Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Rocky Deadshot
|
Posted - 2010.12.22 03:27:00 -
[1]
caldari are the missle race and yet the dont have a faction target painter...
wtf fix this
|
Jay Marshall
Caldari Walks Forever Trade Inc EVE Trade Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.12.22 03:32:00 -
[2]
Agreed.
We need a Caldari Navy Target Painter for the missile loving Caldari ------------------------ CEO Walks Forever Trade Inc
|
Kara Sharalien
Gallente Federal Navy Academy
|
Posted - 2010.12.22 03:51:00 -
[3]
Minmatar are the fast race, yet don't have faction torpedoes...
wtf fix this.
Originally by: Thuul'Khalat WHY YOU VIOLENCE MY BOAT?!
|
Sonya Rayner
Unicorn Enterprise Rooks and Kings
|
Posted - 2010.12.22 04:02:00 -
[4]
Target painting is minmatar faction EW as far as i believe, so it is more logical that the Republic Fleets gets them, not the caldari.
|
Ranka Mei
Caldari
|
Posted - 2010.12.22 06:28:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Ranka Mei on 22/12/2010 06:29:38
Originally by: Sonya Rayner Target painting is minmatar faction EW as far as i believe, so it is more logical that the Republic Fleets gets them, not the caldari.
And, as a result, there's a Rebuplic Fleet TP. :)
As for there being no Caldari Navy one, who cares? The existing ones are more than adequate. --
|
Rocky Deadshot
|
Posted - 2010.12.22 06:34:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Sonya Rayner Target painting is minmatar faction EW as far as i believe, so it is more logical that the Republic Fleets gets them, not the caldari.
by this logic (which is logical i'll admit)... then why isnt there a caldari navy ECM i mean i get that CCP loves minnies and all but i refuse to taint my caldari ship with a minmitar target painter.
|
Smurfity
Caldari No Fish EVE Trade Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.12.22 06:47:00 -
[7]
Swap those RF tps with the Caldari webs, would make much more sense that way round.
|
Misanthra
|
Posted - 2010.12.22 07:25:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Rocky Deadshot
Originally by: Sonya Rayner Target painting is minmatar faction EW as far as i believe, so it is more logical that the Republic Fleets gets them, not the caldari.
by this logic (which is logical i'll admit)... then why isnt there a caldari navy ECM i mean i get that CCP loves minnies and all but i refuse to taint my caldari ship with a minmitar target painter.
ecm, especially for caldari ecm specialist boats doesn't need the boost (assuming more performance). Caldari had op ecm...because of falcon (granted it was op in that case). ECM on non caldari ships not too shabby performance wise either.
Or if its like half of the CN stuff (same as t2, just easier fitting), above average fitting skills (no need to be 5 everything fit skills), no real need to make them fit easier. Even non t2 ECM ships like scorp fit full mids ecm easy enough. Well that and who would run them...getting jammed bad, see a scorpion not snip range with cruise missiles....its dying quick. Full faction ecm spec in the mids scorpion....expensive loss.
For pve try rigor instead. Stuff works nice, also nice to get a mid slot back. PVP....fly a huginn with high skills or bring a friend who can.
|
1600 RT
|
Posted - 2010.12.24 12:47:00 -
[9]
and why not CN magnetic field stabilizers
|
De'Veldrin
Minmatar Green-Core The Obsidian Legion
|
Posted - 2010.12.24 13:19:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Rocky Deadshot
but i refuse to taint my caldari ship with a minmitar target painter.
Then suffer with your inadequate missile impacts. --Vel
I'm more of a care-badger. |
|
Sphit Ker
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.12.24 18:29:00 -
[11]
You cant have that because there is no variations of "pwn" that work with C and N in there.
derp
The following statement is not my signature. The preceding statement is my signature. |
DustiX
|
Posted - 2010.12.24 22:06:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Sphit Ker You cant have that because there is no variations of "pwn" that work with C and N in there.
derp
does it work with R and F ?
|
Sphit Ker
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2010.12.25 23:44:00 -
[13]
Originally by: DustiX
Originally by: Sphit Ker You cant have that because there is no variations of "pwn" that work with C and N in there.
derp
does it work with R and F ?
nope. ****.
The following statement is not my signature. The preceding statement is my signature. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |