Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Jester777
|
Posted - 2010.07.11 00:02:00 -
[1]
./rant on:
i'm all for Hulkageddon. i want THAT to be known straight off the bat! the problem comes when it turns into a: "kill any ships remotely associated with mining"~ageddon i've been in the Hulkageddon 3 channel the past few days, and have seen them attacking and destroying ANY ship mounting a mining laser/strip miner!!! ships from as small as a Bantam, to as large as an Orca; an ORCA!!!! where did Orcas come into play in HULKageddon?!? i've asked them in that channel, that if i were to put mining lasers on a Ferox, and went out to go mine, would they attack me. i was told: "you're fried!" ...wrong answer!... i just personally think this has gotten out of hand, and needs to be reined in significantly!
./rant off |
nafiy gnaw
|
Posted - 2010.07.11 00:08:00 -
[2]
You sir, did not realise this is the wrong forum section to post a rant.
|
I SoStoned
|
Posted - 2010.07.11 00:08:00 -
[3]
I'm also all for hulkageddon.
But the recycled destroyer alts need to be banned along with their mains. If you want to gank hulks (or any mining ship, for that matter) it should be done with a character that's more than just a lol investment.
CCP has already said that recycled alts strictly for the purpose of suicide attacks is an exploit and subject to banning. It should be enforced. --- Dreamer: My dream, Freddy! MY RULES. Freddy Kruger: *groans* Awwwww, f**k. --- Never give up! |
Mr SmartGuy
|
Posted - 2010.07.11 00:42:00 -
[4]
And your suggestion that should get CSM's attention is exactly what???
|
Nuadi
|
Posted - 2010.07.11 00:46:00 -
[5]
First, did you lose a Ferox/Orca?
Originally by: Jester777 i just personally think this has gotten out of hand, and needs to be reined in significantly!
Second, how?
|
Jester777
|
Posted - 2010.07.11 00:49:00 -
[6]
Originally by: I SoStoned I'm also all for hulkageddon.
But the recycled destroyer alts need to be banned along with their mains. If you want to gank hulks (or any mining ship, for that matter) it should be done with a character that's more than just a lol investment.
CCP has already said that recycled alts strictly for the purpose of suicide attacks is an exploit and subject to banning. It should be enforced.
yah, THIS would be the "suggestion" and "purpose" of this Thread; the enforcement of the rules & regulations that CCP has set forth for Hulkageddon! absolutely ANYTHING less, becomes griefing...which is against the Terms & Conditions of EvE Online |
Ori Blake
|
Posted - 2010.07.11 03:15:00 -
[7]
I'm no fan of hulkageddon either, but where do you draw the line of when biomassing an alt is a bannable offense? I think it's not able to be enforcable in any real way.
My personal feeling is that indys need less vulnerability so they cant be suicide ganked by cheap ships. If they gank your Bantam they lose money: indies in general shouldn't be as fragile as they are.
|
Lykouleon
Trust Doesn't Rust
|
Posted - 2010.07.11 03:52:00 -
[8]
:whine:
Go back to HKO
Quote: CCP Mindstar > Sorry - I've completely messed all that up. lets try again
|
Laquisis
|
Posted - 2010.07.11 11:08:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Lykouleon :whine:
Go back to HKO
Go back to.... what?
|
Maxsim Goratiev
Gallente Imperial Tau Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.07.11 11:11:00 -
[10]
while i doa gree that people are getting stupid, and i hate when 1-day alts are used, i don't see what csm can do about it.
|
|
Marktdirne
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 13:11:00 -
[11]
Honestly I hate the idea of ~ageddon. I think the sponsors should be podded and banned. I like a lot of the core mechanics of eve as for how ships, mining, and some of the industrial systems work. But the social dynamics of this game blows.
Anyone with -2.0 or less that enters high sec should be gate gunned and concorded on sight. They are outlaws and do not deserve the survive in high sec. They wanted to be pirates well then go be pirates in low sec.
|
Verys
Burning Technologies Black Star Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 13:50:00 -
[12]
0/10 Please try harder.
Obvious fake rage/tears doesn't make for good entertainment/trolling.
|
Seith Silverstein
Something Rotten
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 13:59:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Seith Silverstein on 13/07/2010 13:59:15
Originally by: Verys 0/10 Please try harder.
Originally by: CCP Soundwave I am literally the internet
|
Galen Gallente
Gallente Agent-Orange Nabaal Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 14:10:00 -
[14]
Edited by: Galen Gallente on 13/07/2010 14:10:34 eh.
|
Marktdirne
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 14:15:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Verys 0/10 Please try harder.
Obvious fake rage/tears doesn't make for good entertainment/trolling.
It is not fake rage. I despise Pirates and Grievers. The mass of idiots and bottom feeding ass hats make the few interesting points in the game not worth playing. He who has the most time to kill/waste and screw with other people wins is not a good game environment. The devs that decided that type of game play was a good idea need to be re-evaluated.
|
Captain Yifan
Shadows Of The Requiem Everto Rex Regis
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 14:19:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Marktdirne
Originally by: Verys 0/10 Please try harder.
Obvious fake rage/tears doesn't make for good entertainment/trolling.
It is not fake rage. I despise Pirates and Grievers. The mass of idiots and bottom feeding ass hats make the few interesting points in the game not worth playing. He who has the most time to kill/waste and screw with other people wins is not a good game environment. The devs that decided that type of game play was a good idea need to be re-evaluated.
If you think you have the power to "re-evaluate" devs, then at least you should have enough guts to post with your main?
|
Seith Silverstein
Something Rotten
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 14:37:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Marktdirne
Originally by: Verys 0/10 Please try harder.
Obvious fake rage/tears doesn't make for good entertainment/trolling.
It is not fake rage. I despise Pirates and Grievers. The mass of idiots and bottom feeding ass hats make the few interesting points in the game not worth playing. He who has the most time to kill/waste and screw with other people wins is not a good game environment. The devs that decided that type of game play was a good idea need to be re-evaluated.
Hello Kitty Online is that way --->
HTFU
Originally by: CCP Soundwave I am literally the internet
|
Marktdirne
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 15:19:00 -
[18]
Edited by: Marktdirne on 13/07/2010 15:19:42
Originally by: Seith Silverstein
Originally by: Marktdirne
Originally by: Verys 0/10 Please try harder.
Obvious fake rage/tears doesn't make for good entertainment/trolling.
It is not fake rage. I despise Pirates and Grievers. The mass of idiots and bottom feeding ass hats make the few interesting points in the game not worth playing. He who has the most time to kill/waste and screw with other people wins is not a good game environment. The devs that decided that type of game play was a good idea need to be re-evaluated.
Hello Kitty Online is that way --->
HTFU
LoL, no don't think so. I will bet one thing though. If HKO was subscription based it would make more money in a month than CCP makes in a year from eve. World of Warcraft I know does. What do these games have in common a defined and ruled PvE system. In the case of WoW there is PvP but not harsh PvP results for loosing. Does it make PvP and PvE a little less meaning full maybe but it depends on what you are trying to get out of it.
Because EVE is so focues on PvP it will never be a large game. Yes there may be 300K subscriptions but I bet there are less than 100K actual players. The way EvE is built it could not survive with 100K -> 300K actual active players all on at the same time.
Hopefully if the game ever does some how grow to that size and they have to shard the world due to technical issues involved with network traffic the new worlds will have a more aggressively defined Rules set for High, Low and Null sec. Leave the cesspool that is the current live shard as it is. The game as a whole is due for a reset anyway.
|
XXSketchxx
Gallente Remote Soviet Industries Important Internet Spaceship League
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 16:19:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Marktdirne Leave the cesspool that is the current live shard as it is. The game as a whole is due for a reset anyway.
maybe you should just quit?
|
Anna Lifera
Gallente Imperial Legion of Amarr HAWK Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 18:30:00 -
[20]
Originally by: Marktdirne Edited by: Marktdirne on 13/07/2010 15:19:42
LoL, no don't think so. I will bet one thing though. If HKO was subscription based it would make more money in a month than CCP makes in a year from eve. World of Warcraft I know does. What do these games have in common a defined and ruled PvE system. In the case of WoW there is PvP but not harsh PvP results for loosing. Does it make PvP and PvE a little less meaning full maybe but it depends on what you are trying to get out of it.
Because EVE is so focues on PvP it will never be a large game. Yes there may be 300K subscriptions but I bet there are less than 100K actual players. The way EvE is built it could not survive with 100K -> 300K actual active players all on at the same time.
Hopefully if the game ever does some how grow to that size and they have to shard the world due to technical issues involved with network traffic the new worlds will have a more aggressively defined Rules set for High, Low and Null sec. Leave the cesspool that is the current live shard as it is. The game as a whole is due for a reset anyway.
1. the real reason some ppl won't play eve is they're just like u who need to be told how to have fun instead of actually using your own brain. the "rules" r there 'cause it's not like u can get shot inside a station *hint hint*. 2. clearly, u just want another wow clone to suit your wow mentality. guess what? there's something even better than a wow clone--the real thing--go back to wow. --- LOLOLOL If anything, lvl4s require LESS effort then Mining!... At least in mining you have to check every 4 minutes to move the ore to the can. You're an idiot. - Jerid Verges |
|
RatKnight1
Gallente Mahdi Followers
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 19:41:00 -
[21]
I am a miner.... This idea is stupid, and here is why:
During hulkageddon, I mine in a retriever. I fit it to have a tank. Because most gankers in hulkageddon don't expect a tanked retriever, I have been fail ganked 6 times since this has started.
It is all about properly fitting your ship, a properly tanked ship can survive some of the best gank attempts.
Rat [url=http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/combat_record.php?type=player&name=RatKnight1][/u |
Verys
Burning Technologies Black Star Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 23:43:00 -
[22]
Originally by: Marktdirne
Originally by: Verys 0/10 Please try harder.
Obvious fake rage/tears doesn't make for good entertainment/trolling.
It is not fake rage. I despise Pirates and Grievers. The mass of idiots and bottom feeding ass hats make the few interesting points in the game not worth playing. He who has the most time to kill/waste and screw with other people wins is not a good game environment. The devs that decided that type of game play was a good idea need to be re-evaluated.
The whole idea of eve is that it is a massive sandbox and not a safe grinding environment because eve is based on becoming more of a sci-fi simulator and less of a game in the traditional sense. CCP has established a set of rules and tools and it's up to the players how the world is divided and shaped. The people who blow up stuff mostly do it out of competition and having a good time.
Now Hulkageddon is just a fun event in which I planned to participate (internet issues ruined this) because it's a competition which was at first aimed against macro-mining and eventually evolved into a poking the bear contest, mostly due to the rage of losing a virtually worthless item.
What I ask to you is to come back once you've borrowed a cup of perspective from your neighbour and mull over if this is the game for you.
|
Galdornae
Caldari Locus Industries
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 03:18:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Marktdirne
LoL, no don't think so. I will bet one thing though. If HKO was subscription based it would make more money in a month than CCP makes in a year from eve. World of Warcraft I know does. What do these games have in common a defined and ruled PvE system. In the case of WoW there is PvP but not harsh PvP results for loosing. Does it make PvP and PvE a little less meaning full maybe but it depends on what you are trying to get out of it.
Because EVE is so focues on PvP it will never be a large game. Yes there may be 300K subscriptions but I bet there are less than 100K actual players. The way EvE is built it could not survive with 100K -> 300K actual active players all on at the same time.
Hopefully if the game ever does some how grow to that size and they have to shard the world due to technical issues involved with network traffic the new worlds will have a more aggressively defined Rules set for High, Low and Null sec. Leave the cesspool that is the current live shard as it is. The game as a whole is due for a reset anyway.
I LOVE that this game is actually challenging, and involves risk. If you want an easy, risk-free game like WOW, then *gasp* go play WOW.
But leave the game I love for it's challenges alone.
|
Saelie
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 03:47:00 -
[24]
Hey Jester. I seem to remember you in the Hulkageddon 3 chat channel daring people to come and find you. Looks like they did. HTFU and learn not to bear-bait.
|
Herzog Wolfhammer
Gallente Aliastra
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 05:36:00 -
[25]
When I saw the thread title I was expecting to see toplessness.
Oh well.
|
|
CCP Applebabe
|
Posted - 2010.07.14 08:07:00 -
[26]
Ranting is not allowed.
Thread locked.
Applebabe Community Representative CCP Hf, EVE Online Contact us |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |