| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
FDIC Agent
   |
Posted - 2010.07.28 05:07:00 -
[1]
Is there a scenario where fitting one is helpful?
I checked his losses and he has lost a previous one with a LSE on it as well. Is this for plexing or a mission?
|
Omara Otawan
|
Posted - 2010.07.28 05:18:00 -
[2]
This is what is typically referred to as a failfit.
No reason to put a LSE there, but I've already seen a Nidhoggur lossmail with a MAPC and HMLs fitted...
|
The Hobbit
|
Posted - 2010.07.28 05:21:00 -
[3]
You must be joking. I can't access the link but LSE adds precise amount of shields not percentege so never fit one on a carrier - it's insignificant in comparison to ships own shields. Better use resistance amplifiers - it will add more shields (it won't directly add shields, it will make your shields count more) than LSE.
|
Fail Fit
|
Posted - 2010.07.28 05:52:00 -
[4]
What's wrong with it
|
saango0
|
Posted - 2010.07.28 05:53:00 -
[5]
YES, really on a capital you need to forget about resists and get more buffer.
|
Zeba
Minmatar
Honourable East India Trading Company
|
Posted - 2010.07.28 06:02:00 -
[6]
 Originally by: Omara Otawan
but I've already seen a Nidhoggur lossmail with a MAPC and HMLs fitted...
wtb: carrier with launcher hardpoints.(or turrets)
Had to be a fakemail.
Originally by: Balsak
Eve-Online, the game that is so awesome people are willing to give CCP money so that they may have the privilege to bash it.
|
Omara Otawan
|
Posted - 2010.07.28 06:16:00 -
[7]
^^ should have read Naglfar, the dread. Its late 
Dunno if fake or not, was posted somewhere on the forums with a story to it (killed while belt ratting or something).
|
Penjual Sayur
|
Posted - 2010.07.28 06:20:00 -
[8]
Originally by: The Hobbit
You must be joking. I can't access the link but LSE adds precise amount of shields not percentege so never fit one on a carrier - it's insignificant in comparison to ships own shields. Better use resistance amplifiers - it will add more shields (it won't directly add shields, it will make your shields count more) than LSE.
Since we're touching on this subject. I have a question about regenerative plates (add % to armor), are they viable (on armor tanked caps)?
|
Smk56
|
Posted - 2010.07.28 07:02:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Penjual Sayur
Originally by: The Hobbit
You must be joking. I can't access the link but LSE adds precise amount of shields not percentege so never fit one on a carrier - it's insignificant in comparison to ships own shields. Better use resistance amplifiers - it will add more shields (it won't directly add shields, it will make your shields count more) than LSE.
Since we're touching on this subject. I have a question about regenerative plates (add % to armor), are they viable (on armor tanked caps)?
They're not bad but resists pretty much give you the same ehp and work better with RR.
|
FlameGlow
Rebellion Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.07.28 07:07:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Penjual Sayur
Since we're touching on this subject. I have a question about regenerative plates (add % to armor), are they viable (on armor tanked caps)?
Short answer is no
Long answer is:
They become viable after 3 resistance mods, so if you have 3 EANMs you're better of with a regenerative then 4th EANM, on the other hand 4 hardeners are better then 4 EANMs
If you devote 8 lowslots on capital to buffer they might be, 1 always goes to DC, so you have 7 left
Max EHP configs on number of slots to resistance/regenerative mods
1 - EANM
2 - 2 EANM
3 - 3 EANM
4 - 4 Hardeners
5 - 4 Hardeners + EANM
6 - 4 Hardeners + 2 EANM
7 - Yay! 4 Hadeners + 2 EANM + 1 Regenerative membrane
So they are viable on pure buffer tanked Aeon/Avatar and nothing else
Originally by: CCP Manifest
Imploding servers are not a part of our business model.
|
raukosen
|
Posted - 2010.07.28 11:14:00 -
[11]
Even so the ENAM is probably better in practice since you'll (hopefully) be receiving RR
|
SFX Bladerunner
Minmatar
Bite me inc.
SRS.
|
Posted - 2010.07.28 11:26:00 -
[12]
Originally by: FlameGlow
Originally by: Penjual Sayur
Since we're touching on this subject. I have a question about regenerative plates (add % to armor), are they viable (on armor tanked caps)?
Short answer is no
Long answer is:
They become viable after 3 resistance mods, so if you have 3 EANMs you're better of with a regenerative then 4th EANM, on the other hand 4 hardeners are better then 4 EANMs
If you devote 8 lowslots on capital to buffer they might be, 1 always goes to DC, so you have 7 left
Max EHP configs on number of slots to resistance/regenerative mods
1 - EANM
2 - 2 EANM
3 - 3 EANM
4 - 4 Hardeners
5 - 4 Hardeners + EANM
6 - 4 Hardeners + 2 EANM
7 - Yay! 4 Hadeners + 2 EANM + 1 Regenerative membrane
So they are viable on pure buffer tanked Aeon/Avatar and nothing else
And even those would probably prefer a cap relay over the regen for obvious reasons.
__________________________________________________
History is much like an endless waltz, the three beats of war, peace and revolution continue on forever.. |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |