Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Anubis Xian
Word Bearers of Chaos
|
Posted - 2011.01.11 04:51:00 -
[1]
Afterburners on frigs are already a good decision a lot of times, but on anything else... not so much.
Massive Propulsion Dynamics (rank 7) Afterburner V, Navigation V
Afterburner mass penalty reduction:
10MN = 15% per level (Medium hull only) 100MN = 25% per level (Large hull only)
Originally by: CCP Oveur The client handles no logic, it is simply a dumb terminal.
CINA
|
DuKackBoon
|
Posted - 2011.01.11 07:08:00 -
[2]
No.
Train Thermodynamics.
|
Anubis Xian
Word Bearers of Chaos
|
Posted - 2011.01.11 09:04:00 -
[3]
Cause 50% more AB speed is exclusive to BSes... right?
Originally by: CCP Oveur The client handles no logic, it is simply a dumb terminal.
CINA
|
Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
|
Posted - 2011.01.11 10:11:00 -
[4]
Wouldn't Cruisers/BCs running around at 1k/s+ with no sig bloom be rather game breaking?
It is bad enough that the Cynabal can do it.
For the BS the same applies, you are suggesting that all but the armour plated trimark behemoths should be able to reach Machariel speeds .. will help against Drake swarms certainly but it breaks everything else.
|
De'Veldrin
Minmatar Green-Core The Obsidian Legion
|
Posted - 2011.01.11 14:14:00 -
[5]
I am not even sure why you'd need this except to make Machariels FOTM. --Vel
I'm more of a care-badger. |
Korg Leaf
Time Bandits.
|
Posted - 2011.01.11 14:20:00 -
[6]
Originally by: De'Veldrin I am not even sure why you'd need this except to make Machariels FOTM.
Its because anubis likes to suggest things to fix battleships without thinking about a. what happens afterwards or b. really considering the main problem that cause battleships to not be used (supercarriers, caps in general, the blob)
|
Glyken Touchon
Independent Alchemists
|
Posted - 2011.01.11 14:34:00 -
[7]
100mn Vagabond?
|
Warren Wagner
|
Posted - 2011.01.11 21:46:00 -
[8]
<sarcasm> Yes, we need to buff minmatar more </sarcasm>
|
Anubis Xian
Word Bearers of Chaos
|
Posted - 2011.01.12 07:11:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Hirana Yoshida Wouldn't Cruisers/BCs running around at 1k/s+ with no sig bloom be rather game breaking?
BCs would still be much slower than cruisers.
Quote: It is bad enough that the Cynabal can do it.
Cynabal is a cruiser, nothing wrong with fast cruisers.
Quote: For the BS the same applies, you are suggesting that all but the armour plated trimark behemoths should be able to reach Machariel speeds .. will help against Drake swarms certainly but it breaks everything else.
Not at all, it just gives BSes a viable alternative to MWDs. Though the vast majority will still prefer MWDs no doubt.
Originally by: Korg Leaf
Originally by: De'Veldrin I am not even sure why you'd need this except to make Machariels FOTM.
Its because anubis likes to suggest things to fix battleships without thinking about a. what happens afterwards or b. really considering the main problem that cause battleships to not be used (supercarriers, caps in general, the blob)
I can't fly nor have any intention to fly a Machariel. Frankly, I don't fly any BSes at all lately... and that wouldn't likely change with this. But you go ahead and write off the idea because of your personal issues with me.
Originally by: Glyken Touchon 100mn Vagabond?
You didn't read the thread.
Originally by: Warren Wagner <sarcasm> Yes, we need to buff minmatar more </sarcasm>
So only Minmatar use ABs. Gotcha.
Originally by: CCP Oveur The client handles no logic, it is simply a dumb terminal.
CINA
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |