Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mamba Lev
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.06.20 17:06:00 -
[1]
Wouldn't it be better to do it by percentage of damage done to the ships left in a tie?
|
Nora Rage
Heroes. Black Star Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.06.20 17:07:00 -
[2]
What? How is that better?
|
Zervun
Amarr hirr
|
Posted - 2010.06.20 17:08:00 -
[3]
Thats a ******ed rule. CCP please find a better way to end tie's. Where is the e-honor when you win by a technicality.
|
Jieter
|
Posted - 2010.06.20 17:09:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Zervun Thats a ******ed rule. CCP please find a better way to end tie's. Where is the e-honor when you win by a technicality.
e-honor is overrated
|
Kainos Kerensky
Shadows Of The Requiem Everto Rex Regis
|
Posted - 2010.06.20 17:11:00 -
[5]
Absolute garbage, there is no reason panda should lose after Dystopia just used a faster ship to run like a coward. They do not deserve to be in the tournament.
|
Arth Lawing
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.06.20 17:12:00 -
[6]
Utter rubbish, you shouldn't win on your being able to qualify, or by being able to run away.
|
Mamba Lev
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.06.20 17:18:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Nora Rage What? How is that better?
It would be better as it would be decided by what happened in the fight not what happened before.
|
Arth Lawing
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.06.20 17:40:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Mamba Lev
Originally by: Nora Rage What? How is that better?
It would be better as it would be decided by what happened in the fight not what happened before.
Yes that would make this like some sort of knockout/finals type competition. A new way of thinking, I'm sure.
|
Master Zeuth
|
Posted - 2010.06.20 17:44:00 -
[9]
My ♥ Goes out to BLAST after this loss. Panda will destroy their space twice as hard now, out of blind rage.
|
Marketman
|
Posted - 2010.06.20 17:44:00 -
[10]
In the event of a draw, the competence of the teams in earlier rounds is easily the fairest way to differentiate between the teams. It promotes aggression in the early rounds and one of the reasons why throwing a first round match to get an easier opponent later on can back fire badly
|
|
Racknor
|
Posted - 2010.06.20 17:49:00 -
[11]
Edited by: Racknor on 20/06/2010 17:52:53
Originally by: Marketman In the event of a draw, the competence of the teams in earlier rounds is easily the fairest way to differentiate between the teams. It promotes aggression in the early rounds and one of the reasons why throwing a first round match to get an easier opponent later on can back fire badly
You should not be able to advance without winning, or be disqualified without losing. This is a flaw in the tournament rules. It only leads to a possible weaker opponent moving on.
|
Markus Reese
Caldari Estrale Frontiers
|
Posted - 2010.06.20 17:50:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Marketman In the event of a draw, the competence of the teams in earlier rounds is easily the fairest way to differentiate between the teams. It promotes aggression in the early rounds and one of the reasons why throwing a first round match to get an easier opponent later on can back fire badly
Even that is a difficult call too. I mean, points might not determine competence on the winning team, but incompetence of the losing one in qualifiers. Say Team A gets a pair of ownage wins because other teams were fail, while Team B wins close upsets over favorites? In that case, the draw wouldn't favour the more competent team.
|
Fhyle
|
Posted - 2010.06.20 17:56:00 -
[13]
rematch |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |