Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
razor haze
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 02:27:00 -
[1]
I want a t3 destroyer and t3 battle ship
|
Chesty McJubblies
Gallente Center for Advanced Studies
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 02:29:00 -
[2]
Shuttle Suggestion: Remove the "new topic" button from everywhere apart from the list of topics section within a subforum.
That'd save those with chronic hand/eye coordination some face. |
Terrax Norik
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 02:30:00 -
[3]
T3 frigate. They could be interesting.
|
Alara IonStorm
Agent-Orange Nabaal Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 02:32:00 -
[4]
Tech 3 Industrial...
I would never fly them but the threads are interesting.
-- I am now on a Crusade to Fix the Omen!
For Great Justice!
|
Culmen
Caldari Blood Phage Syndicate Dead Terrorists
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 02:34:00 -
[5]
T3 Battlecruiser.
Right, anyone want to recommend T3 Barges, Caps, Supercaps and Freighters? We could have the t3 royal flush. and further more why do i even need a sig? |
Selinate
Amarr Wardens of the Void
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 02:37:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Culmen T3 Battlecruiser.
Right, anyone want to recommend T3 Barges, Caps, Supercaps and Freighters? We could have the t3 royal flush.
i hate your ****ing sig, I read it every time.
Also, I would like to see every ship in-game turned into a ship where you could mess around with different subsystems. But since that would never happen, I would most like to see t3 battleships.
|
Akita T
Caldari Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 02:52:00 -
[7]
T3 Battlecruisers, for sure.
_
Beginner's ISK making guide | Manufacturer's helper | All about reacting _
|
IoWalker
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 03:06:00 -
[8]
3 industrials and destroyers would rizzock!
|
Helmh0ltz
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 03:35:00 -
[9]
Tech III battlecruiser far and away. I want my "highly adaptable" 1500dps/300K EHP drake. ====== Your signature is freakishly huge for this forum. Please resize according to the forum rules, thanks. Shadow. |
Professor Tarantula
Hedion University
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 03:42:00 -
[10]
T3 Frigates were already supposed to be here by now. Was mentioned a couple fanfests ago, or something. I'm sure if anyone is intrepid enough they can track down the statement.
If they do Battlecruiser people will expect every little niche ship to have a T3 variant. Best to do the 3 standard sizes, Frigate, Cruiser, and Battleship, for starters anyway.
My Warmest Regards. Prof. Tarantula, Esq. |
|
Axemaster
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 03:58:00 -
[11]
Tbh, I'm not sure if there would be any good reason to add more T3 ships. Doing so would only serve to undermine T1 ships even further.
If more T3 ships are to be added, they should be made to play entirely new roles related to wormhole space, and not simply more uber combat ships. |
Surfin's PlunderBunny
Minmatar The Python Cartel. The Jerk Cartel
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 03:59:00 -
[12]
T3 Archon ftw |
RiskyFrisky
Under the Table Inc. The 0rphanage
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 04:16:00 -
[13]
T3 Frigates.
Instant Access to them I would have :D -
|
Istvaan Shogaatsu
Caldari Guiding Hand Social Club
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 04:19:00 -
[14]
A tech 3 ship available only to pilots above 100 million SP like me. One that's naturally ultra-overpowered.
|
Terrax Norik
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 04:23:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Istvaan Shogaatsu A tech 3 ship available only to pilots above 100 million SP like me. One that's naturally ultra-overpowered.
I always figured that would be a Jove ship.
|
Running missions
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 04:27:00 -
[16]
t3 titan
Originally by: CCP Adida
Originally by: WMunny Is it cheating for a new player to buy ISK using PLEX?
It's against the EULA and can be actioned by GMs.[/ |
Jim Luc
Caldari Rule of Five True Associates
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 04:34:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Axemaster Tbh, I'm not sure if there would be any good reason to add more T3 ships. Doing so would only serve to undermine T1 ships even further.
If more T3 ships are to be added, they should be made to play entirely new roles related to wormhole space, and not simply more uber combat ships.
T1 ships are for beginners or used in heavy warfare because they are cheap. The risk and high cost of T3, along with the advanced skills required. I say the advanced skills because while the current cruisers have a lower skill requirement, a T3 battleship or capital would probably (and hopefully) take a while longer to train for than their T2 counterparts.
Branching off from this idea, I would like to see all ships made modular, and have T1, T2, and T3 hulls and pieces. T3 hulls could take T1 parts, but a T1 hull could not upgrade with a T2 or T3 part.
One thing I hope they move towards is making each player's ship somehow unique. Instead of showing a generic icon in the targeting, they show the actual ship, perhaps allowing the player to enlarge the currently targeted ship to a bigger window. It would help us connect with our friends & enemies a bit more I think.
|
Noun Verber
Gallente
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 04:51:00 -
[18]
5 Sub T3 Cruiser
|
BeanBagKing
Terra Incognita Black Star Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 05:17:00 -
[19]
T3 frigate, but I'd also be interested in seeing a T3 battleship.
Also, some T3 mods to start appearing.
|
Vaal Erit
Science and Trade Institute
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 05:18:00 -
[20]
I always cringe when I hear people wanting t3 frigates. Frigates are just too fragile to be worth the effort of making them a t3 class. Think EAS ships and how you never see them. Re-balance the faction frigates and boost some of the AFs will do more for frigate combat than a cov ops cloaking kestrel with a few missiles and bubble immunity.
I would vote for T3 BC or T3 BS first. Actually I might rather go for a re-work of the marauders and new T2 tier 2 BCs and T2 tier 3 BSs. T3 is really not used much because of the price and until that is taken care of I'd rather have new ships I'd use rather than hangar trophies that only get seen in huge RR blobs. - It's not "Play through a pre-set story, become stronger, do endgame". Gameplay is open ended, and you make your own story. Unless you're too afraid of 'pvp grief' to do anything relevant |
|
Professor Tarantula
Hedion University
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 05:21:00 -
[21]
Edited by: Professor Tarantula on 09/11/2010 05:24:10
Originally by: Vaal Erit Actually I might rather go for a re-work of the marauders
Could certainly use it. Worth 6x more than your average T1 BS, and only marginally better.
They kind of trick you with the 100% damage bonus, until you realize they have half the guns of a normal BS.
My Warmest Regards. Prof. Tarantula, Esq. |
Hakaru Ishiwara
Minmatar Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 05:36:00 -
[22]
Tech 3 Carriers. With the Carrier becoming so common and mundane in null-sec space these days, the ability to spice up and specialize this class of ships would make for some welcome variety to what has become an ocean of default fittings and uses.
Having a potential means to counter a hot drop of SCs and, maybe, just maybe, withstand a doomsday hit would be some additional incentives.
|
Vicker Lahn'se
Minmatar STRAG3S
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 05:49:00 -
[23]
I wouldn't mind seeing tech3 frigates if they added some kind of special frigate only wormhole-ish place.
|
Hentes Zsemle
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 07:13:00 -
[24]
Edited by: Hentes Zsemle on 09/11/2010 07:16:19 Edited by: Hentes Zsemle on 09/11/2010 07:15:56 More subsystems for current T3, or industrial. There is no need for an overpowered class (if its not overpowered ppl wouldn't buy it anyways). If you want just more ships for combat, they can be T1 or T2. I was emoraging at first aswell when CCP didn't implement T3 frigates afterall, but if you think about that they might have coused multiple times the whine the dramiel does, its alright.
|
Sader Rykane
Amarr Midnight Sentinels Midnight Space Syndicate
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 07:27:00 -
[25]
Edited by: Sader Rykane on 09/11/2010 07:28:09 Battleships.
*EDIT*
You know on an interesting note, the "subsystem" skills are actually quite ambigous and could actually be applied to T3 Battleships as well since they mention nothing about cruisers.
|
Aiwha
Caldari 101st Space Marine Force Nulli Secunda
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 07:30:00 -
[26]
POD
I want a corpse with three little lines in the corner...
----
Gullible
|
Night Epoch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 07:38:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Sader Rykane Edited by: Sader Rykane on 09/11/2010 07:28:09 Battleships.
*EDIT*
You know on an interesting note, the "subsystem" skills are actually quite ambigous and could actually be applied to T3 Battleships as well since they mention nothing about cruisers.
I think that's the point. CCP clearly left the skills general to make room for future T3 expansions.
I'd imagine T3 frigates are next = but I'd love to see a T3 BC. Or perhaps a T2 tier 2 BC (tech 2 drake!)
|
Ran Khanon
Amarr Swords Horses and Heavy Metal
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 07:48:00 -
[28]
T3 BS's. T3 frigs or BC's would make too much existing ships obsolete while expendable T1 BS's will still have many roles in pvp. (Even though all lvl 4 highsec mission runners would end up flying a T3 BS I suppose).
Recruiting! |
ArmyOfMe
Pastry Productions Inc. Focused Intentions
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 07:50:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Istvaan Shogaatsu A tech 3 ship available only to pilots above 100 million SP like me. One that's naturally ultra-overpowered.
I support this idea
|
Plastician
Invictus Australis BricK sQuAD.
|
Posted - 2010.11.09 07:53:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Night Epoch I'd imagine T3 frigates are next = but I'd love to see a T3 BC. Or perhaps a T2 tier 2 BC (tech 2 drake!)
T2 Hurricane please
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |