Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mist3r Evil
Caldari the united Negative Ten.
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 07:07:00 -
[31]
Originally by: Cyan Cure *snip*
Butthurt carebear detected. Also, post with your main. and who died and made you the premiere expert on piracy, in fact who are you again ?
Do you have ANY idea about the issues of low sec ? ow wait, your are just a faceless alt.....
Originally by: Cyan Cure How about let's make a penalty for being in gangs to avoid blobbing, or if someone has a falcon in their gang it cuts EHP by 50%.
Ok, so lets reduce the rate of fire on ship-mounted guns/launchers by 10% for every 100 fleet members by the same token, that should go over well in 0.0, talk about blobbing. nice try.
Originally by: Cyan Cure Let's turn solo PvP into a game feature, cause right now you're trying to do the exactly same thing to Piracy
Solo PvP is already a feature in the game, it happens. you should try it perhaps. where did skunk mention that he wants solo-PvP ? this would be a boost to piracy, and we can't have that, now can we....
|
D3rg3
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 07:08:00 -
[32]
Edited by: D3rg3 on 06/05/2010 07:09:35 that was really great. but my mind was already made up to not vote for her because of this
|
Cyan Cure
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 07:44:00 -
[33]
Edited by: Cyan Cure on 06/05/2010 07:52:49
Originally by: Mist3r Evil
stuff
How about cry me a river, i've seen more PvP than you ever will. It doesn't matter whitch character i post with, what you want to check? My BattleClinic stats? Like it's important. Your opinion matters just as much as mine, 'cause i don't know who you are either.
Beside, learn to read, you'll understand what i ment in my post perhaps. As much as i am not going to vote for mazz s/he's completely right in not hastly voting this. We're judging the player on the base of 1 voting against a rule SKUNK doesn't like and i guess you don't either. Well there's more to piracy than gate camping and you didn't make a second thought on how it is going to affect the whole game, not just the tiny frame of it you care about.
As long as solo PvP isn't on the back of the box, it's not a game feature, it's an activity made by players and as long as CCP doesn't do moves towards favouring it, it remains so (exactly the same thing goes for piracy). But this is completely beside the point, because I WAS BEING SARCASTIC, don't act like you're so illiterate.
EDIT: nevermind, i went against what i have said and checked your BC stats. All you do is gate camp in Rancer, so i daubt there's any sence in arguing with you. Just don't talk to me about solo PvP, or PvP at all.
|
Gilgamesh1980
The Black Rabbits The Gurlstas Associates
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 08:19:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Cyan Cure Edited by: Cyan Cure on 06/05/2010 07:52:49
Originally by: Mist3r Evil
stuff
How about cry me a river, i've seen more PvP than you ever will. It doesn't matter whitch character i post with, what you want to check? My BattleClinic stats? Like it's important. Your opinion matters just as much as mine, 'cause i don't know who you are either.
Beside, learn to read, you'll understand what i ment in my post perhaps. As much as i am not going to vote for mazz s/he's completely right in not hastly voting this. We're judging the player on the base of 1 voting against a rule SKUNK doesn't like and i guess you don't either. Well there's more to piracy than gate camping and you didn't make a second thought on how it is going to affect the whole game, not just the tiny frame of it you care about.
As long as solo PvP isn't on the back of the box, it's not a game feature, it's an activity made by players and as long as CCP doesn't do moves towards favouring it, it remains so (exactly the same thing goes for piracy). But this is completely beside the point, because I WAS BEING SARCASTIC, don't act like you're so illiterate.
EDIT: nevermind, i went against what i have said and checked your BC stats. All you do is gate camp in Rancer, so i daubt there's any sence in arguing with you. Just don't talk to me about solo PvP, or PvP at all.
lol you make me laugh,
yeah you might have seen more PvP than anyone else, but I bet it was either while in a cloaky ship or on the receiving end of the pounding, especailly proven by not willing to back your statement up with facts.
Solo PvP IS a valid gamestyle and even in my corp there are people who are masters of this (Stuart Price as one of many) the core is the find what you like and end up good at, United is renowned for their GCing in Rancer, why change somethign when it's not broken
hell going by your logic regarding the back of the box thing Eve must have not existed for 5 of the six years BECAUSE THERE WAS NO BOX!!!!!!
Federic 'Gilgamesh1980' Chopin
Supreme Commander and Diplomat of the Black Rabbits and Gurlstas associates |
NereSky
Gallente Maelstrom Crew Paradigm Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 08:28:00 -
[35]
Eve was boxed back in 2003
|
Cyan Cure
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 08:47:00 -
[36]
Originally by: Gilgamesh1980
lol you make me laugh,
yeah you might have seen more PvP than anyone else, but I bet it was either while in a cloaky ship or on the receiving end of the pounding, especailly proven by not willing to back your statement up with facts.
Solo PvP IS a valid gamestyle and even in my corp there are people who are masters of this (Stuart Price as one of many) the core is the find what you like and end up good at, United is renowned for their GCing in Rancer, why change somethign when it's not broken
hell going by your logic regarding the back of the box thing Eve must have not existed for 5 of the six years BECAUSE THERE WAS NO BOX!!!!!!
I don't think you're replying to the right person, 'cause what you have just said has no corelation with who you quoted. "Solo PvP IS valid gamestyle", how could i disagree, people practice it ever since i remember, "you might have seen more PvP than anyone else", i can't argue beside the "anyone" part in the last quote, i find the claim about seeing more PvP than some whiny gate camper pretty true. I also agree that EVE wasn't boxed. Nothing to argue about here, just if you want to make an unrelated to anything post, don't quote me in it, 'cause i feel obligated to reply.
Well beside this,
Originally by: Gilgamesh1980
hell going by your logic regarding the back of the box thing Eve must have not existed for 5 of the six years BECAUSE THERE WAS NO BOX!!!!!!
Cute, but even if the last part sounded awesome in your little brain, you have to write it in a way that makes sence, or it comes out as a pathetic attempt at being funny. Not that i am trying that myself. Then again i don't know why you want my opinion on it.
|
RuleoftheBone
Minmatar The Littlest Hobos Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 08:53:00 -
[37]
I'm confused.
While I quite like Le Skunk for obscure reasons....I am left baffled by a losec/piracy thread that is mainly highlighting log off (hehe "log") mechanics at POS or gates or wherever.
This has been FUBAR for ages across hi/lo/nullsec.
And frankly I would have thought the biggest issue for losec would be making it attractive to all pilots and boosting small gang/solo pirates in their endeavors...you know...the various schemes and whatnot that have been proposed and ignored since introduction of the CSM .
Supporting various versions of "gatecamp online" is not something I would want to see though.
This thread is a large smelly red herring. Tsk tsk tsk.
p.s. Best way to sort lowsec/nullsec would be to remove local ofc. Proven concept (no *****ing about it either); however, the lack of ability by most players incapable of understanding dscan precludes this from implementation.
|
Chaeryl
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 09:23:00 -
[38]
Edited by: Chaeryl on 06/05/2010 09:28:30 Edited by: Chaeryl on 06/05/2010 09:25:27 A slightly more incriminating offense would be that Mazz supported this (ctrl+f her):
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1310652
If you're a pirate and you vote for Mazz, then you are ****ing stupid. This reaches Ankheheptehupptaufftaefftaqweppa levels of bigotry and asshattery. Mazz thinks that the concept of everyone in this forum getting higher subscription costs "reeks of good idea".
Discuss.
Edit: Clicky link. Edit2: Add to op Skunk?
|
Gilgamesh1980
The Black Rabbits The Gurlstas Associates
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 10:00:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Cyan Cure
Cute, but even if the last part sounded awesome in your little brain, you have to write it in a way that makes sence, or it comes out as a pathetic attempt at being funny. Not that i am trying that myself. Then again i don't know why you want my opinion on it.
damn, I knew I should have brought my big brain with me to work today.
oh and, NO YOU!!
Federic 'Gilgamesh1980' Chopin
Supreme Commander and Diplomat of the Black Rabbits and Gurlstas associates |
Cone Filler
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 10:32:00 -
[40]
its funny how so many people in this thread think that Logoffski is in discussion LOL
WTS reading comprehension 101
seriously the ideas of larkonis have already been passed now its up to CCP to implement it.
There is nothing you can do about it
THE REAL ISSUE here is Mazz deception in order to score votes
And Mazz most politicians promote their own ideas (well where i come from they do) not this BS you are smearing our forum with
Even your additions to your campaign are flawed as The Skunk rightfully pointed out several times
|
|
Faekurias
Origin. Black Legion.
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 10:48:00 -
[41]
Originally by: mazzilliu Edited by: mazzilliu on 05/05/2010 14:57:44 hahaha i am honored that you will put so much effort into this
like i said in the other thread, about two times, i would not vote against a logoffski proposal that isn't terrible.
Also a titan, that cannot be scrambled, has nothing to fear from logging off at an enemy pos. I don't know where your knowledge of game mechanics comes from but it isn't EVE. this change will screw over pilots of things like smaller ships that can be scrambled instead.
Even if this had only the first point, it's still a terrible idea. what about players who are being camped in and probed constantly, but eventually need to log off because they cant play EVE forever? People who are in the situation of being probed for hours are probably pvpers being camped in by a bigger carebear alliance. there's no legitimate method of logging off and disappearing quickly under such a situation provided. if the proposal were passed we would see solo pvpers getting camped in by carebears, and then forced to play eve for 8 hours or lose their ship. i know how tenacious those guys can be, i've been camped in by them lots of times.
If there were something about logoff conditions because local population went from 1 to 2, I would think it's a fair proposal. But when there's already people in local and their chance to catch you unawares has been lost, you need to be able to log off.
You, dear sir, just won my vote. Representing the non 23/7' players is you. +1 People who think blobs have it easy as it is.
|
Cone Filler
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 11:01:00 -
[42]
Originally by: Chaeryl Edited by: Chaeryl on 06/05/2010 09:28:30 Edited by: Chaeryl on 06/05/2010 09:25:27 A slightly more incriminating offense would be that Mazz supported this (ctrl+f her):
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1310652
If you're a pirate and you vote for Mazz, then you are ****ing stupid. This reaches Ankheheptehupptaufftaefftaqweppa levels of bigotry and asshattery. Mazz thinks that the concept of everyone in this forum getting higher subscription costs "reeks of good idea".
Discuss.
Edit: Clicky link. Edit2: Add to op Skunk?
wow just wow Mazzilli seriously, are you sure your name is not Palin?
|
Faekurias
Origin. Black Legion.
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 11:04:00 -
[43]
Originally by: Cone Filler
Originally by: Chaeryl Edited by: Chaeryl on 06/05/2010 09:28:30 Edited by: Chaeryl on 06/05/2010 09:25:27 A slightly more incriminating offense would be that Mazz supported this (ctrl+f her):
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1310652
If you're a pirate and you vote for Mazz, then you are ****ing stupid. This reaches Ankheheptehupptaufftaefftaqweppa levels of bigotry and asshattery. Mazz thinks that the concept of everyone in this forum getting higher subscription costs "reeks of good idea".
Discuss.
Edit: Clicky link. Edit2: Add to op Skunk?
wow just wow Mazzilli seriously, are you sure your name is not Palin?
This looks legit
|
Cpt Branko
Retired Pirate Club
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 11:11:00 -
[44]
Originally by: RuleoftheBone
[b]And frankly I would have thought the biggest issue for losec would be making it attractive to all pilots and boosting small gang/solo pirates
...
p.s. Best way to sort lowsec would be to remove local ofc.
Does not compute.
Look, first in WHs you need a prober to find targets. It's something which is not really doable w/out a covops alt (which I nowdays have) or a recon, and provided the other guy is not in a anomaly or you haven't probed out the system already, newcomers do need to probe things out which shows probes on scanner. This gives them better odds at spotting stuff. Add to that the fact WHs have mass limits, that WH entrances are not static, etc, and that WHs are, in comparison to lowsec, insanely profitable, you have a working system. If you cannot spot the difference between lowsec and WHs then you're crazy or something.
Secondly, lowsec is already preety crowded with various blobmonkeys, russian blobs with 50% falcon composition (not joking) and crap like that. Having the ability to spot these boosts solo and small gang.
Thirdly, what is the incentive to do anything ISK-making activity (bar moon mining) in low-sec w/out local? It becomes less safe (unless you push all content to exploration) then more profitable WHs, for starters. What is the point?
I started pirating in Rifters and stuff roaming low-sec belts. Fun times. Turning lowsec into a WH-lite system makes it impossible to roll like that; just removing local and leaving things as they are makes lowsec preety pointless for our targets (while boosting blobbing).
If people like WHs so much, they can spend more time in WHs. What is the problem there?
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |
Cyan Cure
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 11:25:00 -
[45]
Originally by: Gilgamesh1980
damn, I knew I should have brought my big brain with me to work today.
oh and, NO YOU!!
^^
I enjoy a post without content, ev'ry now and again, too, don't hate.
|
Paknac Queltel
Standards and Practices
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 11:42:00 -
[46]
Originally by: Chaeryl Edited by: Chaeryl on 06/05/2010 09:28:30 Edited by: Chaeryl on 06/05/2010 09:25:27 A slightly more incriminating offense would be that Mazz supported this (ctrl+f her):
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1310652
If you're a pirate and you vote for Mazz, then you are ****ing stupid. This reaches Ankheheptehupptaufftaefftaqweppa levels of bigotry and asshattery. Mazz thinks that the concept of everyone in this forum getting higher subscription costs "reeks of good idea".
Discuss.
Edit: Clicky link. Edit2: Add to op Skunk?
Obviously everyone who clicked "support" in that thread was completely serious in their support. The OP, William DeMeo, is obviously a carebear, despite being in Genos Occidere. This is obviously not an Assembly Hall troll.
Let's focus on Mazz's actual voting history in the CSM. - Paknac Queltel
|
sakana
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 11:46:00 -
[47]
Originally by: Le Skunk Edited by: Le Skunk on 05/05/2010 22:06:34
Originally by: sakana i was going to vote for mazz, but le skunk has opened my mind.
BRING ON GATECAMP ONLINE !
Above 0.0 Pilot Checklist:
* Lost Sleipnir to one of our gatecamps three years ago: CHECK * Still mad: CHECK * Felt need to post snotty comment on forums (its ironic innit): CHECK
Nice to see the 0.0 crowd coming out to support Maz in a thread where i accuse her of... supporting the 0.0 crowd over pirates.
SKUNK
seriously? you ran my name thru your kb to try and 1-up me on the forums? thats a pretty even mix of hilarious and depressing. maybe i should have logged the sleipnir i apparently lost, as apparently thats what everyone does. but your right, i'm still p damn bitter about that loss.
|
Le Skunk
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 13:57:00 -
[48]
Edited by: Le Skunk on 06/05/2010 14:01:33 Edited by: Le Skunk on 06/05/2010 13:59:58
Originally by: Paknac Queltel
Originally by: Chaeryl Edited by: Chaeryl on 06/05/2010 09:28:30 Edited by: Chaeryl on 06/05/2010 09:25:27 A slightly more incriminating offense would be that Mazz supported this (ctrl+f her):
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1310652
If you're a pirate and you vote for Mazz, then you are ****ing stupid. This reaches Ankheheptehupptaufftaefftaqweppa levels of bigotry and asshattery. Mazz thinks that the concept of everyone in this forum getting higher subscription costs "reeks of good idea".
Discuss.
Edit: Clicky link. Edit2: Add to op Skunk?
Obviously everyone who clicked "support" in that thread was completely serious in their support. The OP, William DeMeo, is obviously a carebear, despite being in Genos Occidere. This is obviously not an Assembly Hall troll.
Let's focus on Mazz's actual voting history in the CSM.
Nice spot on that thread there.
But seems like spellbound pilots want more "actual voting history". Well as a fellow pilot Lubomir Penev pointed out. Heres "actual voting history" where she voted AGAINST the C+P representive Larkonis Trasllers complaint about that bug in highsec where outlaws traveling across space trigger a Global Criminal instead of a NPC pursuit when crossing highsec
More Mazz Voting Against Pirate Needs
Strange she claims to be the "baton carrier of larkonis" (who despite his faults did represent the needs of this forum) when she votes AGAINST his main issues. You will note the selection of carebears she joined up with to get that one quashed.
INCLUDING VOTING ALONGSIDE ERIK FINNEGAN the 2nd founding member of the take care movement ALONG WITH ANKHESENTAPEMKAH.
Ankhesentapemkah, if you dont already known (shame on you) has consistently voted against anything low sec, is a prime mover in the campagin against suicide ganks, and has a selection of choice quotes about pirates available elsewhere. This is a pilot that Mazz claims to be able to "wind up".How you can wind up someone by voting along with them I dont know.
Erik Finnegan + Ankhampetama Take Care
Originally by: Cone Filler its funny how so many people in this thread think that Logoffski is in discussion LOL ... seriously the ideas of larkonis have already been passed now its up to CCP to implement it... THE REAL ISSUE here is Mazz deception in order to score votes
THE REAL ISSUE here is Mazz deception in order to score votes
Indeed, mine and other pirates posts have simply been to point out - wtf Mazz is doing trolling around in C+P looking for low sec and pirate votes, when every day someone is uncovering another vote where she has put 0.0ers first and voted against the things that bother pirates.
When I saw her say "I would lobby to bring Battleship rats into lowsec belts" - despite the fact that there have been BS NPCS in lowsec belts for a year. The alarm bells started ringing.
SKUNK
PS: BTW Shes since edited out her "bring bs to lowsec belts" line and replaced it with "Add more battleship spawns to belts in lowsec". Classic. (o)
|
Mynxee
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 14:09:00 -
[49]
While I disagree that logoffski is the most pressing issue for low sec pirates, I applaud Le Skunk for his OP and the discussion it has inspired. To understand the challenges faced by low sec pirates requires immersion into that lifestyle for a significant period of time. Mazz doesn't live in low sec; she doesn't pirate; her frame of reference is obviously null sec; she has demonstrated a lack of knowledge about relatively recent changes in low sec (e.g., BS spawns in belts). Her voting history and past CSM performance should give any pirate pause. If you want low sec and the piracy play style championed effectively in the CSM, invest your votes in someone who knows that environment and play style first-hand and who seriously cares about improving them.
Life In Low Sec |
Paknac Queltel
Standards and Practices
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 14:24:00 -
[50]
Originally by: Le Skunk Edited by: Le Skunk on 06/05/2010 14:07:45
Originally by: Paknac Queltel Let's focus on Mazz's actual voting history in the CSM.
But seems like spellbound pilots "izza gurl n i like gurl" want more "actual voting history".[SNIP]
Not saying I disagree with you on Mazz. A troll post on a troll thread just isn't relevant to this discussion, which is about Mazz's CSM decisions and who she chooses to truly represent when election time is over. - Paknac Queltel
|
|
Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 14:31:00 -
[51]
Originally by: Cyan Cure Edited by: Cyan Cure on 06/05/2010 07:52:49
Originally by: Mist3r Evil
stuff
i've seen more PvP than you ever will.
Now I know you're a nub with absolutely no idea.
|
Flinx Evenstar
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 14:51:00 -
[52]
Originally by: Le Skunk
* Your a 0.0 pilot, in one of the biggest alliances in the game.
Now I know this thread is a troll --- Witness epic fleet battles in Dominion
|
James Tritanius
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 14:54:00 -
[53]
I call troll.
|
Le Skunk
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 15:02:00 -
[54]
Edited by: Le Skunk on 06/05/2010 15:04:17
Originally by: Flinx Evenstar
Originally by: Le Skunk
* Your a 0.0 pilot, in one of the biggest alliances in the game.
Now I know this thread is a troll
LOL I wondered if someone would go for that point. But no troll, im happy to quantify it and any other point:
* 0.0 Pilot - Check her kills. A good 98% are in 0.0 (including all kills in the last three month). Ship of choice is an interdictor - useless (pretty much)in low sec
* Biggest Alliances in the Game. Pandemic legion have 1001 members which is one of the biggest alliances in the game (certainly the top 10% even if we knock out the 1 man alliance). At the time of voting against pirate issues, it was one of the most powerful alliances in the game.
SKUNK (o)
|
Ophelia Ursus
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 15:29:00 -
[55]
Edited by: Ophelia Ursus on 06/05/2010 15:29:52 mazzilliu is awesome because of this: http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1058486
a whole bunch of c&p posters are very dumb, as demonstrated by this thread.
|
Cyan Cure
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 15:41:00 -
[56]
Edited by: Cyan Cure on 06/05/2010 15:41:58
Originally by: Mynxee While I disagree that logoffski is the most pressing issue for low sec pirates, I applaud Le Skunk for his OP and the discussion it has inspired. To understand the challenges faced by low sec pirates requires immersion into that lifestyle for a significant period of time. Mazz doesn't live in low sec; she doesn't pirate; her frame of reference is obviously null sec; she has demonstrated a lack of knowledge about relatively recent changes in low sec (e.g., BS spawns in belts). Her voting history and past CSM performance should give any pirate pause. If you want low sec and the piracy play style championed effectively in the CSM, invest your votes in someone who knows that environment and play style first-hand and who seriously cares about improving them.
LOL @ this, nice wh*re, i hope you're paying SKUNK well. 'least send the guy some naked pictures, looks like he got into this. Making a whole new topic on a matter that barely affects piracy and is the last thing to fix on the list of problems.
EDIT: sheesh, can't even say *****
|
The PitBoss
Caldari Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 15:45:00 -
[57]
In addition Lets NOT forget this BEAUTY
Politician FOR SALE: Im Selling my CSM Powers!!!
Thank-You,
The Pitboss (Space between The & Pitboss)
Signatures by: Kalen Vox |
Siigari Kitawa
Gallente The 8th Order
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 15:55:00 -
[58]
Originally by: Mynxee While I disagree that logoffski is the most pressing issue for low sec pirates, I applaud Le Skunk for his OP and the discussion it has inspired. To understand the challenges faced by low sec pirates requires immersion into that lifestyle for a significant period of time. Mazz doesn't live in low sec; she doesn't pirate; her frame of reference is obviously null sec; she has demonstrated a lack of knowledge about relatively recent changes in low sec (e.g., BS spawns in belts). Her voting history and past CSM performance should give any pirate pause. If you want low sec and the piracy play style championed effectively in the CSM, invest your votes in someone who knows that environment and play style first-hand and who seriously cares about improving them.
I love you Mynxee, but you just joined a group of people whose primary focus is to take on mercenary contracts and stomp around in highsec. Your corp/ally have even captured 0.0 space to be rented out to others. Do you still care about lowsec? I was certainly shocked when you left. I didn't imagine raising your security would have that effect on you. :s
Take it as a constructive nudge.
|
Asuri Kinnes
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 16:40:00 -
[59]
Originally by: Chaeryl Edited by: Chaeryl on 06/05/2010 09:28:30 Edited by: Chaeryl on 06/05/2010 09:25:27 A slightly more incriminating offense would be that Mazz supported this (ctrl+f her):
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1310652
If you're a pirate and you vote for Mazz, then you are ****ing stupid. This reaches Ankheheptehupptaufftaefftaqweppa levels of bigotry and asshattery. Mazz thinks that the concept of everyone in this forum getting higher subscription costs "reeks of good idea".
Discuss.
Edit: Clicky link. Edit2: Add to op Skunk?
You need to train T2 irony detection... Please re-size your signature to the maximum allowed of 400 x 120 pixels with a maximum file size of 24000 bytes. Zymurgist |
Durzel
The Xenodus Initiative.
|
Posted - 2010.05.06 17:12:00 -
[60]
Originally by: Mynxee While I disagree that logoffski is the most pressing issue for low sec pirates, I applaud Le Skunk for his OP and the discussion it has inspired. To understand the challenges faced by low sec pirates requires immersion into that lifestyle for a significant period of time. Mazz doesn't live in low sec; she doesn't pirate; her frame of reference is obviously null sec; she has demonstrated a lack of knowledge about relatively recent changes in low sec (e.g., BS spawns in belts). Her voting history and past CSM performance should give any pirate pause. If you want low sec and the piracy play style championed effectively in the CSM, invest your votes in someone who knows that environment and play style first-hand and who seriously cares about improving them.
Lark isn't running though?
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |