Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Anubis Xian
Word Bearers of Chaos
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 16:30:00 -
[1]
Pretty simple, Yulai in modern EvE would be perfectly capable of handling the number of players that would use it, so I wanted to see how many people would support returning the old highway system and Yulai back to their old selves.
Originally by: CCP Oveur The client handles no logic, it is simply a dumb terminal.
CINA
|
Mishkaii
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 16:37:00 -
[2]
What was the highway sistem?
|
Anubis Xian
Word Bearers of Chaos
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 16:52:00 -
[3]
The quickest way to get from one faction's region to another was usually through CONCORD's Genesis region and Yulai. CCP broke this because Yulai would crash TQ when it had 250 or more people in it.
Originally by: CCP Oveur The client handles no logic, it is simply a dumb terminal.
CINA
|
Tres Farmer
Gallente Federation Intelligence Service
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 16:52:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Mishkaii What was the highway system?
Jumpgates connecting the regions with less 'hopps' than today..
@OP, not supported support Public Idea Tracker | 24hr PLEX |
Gallians
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 17:15:00 -
[5]
Less hops sounds like a good idea
And by the way, I think you are forgetting just how annoying these sigs are. |
Goose99
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 17:55:00 -
[6]
Supported. Reducing number of people stuck in traveling would decrease server load as a whole. If the local node can support it, it's a net positive for server load.
|
Intar Medris
Amarr EntroPrelatial Vanguard EntroPraetorian Aegis
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 22:20:00 -
[7]
Why wouldn't a highly advanced space civilization not have a highway system. I Make Forums For Corps And Alliances. 50 Mil ISK See Example Forum To Get A Idea of What Your's Could Look Like Example Forum |
klyeme
The Mind's Eye Etherium Cartel
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 22:21:00 -
[8]
I like
|
J'Rela
Black Lotus Heavy Industries Ethereal Dawn
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 22:23:00 -
[9]
Edited by: J''Rela on 15/01/2011 22:23:31 I hate Jita enough that I want it to wither and die.
And then there's the nostalgia angle.
So hells yes, bring back the superhighway. Supported. ---- If violence never solves anything, you're not using enough.
|
Wyke Mossari
Staner Industries
|
Posted - 2011.01.15 22:30:00 -
[10]
Supported, for all the QQ from Caldari traders.
|
|
Seamus Donohue
|
Posted - 2011.01.16 03:11:00 -
[11]
While I have a couple of reservations about potentially making High Security "smaller", it certainly would make some things a bit more convenient. That, and I like CONCORD, so seeing Yulai become a busy hub appeals to me, aesthetically.
Supported. __________________________________________________ Survivor of Teskanen, fan of John Rourke. |
Anubis Xian
Word Bearers of Chaos
|
Posted - 2011.01.16 17:01:00 -
[12]
This is probably the most popular idea I've had since Sovereignty 2.0.
lol
Originally by: CCP Oveur The client handles no logic, it is simply a dumb terminal.
CINA
|
Aineko Macx
|
Posted - 2011.01.16 17:25:00 -
[13]
Today the number of people in a system would indeed not be a deterrent to re-instantiating the highways and thusly Yulai to its former status.
However there are good reasons for not reopening the highways: It's one of the things that would make eve smaller, which is something people are complaining about as it is. Furthermore, distances (and the associated time to traverse them) are a key factor for eves economy, creating trade opportunities and in general giving more meaning to the concept of regions and the differences among them.
Finally, with the highways reopened, Yulai would become the new Jita, but worse. ________________________ CCP: Where fixing bugs is a luxury, not an obligation. |
Anubis Xian
Word Bearers of Chaos
|
Posted - 2011.01.16 17:54:00 -
[14]
That's debatable. Even when Yulai was the central hub, there were vibrant local markets. Not everyone wants to travel to town to buy milk, but big purchases like faction ships are all invariably going to be in one centralized location.
Originally by: CCP Oveur The client handles no logic, it is simply a dumb terminal.
CINA
|
Pirokobo
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
|
Posted - 2011.01.16 18:08:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Mishkaii What was the highway sistem?
Think jump bridges except controlled by concord.
|
northwesten
Trinity Corporate Services Novus Ordo Mundi
|
Posted - 2011.01.16 19:59:00 -
[16]
|
Val'Dore
Word Bearers of Chaos
|
Posted - 2011.01.18 17:33:00 -
[17]
~No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously.~ |
Ephemeron
Lubricous Rebel Alliance of New Eden
|
Posted - 2011.01.18 18:56:00 -
[18]
The old highway system made EVE too small.
It's same problem as we have with jump bridges now. Even without the empire highway system, it takes me just 1 hour to travel from deep end of Venal in deep end of Delve. If it took me just half an hour to travel from one end of the map to another, it'd be pretty ridiculous.
People in EVE are getting too damn lazy. Already in 0.0 most people won't bother chasing hostiles if they are 10+ jumps away. They say 10 jumps is too far. These people need to be griefed mercilessly, until they quit or adapt.
No superhighways, no jump bridges, nerf cynos.
|
Crazy KSK
|
Posted - 2011.01.18 19:06:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Ephemeron No superhighways, no jump bridges, nerf cynos.
more systems more low sec more null sec move empires apart and put low sec in between (no high sec connections between empires)
|
Cygnet Lythanea
Shamrock Technical Solutions Independent Faction
|
Posted - 2011.01.18 19:23:00 -
[20]
I'm for a return to Yulai. Frankly the calls to move empires even further apart sound more like 'I want CCP to funnel easy target right into my crosshairs because I'm too lazy to work for my kills'.
Yulai back then was no worse then Jita is now, and this way everyone is more or less equidistant from the major market hub rather then having to pend twenty jumps getting there.
|
|
Maxsim Goratiev
Gallente Imperial Tau Syndicate
|
Posted - 2011.01.18 23:02:00 -
[21]
Originally by: Crazy KSK
Originally by: Ephemeron No superhighways, no jump bridges, nerf cynos.
more systems more low sec more null sec move empires apart and put low sec in between (no high sec connections between empires)
that
|
Tatius Jorgstern
|
Posted - 2011.01.18 23:46:00 -
[22]
All your fiery kernite are belong to us! |
Valen Ikailus
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2011.01.24 16:57:00 -
[23]
|
Herping yourDerp
|
Posted - 2011.01.24 19:49:00 -
[24]
wouldn't this break the regional trade? i dont like it >.> i support the idea of travel with certain items to another region to get more per item.
i think it would be better if certain racial regions had diffrent minerals, like lets say amarr has lots of veldspar, meaning mining will have more tritanium, give gallente more of the mixed mineral asteroids caldari would get the scordite and plagioclase for Pyerite while minmatar would get small roids of everything from the other highsec area's
this would mean money would be made shiping from gallente to amar and back. have a long highsec route through all the factions with a faster lowsec route, if there is no highsec route idea fails, the lowsec route means fast travel with increased risk.
|
Monkeedude
|
Posted - 2011.01.24 20:08:00 -
[25]
Originally by: Herping yourDerp
i think it would be better if certain racial regions had diffrent minerals
This is already the case. Pyroxers and Omber are in different regions. As well, each race's control towers require fuel which comes from mining the ice in their particular region. |
Saju Somtaaw
Gallente Department of Defence Apotheosis of Virtue
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 04:04:00 -
[26]
I've got mixed feelings about this. On one hand it would be easier to get around High-sec, one the other it could vary well mess up the economy for a while making life...interesting while everything settles down. I don't support this, but I'm not against it either. ---- --- ---
|
Ephemeron
Lubricous Rebel Alliance of New Eden
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 04:53:00 -
[27]
It's remarkable how terrible Anubis Xian's ideas are, even tho he's trying hard
EVE needs the exact opposite of Yulai superhighways - separation of 4 empire territories with new 0.0 systems - in a grid pattern, so there's no major choke points
|
Maxx Overseer
Decrypt Enterprise
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 04:58:00 -
[28]
yes but should their be a toll on it? that way not just everyone uses it, it will be mostly for traders and such. Hate to be cure but I hate to see Eve become a kitty game like wOw.
--- --- ---
|
Val'Dore
Word Bearers of Chaos
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 08:35:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Ephemeron It's remarkable how terrible Anubis Xian's ideas are, even tho he's trying hard
I wouldn't say my ideas are terrible, just terribly received. I usually put a lot of thought into them, even when I know EvE's forumbase will just troll it to death.
~No matter what happens, somebody will find a way to take it too seriously.~ |
Liang Nuren
|
Posted - 2011.01.25 09:17:00 -
[30]
Edited by: Liang Nuren on 25/01/2011 09:18:28 I am not a fan of this idea, because it would break regional trade and further encourage market superhubs. Furthermore, I'm not a fan of anything Concord related. The Concord systems are such a pain in the ass.
-Liang -- Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire On Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |