Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
|
CCP Habakuk
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 20:54:00 -
[1]
Hi! If you participated in the masstest on the 28th October, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:
Machine Info
- OS version:
- CPU:
- GPU:
- RAM:
User Experience
- Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out:
- On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)
- Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
|
|
Sidus
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:11:00 -
[2]
machine info:
OS Ver: Windows 7 64-bit CPU: INtel E8500 3.2 GHZ core 2 duo GPU: 1 x Nvidia GTX 260 RAM: 4GB
Average FPS: zoomed out 4-5...zoomed in 0.7 FPS perf 2
|
Shitfest
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:12:00 -
[3]
Edited by: ****fest on 28/10/2010 21:13:30 Windows Vista home premium
CPU: Intel core 2 duo (2.00Ghz)
GPU : Geforce 9600
RAM: 2792 MB
User Experience:
FPS: 7.9 (zoomed out) 0.5 (zoomed in)
Compared to TQ = 10 (this many capitals would crash my computer on TQ
|
Duren
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:15:00 -
[4]
Machine Info
OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
CPU: Intel Core i7 930
GPU: NVIDIA 480 GTX x 2
RAM: 12 GB
User Experience
Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 12 - 18
Zoomed in: 6 - 12
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? 5
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Very Lagged almost unplayable, some mods had messed up timers.
|
star cloud
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:17:00 -
[5]
OS version: windows 7 64 bitt
CPU:amd phenom 9850 quad core
GPU:2x nvidia gtx 295 4 way sli
RAM:8 gig ddr2 dualchannel
User Experience
Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 15 fps
Zoomed in: 7 fps
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)
4 havent been in any fight last month
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
2 weeks back in mass test evey thing was running way better then now. fps was now lower and lot of dysinc on the guns.dint had that at all 2 weeks back
|
QPR0Q
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:17:00 -
[6]
Machine Info
òOS version: Windows 7 64-Bit
òCPU: I7 860 @ 4.31GHZ
òGPU: 2x EVGA GTX260 Core 216
òRAM: 4GB GSkill Ripjaw
User Experience
òAverage FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 150-180 at 1080p max settings brackets off
◦Zoomed in:
90-120 max settings 1080p, brackets off
òOn a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)
7
òDescribe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
ccp banned my main account from sisi last night for sbu's so i had to use my battle charon!
|
Malarthi Behemoth
Gallente Red Frog Freight Red-Frog
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:17:00 -
[7]
OS: Windows 7 Professional CPU: Intel Core i7 2.67 GHz GPU: NVidia GTX 285 Ram: 6GB DDR3
Average FPS: 30 zoomed out/ 25 zoomed in I would rate this test at a 6 I was unable to launch drones several times with an error that I could not perform action "Drop" as I was already in a session change. Additionally I crashed quite a few times until I reduced my number of clients from 3 to 2. After that, I no longer crashed.
|
Memran
Caldari PWNED Factor Elite
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:18:00 -
[8]
Machine Info
- OS version: Windows XP SP3
- CPU: Althon X2 4800+
- GPU: Geforce 8800 GTS
- RAM: 3GB
User Experience FPS is low on my maching, but unlick the fleet fights I've been in on TQ, my modules were still functional after short delays.
FPS during fight with brackets on and zoomed in was 0.1 zoomed out 0.1 Brackets off zoomed in 4, zoomed out 8
Not fighting bracket on, zoomed in 16, zoomed out 30 Brackets off zoomed in 20, zoomed out 38
Hope this was helpful for you :D
|
Vega Vuf
Caldari White Nova Industries Initiative Associates
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:19:00 -
[9]
OS: Windows 7 64bit CPU: Intel core i5 (2.66Ghz) GPU : Radeon 5770 RAM: 4GB
FPS: ~8 (zoomed out) ~1 (zoomed in)
Compared to TQ = 5
|
Clarius Folkar
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:23:00 -
[10]
OS: Vista Ultimate CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad6600 GPU: Nvidia GForce 8800GT RAM: 4GB
Avg FPS During Fight: 1FPS
Compared to TQ: 2 (Way slower)
Jump delays were excruciating. Controls and dmg monitor unresponsive.
|
|
Caldestis
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:23:00 -
[11]
OS: Windows 7 64Bit CPU:3.10GHZ GPU:GeForce GTS 250 1GB RAM:4GB
Average FPS: Zoomed Out: 20FPS Zoomed In: 12FPS About a 4, never alot of problems on TQ but this was first large fleet fight
|
Beesha123
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:24:00 -
[12]
Machine Info * OS version: OpenSuSE 11.3 * CPU: Intel 2.0ghz Duo * GPU:ATI Radeon HD3650 * RAM: 3gb
User Experience
* Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled
I had all effects disabled, brackets hidden and all settings set to low.
Zoomed Out: Average FPS was good throughout the whole event at around 25-30, the initial jump-in on the gate camp was the worst part slowing to around 1 for a good minute after jumping in.
Zoomed In: Prior to the combat, at the gates, the FPS was around 5-10, when engaging a target on the gate camp it slowed to 0.1-0.5 for the duration I was zoomed in.
* On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ?
6, but its been a while since I have been in a fleet battle that large,
* Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
For me, the whole thing went smoothly. I did crash out once but that was due to using Wine and switching windows. The gate jumps were not that bad and the lag was OK apart from the first 60 seconds of the gate camp jump.
|
Teh Grapist
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:24:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Teh Grapist on 28/10/2010 21:26:14 OS: Windows 7 Professional CPU: AMD Phenom II X2 3.1 GHz GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT RAM: 4 GB
Zoomed out: 8fps Zoomed in: 5 fps
about 4 or 5
|
Alexander Angelos
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:25:00 -
[14]
OS: Windows XP: SP3 CPU: AMD PhenomÖ X4. Model, 9550 (MHz 2200) GPU: GeForce 9500 GT RAM: 4 GB
FPS at the start was like 20-30, then near death and probably when i was podded it fell to 0.1, 0.0 (nice one)
|
Liu Ellens
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:28:00 -
[15]
Edited by: Liu Ellens on 28/10/2010 21:29:45 * OS version: Windows XP SP 2, 32bit * CPU: 2x AMD Opteron 2222 (= 4 cores, a 3.0 GHz) * GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTS 250 (1GB) * RAM: 4GB
* FPS (fight, no brackets) ** zoomed out: 4.4 ** zoomed in: 3.5 * FPS performance: ** compared to TQ: 2 ** compared to previous mass tests: 4
* Experience: 1st jump: fast, in first wave, no traffic control 2nd jump: came in last, right at command I got bumped to 3k - traffic control 3rd jump: got through fine, with first wave poitot jump: first wave, traffic control until 2:17
In sum, it was quite nice; I even made it right in time (got issues with launcher), but will not want to come in a Mastodon again :P
|
OptimuzPR
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:28:00 -
[16]
Machine Info
OS version: Windows 7 32-bit
CPU: Core 2 Quad @ 2.8
GPU: GeForce 9800GTX+
RAM: 3G
User Experience
Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 15-30
Zoomed in: 2-10
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) - 7
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Lag was bad, but playable. Module timers were unreliable most times. On one ocacion guns wouldnt stop shooting after target death, but stopped when I canceled them. POS Bash was the laggiest moment, thankfuly it requiered the less player interaction
|
Loreiisa
PWNED Factor
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:28:00 -
[17]
Machine Info OS version: Win 7 64bit CPU: Intel Core Quad Q6600 GPU: ATI Radeon HD4870 RAM: 4Gb DDR2-800
User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled Zoomed out: 8 Zoomed in: 6
How would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? 5
|
Bob Hawk
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:30:00 -
[18]
Machine Info
- OS version: Windows 7 - 64bit
- CPU: I7 - 920 @2.93
- GPU: ATI HD 5970
- RAM: 6 gig
User Experience
- Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 34 - 44
- On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 9
- Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: - no comment today -
|
Gilbert Drillerson
Varorra
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:30:00 -
[19]
machine info:
OS Ver: Windows 7 64-bit Ultimate CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad CPU 2.4Ghz GFX Nvidia 480GTX RAM: 8GB
Average FPS: zoomed out 22...zoomed in 5 FPS perf 2
I did not disable bracket (i forgot how to do it)
I had two clients at the test, one of them (Gil) crashed twice while trying to change overview settings so I would only have non fleet members in overview.
This test does remind me of 1000+ member fleet battles on TQ, to be honest I am not really impressed. http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/0902/gs.gif Dont get mad - Get even |
latofi
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse True Reign
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:31:00 -
[20]
Machine Info
OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 @ 2.66GHz GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT, 1Gb RAM: 8Gb
User Experience
Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled -
Zoomed out: 10-20 Zoomed in: .3-10
Compared to TQ = 5
|
|
Don Dark
Amarr Dark Shadow Industries
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:31:00 -
[21]
Windows 7 32 bit Intel T2300 dual core 1.66 Ghz Nvidea Geforce Go 7300 1 Gb ddr3 ram
Average Fps was 9 during fights and 16 at the end
3 zoomed in 22 zoomed out
On a scale from 1-10 idd say 7 ( even with my Pc i dident crash during the test)
|
Percivs
Rule of Five Lucky Starbase Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:31:00 -
[22]
OS Version: * Windows 7, 32 bit * Intel Core2 Quad CPU 2.66 GHz * Dual-SLI NVidia GeForce 8800 GTX, 768 MB VRAM, split to run two monitors. * 4 GB RAM (obviously I can't use it all with a 32bit OS)
User Experience: * Zoomed In: Computer locked up hard, had to power off to recover * Zoomed Out: 2-6 fps * Compared to TQ: 2 worse |
Rouksobada Micyba
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:32:00 -
[23]
OS Version: * Windows 7, 32 bit * Intel Core2 Quad CPU 2.66 GHz * Dual-SLI NVidia GeForce 8800 GTX, 768 MB VRAM, split to run two monitors. * 4 GB RAM (obviously I can't use it all with a 32bit OS)
User Experience: * Zoomed In: Computer locked up hard, had to power off to recover * Zoomed Out: 2-6 fps * Compared to TQ: 2 worse |
Brynseldimer
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:32:00 -
[24]
Machine Info
OS version: Windows 7 64-bit
CPU: Intel Core i7 2.67 GHz Quad-Core
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
RAM: 8 GB DDR3 SDRAM
User Experience
Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 20-30
Zoomed in: 8-12
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 3
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: I've never been in a big fleet battle before, so my experience with this sort of stress on the servers is pretty much nonexistent.
|
Gaia Ma'chello
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:34:00 -
[25]
OS: OSX 10.6.4 CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo, 2.66 Ghz GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 9400M Mem: 4GB Graphics all set to low All effects, ALL effects turned off Audio: on Brackets: off FPS: zoomed out: 25 Zoomed in: 12
For this test I turned off all the effects to see what sort of FPS I could get. I usually get 2 to 4, and it made a big difference. I turned missle and turret effects back on for the POS bash, and the fps dropped to 3.
In the fight maybe one cycle in 4 of my guns resulted in a shot being fired.
Drones were slow, but controllable.
General experience: 5
Bug: I kept getting "you were logged out of audio chat" and as we were using it, I had to hit esc, toggle eve voice off and on, return to the game, and restart fleet voice. Over and over, maybe a dozen times.
|
SilenceHeart
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:35:00 -
[26]
Machine Info
* OS version: Windows Vista Home Premium (Service pack 2)
* CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @3.00GHz 3.00 GHz
* GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
* RAM: 2.00 GB
User Experience
* Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 6.0 FPS
o Zoomed in: 5.0 FPS
* On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 6 CLOSE TO SAME
* Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: I only Froze a handful of times. mainly when there was alot of ships firing or pos exploding ect.
|
Elias Genvalo
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:36:00 -
[27]
- OS version: W7 64
- CPU: 955 Phenom 2
- GPU: Crossfire 5750 1GB
- RAM: 4GB
- Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled:
- Zoomed out: 7 at gate; 12-18 at pos
- Zoomed in: 7 at gate; 12 at pos
- On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? 7.5
- Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: 5 to 8 second module lag; more for grouped modules
|
Zero Yin
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:36:00 -
[28]
Machine Info
* OS version: Windows XP
* CPU: Intel Dual Core 1,6Ghz
* GPU: ASUS Extreme AX550
* RAM: 1 GB
User Experience
* Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 7-10
o Zoomed in: ~3
* On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
* Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: The second mass test without any crashes. Jumps and grid loading, however were slower than Oct.21. The fight had more FPS than the tower bashing; during tower shooting part the framatare droped to 2.3 per second, which was the lowest rate noticed during this test. I'm only guessing, but much of the framerate is being killed by the light effects cynos and jumps produce. If option was introduced to disable those effects, the framerate could be graetly increased in mass campaigns such as this one.
|
Krezack
Riders of the Apocolypse
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:36:00 -
[29]
Windows XP SP3 AMD Athlon Phenom II x2 550 ATI 5670 series 1 4 gig DDR3
Maxed Everything, Shaders high, 32 bit, 1920 resolution zoomed in: 3-6 fps zoomed out: 6-12 fps
Too many objects being rendered imo. As a graphic developer myself i would limit the amount of objects can be seen at one time depending on range. (Just a suggestion)
Surprised personally that i could play so well with what was on the screen.
|
Pesets
The Hunt Club
|
Posted - 2010.10.28 21:36:00 -
[30]
Edited by: Pesets on 28/10/2010 21:38:39 Machine Info
- OS version:
Vista HP SP2 x64
- CPU:
Core 2 Duo 2x2.26GHz
- GPU:
GeForce 9600M GT
- RAM:
4Gb
User Experience
- Average FPS during the fight at the end, with brackets disabled:
- On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)
3i (imaginary because i don't often participate in this kind of fights on TQ)
- Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Got moved to FD- at step 5 i think (i'm 99% sure moveme channel was not open)
FPS and module lag felt considerably worse than during the last test (brackets were off)
Did not crash though
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |