Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Rokhy Bhalboah
|
Posted - 2010.11.01 03:27:00 -
[1]
People just don't like rules, I guess.
2010.11.01 02:33:00
Victim: Rokhy Bhalboah Corp: Excess Dynamics Alliance: Doomsday Testing Faction: Unknown Destroyed: Capsule System: FD-MLJ Security: 0.0 Damage Taken: 441
Involved parties:
Name: Bruce Destro (laid the final blow) Security: 5.0 Corp: Black Serpent Technologies Alliance: R.A.G.E Faction: NONE Ship: Loki Weapon: 220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II Damage Done: 441
http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/1272/20101101025806cropped.jpg
Thanks Bruce, really appreciate it.
|
Katanah Tsaiukun
RedSun Corporation
|
Posted - 2010.11.01 04:28:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Katanah Tsaiukun on 01/11/2010 04:31:51 What the hell.. I'm coming to FD.
Ofcourse it's unfortunate that I can't actually do anything.
|
|
CCP Oneiromancer
|
Posted - 2010.11.02 13:48:00 -
[3]
Banned.
|
|
Bruce Destro
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 15:41:00 -
[4]
CCP Oneiromancer, would you please check the combat log on my character? as it does seem like a legitimate killmail, i would like you to double check, as i do not recall ever firing on a pod and believe it may be a bug. i have intentionally been on my best behavior as i have some very importing items to test, and i simply do not believe i ever engaged a pod. please reconsider the ban, and if it is in fact a legitimate KM, i would like to apologize.
|
Bruce Destro
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 16:05:00 -
[5]
OH. i read the date wrong. my apologies Rohky, it seems it was halloween night and I let my friend use my character on test server when at my house. i must not have seen him engage your pod. and i am terribly sorry. wont be doing that again. again, sorry rohky
|
Rokhy Bhalboah
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 16:18:00 -
[6]
Edited by: Rokhy Bhalboah on 03/11/2010 16:23:53 That's really cute, Bruce.
http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/7476/captureuw.jpg
Originally by: Bruce Destro i do not recall ever firing on a pod and believe it may be a bug. i have intentionally been on my best behavior as i have some very importing items to test, and i simply do not believe i ever engaged a pod.
Well your ship certainly didn't lock onto my pod and activated its guns on it by itself. There are plenty of bugs to go around, but the ships don't fly themselves yet.
EDIT:
Originally by: Bruce Destro OH. i read the date wrong. my apologies Rohky, it seems it was halloween night and I let my friend use my character on test server when at my house. i must not have seen him engage your pod. and i am terribly sorry. wont be doing that again. again, sorry rohky
Who needs rules and laws when apologies solve everything, right? It's your account, you are responsible for actions carried out with it.
|
Capt WilsonWilson
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 16:29:00 -
[7]
I think a total ban of both TQ and SiSi are in order here. Since the offender openly admited to acount sharing. That is a direct violation of the EULA if I'm not mistaken.
|
Bruce Destro
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 18:12:00 -
[8]
so account sharing includes allowing my friend of 10 years to sit at my computer and play on the test server for 20 mins? even tho it was already logged on? im not allowed to let my friend sit down at my computer and play with my character on a test server, then thats ****ing stupid. and trust me, ive been podded on the test server a few times. but an apology is an apology.
|
Tonto Auri
Vhero' Multipurpose Corp
|
Posted - 2010.11.03 20:01:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Bruce Destro so account sharing includes allowing my friend of 10 years to sit at my computer and play on the test server for 20 mins?
Yes. -- Thanks CCP for cu |
BlueBubbleGum
|
Posted - 2010.11.17 04:09:00 -
[10]
surely them ten mins are good publicity and might bring in a new player?
dont support account shareing on TQ but sisi, honestly who cares?
|
|
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
|
Posted - 2010.11.17 18:25:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Tonto Auri
Originally by: Bruce Destro so account sharing includes allowing my friend of 10 years to sit at my computer and play on the test server for 20 mins?
Yes.
actually no, letting someone play on your account is not account sharing.
Giving someone your account information and log in information is account sharing.
Letting your friend try mining on your account is not account sharing, as you have not shared any account information.
Or are you saying that CCP really don't want you to let anyone else touch your keyboard, and are you saying that is somehow dangerous?
account sharing leads to fraud and hacking, and account stealing.
letting your friend move your ship is not what CCP is worried about.
|
Catari Taga
Centre Of Attention Middle of Nowhere
|
Posted - 2010.11.17 18:45:00 -
[12]
Originally by: MotherMoon actually no, letting someone play on your account is not account sharing.
Of course it is account sharing, and of course it is bannable.
So either you are illiterate, really dumb or you are deliberately spreading misinformation, trying to get other people into trouble. Which one is it? --
|
Jack bubu
Trans-Solar Works Rooks and Kings
|
Posted - 2010.11.17 19:32:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Catari Taga
Originally by: MotherMoon actually no, letting someone play on your account is not account sharing.
Of course it is account sharing, and of course it is bannable.
So either you are illiterate, really dumb or you are deliberately spreading misinformation, trying to get other people into trouble. Which one is it?
Its not account sharing if you dont give your login information away.
|
Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
|
Posted - 2010.11.17 19:48:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Catari Taga
Originally by: MotherMoon actually no, letting someone play on your account is not account sharing.
Of course it is account sharing, and of course it is bannable.
So either you are illiterate, really dumb or you are deliberately spreading misinformation, trying to get other people into trouble. Which one is it?
It's you and your misapplication of logic or lack of common-sense.
Originally by: Allestin Villimar Also, if your bookmarks are too far out, they can and will ban you for it.
Originally by: Torothanax Low population in w systems makes afk cloaking unattractive. |
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
|
Posted - 2010.11.17 20:01:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Catari Taga
Originally by: MotherMoon actually no, letting someone play on your account is not account sharing.
Of course it is account sharing, and of course it is bannable.
So either you are illiterate, really dumb or you are deliberately spreading misinformation, trying to get other people into trouble. Which one is it?
You like looking dumb on the Internets?
|
Catari Taga
Centre Of Attention Middle of Nowhere
|
Posted - 2010.11.17 20:42:00 -
[16]
You guys be trolling or too stupid to read the EULA. Either way I laugh at you. :) --
|
Komen
Gallente Flying Target LLC
|
Posted - 2010.11.18 00:42:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Catari Taga
Originally by: MotherMoon actually no, letting someone play on your account is not account sharing.
Of course it is account sharing, and of course it is bannable.
*snip*
Originally by: EULA You may not share your Account with anyone, or allow anyone other than you personally (or your minor child, if you have registered an Account on behalf of your minor child) to access or use your Account. Joint or shared ownership or use of an Account by more than one user is prohibited.
Relevant part bolded.
That looks like it could be interpreted as 'no allowing someone else to sit at an already logged in character and play'. Probably aimed at macro farms, wherein 1 person monitors several accounts. I suppose it could be argued either way. I really doubt CCP would go after anyone for what the offending party did, right up until the 'friend' broke the rules. That could...swing the balance against.
|
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
|
Posted - 2010.11.18 01:31:00 -
[18]
Edited by: MotherMoon on 18/11/2010 01:31:55
Originally by: Catari Taga You guys be trolling or too stupid to read the EULA. Either way I laugh at you. :)
better ban this person then
edit:can't find link : (
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |