|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dlardrageth
ANZAC ALLIANCE IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.10.24 16:53:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Dlardrageth on 24/10/2010 16:55:59 The conclusion to this seems pretty self-evident to me. From usual experience playing a couple of years and reading "CSM subforums" recently. IMNSHO the majority of petitions with regards to halfway important issues are about as futile as addressing those with the current CSM. Either way hardly any chance of success at best.
OTOH, no reason for a maudlin mood. Once you realize this, you can spend your time in better ways... Unless of course you do enjoy being trolled for your bothers...
|
Dlardrageth
ANZAC ALLIANCE IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.11.01 10:40:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Replicant Gamma
Originally by: mazzilliu
lawl, im sure ccp get a lot of reports of players accusing the other side of having an unfair advantage. investigating something like that would be time consuming and there's no reason to allocate resources on the word of some players with a clear agenda and no proof.
This disqualifies you as a csm member in my opinion , ridiculing and ignoring that issue. Especially that you come from alliance whose member was COUGHT and was PROVEN to block packets that are resonsible for local chat... [...]
I beg to differ. I don't think it disqualifies really the person in question. If you took care to look into the general stance and style of campaign pre-election, you might already have gotten an idea about what was to come. And I'm pretty positive nowhere in her campaign was it ever stated she would refrain from "ridiculing and ignoring". That leaves us back with the proverb that every people get the government (or CSM in this case) they deserve.
At most I'd say it disqualifies the voters of aforementioned person. Only question remaining is what it disqualifies them from... Perhaps from seriously discussing matters CCP won't care about anyway?
|
Dlardrageth
ANZAC ALLIANCE IT Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.11.24 16:18:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Dlardrageth on 24/11/2010 16:18:16
Originally by: Minigin [...] no one knows for sure if people other than monkeysphere have used this to their advantage but i suspect that a few temp bans and the like had something to do with accusations of such nature.
plus
Quote: [...] it is certainly in ccps best interests to look into this, especially so long as pl or other entities are still able to agro things inside pos shields with ecm bursts.
... pretty much answers the question. If it were indeed in "CCP's best interest" to seriously look into this, it won't have resulted in just some lol-temp-bans but permabans rather. Didn't happen. Which makes the conclusion rather obvious that it's yet another time CCP paying merely some sort of lip service (no, I didn't write giving head to PL ), but not really bothering to get seriously involved. So basically some token action to quell possible customer unrest but in the end the well-known "We don't care!" attitude. Go figure...
|
|
|
|