Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 137 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
e30089
|
Posted - 2010.11.01 04:27:00 -
[1051]
Edited by: e30089 on 01/11/2010 04:36:04 NO
Oh please NO
|
Angry B0B
Caldari Zigurrat VertigO
|
Posted - 2010.11.01 05:21:00 -
[1052]
no
microtransaction's games are generally free to play, giving transactions a reason to occur. EvE is far to be free to play !!
Now for the Good News !!!! There are nooooo ****ing good news !!!! * * Iggy Pop aka Angry BoB - Hardware
|
Shemhamphorash
|
Posted - 2010.11.01 08:34:00 -
[1053]
NO!
|
ViezeFritsie
|
Posted - 2010.11.01 08:35:00 -
[1054]
No.
|
KayIena
|
Posted - 2010.11.01 09:45:00 -
[1055]
NO
a strong no to all this nonsense
|
Mon Dieux
|
Posted - 2010.11.01 09:58:00 -
[1056]
No frackin way.
|
Lemmily
Gallente Point Web Down
|
Posted - 2010.11.01 11:07:00 -
[1057]
NO
|
Vesania braxX
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2010.11.01 15:53:00 -
[1058]
cosmetics only //Vesania braxX |
Magden
Gallente Retribution. Inc. R.A.G.E
|
Posted - 2010.11.01 18:23:00 -
[1059]
NO.
People play EVE to get away from that garbage. There are plenty of "microtransaction"/WOW/Pretty Pony games for people who like that. Keep EVE uninfected!
|
Kuikiker
|
Posted - 2010.11.01 19:58:00 -
[1060]
NO
|
|
Mersil
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 03:26:00 -
[1061]
NO.
|
TTorai
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 13:36:00 -
[1062]
No.
|
Kalum Ra
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 14:26:00 -
[1063]
Edited by: Kalum Ra on 02/11/2010 14:44:16 NO!!!
-
Bei¯e nie die Hand die dich fnttert! (or the crappy english translation) Never bite the hand that feeds you!
|
Lursa BEtor
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 14:30:00 -
[1064]
NO.
|
Carmen Gibson
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 14:33:00 -
[1065]
NO
|
Malkev
GRUMPS RESEARCH TEAM
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 14:51:00 -
[1066]
No. |
Mr Shrew
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 15:35:00 -
[1067]
NO and never
|
Replon Zarnock
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 17:12:00 -
[1068]
Edited by: Replon Zarnock on 02/11/2010 17:17:06 No
|
Baljos Arnjak
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 17:51:00 -
[1069]
Not just no, but HELL no.
Microtransactions are for Second Life, not for eve.
|
Nithi Haya'Ji
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 18:55:00 -
[1070]
no
|
|
Jangizal
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 21:07:00 -
[1071]
No.
|
Kahaal
88th Tactical
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 23:42:00 -
[1072]
NO!
It will be corporate suicide if you (CCP) make that move! |
GeeShizzle MacCloud
Caldari FUSI0N INDUSTRIES
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 23:55:00 -
[1073]
Edited by: Gee****zle MacCloud on 02/11/2010 23:57:39 No
hell no, unaquvically and unquestionably no, cosmetically will only spur on the people who will want to force the direct link between $'s and obvious in-game advantage.
this is like the whole of ccp becoming the worst and most unethical versions of the Amarr... allowing r@pú just because they get cash underhandedly. a yes is a vote for real genuine corruption of the highest order.
|
Mocam
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 00:12:00 -
[1074]
Cosmetic Only
I'm not really into it so "no" was my first reaction but, with Incarna, they are aiming for it and won't be dissuaded.
Where I have a problem is this PLEX for remaps. ISK for remaps - I have no problems with that but PLEX? That I have an issue with.
If you look at the char count of 360,000 they aren't having financial woes when that exceeded their "dreams" of more subscriptions than Iceland has population. This is flat out "more money" on their part. Such isn't necessarily a bad thing but I'd prefer to see them get the money by getting more players in the game than by trying to bleed more funds out of the current subscription base.
I don't like the "first step" towards a store being game mechanics bypassing. That's bad. Wait until they have the pretty hair cuts or outfits, etc... then use cosmetics but right now EVE has no cosmetics to "sell" and only 1 item that is bought - PLEX. So they should wait until they can get some "pretty items" to sell vs this bogus stunt.
PS: If you really want to stop this, there is a way but it's not easy and I doubt it can be pulled off. You get multiple account owners to let all but 1 account lapse/cancel them while signing that they are doing so "in protest". 10k-30k accounts take a powder for even 1 month would get the message across in a fashion that gets the bean counters attention and posting that it's being done in protest... They don't quit, just drop back the number of accounts they are using.
Yeah, this would get CCP's attention a hell of a lot more than these threads will. Such threads are just "muttering" and "whining". The above would be pocket book style attention grabbing and that's where they are looking -- their pocketbook.
|
ugh zug
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 07:57:00 -
[1075]
yes.
it's going to happen regardless of what you say though... that's just business as usual. ccp can do whatever they want to their product, they own it, you don't. The only statement you will be able to make would be to unsubscribe en masse... When you do please contract your stuff & isk to me for safe keeping.
Zug |
Caldari Clive
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 10:09:00 -
[1076]
NO leave them for Dust
|
Anubis Freud
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 10:41:00 -
[1077]
no
|
Quaddus Xantilus
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 12:50:00 -
[1078]
No
Hell no!
|
Bernulf
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 18:06:00 -
[1079]
NO
|
Mad B0mber
|
Posted - 2010.11.04 06:46:00 -
[1080]
No.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 .. 137 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |