|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jovialmadness
|
Posted - 2010.07.27 17:18:00 -
[1]
Tbh LHA you need to be removed from the game. |
Jovialmadness
|
Posted - 2010.07.27 17:31:00 -
[2]
Originally by: LHA Tarawa
Originally by: Jovialmadness Tbh LHA you need to be removed from the game.
Because I think the current T2 BPO holders should be compensated in some way when those T2 BPOs are (and they will be) removed from the game?
That is pretty harsh.
I knew there were a lot of people that believed that most T2 BPO holders have LONG ago been compensated and that no further compensation is needed, but I didn't know they were this militant.
Im not arguing with you anymore. Your cause is pointless and you are spewing trash spam at this point. |
Jovialmadness
|
Posted - 2010.07.28 01:12:00 -
[3]
Originally by: vondronage I don't like how the word "compensated" has been thrown around in this thread. I think "incentivized" is a better word to throw around.
I know if I spent months or however long saving up to buy one of these things from someone, only to have it yanked out of the game a month later, I would feel cheated.
Na it wont get yanked, more like pulled gently from your loins by a sexy blonde that promises to give you something in return but doesnt and you still dont feel bad. Then LHA shows up and the emo rage begins. |
Jovialmadness
|
Posted - 2010.07.30 14:34:00 -
[4]
To emphasize akitas remarks...
1. 200 guys blobbing 1
2. 90 million sp officer fitted bhaalgorn attacking a tier 1 hauler noob thats 3 days old.
3. Alliance of 4000 attacking an alliance of 700 and taking their space.
4. Owners of supercapital/capital production corps making hundreds of billions a year. Yea but those arent tech 2 bpos right? Look at their costs.
5. Market traders worth hundreds of billions manipulating entire regions and/or multiple regions to harvest even more isk.
6. Only a few guys in game owning a select few ships in existance.
7. Scammers worth multi billions social engineering a 2 month old and taking every last isk the poor lad has.
8. Shall i go on?
9. Tech 2 bpo holders that aquired their blueprints through hard work and are worth multibillions getting an edge on production by investing capital instead of time like inventors must do.
10. Massive alliances controlling the best space and profiting off their moons while others have to settle for scraps.
11. 15 man peaceful industrial corps getting war dec'd in empire space so they can be harvested for fun/isk.
12. Guys rolling around with a large number of accounts making easier isk off of the fact they have multiple accounts and can pay more in real life for accounts than others.
13. Guys selling GTC's for ingame currency inorder to get an edge through wealth.
14. And my personal fav... Guys in jita declaring they are giving away an expensive ship at xxxz hours at planet I and 200 noobs in pods show up then get smartbombed.
All of these actions are totally legal. Most would probably scream they arent fair.
That is eve.
That is why i like it.
If you dont.
Leave.
Give your stuff to someone else.
I'm rich. I dont need your ****.
Mad?
Good.
|
Jovialmadness
|
Posted - 2010.07.30 17:32:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Mandos2k
Originally by: Cashews
Originally by: Mandos2k stuff
A T2 BPO has a capped profit per timeframe. Invention has not (unless you prefer not to skill Mass Production). That pretty much voids any argument you have, unless you are not doing it for profit.
And because of some miracle all T2 BPO owners can't use invention?
Also which argument of mine is void now? I can't seem to follow you.
Of course we can use invention. Why the bleepin bleep should i if i go to the sell order forums, buy a T2 bpo, produce off it and am happy with my market set profits controlled by inventors?
Like most guys i dont get alot of ingame time anymore. I chose to invest isk to make isk via bpos. Voila! |
Jovialmadness
|
Posted - 2010.07.30 18:06:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Jovialmadness on 30/07/2010 18:07:26
Quote: Thank you Voogru. Inventing multiple tech 2 bpc's doesn't change its inherent advantages over a tech 2 bpo. Just the person benefiting from it.
Fixed that for you |
Jovialmadness
|
Posted - 2010.08.02 14:02:00 -
[7]
Originally by: TheTradeMonkey The way to remove T2 BPO's is easy.
CCP create an unknown alt account\multiple alt accounts Alts place "WTB threads" untill they own all the T2BPOs Alts then publicly destroy the bpos outside jita. BPO's removed, preveous owners paid off, market ****ed.
job done
Dont be surprised if this actually is happening. This is the only way to effectively remove them from the game whilst not ****ing anyone off.
What makes it sweeter is the issue of knowledge. Know one trully knows how many bpo's are actually left ingame of each class.
Lastly it trully could never be tied back to ccp. Everyone might just suspect it though five years from now when bpo's show up on the sell order forum at a rate of 1 a month. |
Jovialmadness
|
Posted - 2010.08.03 15:27:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Da Bandit
Originally by: Narfas Deteis
Originally by: Da Bandit Just change them all back to T1 BPOs and then they can be invented to T2 BPCs like everyone else.
...and do same thing to all ships and modules.
Who wants T2 stuff anyway? It's disadvantage to new players.
No, leave T2 stuff as it is. Just change all T2 BPOs to T1. That way they are removed from the game. Players owning them arent really disadvantaged, they get to keep the T1 BPO, however they just then need to use invention going forward like everyone else.
WTF? Are you serious? Hey ive got a nice piece of real estate ill sell you 500 miles east of florida. Real cheap. Interested? |
Jovialmadness
|
Posted - 2010.08.09 12:37:00 -
[9]
Originally by: KaetheYsera 1) Add T2 BPOs back
2) Remove all T2 BPOs and replace them with a stack of 10 T1 BPOs with the same ME
3) Buff invention until it's competitive with T2 BPOs
I don't really care which one, but one should be done. If there's any issue that makes me want to quit, it's this one (knowing that T2 production is not a competitive area because players who were here before me have an item I can't obtain anymore).
No.
No.
No.
Last statement you made. Not true. Go away. |
Jovialmadness
|
Posted - 2010.08.23 02:49:00 -
[10]
Edited by: Jovialmadness on 23/08/2010 02:50:24 why the bleep was this bastard of a thread bumped
Whitehound is a poor troll that is having some kind of carebear fantasy MMO flashback in the wrong damn game.
You need to gtfo bro. Tell ya what, since you will stay and emobaby all over these forums im going to go buy another tech 2 bpo for myself because of you bro. Then im going to take a shower created from pure flowing isk from tech 2 bpo profits. I still need one more thing for my shower. Can you guess what it is?
yes....your tears. keep them coming |
|
Jovialmadness
|
Posted - 2010.08.23 13:12:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Whitehound Edited by: Whitehound on 23/08/2010 07:19:00 Nothing has convinced me yet. I still want to see them removed. Each of your comments only shows how much this change is needed. T2 BPO owner tears will be a great win for the majority of the players like all the other tears before. All your arguing to keep them is proof for the success of the change and the only way to teach you to let go is by taken them away from you.
Im afraid im not here to convince you of anything. Im here to tell you that you are the only one in tears. Tears of frustration and lust.
Guys let this dude rant. Nothing we say will change his deluded opinion.
Akita you are blasting him with thought out responses that are too involved for this dude. Especially considering every reply he gives consists of five worded drizzle. |
|
|
|