| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Fikreta
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 12:14:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Fikreta on 08/06/2010 12:15:40 So I've heard countless times how EVE is cruel cold hardcore unforgiving blah blah world. But it's all just cheap propaganda. Empty words. Why? Because CCP is not only tolerating THE MOST CAREBEARISH FEATURE of all - multiaccounting, they are actually encouraging it by designing their whole game in a way that everyone not having at least one additional account is automatically less competitive and efficient no matter what he does and how much time he invests in the game.
It doesn't really matter if you were missioner, miner, lowsec ganker, trader, industrialist, 0.0 drone... you WILL enter easy game mode the very minute you start your second account and it WILL become only more and more easier further along the line with every next account you might decide to opet later.
But even that is not the main problem here. It's the very basic concept of multi-character server (MCS) CCP is using, slowly but maliciously enticing their playerbase to sink into the hell hole of multiboxing. Unfortunately, what they apparently don't realize is that alt zergs are damaging every single aspect of this game, turning it into one ridiculously shallow carebear fluffy happy land where everyone is free to do whatever he wants easily evading REAL and long term consequences for their actions.
I think CCP should ban multiaccounting asap. Let me to quickly sum up why, without going into details which would take too much space.
1) EVE is MMO game, right? As such, it should promote interaction and cooperation between players instead of giving them opportunity to become more or less self-sufficient; MCS is not helping this, quite opposite.
2) Having multiple characters only translates to abuse, self reliance, and a innate sense of personal security as you can always be someone else at any given moment if things get rough. Carebearish enough? Sure but hold on, there's more.
3) Using multiple characters which can solve numerous market/trade tasks without having to resort to other people is effectively diminishing the economy.
4) Accountability which basically circles around the need for an personal identity for any character and accountability for their actions; this is almost non-existant in EVE because we can always create, or better: buy yet another fresh character and all our previos nefarious deeds are instantly erased.
5) Sec status, standings, flagging and such are on the brink of irrelevant: whatever you do with one character, you still have another one to jump into and do everything you otherwise could not. In other words, with multiple characters that have no immediate affiliation with one another you can easily roam the space doing whatever you want without suffering any consequences for your previus actions.
6) With multiple characters, or personalities, you can easily act as you wish with one person and drastically change this dependent on who you speak to. Now, while the argument that you can do this regardless is sound, without multiple characters certain traits have to be universally accepted. This transformation does not solely apply to market. By adding MCS to game no player can truly be trusted, and many players become *******s without accountability. Normal activities in the game become a chore, because while in a sandbox environment you shouldnÆt trust others without foundation, in a sandbox game with MCS youÆre unable to trust others, regardless of past interaction with them.
|

Fikreta
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 12:17:00 -
[2]
7) Economic damage (see also my first point) - why ever bother to talk and work on contacts with dedicated manufacturers, when you can make/buy your own? Players need to depend on each other for an economy to really work. It won't if people are self-sufficient. MCS allows players to create countless industrial/mining alts which have detrimental effects on the player driven economy, ultimately increasing the number of manufacturers so those players who want to be full time crafters or even those that aren't interested in PvP but play to be a part of the economy will be severely undervalued. Industrial alts are flooding the market driving prices down, and hurting anyone.
8) Globalization: one of the most tragic things you can see in a game is when the massive huge world shaped around you is reduced to an insignificant size. The ability to log off of one character and immediately be thrown across the face of the map is doing just that.
9) Combat, either PvP or PvE: do I really need to talk how MCS is literally ruining it? Again, instead of encouraging cooperation between players, MCS is promoting one man armies roaming around whole New Eden. And yes, this includes even cap pilot and their now mandatory cyno alts. If you really want to pilot one of those you should first get to know trustworthy friends/corpies in game, not just to fire up another client and pick just another easy lame solution.
TL;DR Alts are evil and the worst carebearish game mechanics in EVE. They should be all lined up and shot.
|

Sol Mahon
Caldari Science and Trade Institute
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 12:18:00 -
[3]
Ok so you have outlined everything wrong with alt accounts. Now, how about a suggested fix? |

Sefredius Mengsk
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 12:19:00 -
[4]
tl;dr
Blah, blah, blah, QQ, whine and cheese 
|

Ovella
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 12:21:00 -
[5]
But if they grow a pair one of those will obviously be an alt  |

Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Dystopia Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 12:22:00 -
[6]
Alts are not a complete replacement of real players. Any multiboxer will tell you that running even 2 accounts at once makes them play much worse on both accounts than if they were playing on just one. _______________
|

Cat o'Ninetails
Caldari Rancer Defence League Elysium Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 12:22:00 -
[7]
I think that a large portion of CCPs income is derived from these "alts" of which you speak. There aren't any official figures available, but rough estimates could place the average number of accounts per unique person at least at two or more.
By disallowing second accounts, there would probably be more negative fallout than you suspect. The indy alt corp that supplies your pvp main corp with ships and modules? Kiss that goodbye, as one example.
Capital ships would suck even more than they do already, imagine trying to move your carrier without alts. Just relying on a chain of your corp or alliance mates to move you along. They'd resent you for it, or maybe not even be online at the time you need to move.
Also, if alts were removed from the game, I'd not be posting here. So, to some there may be a benefit.
My Facebook! |

Kendar
Gallente 4S Corporation Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 12:23:00 -
[8]
The fact is this game is so heavily dependant on cooperation and not singleplayer that people are forced to use alts cause there are not always people around to assist you with every litle thing that need 2 people
|

S'Way
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 12:24:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Fikreta I think CCP should ban multiaccounting asap.
yeah like CCP would do that and lose a huge % of it's income from subscriptions. People will always find ways to multi account even if a devoloper somewhere commited financial suicide by trying to ban it.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 12:24:00 -
[10]
Can't be done. ——— “If you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡… you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.” — Karath Piki |

AlleyKat
Gallente The Unwanted.
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 12:28:00 -
[11]
CCP is a business.
Anything they can do to increase subscriber count and generate revenue should be explored.
Why? Because the more revenue they generate equals more development on this game and any other games they want to deploy off the same IP, like Dust 514.
Without this revenue, New Eden would not look as it does today, and will not look the way it will in the future.
Besides, what someone does with their own money and how they decide to play this game is frankly, none of your business. And if the money they spend on playing this game so they can own a CNR and spin it in stations means we get things like planetary interaction and ambulation, then I'm for it.
AK EVE-ONLINE VIDEO-MAKING TUTORIALS |

James Tritanius
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 12:31:00 -
[12]
lol.
CCP doesn't want to lose 80% of its income.
|

Riedle
Minmatar Origin. Black Legion.
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 12:35:00 -
[13]
Better question:
Why do you care what other people are doing?
I only have one Toon, not even an alt.
Some peopel multi-box or whatever. I don't care. Why should that be my business what other people do with their Rl money?
HTFU
|

Malcanis
Caldari Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 12:57:00 -
[14]
Oh, it's this thread again.
Can't we just talk about how allowing people who advocate gun control teaching evolution makes abortion levels increase amongst homosexuals in the military in Iraq, or something equally productive?
Malcanis' Law: Whenever a mechanics change is proposed on behalf of "new players", that change is always to the overwhelming advantage of richer, older players. |

Dracenhof
Caldari The Knights Templar R.A.G.E
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 12:59:00 -
[15]
In my opinion miss Fikreta is wrong from point one to point nine.
For a long time I had only one account (almost two years I had only one account). I never felt that, it is a good thing to have two accounts, but at some point I realized that second character is a usefull feature. One do not need to have it to excell, but it's so usefull that if you are able to pay it, you may buy it.
So what I'm using this character for?
a) cynoing (when no corp mate is nearby) b) scouting (when system is not covered by our alliance intel) c) market trading d) in the past for mining or hauling
You may say that when you have 2, 3, 4 or even 5 characters you dont need to cooperate with other people. But did you ever try to mine with 3 accounts? After an hour or two you are so exhusted that you preffer to mine with your corp mates, one guy is hauling, one is commpressing in rorqual and you and your alt are mining. Better fun, better yeld, better efficiency, and you have event time to drink your favorite beer or whatever you wish.
Have you ever handled trade orders with 300+ open orders at the same time? (One character of mine has ~160 orders, the other ~140 orders)
Or run missions with 2 characters or more?
Guess what. When you add another character you do not receive second pair of hands or eyes. You are unable to efficently use alts for anything except some slow and passive actions (like trading), and at some point there is so much you have to do, that you even cant use effectively your alts for passive actions (maybe with exception of datacores).
I believe the real issue is not that CCP is forcing usto play multiaccounts, but the lack of trust between pleayers. I prefered to mine, and manufacture on my own, not because I had two accounts, but I was afraid that the guy from my corp at some point will run away with twenty or more quite expensive blueprints. What is more two characters driven by two different people are more effective then two characters driven by one person. It's like cores in your CPU, two or four cores, does not mean that you are going to have two or four times better performance, but yet it's usefull to run an operating system without slowdowns.
My favorite lol part in the end:
3) Using multiple characters which can solve numerous market/trade tasks without having to resort to other people is effectively diminishing the economy.
Market is dimnishing because what? There is too many market orders total?
Cheers.
|

DeT Resprox
Minmatar T.R.I.A.D
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 13:02:00 -
[16]
Alts are needed - if/when i ever get a Mothership or Titan, i'm sure as hell not leaving it in a POS shield while i wander off and there's no way i'd buy another account just to log it in when i need to use said ship.
Alts are handy when you need to buy a char with isk for use of these ships. DeT Resprox T.R.I.A.D CEO INGAME CHANNEL: TRIAD AGENCY
|

Ayaska Shran
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 13:11:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Sol Mahon Ok so you have outlined everything wrong with alt accounts. Now, how about a suggested fix?
Regardless if alts are good or bad, the above quote is the key problem. There is no fix. There is no way to prevent someone from obtaining and running multiple accounts.
So the whole issue is mute.
There is no in-game balancing to fix this either as long as two players/characters are better than one (which it should be) then alts will always be an advantage.
|

Furb Killer
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 13:14:00 -
[18]
Eve would be better without alts, no doubt. (Especially due to the accountebility (or however you write it) part, there would be consequences to actions). But it isnt possible to get completely rid of alts, too many ways to get around it. That said, doesnt need to stop them from making it a eula violation, kinda like account sharing, also not allowed even more not possible for ccp to do anything about it. However in the end CCP just earns too much due to alts to stop it.
|

War Kitten
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 13:26:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Ayaska Shran
...
So the whole issue is mute.
...
I believe the word you're looking for is 'moot'.
OP - get over it. The "game" you've described with one forced personality is called "life" and we all play it daily. The market there sucks too, so find a different argument. :)
"Here's your sign." - Bill Engvall |

MatrixSkye Mk2
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 13:29:00 -
[20]
The OP makes a very good argument. But asking CCP to get rid of alts is asking it to commit suicide. It just won't (and shouldn't) happen.
Grief a PVP'er. Run a mission today! |

Sellmewarez
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 13:34:00 -
[21]
I am in firm agreement that in an ideal world alts dilute the game expierence and it would be nice to remove them completely.
But the problem is with the way eve is structured as a 'sandbox' some people NEED to have alts because they cannot do the things they need to do on their main account. So removing alts in eve would be a complete disaster.
|

Syn Callibri
Minmatar Blacklight Incorporated
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 13:40:00 -
[22]
Edited by: Syn Callibri on 08/06/2010 13:40:58
Alts will not go away...I say this as a single account player and you know what, I dont care that other people have 2-3-4-5-6 whatever accounts t/b/h. Its thier money...thier time...thier playstyle. "EvE is a sandbox", even if other players don't build sandcastles the way you think they should. You want inter-dependance? Join a Corp and an alliance, and depend on them.
/puts soapbox away/
(comments expressed here may not reflect those of Blacklight Inc.) |

Lady Ayeipsia
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 13:44:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Sellmewarez I am in firm agreement that in an ideal world alts dilute the game expierence and it would be nice to remove them completely.
But the problem is with the way eve is structured as a 'sandbox' some people NEED to have alts because they cannot do the things they need to do on their main account. So removing alts in eve would be a complete disaster.
Additionally, alts allow newer players to experience more aspects of EVE. I know I could not have both a PVP player which I enjoy, and an industrialist without alts. I have been playing for only 6 months. Yet with 2 characters, I can enjoy different aspects of EVE which would otherwise take me another 6 months to train for.
|

Marchocias
Silent Ninja's
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 13:47:00 -
[24]
Can anyone suggest an appropriately strong hemorrhoid cream for the OP? He obviously needs something more soothing than the phallus he's currently using!
---- I belong to Silent Ninja (Hopefully that should cover it). |

Gunnanmon
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 13:48:00 -
[25]
Never. Going. To. Happen. Signature locked for discussing moderation. Navigator
|

Natalie Caladan
Royal Amarr Institute
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 13:52:00 -
[26]
Edited by: Natalie Caladan on 08/06/2010 13:56:47
Originally by: James Tritanius lol. CCP doesn't want to lose 80% of its income.
Indeed.
1. Money is a main reason for CCP not to do it (imo) and I honestly don't think 80% is an overstimation. 2. With 30 years of training in the game I can imagine that people want to split the training between multiple accounts, especially as there's very little overlap between for instance a combat character and an industrial. It's nice to have insight into and experience with more aspects of the game - and just one account really doesn't allow that. 3. Semi-afk mining makes mult-acconting very easy to do. Almost as if it's designed to enable multi-accounting. 4. Traveling times: it's often a 30 minutes trip if a corp member wants to help you which doesn't really encourage teaming up. People rather do their thing with 2 accounts. Same for timezones: I'ma euro player and more often than not there's just a few corp members on-line.
- If you don't want multi-accounts I suggest making the game so intensive and requiring so much attention that running 2 accounts isn't really an option. Make NPCs smart and unpredictable, forcing you to respond within a few seconds. It's for a reason people don't play shooters or racing games with 2 accounts. - Also, if you could train more characters on one account like any regular mmorpg you could still experience more aspects of the game without being able to actually play those characters at the same time. But again: loss of income for CCP.
|

Grez
M. Corp Daisho Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 14:30:00 -
[27]
Rofl, 80% not an over-estimation?
It was round about 18-20% last time they gave out figures. The only reason people ***** 'n' whine about it is because they don't have the úúú to do it. ---
|

Shawshanke
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 14:35:00 -
[28]
The OP obviously didn't watch the butterfly effect video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oq2oxt7Nrxo
See if you would have watched it you would have learned that there are no alts in this game, its a game of 300,000 "people". 300,000 who care about what happens in 0.0 and that Atlas is a friendly alliance that doesn't shoot neutrals with a recruiting policy of "save a miner, join our fleet".
|

Gunnanmon
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 14:38:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Grez Rofl, 80% not an over-estimation?
It was round about 18-20% last time they gave out figures. The only reason people ***** 'n' whine about it is because they don't have the úúú to do it.
imo 80% is an exaggeration, but I bet it's closer to 50% than 20%. Signature locked for discussing moderation. Navigator
|

Ana Vyr
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 14:39:00 -
[30]
I agree with the OP.
I refuse to buy a second account despite the self-nerfing it causes, just on principle.
To me, you should be able to be as effective as anyone else in the game with only a single personal account. My industry corp mates laugh their asses off at me for this stance as they merrily run two Hulks and a Orca per player.
45 bucks a month to play a MMO seems way over the top to me. Shrug.
|

Ramiera DaMorre
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 14:44:00 -
[31]
Dear Op! Ultimately this is a game. Stop taking it too seriously.
|

Zen Dijun
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 14:55:00 -
[32]
I very much agree with the OP on this issue. I refuse to purchase an ALT as I like to depend on others and I believe that's the best part of the game. Purchasing ALT's lends its self to soloing the game and reducing the fun of it. Secondly, those who purchase Alts need to get a life... as they probably spend way too much time in EVE.
But... that being said, it's impossible to stop multi-accounts...
-- My Two Cents
|

Lady Ayeipsia
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 15:04:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Zen Dijun I very much agree with the OP on this issue. I refuse to purchase an ALT as I like to depend on others and I believe that's the best part of the game. Purchasing ALT's lends its self to soloing the game and reducing the fun of it. Secondly, those who purchase Alts need to get a life... as they probably spend way too much time in EVE.
But... that being said, it's impossible to stop multi-accounts...
-- My Two Cents
So I have one character in a PvP corp. I get to socialize, work with that corp, and have fun playing with those people.
I have another character that is in an industrial alliance. He works with the industrial corp to help research blueprints and can probe in that area in the hopes of finding grav sites for the alliance.
So, I still socialize with both characters. Neither toon is soloable for any lenghth of time anymore so than a lone character is. Both still need people in game making the T2 stuff, helping form fleets, etc. This setup simply lets me enjoy two seperate aspects of the game, that I could not do with one character unless I had an extra year to train up skills, and in both case, i feel helpful and contribute to our corp/alliance goals.
As for the generic no life statement... what do you define as a life? Going out to bars, getting wasted? I'll pass. Going to sporting events which I really don't care about? I'll pass. Going to concerts, socializing with my friends, keeping a good stable job? I already do all those and happen to enjoy eve as part of my gaming hobby. So really, if that's the best you can come up with, sorry but your definition of what a "life" isn't necessarily correct nor is it the same "life" we all strive for. To each their own.
|

Ramiera DaMorre
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 15:07:00 -
[34]
Originally by: Zen Dijun Secondly, those who purchase Alts need to get a life... as they probably spend way too much time in EVE. -- My Two Cents
Oooooh, baseless assumptions! <3 Don't you think those who argue about other's free time and what they do in private might sign that they too need to get at least one more cup of this mystical "life"?  Seriously now. This is getting reminiscent of the "my way is the only way" threads.
|

omgfreemoniez
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 15:22:00 -
[35]
I agree with the OP, but CCP isn't going to ever cut into their own profits and ban multiaccounting and noone is going to de-sub their alts regardless of how convincing your post is. Personally, I'd love to see alts go, and I wouldn't mind losing my own alt, as long as everyone else did too.
I'd like to ask my own question now: If multiboxing was banned, would you be willing to pay however much you currently pay for all your current accounts to play on just one account? Assuming everyone else would pay the same rate as you (I saw that whine coming).
|

Dr Fighter
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 15:30:00 -
[36]
multiple accounts helps new players get around not having specalised skills in every area, this is why we get 3 alts (per account) 3 sets of focused attributes and 3 ways build them.
multiple accounts can help loney rude freidnless players get more of the games rich quality wihtout having to be social or trust anyone (trust is a massive thing in this game if you haddnt already noticed). also theres supercaps which once in your uber 90m sp char is worthless as anything else in the game for the time he flies it, enter in a 100% trusted alt to hold it while you need to do other things. Lastly and this is the most important reason why it wont change, multiple accounts = more money for ccp, its a busniess and dont forget it.
|

President Not'Sure
Shut Up Woman Get On My Horse
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 15:39:00 -
[37]
So, you do realize some of us have more than one computer and even if they banned alt accounts they wouldn't be able to stop us. Just start an account under a different name and pay in PLEX, running it on your laptop or whatever. Not that there is anything wrong with an alt account, mine is just to save time salvaging or trading so my main can do the more important things like pew pew pirates. Just because you can't afford one doesn't mean those of us who can should be punished for your financial failure.
|

Noran Ferah
Red Sky Morning
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 15:42:00 -
[38]
I use my alts to gain an advantage over other players.
How is this wrong?
|

Zen Dijun
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 15:45:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Lady Ayeipsia
Originally by: Zen Dijun I very much agree with the OP on this issue. I refuse to purchase an ALT as I like to depend on others and I believe that's the best part of the game. Purchasing ALT's lends its self to soloing the game and reducing the fun of it. Secondly, those who purchase Alts need to get a life... as they probably spend way too much time in EVE.
But... that being said, it's impossible to stop multi-accounts...
-- My Two Cents
So I have one character in a PvP corp. I get to socialize, work with that corp, and have fun playing with those people.
I have another character that is in an industrial alliance. He works with the industrial corp to help research blueprints and can probe in that area in the hopes of finding grav sites for the alliance.
So, I still socialize with both characters. Neither toon is soloable for any lenghth of time anymore so than a lone character is. Both still need people in game making the T2 stuff, helping form fleets, etc. This setup simply lets me enjoy two seperate aspects of the game, that I could not do with one character unless I had an extra year to train up skills, and in both case, i feel helpful and contribute to our corp/alliance goals.
As for the generic no life statement... what do you define as a life? Going out to bars, getting wasted? I'll pass. Going to sporting events which I really don't care about? I'll pass. Going to concerts, socializing with my friends, keeping a good stable job? I already do all those and happen to enjoy eve as part of my gaming hobby. So really, if that's the best you can come up with, sorry but your definition of what a "life" isn't necessarily correct nor is it the same "life" we all strive for. To each their own.
Every situation is different of course. I happen to know a few fellas in my alliance who are always on when I login and who own 4 accounts. Yes, to each their own... as for getting a life, you can choose to interpret that in whatever way you want.
|

Dani WH
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 15:47:00 -
[40]
Originally by: Ana Vyr I agree with the OP.
I refuse to buy a second account despite the self-nerfing it causes, just on principle.
To me, you should be able to be as effective as anyone else in the game with only a single personal account. My industry corp mates laugh their asses off at me for this stance as they merrily run two Hulks and a Orca per player.
45 bucks a month to play a MMO seems way over the top to me. Shrug.
you can pay by PLEX
|

Illwill Bill
House of Tempers
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 15:49:00 -
[41]
Dear OP,
Please HTFU.
I have just decided to create a new account. I previously trained two other characters and transferred them to the same account as my main is on. The new account will be used not only to give me additional income to fund my pirating in low-sec, it will also give me an opportunity to infiltrate other corporations, thus increasing the griefing potential.
That is all. Additionally, it really infuriates me, when people use some pointless rant about signatures as a sig. |

BoBoZoBo
Foundation
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 15:52:00 -
[42]
Though I agree with the spirit of the OP on a fundamental level, theory is different than practice. =========================
Minister of Propaganda - Operator 9 |

Stephanie MacKenzie
Minmatar Farsight Enterprises LLC Independent Faction
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 15:55:00 -
[43]
Wow, the OP is butthurt. You'd think he just realized that one of his alts hasn't magically come to life, and that he's been cybering with his little brother for the past three months.
It would be irresponsible not to speculate. ----- "You want FIVE BIRRION EESK!!?? F U!!! TOO BAD!! HERE BOMB!!"
Edited from Rez Valintine's original |

Hon Dao
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 16:04:00 -
[44]
Some people are needy and have to validate their existence through extensive interactions with other people. They have problems with their identity, and as a consequence have to develop a definite focus as to what their personality actually is, because that is core to the interaction with the other people that they need so much. Both what they are to themselves and others.
Meanwhile some of us are perfectly capable of standing on our own two feet, and adapting to circumstances by becoming more diverse in our abilities and outlooks, to the point we become self sufficient, even to the extent of being better able to consider all the different sides to any argument, thanks to having a kind of multiple personality that is frequently in conflict with itself.
You rely on other people, which makes you weaker as an individual, yet stronger as a group.
We rely on ourselves, which makes us stronger individuals, yet as a result we cannot so easily work as a group.
|

Sir Suicidealt
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 16:20:00 -
[45]
Well am an alt of a few other alts but thats thanks to CCP doing the Power of 2 so I guess the OP missed out on the promotion.
|

Cambarus
The Baros Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 16:29:00 -
[46]
TBH you can replace "alts" in the OP with "Skillpoints" or "isk" and you'd have the same rant. Having run out of things to do with the latter 2 I just went and subbed a few alts myself :D |

Widemouth Deepthroat
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 16:37:00 -
[47]
I love my alts. I am in NZ so not so many people on in my time zone without join crappy ANZAC or my friends in Syndicate (I'm bored of Syndicate :D ). I just run around 2-3 character and have some fun. Also I never like having to share my 10/10 loot because I need some other prick to help with plex :D.
|

Caldari Citizen20090217
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 16:44:00 -
[48]
Ah alts. The bane of eve. Except my own of course. <.<
Alts will never go away as theres 100% sure no way to tell if a character is an alt. Would be nice if we could "audit" characters tho to see who they gave/recieved isk to/from, or contracted/traded with. Right now theres no way to kill the economic backbone of the guys harassing you.
|

Dztrgovac
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 16:53:00 -
[49]
Please, stop defending CCP in this. No, a lot functionality provided by multi accounting can't be replaced with ISK or SP in same context. Game does greatly encourage and reward multi accounting.
How many other MMOs are $30 or $45 per month in practice? CCP greatly encouraged multiboxing to increase its income when increasing true sub numbers was much greater; now that EVE is game where you will suffer and be behind if you don't run more than one account, EVE becomes even more niche as there aren't that many possible customers willing to pay that much for a game.
|

Cipher Jones
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 16:55:00 -
[50]
you know, when you type hateful troll bull**** and disguise it with articulate descriptions and a high grade level of writing, its still hateful troll bull****.
1/10.
This is clearly a signature. |

Akaraut
Gallente The Scope
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 16:57:00 -
[51]
To the OP, i quote the heavy weapons guy from team fortress 2: "Waaaaaa cry some more!"
I would point out why removing alts will never happen, but i'd just be repeating all the other posts.
Originally by: Inoue Zael By your reasoning, if we took in physical features into attribute distribution, all minmatar ships would explode once the pilot started them up.
I loled when i saw this |

oolk
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 17:06:00 -
[52]
He madz...
IF CCP would transfer my alt sps onto my main,I might consider it :)
Cool 75mil sps (built from scratch,not bought)to sprinkle over a 85mil sps char...yum...
|

Arc Reven
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 17:08:00 -
[53]
OP is correct on every point, and the only reason CCP won't is because of the money/multiboxer tears. Every "counterpoint" in this thread was already shot down by the OP.
|

Syn Callibri
Minmatar Blacklight Incorporated
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 17:27:00 -
[54]
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
10 to 1 this is the OP's alt...just sayin'. 
"Ka dos shlu'ta phord nindol...dos phuul ilythiiri ka'lum." |

Lady Ayeipsia
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 17:33:00 -
[55]
Originally by: Arc Reven OP is correct on every point, and the only reason CCP won't is because of the money/multiboxer tears. Every "counterpoint" in this thread was already shot down by the OP.
I do not believe this is correct.
"1) EVE is MMO game, right? As such, it should promote interaction and cooperation between players instead of giving them opportunity to become more or less self-sufficient; MCS is not helping this, quite opposite."
This is not a valid assessement. I have seen many instance where one account is a Low/Nul sec and allows the player to interact and cooperate with a certain group of people. These players also have a Hi sec alt within an alliance and allows the player to interact and cooperate with a different group of people. In this case, multiple accounts actually allows a person to interact and cooperate with more groups of people than a lone account can do. So really, how does having 2 accounts, both active in seperate alliances, not lead to cooperation and increased interaction?
So how was this counterpoint shot down by the OP? Seems to me that multiple accounts allow pepole to interact with multiple groups, where as one account, in a system where the account is limited to one corp at a time, you have less interaction.
|

Mendolus
Aurelius Federation Fatal Ascension
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 17:50:00 -
[56]
Originally by: Hon Dao Edited by: Hon Dao on 08/06/2010 16:21:36 Some people are needy and have to validate their existence through extensive interactions with other people. They have problems with their identity, and as a consequence have to develop a definite focus as to what their personality actually is, because that is core to the interaction with the other people that they need so much. Both what they are to themselves and others.
Meanwhile some of us are perfectly capable of standing on our own two feet, and adapting to circumstances by becoming more diverse in our abilities and outlooks, to the point we become self sufficient, even to the extent of being better able to consider all the different sides to any argument, thanks to having a kind of multiple personality that is frequently in conflict with itself.
You rely on other people, which makes you weaker as an individual, yet stronger as a group.
We rely on ourselves, which makes us stronger individuals, yet as a result we cannot so easily work as a group, and do not have the same focus as a group that you do.
And yes, "Everyone must be like me" is a typical attitude coming from those people who feel insecure about their own identity, and therefore have to associate with similar people as validation.
I like this, two thumbs up! Couldn't have said it better myself.
It is amazing how often you hear people argue that others are doing something wrong simply because they are not enjoying the same things they themselves do. I think the most heinous part is they truly believe that such an argument is valid.
I thoroughly, thoroughly enjoy having alternate accounts because I can train to and experience a great diversity of existing and future game content.
This game is designed to provide interactive entertainment and I am paying for a service here so that I may have access to said entertainment. If I am enjoying myself, it is money well spent, end of story. That is all this game is at a fundamental level, a subscriber service to provide entertainment.
Now, if the OP wants to get into diminishing marginal utility and altruism we can start talking about the self serving interests in removing all alternate players from the game so the OP gains more entertainment value through satisfaction of personal needs, and then compare that gain with the loss of entertainment for every single person who had an alternate account banned, and see whether the utility of such an act were to add up, but then we would all be communists, and that is unsavory at best.

IMO bring in the meat shops, sacrifice the lambs so that others may yet live! Chop chop! Next time you have a cold, don't go to the doctor unless you wanna become a living scrapyard of viable body parts for the sick and dying! Kill one, save ten! YARR!
{...and they will respect a line drawn in the sand more than forgiveness} |

Rid'dick
Stargazer Exploration Company Sundiver Technology Diversified
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 18:00:00 -
[57]
Clearly the OP's intention was to create a useless argument on something that everybody will have a different opinion on, notice the lack of a counter argument from the OP. Typically these kind of arguments are brought on by women......!!!
|

Epicbeardman
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 18:09:00 -
[58]
Originally by: Tippia Can't be done.
A mediocre player with 2 characters will generally defeat a good player with 1 character. The downside of ignoring twitch gameplay, EVE is about quantity over quality.
|

JC Anderson
Caldari Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 18:22:00 -
[59]
Edited by: JC Anderson on 08/06/2010 18:24:29 The only problem with them now trying to get rid of it would be that originally they encouraged it.
I ran two accounts for awhile and only because CCP basically made it cheaper to do so. Now Im back down to one account.
A few years back CCP ran a sale called the Power Of Two, where you could open a second account at a discount monthly rate for the first 6 months. Had they not done so, theres a good chance many people would have never bothered with the second account.
In any sense it's pretty clear from that alone that they have absolutely no intention of setting limits on it.
I personally have nothing against it, but in my case the only reason I had the second account was to train a freighter pilot for use when I still lived in ASCN space. And as such I no longer have a use for it. ;)
And on a related note,
I'm not sure as to why the multiple account issue is causing the OP such distress in the first place.
|

kurg
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 18:40:00 -
[60]
OP is the perfect example and poster child of why people solo play MMO's!!
I bet OP whines about everything they don't have, but wish they did! Intelligence is a gift which most folks lack!
|

Ana Vyr
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 19:01:00 -
[61]
Originally by: Dani WH
Originally by: Ana Vyr I agree with the OP.
I refuse to buy a second account despite the self-nerfing it causes, just on principle.
To me, you should be able to be as effective as anyone else in the game with only a single personal account. My industry corp mates laugh their asses off at me for this stance as they merrily run two Hulks and a Orca per player.
45 bucks a month to play a MMO seems way over the top to me. Shrug.
you can pay by PLEX
Just like minerals that you mine yourself are free right?
Time is far more valuable to me than money. I prefer to actually play the game instead of working a second job inside the game to be able to log in.
|

Ramiera DaMorre
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 19:07:00 -
[62]
Originally by: Ana Vyr
Just like minerals that you mine yourself are free right?
Time is far more valuable to me than money. I prefer to actually play the game instead of working a second job inside the game to be able to log in.
Don't know about others, but with minimal effort I can get enough money for a plex fairly fast.
|

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux War.Pigs.
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 19:08:00 -
[63]
Quote:
1) EVE is MMO game, right? As such, it should promote interaction and cooperation between players instead of giving them opportunity to become more or less self-sufficient; MCS is not helping this, quite opposite.
I don't see how this is true. I have 4 accounts and still feel that I have to fleet up with other people to accomplish my goals. For instance, consider something as 'simple' as jumping a jf full of minerals into low sec: - Entry cyno - Exit cyno - Jump freighter - 2-4 carriers
I can maybe pull off the jump freighter and entry cyno - but I definitely cannot fulfill all of these roles myself.
Quote:
2) Having multiple characters only translates to abuse, self reliance, and a innate sense of personal security as you can always be someone else at any given moment if things get rough. Carebearish enough? Sure but hold on, there's more.
Pure speculation?
Quote:
3) Using multiple characters which can solve numerous market/trade tasks without having to resort to other people is effectively diminishing the economy.
Actually, ISK faucets don't parallelize well and ISK sinks do. Thus we end up with a linearly growing market with a fractionally (logrithmically?) growing income...
Quote:
4) Accountability which basically circles around the need for an personal identity for any character and accountability for their actions; this is almost non-existant in EVE because we can always create, or better: buy yet another fresh character and all our previos nefarious deeds are instantly erased.
i don't know that this being true is dependent upon having multiple accounts and alts.
Quote:
5) Sec status, standings, flagging and such are on the brink of irrelevant: whatever you do with one character, you still have another one to jump into and do everything you otherwise could not. In other words, with multiple characters that have no immediate affiliation with one another you can easily roam the space doing whatever you want without suffering any consequences for your previus actions.
Speaking as a 3 character/4 account pirate... sec status is a major pain in the ass - and that neglects the PVP disadvantage it gives you. See, you can go to Jita and buy a Bhaalgorn... I have to buy a BPC and put up buy orders for minerals, jump them into low sec, and build my Bhaalgorn there. Much much more work... all because I can't go into high sec.
Quote:
6) With multiple characters, or personalities, you can easily act as you wish with one person and drastically change this dependent on who you speak to. Now, while the argument that you can do this regardless is sound, without multiple characters certain traits have to be universally accepted. This transformation does not solely apply to market. By adding MCS to game no player can truly be trusted, and many players become *******s without accountability. Normal activities in the game become a chore, because while in a sandbox environment you shouldnÆt trust others without foundation, in a sandbox game with MCS youÆre unable to trust others, regardless of past interaction with them.
I underlined the interesting part here.
-Liang -- Liang Nuren - Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire |

Terrax Norik
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 19:11:00 -
[64]
Originally by: Fikreta
TL;DR Alts are evil and the worst carebearish game mechanics in EVE. They should be all lined up and shot.
While you idea may be a nice fantasy to some, it completely ignores the reality of business. You might as well ask for all politicians to be completely honest. 
|

simon perry
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 19:17:00 -
[65]
Originally by: Ovella But if they grow a pair one of those will obviously be an alt 
+1

|

Terminal Insanity
Minmatar Gith Industries
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 19:30:00 -
[66]
theres no way for them to do this. As EVERY OTHER GAME IN EXISTANCE has pointed out, it is IMPOSSIBLE to prevent multiboxing/metagaming/etc.
Also, Who gives a ****? A player playing 4 accounts is actually at a disadvantage since he has to manage 4 different ships, compaired to you with 3 other friends all managing 1 ship each.
So, i say to you, GROW A PAIR, and stop posting this stupid with YOUR ALT of all things... lol...
~ ° ° ° ~ Non-Gameplay Enhancements! |

Shawshanke
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 19:53:00 -
[67]
Originally by: Terminal Insanity theres no way for them to do this. As EVERY OTHER GAME IN EXISTANCE has pointed out, it is IMPOSSIBLE to prevent multiboxing/metagaming/etc.
Also, Who gives a ****? A player playing 4 accounts is actually at a disadvantage since he has to manage 4 different ships, compaired to you with 3 other friends all managing 1 ship each.
So, i say to you, GROW A PAIR, and stop posting this stupid with YOUR ALT of all things... lol...
As far as missioning goes unless you can instapop battleships you're spending a lot of time watching your screen. In the time that you are waiting to switch targets I'm quickly and easily flipped between my dps ship and salvaging ship. Click click wait is just to slow a boring for me so I need to run 2 alts and can do it just as efficiently as 3 people.
|

Megan Maynard
Minmatar Unknown-Entity Black Star Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 20:03:00 -
[68]
I played this game for 3 years without any alts. Great fun.
Then I decided to get into Capital ships.
All I can say is good freakin luck flying a capital ship without an alt. You'll run into skillpoint issues, timezone issues, and overall lazy corp mate issues.
The game was playable before I got a carrier with a single accout..... Not anymore.
Sorry but completely putting the trust in other players with a ship over a billion isk is not my cup of tea thank you.
Originally by: F'nog
Originally by: Stareatthesun No no no ... Polaris is where CCP keeps the death star that will destroy eve when the servers shut down.
Thankfully I've got Interceptors trained to V. S
|

Terminal Insanity
Minmatar Gith Industries
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 20:12:00 -
[69]
i just utterly fail to see what you would expect ccp to do about it. you can hate metagaming/multiboxing all you like, but unless CCP wants to lose a quarter of its income and ban legitimate players who arnt multiboxing, you'll have to deal with it.
Why cant you stop multiboxing? What if my brother wants to play? Both clients appear to be coming from the same IP address, therefore same household.
Further, some ISPs tunnel their users through the SAME ip, so even if you have no relation to the guy down the street, he is still sharing the same IP address you are using, and therefore you're banned for 'multiboxing' as well.
You see now why this is something that cant ever be solved, and therefore why this thread is pointless.
Quit, or man up.
~ ° ° ° ~ Non-Gameplay Enhancements! |

Nomad Storm
The Wandering Path
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 20:14:00 -
[70]
Best part of this thread is all the people the OP seems to have scared.
|

Kohana Chayton
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 20:18:00 -
[71]
This is not limited to eve, it is a problem with all MMO's. When I played EQ and EQII, I never had less than 4 active accounts at any one time. When I went on to play Vanguard, I had 3 accounts running at the same time. I switched over to Guild Wars for a while and I ran 6 accounts.
I talked with a lot of people and very few of them only had 1 account. Most had 2 or more.
OP just needs to get a better computer and get with the game.
|

JC Anderson
Caldari Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 20:24:00 -
[72]
Edited by: JC Anderson on 08/06/2010 20:26:39 And again, beyond all of the other reasons you have to look at the fact that CCP encourages it.
Hence, the power of 2 promo's they run every so often which allows you to have a second account for a reduced monthly subscription rate.
They are not going to turn around and ban multi boxing after they have encouraged and made it easier to do in the first place through the reduced 2nd subscription promo's.
|

Ekrid
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 20:25:00 -
[73]
/signed in favor of OP.
just biomass all alts and give the ISK from the liquidation of skill/train time, total ISK value of character, and other stuff to their choice of main.
|

Sol Lethe
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 21:07:00 -
[74]
The solution isn't to stop people from having alts. The solution is to allow a person with a single account to also have (usable) alts. Your wallet in real life shouldn't translate into an in game advantage.
This means being able to train and use all 3 characters on the account at the same time. Problem solved. Probably won't happen though.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 21:10:00 -
[75]
Originally by: Sol Lethe The solution isn't to stop people from having alts. The solution is to allow a person with a single account to also have (usable) alts. Your wallet in real life shouldn't translate into an in game advantage.
This means being able to train and use all 3 characters on the account at the same time. Problem solved. Probably won't happen though.
How does that change the fact that RL-wallets will translate into game advantages? So now everyone has 3 alts, and those with larger wallets will have 9à ——— “If you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡… you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.” — Karath Piki |

Ryhss
Caldari Victory Fleet Systems C.H.A.L.I.C.E.
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 21:20:00 -
[76]
Originally by: Fikreta Edited by: Fikreta on 08/06/2010 12:15:40 So I've heard countless times how EVE is cruel cold hardcore unforgiving blah blah world. But it's all just cheap propaganda. Empty words. Why? Because CCP is not only tolerating THE MOST CAREBEARISH FEATURE of all - multiaccounting, they are actually encouraging it by designing their whole game in a way that everyone not having at least one additional account is automatically less competitive and efficient no matter what he does and how much time he invests in the game.
It doesn't really matter if you were missioner, miner, lowsec ganker, trader, industrialist, 0.0 drone... you WILL enter easy game mode the very minute you start your second account and it WILL become only more and more easier further along the line with every next account you might decide to opet later.
But even that is not the main problem here. It's the very basic concept of multi-character server (MCS) CCP is using, slowly but maliciously enticing their playerbase to sink into the hell hole of multiboxing. Unfortunately, what they apparently don't realize is that alt zergs are damaging every single aspect of this game, turning it into one ridiculously shallow carebear fluffy happy land where everyone is free to do whatever he wants easily evading REAL and long term consequences for their actions.
I think CCP should ban multiaccounting asap. Let me to quickly sum up why, without going into details which would take too much space.
1) EVE is MMO game, right? As such, it should promote interaction and cooperation between players instead of giving them opportunity to become more or less self-sufficient; MCS is not helping this, quite opposite.
2) Having multiple characters only translates to abuse, self reliance, and a innate sense of personal security as you can always be someone else at any given moment if things get rough. Carebearish enough? Sure but hold on, there's more.
3) Using multiple characters which can solve numerous market/trade tasks without having to resort to other people is effectively diminishing the economy.
4) Accountability which basically circles around the need for an personal identity for any character and accountability for their actions; this is almost non-existant in EVE because we can always create, or better: buy yet another fresh character and all our previos nefarious deeds are instantly erased.
5) Sec status, standings, flagging and such are on the brink of irrelevant: whatever you do with one character, you still have another one to jump into and do everything you otherwise could not. In other words, with multiple characters that have no immediate affiliation with one another you can easily roam the space doing whatever you want without suffering any consequences for your previus actions.
6) With multiple characters, or personalities, you can easily act as you wish with one person and drastically change this dependent on who you speak to. Now, while the argument that you can do this regardless is sound, without multiple characters certain traits have to be universally accepted. This transformation does not solely apply to market. By adding MCS to game no player can truly be trusted, and many players become *******s without accountability. Normal activities in the game become a chore, because while in a sandbox environment you shouldnÆt trust others without foundation, in a sandbox game with MCS youÆre unable to trust others, regardless of past interaction with them.
I concur with the above statement.
Originally by: Abrazzar I don't know what's going on but I am terribly upset about it. 
|

Sol Lethe
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 21:24:00 -
[77]
Originally by: Tippia How does that change the fact that RL-wallets will translate into game advantages? So now everyone has 3 alts, and those with larger wallets will have 9à
3 characters is a reasonable (albeit arbitrary) amount. Most people won't ever use more than the 3 characters.
The advantage gained in the current format is that of being able to do more than one thing at once (cyno alt, etc). This advantage is nullified by allowing all 3 characters to be used (and trained) at once. Sure, someone could buy 2 more accounts, but then they are only gaining additional concurrency and not the ability to do so in the first place.
In the current system the two slots are probably reserved for a forum ***** and a low sp hauler alt for most single account players. They rarely become more than that unless you're a veteran player and don't mind pausing training on your main.
|

SamGromoff
Amarr Viziam
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 21:25:00 -
[78]
I, too, would like to fly a supercapital ship with one account per player
|

Gladys Pank
Amarr Trillionaire High-Rollers Suicidal Bassoon Orkesta
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 21:40:00 -
[79]
I will be opening a sixth account in honour of this thread.
|

JC Anderson
Caldari Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 21:43:00 -
[80]
Originally by: Gladys Pank I will be opening a sixth account in honour of this thread.
ROFL
|

Selene D'Celeste
Caldari The D'Celeste Trading Company ISK Six
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 22:26:00 -
[81]
With regards to accounts and subbing, CCP is among the most progressive of all MMOs to date. The combination of encouraging multiple accounts, character selling, and GTC/PLEX purchases is really a powerful combo in terms of their income, increasing the player population (actual humans not accounts), hurting ISK sellers, and allowing a mechanism to get around the SP barrier for newer players.
Making such things EULA violations is ineffective and bad business. This is one of the areas where CCP excels, so no, they should change nothing.
|

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux War.Pigs.
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 22:46:00 -
[82]
Originally by: Selene D'Celeste With regards to accounts and subbing, CCP is among the most progressive of all MMOs to date. The combination of encouraging multiple accounts, character selling, and GTC/PLEX purchases is really a powerful combo in terms of their income, increasing the player population (actual humans not accounts), hurting ISK sellers, and allowing a mechanism to get around the SP barrier for newer players.
Making such things EULA violations is ineffective and bad business. This is one of the areas where CCP excels, so no, they should change nothing.
Oooooooh.... very nice post. My compliments. :)
-Liang -- Liang Nuren - Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire |

Digital Solaris
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 23:04:00 -
[83]
Originally by: Fikreta WAAH~!
To be honest, I am happy that I can afford multiple accounts so I won't have to rely on a bunch of madly jealous neurotic asshats for stuff to be done. It is just not worth the time or the headache I'd get from dealing with one of you. As matter of fact, the next time CCP has another Power of Two deal, I plan to get my fifth account.
A harsh, cruel, cold and bitter truth for you right there. Suck on that fact along your whine and cheese whilst I will have more of your absolutely divine tears, like a fine wine, as they roll down your cheeks until they flow down into my empty glass. |

Kyusoath Orillian
Haters Gonna Hate
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 23:22:00 -
[84]
Originally by: Fikreta Edited by: Fikreta on 08/06/2010 12:15:40...complete ****..
one of the worst trolling attempts i have ever seen.
did no one ever tell you that trolling is a art ?
|

empire hauler
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 23:49:00 -
[85]
while op is correct in some points the thread is overall fail...
1 alts do not lessen interaction, they give more ways of interaction.
2 ''innate sense of personnal security'' wtf its a game lol
3 more character=more commerce(=more offer=more demand=bigger market), ur statment is horribly against logic
4 ''need for an personal identity for any character and accountability for their actions'' dude its a game, u sound like ure running a state ministry of justice...
5 ''Sec status, standings, flagging and such are on the brink of irrelevant'' oh really? fake edit: i just tried avoided flagging, i told concord: ''fear mah ship i haz alts'' man concord blew me up in mah face. so i bring that other alt, u know to teach those concord suckers a lesson they need... again they killed my alt even thou my alts were confirmin in local im telling truth to concord officer. I raged and raged and little tought, hrm concord dumb ****s dont know yet that flagging is ''on the brink of irrelevant''
6 the ''easily act'' part is called role playing: Massive Multiplayer Online ROLE PLAYING: MMORPG, ever heard of it yet? about the trust part: if u cant trust a guy with multiaccs u cant trust him on one account neither.
|

Kohana Chayton
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.06.08 23:53:00 -
[86]
Originally by: Selene D'Celeste With regards to accounts and subbing, CCP is among the most progressive of all MMOs to date. The combination of encouraging multiple accounts, character selling, and GTC/PLEX purchases is really a powerful combo in terms of their income, increasing the player population (actual humans not accounts), hurting ISK sellers, and allowing a mechanism to get around the SP barrier for newer players.
Making such things EULA violations is ineffective and bad business. This is one of the areas where CCP excels, so no, they should change nothing.
+1
I agree 100% with this. EVE, while it does have it's problems, is easily the most liberal MMO going in this aspect.
Originally by: CCP Zymurgist OK everyone, please play nicely. There is no need to start getting angry or show off your Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Troll impression.
|

Windjammer
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 00:05:00 -
[87]
Sounds like the OP is having a hard time getting anyone to play with him. Since his answer to that problem is to force others to play with him, perhaps we can see why others do not wish to play with him.
Couple that with the completely delusional suggestion that CCP give up over half their subscribers? I'm calling this a nut case. Fun to laugh at, but other than that a waste of time.
Windjammer
|

empire hauler
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 00:06:00 -
[88]
Edited by: empire hauler on 09/06/2010 00:08:51
Originally by: Fikreta 7) Economic damage (see also my first point) - why ever bother to talk and work on contacts with dedicated manufacturers, when you can make/buy your own? Players need to depend on each other for an economy to really work. It won't if people are self-sufficient. MCS allows players to create countless industrial/mining alts which have detrimental effects on the player driven economy, ultimately increasing the number of manufacturers so those players who want to be full time crafters or even those that aren't interested in PvP but play to be a part of the economy will be severely undervalued. Industrial alts are flooding the market driving prices down, and hurting anyone.
8) Globalization: one of the most tragic things you can see in a game is when the massive huge world shaped around you is reduced to an insignificant size. The ability to log off of one character and immediately be thrown across the face of the map is doing just that.
9) Combat, either PvP or PvE: do I really need to talk how MCS is literally ruining it? Again, instead of encouraging cooperation between players, MCS is promoting one man armies roaming around whole New Eden. And yes, this includes even cap pilot and their now mandatory cyno alts. If you really want to pilot one of those you should first get to know trustworthy friends/corpies in game, not just to fire up another client and pick just another easy lame solution.
TL;DR Alts are evil and the worst carebearish game mechanics in EVE. They should be all lined up and shot.
7 if u wanna buy your own u will need to get it from manufacturers, if u wanna make ur own u will still probably need something from market. many things cant be made so depend on marker regardles of number of alts u have. actualy the more alts the more stuff they will need/produce the more they will drive market.
8 u can clone jump or suicide jump even on one char, argument invalid
9 one man armies roamin across new eden... hey can i have some of the stuff ure smoking... if now u can maybe get a cyno in yr corp chat its mainly bcs corpies have alts, remove alts and u will see how many ppl will move ther main to make a cyno for you (hint: its a low number)
actualy the single problem there is that i see is that multiboxing (specially mining) in combination with macros is making work of otherplayer not using macros and multiple accounts worth lot less. its funny op didnt mention the only real issue that lowers the quality of the game...
tl;dr op is just going whiny emo kid. i wonder what happened is he a trader that cant make profit and hes blaming alts, did he die cos of the falcon alt, must be something but im 2 lazy to research who touched him where and why is he so butthurt now.
not so fake edit: yesss im an alt 
|

beautyispain
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 00:43:00 -
[89]
I'd like to point out that having two accounts makes it extremely easy to make enough isk to run the second account for free with PLEX. But limiting how many accounts one can have is just plain stupid, people should be able to play this game however they please, if they want to play alone with a couple of alts, fine.
|

Terminal Insanity
Minmatar Gith Industries
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 00:50:00 -
[90]
Originally by: Terminal Insanity i just utterly fail to see what you would expect ccp to do about it. you can hate metagaming/multiboxing all you like, but unless CCP wants to lose a quarter of its income and ban legitimate players who arnt multiboxing, you'll have to deal with it.
Why cant you stop multiboxing? What if my brother wants to play? Both clients appear to be coming from the same IP address, therefore same household.
Further, some ISPs tunnel their users through the SAME ip, so even if you have no relation to the guy down the street, he is still sharing the same IP address you are using, and therefore you're banned for 'multiboxing' as well.
You see now why this is something that cant ever be solved, and therefore why this thread is pointless.
Quit, or man up.
You can never put too many nails into a coffin.
~ ° ° ° ~ Non-Gameplay Enhancements! |

GoGo Rens
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 02:23:00 -
[91]
Why would you waste so much time posting about something that will never change. Obviously ccp are not going to suddenly wipe out 50% of their income by banning half the accounts that people pay for and therefore their income.. Not including all the others who would then quit their main character as well.
|

Kyra Felann
Gallente Neh'bu Kau Beh'Hude Ushra'Khan
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 02:31:00 -
[92]
I absolutely agree. The complete elimination of alts and multiple accounts would be the single best change that could be made to the game. I also realize it'll never happen. -----SIGNATURE-----
Originally by: CCP Ginger Ships have crews, most pod controlled frigates do not, above that they have crews of varying sizes. Hope that helps.
|

Shiho Weitong
Caldari Punken Dredophiles
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 02:42:00 -
[93]
Originally by: Gladys Pank I will be opening a sixth account in honour of this thread.
OMG! 
I'm only opening my 5th. 
I feel hopelessly behind. 
And to the guy talking plexes and jobbing: I make more than enough for 4 plexes a month on passive income alone. ----------- Why is it called common sense, when it's clearly very rare.
I had a mind once, but alas, I seem to have forgotten where I left it.
Originally by: Tchell Dahhn You win, and thank you.
|

Jason Babbage
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 02:50:00 -
[94]
To me Eve is an MMO-RPG/RTS.
You don't play Age of Empires with just one archer do you?
I don't think more than one accounts is required, but for certain styles of game play it can make things more interesting.
I just wish CCP would let us control our multiple accounts with the same client. I really hate all the alt-tabbing :-(
|

Shawshanke
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 04:58:00 -
[95]
Originally by: GoGo Rens Why would you waste so much time posting about something that will never change. Obviously ccp are not going to suddenly wipe out 50% of their income by banning half the accounts that people pay for and therefore their income.. Not including all the others who would then quit their main character as well.
Because I like to troll the forums between missions.
|

Traspace
Caldari School of Applied Knowledge
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 05:56:00 -
[96]
Isn't the basic idea of EVE that of a sandbox, you can reach for the stars and beyond doing what you will...until one of these friendly pirates wants your cargo :p
If someone wants to be a carebear they should have that right.
|

Lilith Order
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 06:34:00 -
[97]
Originally by: Kyra Felann I absolutely agree. The complete elimination of alts and multiple accounts would be the single best change that could be made to the game. I also realize it'll never happen.
Kill multi boxing and U'K goes from 1200 to 12. Ok maybe 120. I'm sure a few -A- would put token 55K chars in there.
OP: Orca envy? |

dankness420
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 06:52:00 -
[98]
I have 5 accounts but I can really only effectively handle two in combat at once.
Even then, I am nowhere near as effective as two actual players. Like people say, you dont get an extra pair of eyes and arms!
|

Sidewayzracer
Caldari Corax. New Eden Retail Federation
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 07:08:00 -
[99]
Originally by: Cat o'Ninetails Also, if alts were removed from the game, I'd not be posting here.
Quick Ban them all
|

Jennifer Fenring
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 07:27:00 -
[100]
Originally by: Selene D'Celeste CCP is among the most progressive of all MMOs to date. The combination of encouraging multiple accounts, character selling, and GTC/PLEX purchases is really a powerful combo in terms of their income.
I don't disagree but character selling is really against everything RPG stands for. But well, we are our ships anyway .. I hope walking in stations may change that a little.
@OP: I agree but it is never ever going to happen.
|

Khors
Amtek Inc
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 07:34:00 -
[101]
But, but... who would I post with?! 
|

JC Anderson
Caldari Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 07:39:00 -
[102]
Originally by: Lilith Order
Originally by: Kyra Felann I absolutely agree. The complete elimination of alts and multiple accounts would be the single best change that could be made to the game. I also realize it'll never happen.
Kill multi boxing and U'K goes from 1200 to 12. Ok maybe 120. I'm sure a few -A- would put token 55K chars in there.
OP: Orca envy?
Likely have an effect far beyond that.
I'm not sure if it's this way beyond my circle of friends, but I often find myself the minority by having only one active account.
|

Fikreta
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 07:52:00 -
[103]
Well, thanks everyone for your comments. Some are very good and the rest are just proving what I already knew: EVE is soft. Sadly, some of you guys are acting like a bunch of little whining carebears scared even to think about alternative to this fluffy mess we dare to call 'a hardcore MMO game'. It's funny because honestly, all anti-SCS (single character/server) arguments I've seen are basically coming to this one: "it's easier with alts". What an irony.
Yes, I'm aware that CCP is not going to touch our precious easy game mode tickets called alts, ever, so don't be afraid that things might become a little bit rougher and (OMG!) complicated some day - they won't. Alt zergs are bringing them way too much money. Disabling multiaccounting -a bold move which would REALLY make this game what it falsely pretends to be- would also make their Almighty God of Holy Profit angry and that's where this story ultimately ends.
So let us all relax and carry on with our daily carebear routines. Highsec, lowsec, 0.0, it doesn't make any difference.
Just don't forget to fire up another client or two because we want our easy portion of fun and instant gratification which would be oh so much tougher to earn with single character.
|

Potato IQ
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 09:51:00 -
[104]
Originally by: Fikreta because we want our easy portion of fun and instant gratification
Wellà.yes actually. You do realise itÆs simply a game that offers a change from the real world for a while. You do, donÆt you?
Silly person
|

Jennifer Fenring
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 10:39:00 -
[105]
Edited by: Jennifer Fenring on 09/06/2010 10:42:12
Originally by: Fikreta Sadly, some of you guys are acting like a bunch of little whining carebears scared even to think about alternative to this fluffy mess we dare to call 'a hardcore MMO game'. It's funny because honestly, all anti-SCS (single character/server) arguments I've seen are basically coming to this one: "it's easier with alts".
Why is carebearing and multi-accounting the same? Talking about hardcore - what about permadeath? The only true form of hardcore. It will definitely bring a whole new dimension to EVE.
My reason for multi accounts is that the skillqueue is too long to be able to train more professions within a reasonable timeframe. I don't know what I'll be doing in 5 years but I'm not betting on it that I'll still be playing EVE. A 25 year time requirement to enjoy and experience all aspects of a game on one character is a bit over the top imo.
Originally by: Fikreta easy portion of fun and instant gratification which would be oh so much tougher to earn with single character.
EVE and instant gratification - isn't that a Contradictio in terminis? Have you ever played other games at all?
Still I do agree that no alts would be great but I don't agree with all your arguments.
|

Mashie Saldana
Red Federation
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 11:30:00 -
[106]
I have sold/biomassed the alt's I had. Now I only have three mains left. 
|

Hanneshannes
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 11:35:00 -
[107]
Originally by: Ana Vyr I agree with the OP.
I refuse to buy a second account despite the self-nerfing it causes, just on principle.
To me, you should be able to be as effective as anyone else in the game with only a single personal account. My industry corp mates laugh their asses off at me for this stance as they merrily run two Hulks and a Orca per player.
45 bucks a month to play a MMO seems way over the top to me. Shrug.
There are more expensive hobbies.
|

Gladys Pank
Amarr Trillionaire High-Rollers Suicidal Bassoon Orkesta
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 11:40:00 -
[108]
Originally by: Mashie Saldana I have sold/biomassed the alt's I had. Now I only have three mains left. 
That and an appreciation of Peter F Hamilton 
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 11:42:00 -
[109]
àand while people are jabbering away about the pros and cons and reasons and counter-arguments for this kind of change, I'd still like to know how on earth it would be done?
How do you keep people from having alts? How do you separate two persons with one character each from one person with two characters?
A problem isn't a problem if it cannot be solved ù otherwise, it's just a fact of life. ——— “If you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡… you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.” — Karath Piki |

Dravius Luxor
Minmatar Phoibe Enterprises
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 12:57:00 -
[110]
Please CCP, delete these forums. Or stop reading them.
|

BrundleMeth
Caldari Temporal Mechanics
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 13:50:00 -
[111]
Edited by: BrundleMeth on 09/06/2010 13:55:24 So because you can't afford a second account no one should get one... I have 4 and wouldn't play with only 1. So there goes $700.00 a year from one person. Like CCP would ever do this... Whiner... Besides, it would be likely be impossible anyway or if it was it would cost too much to make any sense...
Originally by: Fikreta Well, thanks everyone for your comments. Some are very good and the rest are just proving what I already knew: EVE is soft. Sadly, some of you guys are acting like a bunch of little whining carebears scared even to think about alternative to this fluffy mess we dare to call 'a hardcore MMO game'. It's funny because honestly, all anti-SCS (single character/server) arguments I've seen are basically coming to this one: "it's easier with alts". What an irony.
Yes, I'm aware that CCP is not going to touch our precious easy game mode tickets called alts, ever, so don't be afraid that things might become a little bit rougher and (OMG!) complicated some day - they won't. Alt zergs are bringing them way too much money. Disabling multiaccounting -a bold move which would REALLY make this game what it falsely pretends to be- would also make their Almighty God of Holy Profit angry and that's where this story ultimately ends.
So let us all relax and carry on with our daily carebear routines. Highsec, lowsec, 0.0, it doesn't make any difference.
Just don't forget to fire up another client or two because we want our easy portion of fun and instant gratification which would be oh so much tougher to earn with single character.
Blah, blah blah... What a goofball, it's just a game ffs. And you are like so many other people on this board. Attack people who don't agree with you because of course you MUST be correct in your opinion...
And if you have decided that CCP won't do anything anyway what is the point of your whole moronic drivel???
|

Ana Vyr
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 14:00:00 -
[112]
Edited by: Ana Vyr on 09/06/2010 14:00:37
Originally by: Tippia àand while people are jabbering away about the pros and cons and reasons and counter-arguments for this kind of change, I'd still like to know how on earth it would be done?
How do you keep people from having alts? How do you separate two persons with one character each from one person with two characters?
A problem isn't a problem if it cannot be solved ù otherwise, it's just a fact of life.
They could open up the other two characters on the account you already have for starters, so that they could be played and trained simultaneously. Sure, some folks (probably most) would still have multiple accounts, but the advantage would be less noticeable.
|

Hon Dao
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 15:32:00 -
[113]
Edited by: Hon Dao on 09/06/2010 15:32:39 To further discuss an issue touched on here:
Originally by: Hanneshannes
Originally by: Ana Vyr 45 bucks a month to play a MMO seems way over the top to me. Shrug.
There are more expensive hobbies.
And here:
Originally by: Jennifer Fenring My reason for multi accounts is that the skillqueue is too long to be able to train more professions within a reasonable timeframe. I don't know what I'll be doing in 5 years but I'm not betting on it that I'll still be playing EVE. A 25 year time requirement to enjoy and experience all aspects of a game on one character is a bit over the top imo.
There's no real difference between buying a premade character to get skill points quicker, or buying a second account on which to gain a second set of skillpoints. However, I don't see anyone complaining about PLEX and character trading.
And as for the cost? No, running several accounts in an MMO is not a particularly expensive hobby. I've had to give up others that I spent less time on, because they were outside the confines of my budget, and yet I can multibox 5 wow accounts, and have just started EVE with 2.
I too only added a second account when I discovered the limitation of a single skill queue per account. I don't want to be limited to training just one specialisation for the first few months, when that is the time I really wnat to be exploring my options in the game.
I don't see any reason (just a lot of ignorant prejudice), as to why dedicating more time, money and effort to an MMO video game should be considered any different from doing the same in any other hobby. It's entertainment. It doesn't provide any real benefit to society because it's a frivolous time sink. So how is it that MMOs are any different from having a greater interest in, for example, going to the cinema? Some people go occasionally, others have season tickets (add in the costs of transport, and food and drink, and even something as everyday as that is probably more costly than multiboxing an MMO).
Then we come onto those who go so far as to say any over average interest in an MMO is actually addiction. I could say there are more people 'addicted' to watching TV, supporting a sports team, cycling, or horseriding than there are to MMOs. The MMO players only spend more time doing it (than everyone except the TV watcher), because sitting down at a computer in your own home, is more convenient. Especially considering all the other things you can do on the computer, while playing an MMO.
What I choose to do with my free time is of no concern to anyone, no matter how much they may think they have a right, to dictate what others should do.
|

Ramiera DaMorre
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 15:50:00 -
[114]
Edited by: Ramiera DaMorre on 09/06/2010 15:49:42
Originally by: Hanneshannes
There are more expensive hobbies.
Confirming this. I'm collecting and painting Warhammer 40k and Fantasy miniatures... and plushies. Eve is practically for free.
|

Syn Callibri
Minmatar Blacklight Incorporated
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 16:09:00 -
[115]
Personally...if someone want to multi-box, etc...let them, its thier money. I have a single account and could care less what other players do. I enjoy EvE for what it is....a game (hello...did we all get that?).
(The views expressed may not be those of Blacklight Inc.) |

Hon Dao
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 16:15:00 -
[116]
Originally by: Ramiera DaMorre Confirming this. I'm collecting and painting Warhammer 40k and Fantasy miniatures... and plushies. Eve is practically for free.
Hehe, I gave that one up when I was about 16 (after about 5 years of it being my main hobby). I then had enough money to buy my own computer to play FPS games on. And when I stopped keeping my computer up to date to play FPS games, I found I could not only afford the subscription MMOs I'd been avoiding, but actually afford several subscriptions.
EVE is different from the others, in that if you put more into it, it can actually become free. Multi-accounting is probably the best way to do that.
|

Eelis Kiy
Gallente Shadows Of The Federation
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 16:24:00 -
[117]
Edited by: Eelis Kiy on 09/06/2010 16:25:29
How would you even determine an alt account was an alt account and not someones spouse/partner/child/fluffbuddy/whatever that they are also paying for and share an IP addy with? -----------------------------
>>where the frack is my ship?<< |

omgfreemoniez
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 16:42:00 -
[118]
Originally by: Digital Solaris
To be honest, I am happy that I can afford multiple accounts so I won't have to rely on a bunch of madly jealous neurotic asshats for stuff to be done. It is just not worth the time or the headache I'd get from dealing with one of you. As matter of fact, the next time CCP has another Power of Two deal, I plan to get my fifth account.
You speak like you aren't a neurotic asshat yourself, then...
Originally by: Digital Solaris
A harsh, cruel, cold and bitter truth for you right there. Suck on that fact along your whine and cheese whilst I will have more of your absolutely divine tears, like a fine wine, as they roll down your cheeks until they flow down into my empty glass.
ROFL
|

Ramiera DaMorre
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 17:03:00 -
[119]
Originally by: Hon Dao Hehe, I gave that one up when I was about 16 (after about 5 years of it being my main hobby). I then had enough money to buy my own computer to play FPS games on. And when I stopped keeping my computer up to date to play FPS games, I found I could not only afford the subscription MMOs I'd been avoiding, but actually afford several subscriptions.
Hehe, I bought my first (severely outdated, but it was MINE!) PC at 16 too, but started getting into the miniature business only at 25. I doubt I'll ever give it up tho, putting dioramas together is too much fun.
Quote: EVE is different from the others, in that if you put more into it, it can actually become free. Multi-accounting is probably the best way to do that.
Quite so and I'm glad for that since I could get a friend of mine into EVE by churning out the ISK for his plexes too. Damn, I'm being used! 
|

Hon Dao
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 17:05:00 -
[120]
Originally by: omgfreemoniez
Originally by: Digital Solaris To be honest, I am happy that I can afford multiple accounts so I won't have to rely on a bunch of madly jealous neurotic asshats for stuff to be done. It is just not worth the time or the headache I'd get from dealing with one of you.
You speak like you aren't a neurotic asshat yourself
I may be a neurotic ass hat, but at least I'm not jealous too ;)
|

Diosas
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 17:21:00 -
[121]
Edited by: Diosas on 09/06/2010 17:21:17 Multi accounts well you cant stop that and i dont think it should. If a person is willing to pay for another account then fine. However i think the OP mean, correct me if im wrong to remove alts as in extra chars on one account
of which to be honest i support. posting with my alt...oh yeah will stop alt posters too...probably clean up the forums alot too
|

Khavi Kitamatsu
|
Posted - 2010.06.09 19:55:00 -
[122]
Originally by: Fikreta Well, thanks everyone for your comments. Some are very good and the rest are just proving what I already knew: EVE is soft. Sadly, some of you guys are acting like a bunch of little whining carebears scared even to think about alternative to this fluffy mess we dare to call 'a hardcore MMO game'. It's funny because honestly, all anti-SCS (single character/server) arguments I've seen are basically coming to this one: "it's easier with alts". What an irony.
Yes, I'm aware that CCP is not going to touch our precious easy game mode tickets called alts, ever, so don't be afraid that things might become a little bit rougher and (OMG!) complicated some day - they won't. Alt zergs are bringing them way too much money. Disabling multiaccounting -a bold move which would REALLY make this game what it falsely pretends to be- would also make their Almighty God of Holy Profit angry and that's where this story ultimately ends.
So let us all relax and carry on with our daily carebear routines. Highsec, lowsec, 0.0, it doesn't make any difference.
Just don't forget to fire up another client or two because we want our easy portion of fun and instant gratification which would be oh so much tougher to earn with single character.
So can you explain how having multiple accounts is carebearish? Maybe my brain is malfunctioning. But I would really like to know. Plus...how is any game hardcore? Ummm...it is a game. I mean unless we loose real money like you might do in a game of poker - then how again is this game or any game like this hardcore? Explain hardcore while you are at it please. Thanks.
|

RazorDreamz
Caldari Chaotic dynamics
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 02:59:00 -
[123]
-1 for obvious troll. No one would that stupid to suggest this.
|

paracidic
Destructive Influence IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 03:05:00 -
[124]
HEY OP.
Put down the pipe and back away slowly. ***********************************************
Everything ever written by a goon or DS1 member is absolutely factual and should not be challanged in anyway. |

Fikreta
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 06:40:00 -
[125]
A few comments...
Originally by: BrundleMeth So because you can't afford a second account no one should get one
This thread is about multiaccounting as one of the EVE's specialities, and all negative long term effects it causes. But you, as many others, are clearly missing the point.
Originally by: BrundleMeth it's just a game ffs
Well remember that next time you call someone a carebear, taste his delicious tears and/or show him a way to ---> /random MMO game here/
Originally by: BrundleMeth And if you have decided that CCP won't do anything anyway what is the point of your whole moronic drivel???
To check general community opinion? Now calm down will you, no one is going to steal your beloved fluffy little toys... err, alts.
Originally by: Diosas i think the OP mean, correct me if im wrong to remove alts as in extra chars on one account.
That would be ultimate goal, yes, but removing MCS would be the first and probably the hardest step for both CCP and this playerbase which is, btw, largely so spoiled and whiny I just cannot believe.
Originally by: Tippia How do you keep people from having alts?
While it's not possible to completely prevent people using this or that trick/hack/proxy/whatever to still run several accounts, there are known methods to control and significantly cut that number down so in the end the vast majority of norm players would not bother/risk. Especially if they are familiar with harsh consequences, which would be in this case - perma ban for all accounts registered and verified as multiples.
Originally by: Khavi Kitamatsu So can you explain how having multiple accounts is carebearish?
Please read OP again. If you're still unable to see why, then I cannot help you with this one. Sorry.
|

Potato IQ
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 09:41:00 -
[126]
Very, very dim bulb
Just one of a number of very good reasons, which has already been mentioned, for having another account is to specialise on a different path. If the SP requirements are completely different yet highly intensive, then I would be missing out on a game element for months if not years
You keep correcting people by referring to your OP. Why as itÆs a lot of nonsense. Point 1 to 3 are quite disgraceful as itÆs a blinkered view on how everyone should play this game. I will remind you of the following:
Originally by: from this site æAbout Eve OnlineÆ
However, the level at which each player decides to participate is a matter of personal choice. The game leaves ample room for continual progress and variety in all its solo playing aspects. For those who opt to do so, becoming the best lone-wolf pirate or bounty hunter is a never-ending task as the competitors are other human players who will employ every method at their disposal to gain an edge over the rest. Solo players are also able to hire out their services as mercenaries or hit men to other players or player-run corporations
So who are you to tell anybody how to play this game
I come on these forums to glean information from the experienced players which will improve my play time and enjoyment of the game. Crap like this post is neither constructive or helpful. Please go away
|

Im Blue
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 10:01:00 -
[127]
as a player with 6 accounts(3 pvp'ers spec'd in different races and ships, 2 industry/science guys and 1 future super cap holding guy) and 12 other alts(few for lab works few for cynos few for just eyes) stating that all alts should be removed is infact a very silly idea.
all though this is a mmo, there are times when other players arnt on, dont have the skills or the ability to help even when they are on. if i have to move my own caps about i have no choice but to use my own cyno alts. sometimes i need upto 5 just to get from one place to another. expecting orther players to be there each and everytime is just not workible.
i dont pay for my accounts with cash, i make most of my isk from my alts without much effort. no eve job for me in that regard.
why do i have 6 accounts, well i do love playing in eve(i have many issues with ccp but i still love eve) i like being able to play every part of the game without trying to do everything on just 1 account.
would i leave game if i had to play with just 1 guy? probibly not, would i enjoy eve as much? probibly not as i would miss out on much it has to offer.
you play your way, ill play mine
Blue
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 10:12:00 -
[128]
Originally by: Fikreta
Originally by: Tippia How do you keep people from having alts?
While it's not possible to completely prevent people using this or that trick/hack/proxy/whatever to still run several accounts, there are known methods to control and significantly cut that number down so in the end the vast majority of norm players would not bother/risk. Especially if they are familiar with harsh consequences, which would be in this case - perma ban for all accounts registered and verified as multiples.
Would you care to elaborate, and especially point out how these methods don't yield false positives? ——— “If you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡… you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.” — Karath Piki |

Spurty
Caldari D00M. RED.OverLord
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 11:07:00 -
[129]
Two reasons for multiple accounts.
GM account + non GM account Spies in enemies corporation / alliance
How are we supposed to Meta game without information?
If you are serious about removing Alts one must logically say you are affirming the desire to have monthlysubs trippled and removal of plexes.
This would be acceptable financially to ccp of they can force us all into a 2 year contract
So you would sign that contract op?
Personally I wouldn't. I love that Eve subs Zymurgist ACCIDENTALLY my thargoid |

Tobias Sjodin
Ore Mongers Gentlemen's Club
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 11:28:00 -
[130]
"Whaaaa"
Great contribution Fikreta.
|

BrundleMeth
Caldari Temporal Mechanics
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 11:57:00 -
[131]
Edited by: BrundleMeth on 10/06/2010 11:58:02
Originally by: Hon Dao There's no real difference between buying a premade character to get skill points quicker, or buying a second account on which to gain a second set of skillpoints. However, I don't see anyone complaining about PLEX and character trading.
And as for the cost? No, running several accounts in an MMO is not a particularly expensive hobby. I've had to give up others that I spent less time on, because they were outside the confines of my budget, and yet I can multibox 5 wow accounts, and have just started EVE with 2.
I too only added a second account when I discovered the limitation of a single skill queue per account. I don't want to be limited to training just one specialisation for the first few months, when that is the time I really wnat to be exploring my options in the game.
I don't see any reason (just a lot of ignorant prejudice), as to why dedicating more time, money and effort to an MMO video game should be considered any different from doing the same in any other hobby. It's entertainment. It doesn't provide any real benefit to society because it's a frivolous time sink. So how is it that MMOs are any different from having a greater interest in, for example, going to the cinema? Some people go occasionally, others have season tickets (add in the costs of transport, and food and drink, and even something as everyday as that is probably more costly than multiboxing an MMO).
Then we come onto those who go so far as to say any over average interest in an MMO is actually addiction. I could say there are more people 'addicted' to watching TV, supporting a sports team, cycling, or horseriding than there are to MMOs. The MMO players only spend more time doing it (than everyone except the TV watcher), because sitting down at a computer in your own home, is more convenient. Especially considering all the other things you can do on the computer, while playing an MMO.
What I choose to do with my free time is of no concern to anyone, no matter how much they may think they have a right, to dictate what others should do.
You sir are exactly right. We should be friends... (And I play EVE while watching TV so I must really be addicted)...
|

BrundleMeth
Caldari Temporal Mechanics
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 12:05:00 -
[132]
Edited by: BrundleMeth on 10/06/2010 12:07:10
Originally by: Fikreta A few comments...
Originally by: BrundleMeth So because you can't afford a second account no one should get one
This thread is about multiaccounting as one of the EVE's specialities, and all negative long term effects it causes. But you, as many others, are clearly missing the point.
No I got the point. But your complaint is clearly like so many other complaints in life. It just masks the fact you are broke so have to rationalize SOME reason why others shouldn't get to do something that YOU can't afford. Like the moron who tells me I shouldn't drive a Corvette because his 74 Toyota can get him to the grocery store just fine...
Originally by: BrundleMeth it's just a game ffs
Well remember that next time you call someone a carebear, taste his delicious tears and/or show him a way to ---> /random MMO game here/ I have NEVER called anyone a carebear. I think it's a stupid term, and I never direct anyone to any other MMO. I don't really know any other MMO's. And the only tears I taste are my own cause I can't fight worth crap lol
|

MatrixSkye Mk2
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 12:08:00 -
[133]
Originally by: Fikreta
Originally by: BrundleMeth it's just a game ffs
Well remember that next time you call someone a carebear, taste his delicious tears and/or show him a way to ---> /random MMO game here/
Very well said. QFT.
You're touching on the hypocrisy that exists among some of the most prevalent "hardcore" players of the game. I'd dare say most of the idiots that spout "HTFU" and "cry some moar, carebear" bring their own risks down and close to zero with the use of alts.
Grief a PVP'er. Run a mission today! |

Jennifer Fenring
Amarr
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 13:02:00 -
[134]
Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2 .. the hypocrisy that exists among some of the most prevalent "hardcore" players of the game. I'd dare say most of the idiots that spout "HTFU" and "cry some moar, carebear" bring their own risks down and close to zero with the use of alts.
And of course the only "real hardcore" is permadeath. I'd like to see their faces when it happens to them! 
|

S Pada
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 13:29:00 -
[135]
i do believe that alts wreck the game as well, as it dose not give you that alternate personality as that the hole reason for mmo's to live a alternate life, but ccp works of a money system if it would make them more money that would do it, why you think they stopped ghost training for, now you need to have a 2nd account to train for your Indy or pvp toon as it takes so long to train in this game it is wise to have a alt. why you think they allow neutral remote repairs. The only way you could ever get ccp to change any think is to stop paying your accounts for 3 months until they change some thing, have a strike till ccp actually listens to the players, but as Ive seen so far they dont care as long as the $$$ are going in to there pocket, look at there match fixing in the alliance tournament, look at eve poker thats a 3rd party program that they have allowed because the owner used to be a gm. but hey im just one voice
|

Rainb0w bright
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 13:38:00 -
[136]
Originally by: Shawshanke
Originally by: GoGo Rens Why would you waste so much time posting about something that will never change. Obviously ccp are not going to suddenly wipe out 50% of their income by banning half the accounts that people pay for and therefore their income.. Not including all the others who would then quit their main character as well.
you dont have to ban any of the accounts just do what they do with trial account no multiboxing,
|

ihcn
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 13:41:00 -
[137]
Wormhole space is boring. The only way one could possibly live in wspace without being burned right out of the game altogether, is to have non-wspace alts.
|

polly pritypants
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 13:52:00 -
[138]
Edited by: polly pritypants on 10/06/2010 13:55:10 nullEdited by: polly pritypants on 10/06/2010 13:54:16 well yer i thought the hole reason for mmo's was to interact with other people, if you want to go around mining in a 5 man fleet or pvping with a neutral rr, fill a corp coz the ceo haz got a personalty of a a door nob or alts around hubs coz you cant be bothered jumping around in a space ship in a space game , yous may as well sit at watch a move and play with your self at home.
we can tell who has rl mates :D
boxing
|

dexington
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 13:53:00 -
[139]
Originally by: S Pada i do believe that alts wreck the game as well, as it dose not give you that alternate personality as that the hole reason for mmo's to live a alternate life
no no no!... not everyone is into RP, besides i've never even seen the character i'm playing in eve, do you really believe someone wants to play an alternate personality that is a space ship?
... u r wee todd id, u r sofa king wee todd id ... |

Rainb0w bright
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 14:10:00 -
[140]
Edited by: Rainb0w bright on 10/06/2010 14:11:22
Originally by: dexington
no no no!... not everyone is into RP, besides i've never even seen the character i'm playing in eve, do you really believe someone wants to play an alternate personality that is a space ship?
umm thats is not really Rp its your alt person your digilife as you will why you think wow sucks now coz people are multiboxing to much on there as in they guys/girl link above
so why do you play this game for then
|

Savatar Mei
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 14:13:00 -
[141]
Originally by: Illwill Bill Dear OP,
Please HTFU.
I have just decided to create a new account. I previously trained two other characters and transferred them to the same account as my main is on. The new account will be used not only to give me additional income to fund my pirating in low-sec, it will also give me an opportunity to infiltrate other corporations, thus increasing the griefing potential.
That is all.
sounds like that noob over at aggressive tendencies
that'll do pig.
|

Le Skunk
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 14:20:00 -
[142]
Originally by: Dez Affinity Alts are not a complete replacement of real players. Any multiboxer will tell you that running even 2 accounts at once makes them play much worse on both accounts than if they were playing on just one.
Indeed - i always count my falcon alt as Half a falcon, when eyeing up possible fights and odds of success
SKUNK (o)
|

Lady Ayeipsia
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 15:18:00 -
[143]
OK... I'm a little confused here...
Is the OP requesting the removal of all Alternate accounts/characters... meaning we each would get only 1 character, that's it?
If so... what happens if you reach a state of Chiriba or the like? You've been playing for 7 years and have done it all and then some. Should not such a person be allowed to create a new character to experience all the changes since their character started so long ago? I mean it would be cruel to say you have to delete the older character just so you can say you had experienced the new tutorials, the character creation process, and how you now plan a character with the training bonus replacing the old assigned skills method.
Or is the OP only complaining about running multiple accounts at the same time? For example, when someone has one account working as an active scout, alt-tabbing or running dual monitors, while also piloting their combat character?
|

Hon Dao
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 15:44:00 -
[144]
Edited by: Hon Dao on 10/06/2010 15:49:15
Originally by: Rainb0w bright you dont have to ban any of the accounts just do what they do with trial account no multiboxing
There is no restriction on multiboxing with trials. At least one that can't be circumvented by using another computer, or a VM (or any one of a number of methods, should they rather stupidly restrict it to one log in per IP, which as a consequence would also stop 2 or more people playing over the same connection).
The problem here is that people who have no understanding of the technology behind it, think it's oh so easy to stop multiboxing. Those who do understand, know that that is most certainly not the case. That would include the game's developers.
Originally by: polly pritypants well yer i thought the hole reason for mmo's was to interact with other people
Other than the whole fantasy/not real thing, the only difference between real life and an MMO game is the O. There is no obligation to go and do anything with people in real life just because they happen to be there, so why should I suddenly have to do stuff with a bunch of people, just because I'm doing it online? In fact online people have pretty much proven themselves to be a bigger bunch of a-holes than people you meet in real life. Playing with other people in a multiplayer game is an option, not a requirement, and it's a pretty poor assumption to think otherwise.
I'm not going to play this game the same way you do, just because you're incapable of understanding that there are other ways to play it, and because having other people do them, gives you the burden of actually having to acknowledge and think about them instead of continuing in the willful ignorance that you're trying to so hard to protect.
If you don't want to see people doing something different from you, then you are the one doing the wrong thing by playing an MMO.
|

Khavi Kitamatsu
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 15:49:00 -
[145]
Originally by: Fikreta
Originally by: Khavi Kitamatsu So can you explain how having multiple accounts is carebearish?
Please read OP again. If you're still unable to see why, then I cannot help you with this one. Sorry.
I am sorry, I read and reread what you wrote and do not see why it is easy mode.
|

Catherine Frasier
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 16:01:00 -
[146]
Originally by: Fikreta 1) EVE is MMO game, right? As such, it should promote interaction and cooperation between players
Um, no. Eve is an MMO and, as such, there are multiple people playing on-line. Period. How they play, whether they cooperate, compete on the market or just swarm around in a free-for-all shooting each other in the face is entirely up to them. That's the beauty and the genius of Eve. CCP doesn't try to make us all play to conform to the limited scope of your imagination.
|

Hon Dao
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 16:01:00 -
[147]
Edited by: Hon Dao on 10/06/2010 16:06:12 They think it is easy mode, for exactly the same reason they think it would be so easy to stop it.
Because they are completely ignorant of what people like them would actually need to do, in order to achieve it.
Ignorant people should have questions, not opinions.
|

Cipher Jones
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 20:21:00 -
[148]
Originally by: Ekrid Edited by: Ekrid on 08/06/2010 20:32:38 /signed in favor of OP.
just biomass all alts and give the ISK from the liquidation of skill/train time, total ISK value of character, and other stuff to their choice of main.
here's the problem: if you have alts, you have less need of other people to do things for you, so there is less REAL commerce, and more alt slaving. That makes it actually more difficult for people with only 1 account and 1 character, because they are playing as if they are a part of the eve world, and as such cant compete with randombasementdweller193812 with his 40 yr old neckbeard and 10 alt accounts. The value of this person with a single account and character is immeasurably lessened because of the alt slave.
Think about it. Look at real life world. Slaves were a way to get labor for dirt cheap. The owner of slaves wants to get as much surplus value out of the slaves as possible. But slaves in real life have constant upkeep requirements. Once you get your alt slaves to where you want them in the game, they basically work for free, or another way, the cost to have them per day becomes cheaper the longer they are around and doing work for free for randombasementdweller's main.
This makes labor value exceedingly cheap, therefor any individual with 1 account/character will have the labor value directly relative to all the alt slaves, which is a very low value indeed. That makes the 1 account/character individual less able to make money, less competitive, and less able to gain their own surplus value in terms of their labor.
Thats what makes it a GRIND (!!) for them, while for people paying for multiple accounts, they GRIND (!!) just the same to keep on top with their capitalist function of ISK making.
You fail at logic. My alt costs as much as my main to use every month so in no way is it a "slave". This is clearly a signature. |

Fikreta
|
Posted - 2010.06.10 23:55:00 -
[149]
Originally by: Tippia Would you care to elaborate, and especially point out how these methods don't yield false positives?
The best method I can think of would be to remove the incentives for creating multiple accounts.
Ask yourself: do you limit your users in any way? Can those limits be easily overcome by creating multiple accounts? If so, then you're probably doing something wrong: maybe you should think about removing those limits.
|

Sambo Stone
Nurses are Superheros Shadow of xXDEATHXx
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 00:18:00 -
[150]
I live in the drone regions. My transport/hauler/salvager/loot/freighter alt is at least as important as me.
|

Ekrid
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 01:19:00 -
[151]
Originally by: Fikreta
Originally by: Tippia Would you care to elaborate, and especially point out how these methods don't yield false positives?
The best method I can think of would be to remove the incentives for creating multiple accounts.
Ask yourself: do you limit your users in any way? Can those limits be easily overcome by creating multiple accounts? If so, then you're probably doing something wrong: maybe you should think about removing those limits.
exactly. The game imposes limitations on a single character. Therefor, people buy alts to do other things with. people with alts have no upkeep cost for those alts once they're in their hauler/CNR and doing work to make the main money. That decreases labor value for everyone in eve, particularly people who only have one account.
This doubly impoverishes people who play legitimately, within the spirit of the game, i.e. confined by limitations to what they can and cant do.
a -10 pirate? Subvert the bad things that go with that (no access to highsec) with a hauler alt and make pirating easy carebear style for yourself.
Why would CCP put limitations on a single character, such as training speed, put limitations on a single account, such as only training one character at a time, and then turn around and offer power of two for multiple accounts to get around the very limitations they put in?
I know the answer already, but if anyone else can state it, its time to wake up people, and listen to the person who isn't me who can give the proper answer. them giving proves its not just tinfoiling on my part. tyvm.
|

Ekrid
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 02:23:00 -
[152]
Edited by: Ekrid on 11/06/2010 02:26:43 I like that crack is not censored but the injecting drug is.
-using your U.S. welfare to support your game addiction, you're sucking money from two types of people. 1, the people that worked for the money and put it in as taxes and 2, the people who are disabled and can't work.
If you can't admit you have a problem, have all the fun in the world with that. just know you'll be 50 yrs old and wondering where your life went and how much you didn't do with it.
the really bad thing is CCP is encouraging that kind of behavior with their "deals" and limitations on single accounts and whatnot.
I'd say live your life how you want to, if you wan't to be an idiot. unfortunately if 1 person has a problem, its everyone's problem. Everyone's connected and we aren't in this ourselves. You problems will affect other people. your drain on society will affect other people.
In fact, I think thats what all hardcore drug users say "Its my life and noone else's business what I do with it". Kinda ironic you wrote that, considering thats the mating call of the loser drug abuser/addict.
Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2
Originally by: Fikreta
Originally by: BrundleMeth it's just a game ffs
Well remember that next time you call someone a carebear, taste his delicious tears and/or show him a way to ---> /random MMO game here/
Very well said. QFT.
You're touching on the hypocrisy that exists among some of the most prevalent "hardcore" players of the game. I'd dare say most of the idiots that spout "HTFU" and "cry some moar, carebear" bring their own risks down and close to zero with the use of alts.
QFT.
|

S Pada
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 02:37:00 -
[153]
every one can ***** and mone about this and other things in the game as much as thay want as i do my self as i find eve not as much of a sand box as ccp likes to think but any who.
its all about the money to pocket ratio so as long as they are not dropping in money they will not change any think. so even posting and reading this forums makes it a waist of time but i do like to know people fell the same way about things
|

Jason Babbage
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 02:43:00 -
[154]
------> MMORPG/RTS <------------
|

Selinate
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 03:25:00 -
[155]
I agree with the OP also. Access to 2 or more accounts for players give an unfair advantage to those without the capacity (or want) to have more than 1 account.
I also know, however, that they must be making a decent income from letting players have more than 1 account. It's BS but it's true. I guess in the end I'd rather have multiple accounts than non-free expansions.
|

Ekrid
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 05:16:00 -
[156]
Originally by: Selinate I agree with the OP also. Access to 2 or more accounts for players give an unfair advantage to those without the capacity (or want) to have more than 1 account.
I also know, however, that they must be making a decent income from letting players have more than 1 account. It's BS but it's true. I guess in the end I'd rather have multiple accounts than non-free expansions.
really? Cause I know I'd pay 15$ a month more if the playing field was fair. But people want their carebear gaming with their alt slave armies.
I'd pay 15$ a month for expansions if they had something of substance, I'd pay 15$ if they made this game competitive for everyone and not for who has the highest USD/Life ratio.
|

Spruillo
Gallente Spruillo Corp
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 06:36:00 -
[157]
Originally by: Fikreta one man armies roaming around whole New Eden.
lol
|

Zek Keiria
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 09:30:00 -
[158]
I'd like to see the use of IRL friends banned. How is it fair that all you glee club captains with access to drones of IRL friends piloting massive blobs, amassing endless wealth just run over poor no-life, no-friends, grandmother's basement dwellers like me?
Yes, Eve needs more rules and restrictions so that it can be more hardcore and less carebear. Let's just completely adopt the hardcore Runescape rulez for ultimate PvP paradise - they don't allow multiaccounts. |

dexington
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 09:34:00 -
[159]
Originally by: Zek Keiria I'd like to see the use of IRL friends banned. How is it fair that all you glee club captains with access to drones of IRL friends piloting massive blobs, amassing endless wealth just run over poor no-life, no-friends, grandmother's basement dwellers like me?
i'll be your friend 
... u r wee todd id, u r sofa king wee todd id ... |

Tribunia
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 09:36:00 -
[160]
Originally by: Kendar The fact is this game is so heavily dependant on cooperation and not singleplayer that people are forced to use alts cause there are not always people around to assist you with every litle thing that need 2 people
This. Like everything else CCP promotes as being neccessary elements of an mmorpg game: cooperation.
The hidden agenda tho, is to lure and entice people into using multiple accounts to boost their revenue instead of making the game sensible, ie not being dependandt on a 2nd player to move your carrier etc.
With all due respect CCP, you suck in that department and hard too. 
|

Fikreta
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 09:57:00 -
[161]
Very well put Ekrid, thank you.
It's good to know that there are people like you (and few others posting in this thread as well) who are capable to comprehend what is really going on here and to see sad state this game and its playerbase are turning into.
|

Im Blue
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 10:11:00 -
[162]
Originally by: Fikreta Very well put Ekrid, thank you.
It's good to know that there are people like you (and few others posting in this thread as well) who are capable to comprehend what is really going on here and to see sad state this game and its playerbase are turning into.
i fail to understand why it is sad state that allows alts.
if you want the illusion of fairness its about time you either grow up or go play hellokitty
|

Rainb0w bright
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 11:09:00 -
[163]
i find all the people that are posting that there should be multiboxing are the ones that need the alts ie -10, people that are war deced all the time coz they're tools, the list goes on, and i find these people the biggest care bears coz they don't have the nuts to run there accounts like they want to be a pirate, be a pirate, and hire people to run your goods to you thats the point of the op. eve has gone downhill. I got 3 toons and there all in the same corp as me and where ever i go, but i do not multibox, there is no need for them wen i got corp mates and alliance members. but i'm going to wait to see what ccp has to say at fan fest and i hope this comes up, more about the rr more then any thing, as i voted for the csm who felt strongly about rr neutrals and if they decide there not going to do any thing i will be stopping my accounts and that is the only way to fix things is to effect there income then they will change things.
|

Im Blue
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 11:16:00 -
[164]
Originally by: Rainb0w bright i find all the people that are posting that there should be multiboxing are the ones that need the alts ie -10, people that are war deced all the time coz they're tools.
i have 6 accounts, i have not one with negative sec nor do i have any currently with war dec's, i dont use them to avoid dec's either.
i use them all for different jobs. why? cos there is no way im waiting years to do it all on 1 guy, sod that. id guess most people with more than 1 account have simlar reasons, why wait years to have 1 person spec'd in everything when you can just train someone else to do it.
|

Cone Filler
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 11:23:00 -
[165]
Activate 1 gun and ill activate 1 gun
oops i activated 3 guns
CHEATER!!!! TO THE FORUMS OMFG HAXS
|

Hon Dao
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 11:30:00 -
[166]
Originally by: Ekrid Edited by: Ekrid on 11/06/2010 02:26:43 I like that crack is not censored but the injecting drug is.
-using your U.S. welfare to support your game addiction, you're sucking money from two types of people. 1, the people that worked for the money and put it in as taxes and 2, the people who are disabled and can't work.
If you can't admit you have a problem, have all the fun in the world with that. just know you'll be 50 yrs old and wondering where your life went and how much you didn't do with it.
the really bad thing is CCP is encouraging that kind of behavior with their "deals" and limitations on single accounts and whatnot.
I'd say live your life how you want to, if you wan't to be an idiot. unfortunately if 1 person has a problem, its everyone's problem. Everyone's connected and we aren't in this ourselves. You problems will affect other people. your drain on society will affect other people.
In fact, I think thats what all hardcore drug users say "Its my life and noone else's business what I do with it". Kinda ironic you wrote that, considering thats the mating call of the loser drug abuser/addict.
Yeah?
And here's a big **** you from someone who is disabled, and doesn't appreciate being compared to drug users by someone who obviously doesn't know anything about that either.
You think everyone on welfare is doing it as a scam? Maybe I'd like a job, maybe I'd like to make the kind of money where I can get the car, the house, the clothes and the girl who won't go near a guy who doesn't have all that. Maybe I'd like to have more of a life than just playing games to fill in all the useless free time I've got.
It's just too bad that for governments, throwing money away on welfare (including for people who don't need it), is a lot cheaper than spending on healthcare that would actually help people like me get into work (And I know a darn sight more about that than an ignorant **** like yourself, having spent the best part of the last 5 years trying to get some healthcare that would get me something approaching a normal life).
Sorry if it's offends your ****ed up sensibilities of what is good and right in your perfect ignorant little world, but in my world playing MMOs for most of the day is the one thing stopping me going crazy. I play them more than one account at once, because playing one just isn't as stimulating as playing several at once. Having got to know a few multiboxers I can say that most of them do it because they're obviously smarter than people like you, and need the stimulation.
While we're at it, you can go and shove your whole 'slave characters' idea right up your ass. Why would I pay RL money to steal from myself? There are other players I can do that to without it costing me anything. I'm playing 2 characters, and surprise surprise, I'm paying the same on both of them to train and equip them fully. So what if I'm not contributing anything to the game economy? I DON'T HAVE TO. I have my own economy, and both work fine without being connected in any way.
Let me tell you how the economy really works in this game.
Resources come into the game from infinite, inexhaustable sources, like mission rewards, asteroids, and loot from rat spawns.
People sell this stuff to other people who make things from it, or make stuff themselves.
They buy the things made by those people, or sell them themselves.
Those things eventually get blown up.
Everything goes from A-B. Does it really matter how it gets there? Or is what's really at stake here the size of your ego, and your need to feel important from supporting and making this whole 'economy' thing seem as big and complicated as possible, when it will never be anything more than plucking things off a tree and consuming them.
You're nothing but another dumb troll, trying to make himself look big through association with big things he doesn't understand in the slightest. -------------------------------------------------- I could care less about Americans' use of English.
Caring = Could care less Not caring = Couldn't care less |

dexington
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 11:33:00 -
[167]
Originally by: Im Blue i use them all for different jobs. why? cos there is no way im waiting years to do it all on 1 guy, sod that.
That's why i made an extra account, so i can have one account i specialise in pvp and one where i pick skills without any major plan.
... u r wee todd id, u r sofa king wee todd id ... |

Jint Hikaru
OffWorld Exploration Inc
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 11:34:00 -
[168]
I am wondering how all the multiaccount haters suggest that CCP (once they get over the hit in revenue) police and enforce this suggestion?
I am happy to admit that I run 2 accounts. I have 2 computers/screens/Keyboards/mice set up in my computer room. I am not a hardcore player, I have a life, a full time job and a fulltime GF. I just like to run 2 accounts that support each other.
How is CCP supposed to differentiat between me and a father paying for two accounts (one for each of his sons) running on different computers in the same house?
------------------------ Jint Hikaru - Miner / Salvager / Explorer "I've got a couple of Strippers on my ship... and they just love to dance!" ------------------------ |

MaxxOmega
Caldari Dissident Aggressors Mordus Angels
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 11:55:00 -
[169]
Edited by: MaxxOmega on 11/06/2010 11:57:22
Originally by: Fikreta Very well put Ekrid, thank you.
It's good to know that there are people like you (and few others posting in this thread as well) who are capable to comprehend what is really going on here and to see sad state this game and its playerbase are turning into.
And the two of you are completely delusional. Ekrid has some of the stupidest post I've ever read and it's not surprising you would be in agreement... CCP wants to make money. EVERYTHING else is just fluff. Multiple accounts make CCP more money. And there would be absolutely no way whatsoever to stop this from happening without spending far more money then the issue is worth. It's never gonna happen. So live with it or quit...
Originally by: Im Blue i have 6 accounts, i have not one with negative sec nor do i have any currently with war dec's, i dont use them to avoid dec's either.
i use them all for different jobs. why? cos there is no way im waiting years to do it all on 1 guy, sod that. id guess most people with more than 1 account have simlar reasons, why wait years to have 1 person spec'd in everything when you can just train someone else to do it.
Well said, everyone else can **** off...
|

Rainb0w bright
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 11:57:00 -
[170]
Originally by: MaxxOmega
Originally by: Fikreta Very well put Ekrid, thank you.
It's good to know that there are people like you (and few others posting in this thread as well) who are capable to comprehend what is really going on here and to see sad state this game and its playerbase are turning into.
And the two of you are completely delusional. Ekrid has some of the stupidest post I've ever read and it's not surprising you would be in agreement... CCP wants to make money. EVERYTHING else is just fluff. Multiple accounts make CCP more money. And there would be absolutely no way whatsoever to stop this from happening without spending far more money then the issue is worth. It's never gonna happen. So live with it or quit...
get a 2nd phone line :P
|

TheBlueMonkey
Gallente Priory Of The Lemon Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 12:03:00 -
[171]
In part I agree but then I see reasons for them not as well.
My question thought, is how?
You could do it by email address but email addresses are easy to create.
You could do it by credit card but then they're also easy to get and there's also the fact that people can play with plex's.
You could do it by IP address but then what if someone plays at a gaming center or if to players share a house\internet connection?
Realistically, there's no way of limiting one account per person without gimping the game into something horrible where it gives pops and verifications every 2 min... wait... make that every 5min and that's PI :P
plus, alot of people in eve are morons --
Nothing is worthless, you may have gotten it for free but it still has an inherent value
|

Rainb0w bright
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 12:04:00 -
[172]
Originally by: Hon Dao
Yeah?
And here's a big **** you from someone who is disabled, and doesn't appreciate being compared to drug users by someone who obviously doesn't know anything about that either.
You think everyone on welfare is doing it as a scam? Maybe I'd like a job, maybe I'd like to make the kind of money where I can get the car, the house, the clothes and the girl who won't go near a guy who doesn't have all that. Maybe I'd like to have more of a life than just playing games to fill in all the useless free time I've got.
It's just too bad that for governments, throwing money away on welfare (including for people who don't need it), is a lot cheaper than spending on healthcare that would actually help people like me get into work (And I know a darn sight more about that than an ignorant **** like yourself, having spent the best part of the last 5 years trying to get some healthcare that would get me something approaching a normal life).
Sorry if it's offends your ****ed up sensibilities of what is good and right in your perfect ignorant little world, but in my world playing MMOs for most of the day is the one thing stopping me going crazy. I play them more than one account at once, because playing one just isn't as stimulating as playing several at once. Having got to know a few multiboxers I can say that most of them do it because they're obviously smarter than people like you, and need the stimulation.
well maybe if you did not spend your money on eve and pc you mite be able to afford to get your lazy as to work instead of paying for games and wanting more money of the government to help your ass out
|

BrundleMeth
Caldari Temporal Mechanics
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 12:07:00 -
[173]
Originally by: Hon Dao
Yeah?
And here's a big **** you from someone who is disabled, and doesn't appreciate being compared to drug users by someone who obviously doesn't know anything about that either.
You think everyone on welfare is doing it as a scam? Maybe I'd like a job, maybe I'd like to make the kind of money where I can get the car, the house, the clothes and the girl who won't go near a guy who doesn't have all that. Maybe I'd like to have more of a life than just playing games to fill in all the useless free time I've got.
It's just too bad that for governments, throwing money away on welfare (including for people who don't need it), is a lot cheaper than spending on healthcare that would actually help people like me get into work (And I know a darn sight more about that than an ignorant **** like yourself, having spent the best part of the last 5 years trying to get some healthcare that would get me something approaching a normal life).
Sorry if it's offends your ****ed up sensibilities of what is good and right in your perfect ignorant little world, but in my world playing MMOs for most of the day is the one thing stopping me going crazy. I play them more than one account at once, because playing one just isn't as stimulating as playing several at once. Having got to know a few multiboxers I can say that most of them do it because they're obviously smarter than people like you, and need the stimulation. While we're at it, you can go and shove your whole 'slave characters' idea right up your ass. Why would I pay RL money to steal from myself? There are other players I can do that to without it costing me anything. I'm playing 2 characters, and surprise surprise, I'm paying the same on both of them to train and equip them fully. So what if I'm not contributing anything to the game economy? I DON'T HAVE TO. I have my own economy, and both work fine without being connected in any way.
Let me tell you how the economy really works in this game.
Resources come into the game from infinite, inexhaustable sources, like mission rewards, asteroids, and loot from rat spawns.
People sell this stuff to other people who make things from it, or make stuff themselves.
They buy the things made by those people, or sell them themselves.
Those things eventually get blown up.
Everything goes from A-B. Does it really matter how it gets there? Or is what's really at stake here the size of your ego, and your need to feel important from supporting and making this whole 'economy' thing seem as big and complicated as possible, when it will never be anything more than plucking things off a tree and consuming them.
You're nothing but another dumb troll, trying to make himself look big through association with things he doesn't understand in the slightest.
I know exactly what you mean. While my disability doesnÆt keep me out of the workforce, by the end of my day I can do nothing but drop into a char and play EVE. It to keeps me from going crazy wasting my time watching too much TV or staring at the walls...
|

beautyispain
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 12:11:00 -
[174]
Originally by: Cat o'Ninetails I think that a large portion of CCPs income is derived from these "alts" of which you speak. There aren't any official figures available, but rough estimates could place the average number of accounts per unique person at least at two or more.
By disallowing second accounts, there would probably be more negative fallout than you suspect. The indy alt corp that supplies your pvp main corp with ships and modules? Kiss that goodbye, as one example.
Capital ships would suck even more than they do already, imagine trying to move your carrier without alts. Just relying on a chain of your corp or alliance mates to move you along. They'd resent you for it, or maybe not even be online at the time you need to move.
Also, if alts were removed from the game, I'd not be posting here. So, to some there may be a benefit.
Who are you and what did you do with Cat??
|

Caldari Citizen20090217
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 13:48:00 -
[175]
Originally by: TheBlueMonkey In part I agree but then I see reasons for them not as well.
My question thought, is how?
You could do it by email address but email addresses are easy to create.
You could do it by credit card but then they're also easy to get and there's also the fact that people can play with plex's.
You could do it by IP address but then what if someone plays at a gaming center or if to players share a house\internet connection?
Realistically, there's no way of limiting one account per person without gimping the game into something horrible where it gives pops and verifications every 2 min... wait... make that every 5min and that's PI :P
plus, alot of people in eve are morons
Use ingame methods. Let us see all transactions between characters and then we can work out who is supplying who with isk etc. Then we know which mission runner alt to gank as payback for losing an ibis to a gatecamp. Also opens up a new career in eve - inport/export houses who provide anonymous transactions, as well as rewarding smarter players who hide their alts better.
|

Ana Vyr
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 14:07:00 -
[176]
Edited by: Ana Vyr on 11/06/2010 14:07:34 I have no hate for the folks who use multiple accounts at all.
Eve is just one of many hobbies for me, and I play two MMO's. I have self imposed rule that I'm only going to pay for one "account" per hobby.
Under that constraint, I am at a disadvantage in game in my chosen field of industry.
That's the only beef I have with the multiple account thing. I'd like to be able to run the other characters on that account simultaneously to reduce (not eliminate) the disadvantages I face. That's all.
|

Selinate
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 14:40:00 -
[177]
Originally by: Ekrid
Originally by: Selinate I agree with the OP also. Access to 2 or more accounts for players give an unfair advantage to those without the capacity (or want) to have more than 1 account.
I also know, however, that they must be making a decent income from letting players have more than 1 account. It's BS but it's true. I guess in the end I'd rather have multiple accounts than non-free expansions.
really? Cause I know I'd pay 15$ a month more if the playing field was fair. But people want their carebear gaming with their alt slave armies.
I'd pay 15$ a month for expansions if they had something of substance, I'd pay 15$ if they made this game competitive for everyone and not for who has the highest USD/Life ratio.
Well, this is a game. And just like how I don't care enough about this game to pay for a second account, I don't care enough either to force people to get rid of their multiple accounts in the name of fairness in an MMO if it means I have to pay more.
|

Bloody Meridian
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 16:37:00 -
[178]
I don't actually give a **** either way, but I do know people who wouldn't even start up with Eve because they knew they would pretty much need more than one account. Just sayin'.
|

cBOLTSON
Caldari Shadow Legion. Talos Coalition
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 16:43:00 -
[179]
Hahahahaha 
|

Digital Solaris
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 17:26:00 -
[180]
Originally by: omgfreemoniez
Originally by: Digital Solaris
To be honest, I am happy that I can afford multiple accounts so I won't have to rely on a bunch of madly jealous neurotic asshats for stuff to be done. It is just not worth the time or the headache I'd get from dealing with one of you. As matter of fact, the next time CCP has another Power of Two deal, I plan to get my fifth account.
You speak like you aren't a neurotic asshat yourself, then...
Nope, I am happily angry and murderous. 
Originally by: omgfreemoniez
Originally by: Digital Solaris
A harsh, cruel, cold and bitter truth for you right there. Suck on that fact along your whine and cheese whilst I will have more of your absolutely divine tears, like a fine wine, as they roll down your cheeks until they flow down into my empty glass.
ROFL
With a profound love for harsh language. |

Jack Coutu
Gallente Kangaroos With Frickin Lazerbeams Negative Ten.
|
Posted - 2010.06.11 17:28:00 -
[181]
I like the insane jabbering of the guy accusing people of being drug addicts. You do realize that most people with alts make enough ISK to buy plex for the accounts from people that are too lazy to do anything in game like dual box missions or run an industrial set up?
|

Ekrid
Amarr Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2010.06.12 05:00:00 -
[182]
Edited by: Ekrid on 12/06/2010 05:08:33 Edited by: Ekrid on 12/06/2010 05:01:59
Originally by: MaxxOmega Edited by: MaxxOmega on 11/06/2010 11:57:22
Originally by: Fikreta Very well put Ekrid, thank you.
It's good to know that there are people like you (and few others posting in this thread as well) who are capable to comprehend what is really going on here and to see sad state this game and its playerbase are turning into.
And the two of you are completely delusional. Ekrid has some of the stupidest post I've ever read and it's not surprising you would be in agreement... CCP wants to make money. EVERYTHING else is just fluff. Multiple accounts make CCP more money. And there would be absolutely no way whatsoever to stop this from happening without spending far more money then the issue is worth. It's never gonna happen. So live with it or quit...
Originally by: Im Blue i have 6 accounts, i have not one with negative sec nor do i have any currently with war dec's, i dont use them to avoid dec's either.
i use them all for different jobs. why? cos there is no way im waiting years to do it all on 1 guy, sod that. id guess most people with more than 1 account have simlar reasons, why wait years to have 1 person spec'd in everything when you can just train someone else to do it.
Well said, everyone else can **** off...

You can call my posts stupid all you like, just as you can call people who say the world is round is stupid because it infringes on your mentally deficient viewpoint, but that doesn't make them or me wrong . 
Let me rephrase what you quoted.
Quote: I like to do everything in the game without relying on anyone, because i like playing an MMORPG solo mode despite the game being based on the idea that it works like reality, everyone contributes a part and noone can do everything alone, unlike OFFLINE RPGS. I am, in effect, completely defeating the purpose of paying extra per month to keep their servers running, when I could play an offline RPG free and just keep a chat client open and talk to my friends and use Omegle to talk to random strangers if I became so inclined. but thats cause Im an idiot who loves ****ing away money
FYQP~
BUt yeah, have fun with your delusions while calling everyone else delusional 
Originally by: Hon Dao Yeah?
And here's a big **** you from someone who is disabled, and doesn't appreciate being compared to drug users by someone who obviously doesn't know anything about that either.
Guess what, I made that exception and pointed out, in fact, that people who are addicts take money from the disabled who actually need it, but you didn't bother to read that because you're an idiot. Handicapped people can still do things, can still make their life work, there's plenty of successful types out there. But you are a proven lazy person since you went off half-****ed without reading my post. thats just fact speaking for itself. I am handicapped. I lost two legs, but I found a good job, and make money, because I'm not lazy. That would also be why I am fully aware of the abuse of systems like welfare and the dole by chavs. alts are for people with a USD/life ratio higher than adolfs K/D in WWII. - Ekrid
" i'll log my alt in and check if the station has hostiles near". such a fierce carebear pirate you are |

Fikreta
|
Posted - 2010.06.12 07:43:00 -
[183]
Originally by: Ana Vyr I have no hate for the folks who use multiple accounts at all.
I don't hate altoholics either - it's not their fault because CCP has put the things to work this way. On the other hand, I despise CCP for what they're doing here.
Originally by: Im Blue if you want the illusion of fairness its about time you either grow up or go play hellokitty
I'm not asking for 'fairness'. What's that? I only want this game to become what it falsely pretends to be: tough hardcore MMO for smart and patient people, providing consequences for their actions. Swarm of alts and multiboxing are making it no better than hellokitty so you better put away that silly elitist attitude.
Originally by: TheBlueMonkey My question thought, is how?
While the best method to stop multiaccounting would be to remove reasons/limitations forcing people to think about their 2nd, 3rd... account, technically speaking you already gave few valid answers so let me to just expand them a little bit:
* concept 'one user = one account = one character'; * unique email address on registration (no free webmail services allowed); * valid credit card together with basic personal info which can be veryfied at any time; * IP check supported by program routine which creates and analizes a log file on every user login (username, timestamp, IP, etc), searching for certain common patterns typical for multiaccounting and sending results back to GMs to take a closer look; * surveying of contacts established between characters in game with isk/assets transfers being the primary target - another automated process which must be necessarily put in correlation with the data provided in previous steps; * adding an application to client to silently work in the background and scan memory in search for multiple clients running in the same time; * communication with playerbase - education that multiaccounting is hurting everyone, and encouraging people to report suspected abuse;
Obviously, people behind LAN and families with several members playing the game should notify CCP so they are eventually put on some sort of exception list. Malicious proxy users remain problem though, but with all system and GM checks on place their presence should be minimalized in time.
I'll also repeat what I said before: it's not possible to completely prevent multiaccounting but it's possible to fight it simultaneously on several different levels so at the end you will find out that vast majority of players just don't dare to risk - especially after they hear about that poor sucker in their corp being perma banned for breaking the EULA.
|

Kyusoath Orillian
Haters Gonna Hate
|
Posted - 2010.06.12 08:04:00 -
[184]
this is a pretty long troll thread. good job op
|

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
|
Posted - 2010.06.12 08:13:00 -
[185]
Edited by: Destination SkillQueue on 12/06/2010 08:15:04
Originally by: Fikreta
Originally by: Im Blue if you want the illusion of fairness its about time you either grow up or go play hellokitty
I'm not asking for 'fairness'. What's that? I only want this game to become what it falsely pretends to be: tough hardcore MMO for smart and patient people, providing consequences for their actions. Swarm of alts and multiboxing are making it no better than hellokitty so you better put away that silly elitist attitude.
It isn't about elitist attitude. It is seeing your demands for hardcore consequenses for players being plain silly. EVE does provide consequenses for characters, but there really isn't any reason to even try to provide consequenses for players for what one of their characters did in the game(bannable offences excluded). So what if you can get around some of the negatives or get slight advantage with alts over players with a single account? The same could be done with a friend in the exact same way. Using an alt is at times more convenient, but also makes you much less effective than actually having someone to help you. If you want hardcore consequenses for people that are really hard to avoid, you should stop playing video games and live in the real world.
There really isn't any point commenting on the methods, since there isn't a good reason to limit the use of alts anyway. It also has serious negative impact on some players gameplay and CCP's income. So basicly loads of effort with limited chance of success to achieve a goal that is against the interests of the company and parts of the playerbase 
|

Im Blue
|
Posted - 2010.06.12 11:10:00 -
[186]
Originally by: Fikreta
[quote=Im Blue if you want the illusion of fairness its about time you either grow up or go play hellokitty
I'm not asking for 'fairness'. What's that? I only want this game to become what it falsely pretends to be: tough hardcore MMO for smart and patient people, providing consequences for their actions. Swarm of alts and multiboxing are making it no better than hellokitty so you better put away that silly elitist attitude.
LOL elitist, im just seeing this discussion for what it really is, you got ganked by someone and his/her falcon alt, you got upset and though ban all alts that will save me next time-quick to the forums.
i also fail to see how a alt makes eve no better than hello kitty? maybe if they all spouted rainbows and fluffy clouds, but as far as im concerned mine mostly fire guns.
|

Blane Xero
Amarr The Firestorm Cartel
|
Posted - 2010.06.12 12:24:00 -
[187]
Alts are here to stay, I myself have two main accounts that are always subbed and a couple of extras I subscribe on an "I need to" basis. _____________________________________ Haruhiist since December 2008
Originally by: CCP Fallout Been there. Done that. Need antibiotics.
|

Disposeble Alt
Caldari
|
Posted - 2010.06.12 13:10:00 -
[188]
What is the use of this discussion?
Even if you would lock accounts to a dna profile to limit the account to a user and a user to one account it could be circumvented by acquiring a few dna samples of people that never ever will play eve themselves.
Why would you want ccp to put a rule into their policies that simply cannot be enforced?
Posts by alts hide political affiliation and history. No political statement by any alt should be taken seriously. |

Bomberlocks
Minmatar CTRL-Q
|
Posted - 2010.06.12 14:07:00 -
[189]
Originally by: Cat o'Ninetails I think that a large portion of CCPs income is derived from these "alts" of which you speak. There aren't any official figures available, but rough estimates could place the average number of accounts per unique person at least at two or more.
...
CCP as a company possibly survives by the probably intended feature of almost requiring an alt to be able to play with any modicum of efficiency. You can play with only one account, but you will almost always be behind most of the others in terms of isk and skillpoints.
There are around 320000 active accounts on Eve, but I usually assume (and IIRC one of the quarterly reports also reported that the average player in eve had 2.5 accounts, or something like that) that there are only around 60000 people who actually play the game.
If that number is correct* then I think CCP as a company would not be profitable at its current size if most players were only to have one account.
*There are a number of things that makes me think that this number is correct: 1. The almost desperate push for continual new features (PI, DUST, WHs, Sov etc) in Eve to attempt to bring in new players. 2. The incredible hubris that CCP publicly puts out in Marketing and in the forums, i.e. always attempting to brush and of the thousands of broken issues and negative complaints under the carpet. 3. The fact that almost every patch is never improved or developed upon as CCP is too busy working on the next new feature set.
|

V'hellu
|
Posted - 2010.06.12 14:10:00 -
[190]
Originally by: Bomberlocks
Originally by: Cat o'Ninetails I think that a large portion of CCPs income is derived from these "alts" of which you speak. There aren't any official figures available, but rough estimates could place the average number of accounts per unique person at least at two or more.
...
CCP as a company possibly survives by the probably intended feature of almost requiring an alt to be able to play with any modicum of efficiency. You can play with only one account, but you will almost always be behind most of the others in terms of isk and skillpoints.
There are around 320000 active accounts on Eve, but I usually assume (and IIRC one of the quarterly reports also reported that the average player in eve had 2.5 accounts, or something like that) that there are only around 60000 people who actually play the game.
If that number is correct* then I think CCP as a company would not be profitable at its current size if most players were only to have one account.
*There are a number of things that makes me think that this number is correct: 1. The almost desperate push for continual new features (PI, DUST, WHs, Sov etc) in Eve to attempt to bring in new players. 2. The incredible hubris that CCP publicly puts out in Marketing and in the forums, i.e. always attempting to brush and of the thousands of broken issues and negative complaints under the carpet. 3. The fact that almost every patch is never improved or developed upon as CCP is too busy working on the next new feature set.
If that's true, then that says more about how the game needs to be fixed so it doesn't require alts than otherwise. Make it a bit more fast-paced (no waiting months for skills), and maybe more people would be willing to play, hence more cash for CCP? Just sayin'...
|

Mashie Saldana
Red Federation
|
Posted - 2010.06.12 14:12:00 -
[191]
Originally by: Gladys Pank
Originally by: Mashie Saldana I have sold/biomassed the alt's I had. Now I only have three mains left. 
That and an appreciation of Peter F Hamilton 
Oh yes! 
|

V'hellu
|
Posted - 2010.06.12 14:50:00 -
[192]
If you notice, none of the CCP mods or devs have even bothered to reply to this topic.
Makes me wonder if they know that multiple accounts is unfair and wrong, but yet they are in fact doing it purely for the money...
|

Caldari Citizen20090217
|
Posted - 2010.06.12 15:07:00 -
[193]
Simple fix for alts: Let us see all trades/transactions etc between characters. Then it will be possible to work out who is supplying who and act accordingly.
|

JC Anderson
Caldari Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2010.06.12 18:38:00 -
[194]
Originally by: polly pritypants
we can tell who has rl mates :D
boxing
Oh dear lord.
|

dexington
|
Posted - 2010.06.12 19:57:00 -
[195]
Originally by: V'hellu If you notice, none of the CCP mods or devs have even bothered to reply to this topic.
Makes me wonder if they know that multiple accounts is unfair and wrong, but yet they are in fact doing it purely for the money...
0/10 Signature removed for not being EVE related. Zymurgist |

Cura 666
|
Posted - 2010.06.12 20:50:00 -
[196]
Originally by: AlleyKat CCP is a business.
Anything they can do to increase subscriber count and generate revenue should be explored.
Why? Because the more revenue they generate equals more development on this game and any other games they want to deploy off the same IP, like Dust 514. [...]
So maybe they should just shut this **** up and develop another wow clone 
|

Feyleaf
|
Posted - 2010.06.13 05:24:00 -
[197]
Edited by: Feyleaf on 13/06/2010 05:33:36 I would get bored playing only one account.. get 2x24" and try it for awhile, it gives the game entirely new dimensions and awesome multitaking practice and brain gymnastics ;) If you meant 3 chars with fast training to begin.. for scouts/cyno's and stuff thats awesome as is :D
|

Amitious Turkey
Gallente TarNec manufacturing disaster
|
Posted - 2010.06.13 05:31:00 -
[198]
I have one account. I can't keep track of more than one person, and this is it. My other alts on the same account I haven't played in at least a year.
For those who can handle multitasking, I'm impressed. More power to 'em. Seriously though, what's up with the whining? Haunting the forums since '03 BECAUSE OF FALCONDUST!
Originally by: CCP Navigator We love you all as well <3

NAVIGATOR <3 |

Conmen
Shut Up And Play WE FORM VOLTRON
|
Posted - 2010.06.13 08:14:00 -
[199]
stop wining noob
|

Tarasina
|
Posted - 2010.06.13 17:40:00 -
[200]
The official numbers are:
300 000 unique accounts, total accounts 660 000, so more than 2 accounts per person on average.
What they consider to be unique is something I wonder about, different credit card numbers?
I run 2 accounts, just because 1 is boring. I fall asleep playing just one, literally.
|

Aunt margret
|
Posted - 2010.06.13 18:29:00 -
[201]
Originally by: Tarasina The official numbers are:
I fall asleep playing just one, literally.
Why all those casual players in there millions vote with their feet and ignore eve all together.
Saying that though, makes sense ignoring that volotile market and sticking with the hardcore that arn't going anywhere, getting them into mass multiple accouting makes up the numbers.
Id imagine though that the numbers in terms of millions that more player friendly games are putting up at the momment do make them wonder 'what if'
|

Java Hun
Rockey Mountain Lumber Co.
|
Posted - 2010.06.13 18:38:00 -
[202]
Just because you cant afford more than one account doesn't mean we should stop using our alts. I know i give around a grand a year to CCP for mine, Times that times all the people with just as many alts as me and there you go...no way they'd get rid of that type of pretty much passive income.
|

Kewso
|
Posted - 2010.06.13 18:38:00 -
[203]
yea alts suck
unfortunately almost every mmorpg has them
people have been whining for over 8 years about buffbots in daoc, etc. other games alts are used as buffbots, mules, or to "solo" harder encounters to farm loot.
noone has been able to stop them
|

dexington
|
Posted - 2010.06.13 19:04:00 -
[204]
Originally by: Kewso noone has been able to stop them
Few if any have tryed, the only players who care about alts is a small group of self proclaimed "hardcore" players. Money gets **** done, you can whine all you want on the forums aslong as the casual carebears are CCPs main source of income, you hardcore basement dwellers are not going to change a damn thing.
Signature removed for not being EVE related. Zymurgist |
|

CCP Zymurgist
Gallente C C P

|
Posted - 2010.06.13 19:47:00 -
[205]
Everyone please remember to post constructively and don't troll or feed the trolls.
Zymurgist Community Representative CCP Hf, EVE Online Contact Us |
|

Throatslitter
|
Posted - 2010.06.13 21:22:00 -
[206]
To the OP: Whatever mate!
Ever tried playing in the Oceanic timezone with only one alt? The timezone where even the big alliances struggle to get more than 50 people in their fleet ... it is very, very boring.
An army of alts in some cases are the only effective way of accomplishing certain PVE\PVP goals.
|

Whitehound
The Whitehound Corporation
|
Posted - 2010.06.13 21:27:00 -
[207]
I do not care for alts. Not because I cannot afford for them, but because it makes for a weak play style. Controlling two or more accounts requires a lot of attention and usually the person who cannot play with only one account often has an attention deficiency. It usually is a person who needs to have multiple accounts and lacks patience to get along with only one. For them things need to be happening fast or not at all.
I personally find it boring to play with players who use more than one account. They are more busy with managing their characters than with the people who they are playing with. It makes them stressed, nervous players who can only play EVE their way and one needs to adjust to their ways or they fail to fit in.
I do not want to take away what they feel as necessary even when I find it wrong to play an MMO in such a way. It is just a form of solo play, which requires to have multiple accounts. --
|

BrundleMeth
Caldari Temporal Mechanics
|
Posted - 2010.06.14 12:47:00 -
[208]
Originally by: Ekrid Edited by: Ekrid on 12/06/2010 05:08:33 Edited by: Ekrid on 12/06/2010 05:01:59
Originally by: MaxxOmega Edited by: MaxxOmega on 11/06/2010 11:57:22
Originally by: Fikreta Very well put Ekrid, thank you.
It's good to know that there are people like you (and few others posting in this thread as well) who are capable to comprehend what is really going on here and to see sad state this game and its playerbase are turning into.
And the two of you are completely delusional. Ekrid has some of the stupidest post I've ever read and it's not surprising you would be in agreement... CCP wants to make money. EVERYTHING else is just fluff. Multiple accounts make CCP more money. And there would be absolutely no way whatsoever to stop this from happening without spending far more money then the issue is worth. It's never gonna happen. So live with it or quit...
Originally by: Im Blue i have 6 accounts, i have not one with negative sec nor do i have any currently with war dec's, i dont use them to avoid dec's either.
i use them all for different jobs. why? cos there is no way im waiting years to do it all on 1 guy, sod that. id guess most people with more than 1 account have simlar reasons, why wait years to have 1 person spec'd in everything when you can just train someone else to do it.
Well said, everyone else can **** off...

You can call my posts stupid all you like, just as you can call people who say the world is round is stupid because it infringes on your mentally deficient viewpoint, but that doesn't make them or me wrong . 
Let me rephrase what you quoted.
Quote: I like to do everything in the game without relying on anyone, because i like playing an MMORPG solo mode despite the game being based on the idea that it works like reality, everyone contributes a part and noone can do everything alone, unlike OFFLINE RPGS. I am, in effect, completely defeating the purpose of paying extra per month to keep their servers running, when I could play an offline RPG free and just keep a chat client open and talk to my friends and use Omegle to talk to random strangers if I became so inclined. but thats cause Im an idiot who loves ****ing away money
FYQP~
BUt yeah, have fun with your delusions while calling everyone else delusional 
Trolling and off topic comments removed. Zymurgist
Wow, what a loser. Even the mods think (know) your a troll...
|

1Ekrid1
|
Posted - 2010.06.17 18:04:00 -
[209]
Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2
Originally by: Fikreta
Originally by: BrundleMeth it's just a game ffs
Well remember that next time you call someone a carebear, taste his delicious tears and/or show him a way to ---> /random MMO game here/
Very well said. QFT.
You're touching on the hypocrisy that exists among some of the most prevalent "hardcore" players of the game. I'd dare say most of the idiots that spout "HTFU" and "cry some moar, carebear" bring their own risks down and close to zero with the use of alts.
QFT FTW
Any accusations of Trolling is used with the same judiciousness around here as accusations of people being terrorists to turn public opinion against them.
its silly scare tactics from children who would rather not argue the point because they dont want to lose so call it trolling to try to invalidate it that way. funny thing is that truth is truth no matter if only one person believes it, or even if noone beliees it. it still exists.
so keep claiming people are trolls just because you disagree with them guiys/mods, Im sure that makes you very mature and useful to the development of eve into a better game than it is right now. pat yourselves on the back for a job well done in crying "troll" to try to win arguments. There's 1, repeat 1, frigate in the T1 lineup designed to be a suicide tackler. the rest are for COMBAT. so don't tell me to tackle when I'm in a combat T1 frig. OR tell CCP to fix their mess. |

BrundleMeth
Caldari Temporal Mechanics
|
Posted - 2010.06.18 00:27:00 -
[210]
Originally by: 1Ekrid1
Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2
Originally by: Fikreta
Originally by: BrundleMeth it's just a game ffs
Well remember that next time you call someone a carebear, taste his delicious tears and/or show him a way to ---> /random MMO game here/
Very well said. QFT.
You're touching on the hypocrisy that exists among some of the most prevalent "hardcore" players of the game. I'd dare say most of the idiots that spout "HTFU" and "cry some moar, carebear" bring their own risks down and close to zero with the use of alts.
QFT FTW
Any accusations of Trolling is used with the same judiciousness around here as accusations of people being terrorists to turn public opinion against them.
its silly scare tactics from children who would rather not argue the point because they dont want to lose so call it trolling to try to invalidate it that way. funny thing is that truth is truth no matter if only one person believes it, or even if noone beliees it. it still exists.
so keep claiming people are trolls just because you disagree with them guiys/mods, Im sure that makes you very mature and useful to the development of eve into a better game than it is right now. pat yourselves on the back for a job well done in crying "troll" to try to win arguments.
Um, I wasn't arguing. Personally I think your a clown not worth trying to prove anything to. But you do make me laugh, you take yourself quite seriously. You need to relax or go take a big dump or say something else profound lol...
|

David Grogan
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.06.18 00:53:00 -
[211]
Originally by: Ramiera DaMorre Dear Op! Ultimately this is a game. Stop taking it too seriously.
this
also stop being a tight ass and get a second account SIG: if my message has spelling errors its cos i fail at typing properly :P |

Amanda Rothschild
|
Posted - 2010.06.18 13:17:00 -
[212]
Edited by: Amanda Rothschild on 18/06/2010 13:19:27
Originally by: Fikreta Edited by: Fikreta on 08/06/2010 12:15:40 So I've heard countless times how EVE is cruel cold hardcore unforgiving blah blah world. But it's all just cheap propaganda. Empty words. Why? Because CCP is not only tolerating THE MOST CAREBEARISH FEATURE of all - multiaccounting, they are actually encouraging it by designing their whole game in a way that everyone not having at least one additional account is automatically less competitive and efficient no matter what he does and how much time he invests in the game.
It doesn't really matter if you were missioner, miner, lowsec ganker, trader, industrialist, 0.0 drone... you WILL enter easy game mode the very minute you start your second account and it WILL become only more and more easier further along the line with every next account you might decide to opet later.
But even that is not the main problem here. It's the very basic concept of multi-character server (MCS) CCP is using, slowly but maliciously enticing their playerbase to sink into the hell hole of multiboxing. Unfortunately, what they apparently don't realize is that alt zergs are damaging every single aspect of this game, turning it into one ridiculously shallow carebear fluffy happy land where everyone is free to do whatever he wants easily evading REAL and long term consequences for their actions.
I think CCP should ban multiaccounting asap. Let me to quickly sum up why, without going into details which would take too much space.
1) EVE is MMO game, right? As such, it should promote interaction and cooperation between players instead of giving them opportunity to become more or less self-sufficient; MCS is not helping this, quite opposite.
2) Having multiple characters only translates to abuse, self reliance, and a innate sense of personal security as you can always be someone else at any given moment if things get rough. Carebearish enough? Sure but hold on, there's more.
3) Using multiple characters which can solve numerous market/trade tasks without having to resort to other people is effectively diminishing the economy.
4) Accountability which basically circles around the need for an personal identity for any character and accountability for their actions; this is almost non-existant in EVE because we can always create, or better: buy yet another fresh character and all our previos nefarious deeds are instantly erased.
5) Sec status, standings, flagging and such are on the brink of irrelevant: whatever you do with one character, you still have another one to jump into and do everything you otherwise could not. In other words, with multiple characters that have no immediate affiliation with one another you can easily roam the space doing whatever you want without suffering any consequences for your previus actions.
6) With multiple characters, or personalities, you can easily act as you wish with one person and drastically change this dependent on who you speak to. Now, while the argument that you can do this regardless is sound, without multiple characters certain traits have to be universally accepted. This transformation does not solely apply to market. By adding MCS to game no player can truly be trusted, and many players become *******s without accountability. Normal activities in the game become a chore, because while in a sandbox environment you shouldnÆt trust others without foundation, in a sandbox game with MCS youÆre unable to trust others, regardless of past interaction with them.
Stupid Poor People! Throw your hands up! Stupid Poor People! \o/
PS Working as intended
*edit* this is a reference to "I kill people" Jonlajoie look it up on youtube newbs
|

1Ekrid1
|
Posted - 2010.06.18 15:56:00 -
[213]
Originally by: Skye Mk2
Originally by: Fikreta ]it's just a game ffs
Well remember that next time you call someone a carebear, taste his delicious tears and/or show him a way to ---> /random MMO game here/
Very well said. QFT.
You're touching on the hypocrisy that exists among some of the most prevalent "hardcore" players of the game. I'd dare say most of the idiots that spout "HTFU" and "cry some moar, carebear" bring their own risks down and close to zero with the use of alts.
QFT FTW
Any accusations of Trolling is used with the same judiciousness around here as accusations of people being terrorists to turn public opinion against them.
its silly scare tactics from children who would rather not argue the point because they dont want to lose so call it trolling to try to invalidate it that way. funny thing is that truth is truth no matter if only one person believes it, or even if noone beliees it. it still exists.
so keep claiming people are trolls just because you disagree with them guiys/mods, Im sure that makes you very mature and useful to the development of eve into a better game than it is right now. pat yourselves on the back for a job well done in crying "troll" to try to win arguments. Um, I wasn't arguing. Personally I think your a clown not worth trying to prove anything to. But you do make me laugh, you take yourself quite seriously. You need to relax or go take a big dump or say something else profound lol...
you take it seriously enough to call me names and repost so I figure you could use a dump yourself, since you obviously care too much but of course the "hey lets not be so serious guys lol ur silly" argument is the recourse of failed intellectuals much as you say you're laughing at me Im laughing at you trying to be "too cool" to make yourself feel less inferior.  There's 1, repeat 1, frigate in the T1 lineup designed to be a suicide tackler. the rest are for COMBAT. so don't tell me to tackle when I'm in a combat T1 frig. OR tell CCP to fix their mess. |

Creepin
|
Posted - 2010.06.18 17:18:00 -
[214]
Edited by: Creepin on 18/06/2010 17:19:15
Originally by: Selinate I agree with the OP also. Access to 2 or more accounts for players give an unfair advantage to those without the capacity (or want) to have more than 1 account.
Are you... serious? Like, you're really telling that people who invested more of their time/effort into certain activity (playing eve in this example) shouldn't have any advantages over those who invested (noticeably) less time/effort? Sounds like an idiocy for me. 
Or may be I get it wrong and you're just telling that playing eve is conceptually different than all other hobbies/activities around, which (surprise!) always gives advantages for those who invested more? 
|

Jurai Talar
|
Posted - 2010.06.18 17:46:00 -
[215]
I'll throw in my 2 cents. The presence of alts in EVE reminds me of when other MMOs have uber equipment that can only be purchased from a RL money cash shop. Those players who pay more RL money get a substantial in-game advantage over the other players who do not. I'm not saying that it is a good thing or a bad thing but I personally don't care for alts since they break immersion.
I don't see any feasable way that CCP could stop the use of alts but maybe they could create game mechanics that could be used in place of the most common alt activites.
|

Heaven's Eye
|
Posted - 2010.06.18 17:47:00 -
[216]
Originally by: Fikreta Edited by: Fikreta on 08/06/2010 12:15:40 Unfortunately, what they apparently don't realize is that alt zergs are damaging every single aspect of this game, turning it into one ridiculously shallow carebear fluffy happy land where everyone is free to do whatever he wants easily evading REAL and long term consequences for their actions.
There is a consequence for having fun? In a game? REAL? Long term?
What
The
****?
Kid, are you too nerdy to step outside and smell the flowers of the skate park asphalt?
This. Is. A. ****ing. Game. Get that through your nerd head. Who sits tens of hours in front of EVE like you probrably do and help others move carriers? orcas?
I have 4 accounts, I can afford 4 accounts, so I have 4 accounts. If you can't afford 4 accounts, not my problem.
1 account = 80% isk grinding to have 20% of fun. 4 accounts = 100% isk grinding with 3 accounts, 100% fun station spinning or PvPing with 1 account.
You say we have to use other players? Sounds good. But I don't pay 15$ a month to move your sorry ass carebear orca. If people are willing, good for them, but I for one wouldn't. You seem to not grasp the aspect that in a game people do what they want to do, it is a way to escape rea life BS that you want to put in this game LOL stupid ****.
"Normal activities in the game become a chore, because while in a sandbox environment you shouldnÆt trust others without foundation, in a sandbox game with MCS youÆre unable to trust others, regardless of past interaction with them."
They are a chore because you are the only one on EVE who doesn't have a second account! Haha *****. Why would I trust anyone on a game? It's more fun than gambling!
"you WILL enter easy game mode the very minute you start your second account..."
What are you waiting for? Thursday paycheck? Isn't that a good thing? The game is complicated enough.
Judging by the character you chose to create (which is a girl) you probrably take this game too seriously, at which point you must lift your 400 pound ass and go outside for a jog and get a social life with REAL women.
|

omgfreemoniez
|
Posted - 2010.06.18 17:51:00 -
[217]
Edited by: omgfreemoniez on 18/06/2010 17:51:21 1 account with +1,000,000,000 isk a month from the money you would have paid for your other 3 accounts = 100% fun  You could lose a couple T2 cruisers a week, or a t2 fit BC a day, without breaking a sweat. Just on money saved from not having alts.
|

Heaven's Eye
|
Posted - 2010.06.18 17:53:00 -
[218]
Originally by: omgfreemoniez Edited by: omgfreemoniez on 18/06/2010 17:51:21 1 account with +1,000,000,000 isk a month from the money you would have paid for your other 3 accounts = 100% fun  You could lose a couple T2 cruisers a week, or a t2 fit BC a day, without breaking a sweat. Just on money saved from not having alts.
Sure, but i like managing many accounts, cuz then i can skill up 4 characters and eventually perhaps get them all in pvp ships? or 3 in a logi ship and 1 attacking 
|

1Ekrid1
|
Posted - 2010.06.18 18:21:00 -
[219]
Originally by: Creepin Edited by: Creepin on 18/06/2010 17:19:15
Originally by: Selinate I agree with the OP also. Access to 2 or more accounts for players give an unfair advantage to those without the capacity (or want) to have more than 1 account.
Are you... serious? Like, you're really telling that people who invested more of their time/effort into certain activity (playing eve in this example) shouldn't have any advantages over those who invested (noticeably) less time/effort? Sounds like an idiocy for me. 
Or may be I get it wrong and you're just telling that playing eve is conceptually different than all other hobbies/activities around, which (surprise!) always gives advantages for those who invested more? 
Lets put it simply, there's a reason steroids are banned frm sports. there's a reason for weight classes in boxing and other sorts of physical combat competitions.
its for fairness and the thought of being the best on the most fair ground. In war and real fighting, anything you can take advantage of goes, in games, such as boxing and the olympics, fairness among competitors is what counts just as much.
You're saying you want to have as much an unfair advantage as you can get just because you can get it? thats the opposite of the gamer spirit. its people like you that hack vision in starcraft because you cant handle the thought of losing fairly, and would rather win unfairly.
You're paying more money to win over people with one account. admit it and lets stop being denying choobs about it. There's 1, repeat 1, frigate in the T1 lineup designed to be a suicide tackler. the rest are for COMBAT. so don't tell me to tackle when I'm in a combat T1 frig. OR tell CCP to fix their mess. |

Milla Jovobitch
|
Posted - 2010.06.18 21:34:00 -
[220]
Originally by: Fikreta Get rid of alts
Yeah!
No, wait. You want to get rid of ME?!??!
Unacceptable.
|

Gloria Stitz
|
Posted - 2010.06.18 22:13:00 -
[221]
JSFW
Really
. ------------- 'Don't try to learn Eve all at once, otherwise your brain will explode' - Albert Einstein ------------ |

Musical Fist
Gallente The Unknown Bar and Pub
|
Posted - 2010.06.18 22:21:00 -
[222]
ITT people getting trolled and still biting -- Emo TraderJohn's Number 1 Fan!! |

BrundleMeth
Caldari Temporal Mechanics
|
Posted - 2010.06.18 23:47:00 -
[223]
Edited by: BrundleMeth on 18/06/2010 23:54:42
Originally by: 1Ekrid1
Originally by: Skye Mk2
Originally by: Fikreta ]it's just a game ffs
Well remember that next time you call someone a carebear, taste his delicious tears and/or show him a way to ---> /random MMO game here/
Very well said. QFT.
You're touching on the hypocrisy that exists among some of the most prevalent "hardcore" players of the game. I'd dare say most of the idiots that spout "HTFU" and "cry some moar, carebear" bring their own risks down and close to zero with the use of alts.
QFT FTW
Any accusations of Trolling is used with the same judiciousness around here as accusations of people being terrorists to turn public opinion against them.
its silly scare tactics from children who would rather not argue the point because they dont want to lose so call it trolling to try to invalidate it that way. funny thing is that truth is truth no matter if only one person believes it, or even if noone beliees it. it still exists.
so keep claiming people are trolls just because you disagree with them guiys/mods, Im sure that makes you very mature and useful to the development of eve into a better game than it is right now. pat yourselves on the back for a job well done in crying "troll" to try to win arguments.
Um, I wasn't arguing. Personally I think your a clown not worth trying to prove anything to. But you do make me laugh, you take yourself quite seriously. You need to relax or go take a big dump or say something else profound lol...
you take it seriously enough to call me names and repost so I figure you could use a dump yourself, since you obviously care too much but of course the "hey lets not be so serious guys lol ur silly" argument is the recourse of failed intellectuals much as you say you're laughing at me Im laughing at you trying to be "too cool" to make yourself feel less inferior.  I'm fat and 50 anything but cool. Serious? No, but this is funny. And take a look at most of your other threads started. EVERYONE is laughing at you...
Originally by: Heaven's Eye You seem to not grasp the aspect that in a game people do what they want to do, it is a way to escape realife BS that you want to put in this game LOL stupid ****.
Yep, I play EVE how I want to play it. Don't need anyone's permission...
|

Fikreta
|
Posted - 2010.06.19 06:55:00 -
[224]
Originally by: Creepin Like, you're really telling that people who invested more of their time/effort into certain activity (playing eve in this example) shouldn't have any advantages over those who invested (noticeably) less time/effort?
No, I'm not telling that. Players who invest more time/effort in game, know more people willing to help and work together, or are just plain smarter will always have advantage. That's how it should be. That's NOT how it is now. And it's only getting worse.
Originally by: Heaven's Eye There is a consequence for having fun? In a game? REAL? Long term?
Might sound strange to you, I know, but EVE was originally designed around that idea: to provide real (ingame 'real') long term consequences for your actions. It's the major part of fun. Alas, those consequences are brought to brink of extinction with the plague of alts and multiboxing. But you seem to be quite well aware of that, you just don't know.
Originally by: Heaven's Eye I have 4 accounts, I can afford 4 accounts, so I have 4 accounts. If you can't afford 4 accounts, not my problem.
Good for you, you're my idol. By the way, did I say that I don't have other account? And why is that important for this discussion in first place? Trust me: I know what it means when I say "you WILL enter easy game mode the very minute you start your second account".
Originally by: Heaven's Eye The game is complicated enough.
No it's not. It's only one huge fluffy time sink.
Originally by: 1Ekrid1 Lets drop the charade CCP, just offer us the ability to buy ships directly for money.
Yeah, but don't stop with ships - give us skills that can be bought as well. Finally, it all comes down to question of how much rl money someone can/wants to throw to this game. Right?
|

Shinjin Malvek
Amarr Whiskey Loners
|
Posted - 2010.06.19 09:46:00 -
[225]
I must confess I didn't read all the pages of this thread but I feel the need to say that I have a big pair!!! I am Shinjin Malvek, this is my main since early 2007 and have no other accounts. Oh and if you have any Minmatar slave girls handy I could use one or many depending on the price. I don't get out much lol 
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 :: [one page] |