Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Bobo Cindekela
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
26
|
Posted - 2012.10.27 10:49:00 -
[91] - Quote
offgrid boosting is awesome, get your dual-boxing gloves on and HTFU
besides, everytime someone makes a remove offgrid boosting thread the accountants point out that people WILL cancel subs that they have been paying for and training for months/years just to have their own boosters, and cancelled subs makes the ceo cry You are about to engage in an arguement with a forum alt,-á this is your final warning. |
Solj RichPopolous
Mentally Assured Destruction
19
|
Posted - 2012.10.27 13:25:00 -
[92] - Quote
I use a booster lots. Gives us an edge when we fight 30 vs 5 fleets. I dont think this is relevant to my associates and I though since we are in high sec (not on a station). I have a clay alt for high and a loki for low sec runs. I guess low being on grid could become an issue but i suppose id put him at some obnoxious range or just rig some ludacris 100mn fit for it to make it untouchable for the most part.
Now that i think about it that would make for a wonderful distraction to the population of eve who dont understand sig radius and would try to pursue it while being killed. |
Lin-Young Borovskova
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
869
|
Posted - 2012.10.27 16:53:00 -
[93] - Quote
Gevlin wrote:I am all for keeping the option of off grid boost. Removing this option of play styles therefore dumbing Down the game
Dumbing down the game is when "alts" are all you need to play whatever game, it's when you need hacks to play for you or broken mechanics to exploit because without those you couldn't do anything by yourself.
Combat OGB is terrible and should simply be removed from the game. brb |
half of eve
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
5
|
Posted - 2012.10.27 21:24:00 -
[94] - Quote
The problem with removing OGBs is that t3 link users will become useless. The problem with CSs as they are now is that they're really not that useful beyond their ability to boost.
Leave OGBs as they are, buff field CSs to be on the same level as the eos pre-nerf (Or give them the ability to field links and put out ~700 DPS at least) the idea being that because of how boring pvp is if your only job is to be the booster, you'd ideally want to be able to actually contribute to the fight in a CS. Off-grid links wouldn't be as big a problem if on-grid boosting wasn't so pointless and boring. |
Tikktokk Tokkzikk
Cult of Escobar
103
|
Posted - 2012.10.28 00:44:00 -
[95] - Quote
What bothers me the most with off-grid boosting is the lack of indicators. If I see a T3 on D-scan, I assume everyone in that system is receiving boosting and I usually just leave.
I don't really care all that much if off-grid boosting is removed, but I hope CCP add some visual effect to indictate which ships are receiving boosting if they don't. |
Marlona Sky
D00M. Northern Coalition.
1606
|
Posted - 2012.10.28 03:33:00 -
[96] - Quote
Another idea is that perhaps the position in fleet affects the amount of the boost. Best boost coming from the squad commander, then wing commander and the least effective boost coming from fleet commander. So squad command give 100% of the current boost, wing say 75% and fleet 50%.
Just tossing that out there.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1630
|
Posted - 2012.10.28 05:35:00 -
[97] - Quote
Bobo Cindekela wrote:offgrid boosting is awesome, get your dual-boxing gloves on and HTFU
besides, everytime someone makes a remove offgrid boosting thread the accountants point out that people WILL cancel subs that they have been paying for and training for months/years just to have their own boosters, and cancelled subs makes the ceo cry Aww, we even collect ceo and accountant tears? Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |