, instead choosing to go FOTM. Why throw in another set that'll probably at best get passed over, and at worst made into the new FOTM, with the old completely abandoned and people whining about how OP it is? |
Pr1ncess Alia
Caldari Perkone
|
Posted - 2010.05.04 05:23:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Lolrus McBukkit On one hand, I understand people's frustration with CCP promising 5 subs, only delivering 4, and then not commenting on the topic, but realistically, do we really have any use for that 5th one?
What is CCP going to give us, a mining&refining subsystem, or something equally shortsighted/useless? As I see it, we have enough currently. Most people don't even consider a large majority of the combos, instead choosing to go FOTM. Why throw in another set that'll probably at best get passed over, and at worst made into the new FOTM, with the old completely abandoned and people whining about how OP it is?
FYI: your lack of imagination and vision is hardly a basis you want to build your argument upon. "A game that is significantly nonlinear is sometimes described as being open-ended or a sandbox, and is characterized by there being no "right way" of playing the game." |
Darcon Kylote
Terminal Impact On the Rocks
|
Posted - 2010.05.04 12:49:00 -
[8]
Of all the things they could be working on, a 5th subsystem is WAY down on my list.
I like T3 the way it is, although admittedly the loki could use some help, and the legion could use a lot of help. But even that should be lower on the priority list than a lot of other stuff. Like assault frigs, black ops, rockets, etc. -- Terminal Impact is recruiting PVPers for fun ops in lowsec/0.0/wormhole space. Visit our website or join ingame channel "the tict pub". |
Iron Mayden
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.05.04 18:55:00 -
[9]
It does worry me, I do get that feeling that T3 was put on hold. This is not to say T3 is a total failure, just that it seems CCP does not have plans to maintain and also create new things.
Well at least it is not a total failure like COSMOS tech.
But I would really like CCP to continue its support.
Production and Science is my love in EVE, and I would really like to see it being improved.
Specialized in Science, Industry and Trade My Skills |
Avalon Champion
Aliastra
|
Posted - 2010.05.04 19:58:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Iron Mayden It does worry me, I do get that feeling that T3 was put on hold. This is not to say T3 is a total failure, just that it seems CCP does not have plans to maintain and also create new things.
Well at least it is not a total failure like COSMOS tech.
But I would really like CCP to continue its support.
Production and Science is my love in EVE, and I would really like to see it being improved.
There are plans, like T3 Frigates and T3 Mods, at fanfest they said these were plans but planetary interaction and Incana where higher on the list than these as they had been the longest on the wish list.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |