Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 137 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Saint Schala
Beyond Divinity Inc
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 08:56:00 -
[3601]
no
|
vasuul
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 09:02:00 -
[3602]
Edited by: vasuul on 27/06/2011 09:02:54 NO
microtransactions kill the sandbox
we want more content if they have to raise subscription to do it so be it. With in reason (repeat within reason meaning less than 5 dollars more ) by content i dont mean just bull**** clothing, i mean some new missions would be nice i have been playing eve since 2007 and i haven't seen any new agent content in the last year
have your non vanity items if you want just seed em on the market or better still seed the bpos and let us make the stuff thats how the sandbox is supposed to work either way there is better ways to make money than putting the squeeze to your loyal followers
I hope you don't fill our sandbox with concrete Seriously we are passionate cause we love this game and would hate to see it die
|
Insidious Chaos
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 09:20:00 -
[3603]
NO. It isn't with the spirit of a virtual game to sell virtual items for real money. Just because everyone else is jumping off a cliff, do you join in?
|
Axel vonSchalscha
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 09:20:00 -
[3604]
NO!!!
|
Fecklaar
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 09:21:00 -
[3605]
Yes
Im all for the vanity items side of the new aurum system as it has no impact on the game .. Appart from the people who will be primary if you have a silly eye thingy on your portrait
Im even up for so called "gold ammo" and other such items but only if they come in the form of a bpo (though i do understand that the leaked memo was a brainstorming memo and nothing more)
Where i would draw the line is the sale of sp, as it takes time and effort to get the better ships and the skill to fly them also takes time to master
My 2 pennys
|
tony dinozo
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 09:26:00 -
[3606]
NO pleaaase !
|
Uluru Blok
Minmatar FATHOM STAR INDUSTRIES
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 09:27:00 -
[3607]
NO [image] _____________________________________
Uluru_Blok - Advanced Production Division
|
Pax J'hur
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 09:28:00 -
[3608]
NO!
|
Vander Zylen
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 09:38:00 -
[3609]
No.
|
Elrica bloodbane
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 09:45:00 -
[3610]
NO
|
|
E'lisha
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 09:53:00 -
[3611]
NO
|
Karsa Egivand
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 09:54:00 -
[3612]
COSMETIC ONLY
|
Sethose Olderon
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:01:00 -
[3613]
No - Micro-transactions kill the sandbox and ruin immersion. Alliance Owned Stargates
|
Xelarus Vulgaris
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:01:00 -
[3614]
NO
|
Ammi84
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:14:00 -
[3615]
NO!!! THIS IS KILLING EVE OTHERWISE!
|
Markarian Aurelius
Bureau of Interstellar Exploration
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:19:00 -
[3616]
Cosmetic Only
|
Evil Resident
Lunar Tech
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:19:00 -
[3617]
No,
Also remove the Aurum shop from he market page, it doesn't belong there. |
Dibneres
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:34:00 -
[3618]
NO
|
mimori
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:38:00 -
[3619]
Edited by: mimori on 27/06/2011 10:38:54 yes, with it being vanity items only Under the provision that any vanity items get destroyed/looted when the capsuleer dies. The clone died, thus everything on said clone should go too. I want the tears of people who just lost a $70 monacle.
|
ninjaholic
House Aratus Fatal Ascension
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 10:48:00 -
[3620]
NO.
Microtransactions will destroy Eve. CCP have always fought the norm and done the different thing all along. WHAT THE F*** HAS CHANGED? Why are you greedy ******** following the other greedy companies like EA, Activision and Blizzard?
CCP go back to doing the different thing. Not this in-game microtransactions crap that will destroy the game. Aurum sucks, NeX sucks, microtransactions suck. Leave it out yea?
+ Support EVE's own IN-GAME fight record tool! |
|
grevo
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 11:03:00 -
[3621]
NO!
nuff said
|
Princess ORCHID
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 11:11:00 -
[3622]
NO |
vovan lin
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 11:12:00 -
[3623]
NO
|
Tim Golan
Gallente The X-Trading Company RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 11:12:00 -
[3624]
No!
|
Za0za
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 11:12:00 -
[3625]
NO |
Yxe Orlenard
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 11:15:00 -
[3626]
COSMETIC ONLY |
Yahyan
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 11:16:00 -
[3627]
cosmetic only
|
Liastr
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 11:29:00 -
[3628]
cosmetic only
not that i believe it will stay that way.
|
Shani Khorme
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 11:32:00 -
[3629]
No .
|
Drake Iddon
Danneskjold Heavy Industries
|
Posted - 2011.06.27 11:34:00 -
[3630]
COSMETIC ONLY
(its basicaly a no, but if 12 year olds like to steal mommy and daddy's cash for a shiney item of no use, fine by me)
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 137 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |