Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Liang Nuren
|
Posted - 2011.02.02 05:18:00 -
[31]
Edited by: Liang Nuren on 02/02/2011 05:19:55 Here are some thoughts on the matter:
Sansha Ships These ships are almost decent - but there's a reason everyone just buys a Zealot. You can really feel the lost shields, and the ships are obviously meant to be all out gank machines, even more so than the Serpentis ships which have the awesome web bonus, but then when you look at the ships you see those two utility highs. They might be reasonable if your already extreme cap dependence didn't all but preclude neut usage or nos was actually worth fitting.
I'd say fixing the Sansha ships should focus on the lost shield HP and those two utility highs - perhaps trading them for mids/lows/turrets.
Blood Raider Ships These ships are also pretty close to reasonable. It seems to me that the Cruor/Ashimmu are Pilgrims that traded away the covops cloak, tracking disruption, capless damage, and part of their neut bonus for a web bonus and cap hungry turret DPS. I think this is a slightly unreasonable trade, given that the Pilgrim draws so strongly on the covops cloak to pick targets and the TDs to mitigate damage.
I'd say the fixing the Blood Raider ships should focus on survivability to compensate for the "loss" of the TD+Cloak+Cap Reliance. I think I'd personally experiment with sprucing up the neut bonus - by increasing its range, amount, or making it also apply to neutralizer cap requirements (zomg, almost free neuts?!).
Guristas Ships Let me start off by saying that I'm not overly fond of the concept behind the Guristas ships. The missile range bonus just completely killed the mood set up by a shield/missile/drone boat. I am rather strongly in favor of trading the missile range bonus for a missile ROF bonus. It'd turn them into brawlers, true, but that's ok. I also admit that I lust after a worm with a 10% drone damage/hp bonus and inbuilt drone bay bonus.
Angel Ships I think everyone pretty much agrees that the Angel ships could use a drone bay and agility nerf. A general reduction of AC awesomeness (by a little) wouldn't be a bad move, but I admit to being fearful of an unnecessary sledgehammer approach.
Serpentis Ships I'm gonna say to leave them alone pending a thorough looking over of Hybrids.
-Liang
Ed: Formatting -- Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire On Twitter
|
The Djego
Hellequin Inc.
|
Posted - 2011.02.02 08:32:00 -
[32]
Supported.
The shield nerf was uncalled for. ---- Nerf Tank - Boost Gank!
Originally by: Amantus Real men don't need to get into blaster range.
|
Sepheir Sepheron
Between Ordeals
|
Posted - 2011.02.02 15:46:00 -
[33]
Caldari Cruiser - 25% bonus to damage I want this thing nicknamed the spaztasm.
|
Cockroach
Amarr Kinetic Vector
|
Posted - 2011.03.12 21:17:00 -
[34]
Please give the Phantasm a bit of quality, its not much better than a T1 cruiser :(
'Have we sent the 'dont shoot us we're pathetic' transmission yet?' |
Tarikan
|
Posted - 2011.03.13 03:16:00 -
[35]
+1 angel ships are taking over the scene and you see nothing else, nerf the angels a bit too
|
Aichi Awara
|
Posted - 2011.05.03 07:22:00 -
[36]
Edited by: Aichi Awara on 03/05/2011 07:27:44
Amarr Cruiser Skill Bonus: 7.5% bonus to Medium Energy Turret tracking per level Caldari Cruiser Skill Bonus: 5% bonus to Medium Energy Turret damage per level ----- You will get better hits with phantasm. That tracking bonus provides something.
I was testing absolution and phantasm yesterday (PVE), and phantasm scored better hits most of the time. Only difference being the tracking bonus.
Funny side of the story was, that phantasm scored better hits (not all tho) with scorch than absolution with imperial navy multifrequency within optimal.
Additional bonus for phantasm was ship speed & agility combined with smaller signature which seemed to compensate the 5% ROF rate of absolution...
(Ship related skills all V)
One more thing.
Phantasm does perform over normal t1 cruiser hull. It DID tank 2x1.1m BS and 3 BC well enough...resulting 2 dead BS&BC's. -----
About pvp I won't be commenting since I haven't tested the ship.
--
Edit. The comparison happened by accident. I didn't have any other ships available and thus this post
|
King Rothgar
Path of the Fallen
|
Posted - 2011.05.04 17:21:00 -
[37]
Bumping this, it really does need to be addressed. Thus far you shall read, but no further; for this is my sig. |
Triksterism
Spacecataz.
|
Posted - 2011.05.04 22:29:00 -
[38]
Caplesstasm ----------LOL SIGNATURE----------
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |